https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/screw-compressor-technology-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Mechanical Engineering & Machinery
Screw compressor patents: rotor profile, oil injection and variable capacity claims mapped across 2,683 families
  • Filing has declined since its 2018 peak of 161, with the midpoint year 2022 at 81 — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
  • Japan leads receiving offices with 654 filings, ahead of Europe (484), the US (400) and China (376), signalling where enforcement risk concentrates first.
  • Recent-year momentum is flat across the named leaders, several majors show 0 filings or -100% YoY in the latest year, consistent with publication lag rather than exit.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,683
Published Records
44%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-8%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
JP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (74 records) with 2024 (68) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,683 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

The corpus tracks 2,683 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine screw compressor terminology with claims touching rotor profile design, oil injection, clearance sealing or variable capacity, filtered to the core rotary-piston pump IPC classes. Nearly all records sit in F04C, with meaningful overlap into F01C rotary-piston machines and F25B refrigeration — the expected footprint for a compressor technology that serves HVAC, industrial gas handling and refrigeration equally.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years of the trend understate actual filing activity. Read the 2024-2026 tail as incomplete rather than as evidence of a sudden drop.

Filings by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1DAIKIN INDUSTRIES LTD478
  2. 2KOBE STEEL LTD280
  3. 3MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP167
  4. 4HITACHI IND EQUIP SYST CO LTD135
  5. 5KOBELCO COMPRESSORS CORP126
  6. 6HITACHI LTD105
  7. 7SVENSKA ROTOR MASKINER AB98
  8. 8CARRIER CORP71
  9. 9TRANE INTERNATIONAL INC68
  10. 10BITZER KUEHLMASCHINENBAU GMBH67
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Screw Compressor Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which adjacent IPC subclasses the same records also touch.

A peak behind us

Filings ran from 114 in 2017 to a peak of 161 in 2018, then eased toward 81 at the 2022 midpoint. That trajectory reads as a technology whose core mechanical claims — rotor profiles, sealing geometry, oil management — were substantially staked out earlier in the window, with later years adding refinement rather than a new wave of entrants.

A peak behind us05010015020011420171612018201920202021202220232024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in F04C, with refrigeration and hydraulics adjacency

F04C rotary-piston pumps accounts for 2,680 of 2,683 records, essentially the whole corpus. The next-largest overlaps are F01C rotary-piston machines (269) and F25B refrigeration and heat pumps (245), reflecting how screw compressor claims routinely get filed alongside broader positive-displacement machine claims and refrigeration-system claims. F16J seals and gaskets (67) and F16K valves (44) are smaller but consistent with clearance-sealing and capacity-control subject matter.

Concentrated in F04C, with refrigeration and hydraulics adjacencyF04C · Rotary-piston pumps2,68099.9%F01C · Rotary-piston machines26910.0%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps2459.1%F04B · Positive-displacement pumps1746.5%F16J · Pistons, seals & gaskets672.5%F16K · Valves & taps441.6%F04D · Non-positive-displacement pumps361.3%F03C · Positive-displacement hydrauli…341.3%Other26910.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,683 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Screw Compressor Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Screw Compressor Technology Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about screw compressor technology landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The records other filings cite

Representative filing
US10941770B22021-03-09

Variable capacity screw compressor and method (US10941770B2, Trane International)

TRANE INTERNATIONAL INC.

The claims tie rotor rotational speed to an optimum peripheral velocity independent of synchronous motor speed, using a variable speed drive commanded by a controller to run the rotor substantially above synchronous speed at full-load capacity. That construction lets capacity vary without the mechanical slide valves or bypass ports many earlier designs relied on.Filed by Trane International; granted 2021-03-09.

US10941770B2 — patent drawing 1US10941770B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4478054AHelical screw rotary compressor for air conditioning system having improved oil management105
2US5653585AApparatus and methods for cooling and sealing rotary helical screw compressors101
3US3922114AHermetic rotary helical screw compressor with improved oil management98
4US3936239AUndercompression and overcompression free helical screw rotary compressor95
5US4497185AOil atomizing compressor working fluid cooling system for gas/vapor/helical screw rotary compressors94
6US4042310AScrew compressor control means90
7US3795117AInjection cooling of screw compressors90
8US4062199ARefrigerating apparatus80
9US4180986ARefrigeration system on/off cycle79
10US20050188708A1System and method for variable speed operation of a screw compressor77

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — read them as a signal of foundational influence on oil management and sealing approaches, not as a ranking of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Screw Compressor Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, jurisdiction spread and citation data that matter more than the raw counts alone.

Filing trend
161 → 81
peak year 2018 vs. midpoint 2022

Core mechanical claims are largely staked out

The decline from the 2018 peak to the 2022 midpoint suggests foundational rotor-profile and sealing geometry claims were filed earlier in the window. New entrants now compete for narrower refinements rather than open mechanical territory.

Treat 2024-2026 counts as understated due to publication lag.
Jurisdiction spread
654 filings
Japan, the leading receiving office

Japan and Europe carry the enforcement weight

Japan (654) and the EPO (484) each out-file the US (400) and China (376). A freedom-to-operate check that stops at the USPTO will miss the offices where this art is most densely filed.

WIPO/PCT filings (219) indicate a meaningful share seeking multi-jurisdiction protection.
Citation pattern
105 citations
top-cited record, US4478054A

Oil management is the most-referenced sub-problem

The five most-cited records all address oil management, cooling or sealing in helical screw rotors, several dating to the 1970s-80s. That concentration signals these are the foundational patents any oil-injection or sealing claim will be checked against.

High citation count reflects age and influence, not current commercial weight.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to screw compressor technology landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Screw Compressor Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and how actively

Assignee activity in the most recent year is flat to declining across the named leaders — consistent with either a mature filing cadence or simply publication lag masking work still in the pipeline.

Momentum
-100% YoY
several leaders, latest year

Named leaders show near-zero recent-year output

Firms including Daikin and Hitachi show 0 filings in the latest year with -100% YoY change; Mayekawa shows 1 filing, -50% YoY. Given the 18-month publication lag, this is more likely a reporting gap than a withdrawal from the space.

Confirm current activity against each assignee's most recent public filings before drawing conclusions.
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is limited and concentrated around one firm

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus, with Daikin's pairings with individual named inventors the strongest (9-10 shared filings each). Collaboration here reads more as internal inventor-assignee structure than cross-company joint development.

Sparse co-filing suggests most competitive activity is proprietary rather than joint-ventured.
Cited foundations
US4478054A
105 citations, oil management

Foundational oil-management patents anchor the field

The most-cited records, several from the 1970s-80s, address helical screw rotor oil management and cooling. Any new oil-injection claim in this space will likely be evaluated against this cluster.

These are prior-art anchors, not necessarily active enforcement risks today.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Smaller IPC overlaps suggest room outside the dense F04C core.
Rotor tip clearance sensingVariable-speed drive integration for capacity controlOil-free sealing geometriesMulti-stage rotor synchronizationDischarge valve/port timing control
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Mayekawa Mfg. Co., Ltd.1-50%
Daikin Industries, Ltd.0-100%
Kobe Steel, Ltd.0
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation0
Hitachi Industrial Equipment Systems Co., Ltd.0
Hitachi, Ltd.0-100%
Svenska Rotor Maskiner AB0
Carrier Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Screw Compressor Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, R&D targeting or competitive tracking.

Check claim scope against the top-cited cluster

Before filing an oil-injection or sealing claim, review the foundational patents this corpus cites most heavily — they define the prior art baseline examiners will reach for.

Explore Patsnap Eureka →

Map the under-claimed sub-areas in detail

The smaller IPC overlaps (seals, valves, hydraulics) carry lower filing density than the F04C core and may offer more open claim space for variable-capacity or clearance-sealing work.

Explore Patsnap Eureka →

Track assignee momentum past the publication lag

Flat recent-year counts from named leaders need re-checking in 12-18 months once the current filing wave publishes, before concluding any firm has exited the space.

Explore Patsnap Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Screw Compressor Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about screw compressor patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Screw Compressor Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Screw Compressor Technology Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole screw compressor technology landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.