Seed Treatment Manufacturing Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
- Filing has cooled, not accelerated. the trend runs from 5 families in 2017 to a 2025 peak of 13, with the flat 2022 midpoint showing growth stalled well before the recent spike.
- China now files more than the US. 36 China receiving-office filings versus 33 for the United States, with Europe, Canada, India and PCT routes trailing well behind.
- Co-filing is thin and personal, not corporate. only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 146 families, and the strongest links center on a handful of named inventors rather than joint-venture assignees.
Filing growth compares 2021 (12 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 146 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks 146 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine seed treatment terminology — coating, pelleting, priming — with explicit manufacturing-process language and the A01C planting/sowing classification. It is a process-level view: claims here describe how a coating or priming step is carried out, not just the agrochemical or polymer formulation being applied. A01C covers all but one of the 146 families, confirming the corpus is centred on the mechanical and process side of seed treatment rather than on active-ingredient chemistry alone.
The overlap with A01N biocide/agrochemical classification (94 of 146 records) shows most process claims are still filed alongside an active-ingredient claim rather than standing on process novelty by itself. Fertiliser mixture classes (C05G, C05F) and plant-breeding classification (A01H) appear in single-digit or low double-digit counts, marking those as adjacent rather than core to this corpus.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology mix
Two views of the same 146-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years in the trend chart will under-count true filing activity.
A flat-to-declining trend with a late spike
Families rose from 5 in 2017 to a midpoint of 5 again in 2022 — effectively no growth over five years — before climbing to a peak of 13 in 2025. A single peak year after a flat stretch is more consistent with a batch of related filings from one or two applicants than with a sustained shift in R&D investment; the 2026 figure (2 so far) is a partial year and should not be read as a drop-off.
Process claims dominate, chemistry claims ride along
A01C appears in 145 of 146 families, making it effectively the definitional class for this corpus. A01N (94) and A01P (44) show that most process claims are paired with an agrochemical or pesticide-activity claim, while A01G, C05G, A01H, C05F and C07D each register in the single or low double digits, marking horticulture, fertiliser-mixture and heterocyclic-compound angles as adjacent rather than heavily contested ground.
Shares are the percentage of the 146 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Seed Treatment Technology Manufacturing Process with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about seed treatment technology manufacturing process and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe prior art carrying the most citation weight
Superabsorbent Polymer Seed Coating Compositions (US20180124995A1)
Disclosed herein are several exemplary seed coating compositions, and exemplary methods for creating and using the same. Also disclosed are several exemplary seed coating manufacturing processes, and the products created by such processes. The seed coating compositions are for decreasing dusting and increasing the quality of coated seeds, and comprise an effective amount of clay mineral.Filed by Seed Enhancements LLC, published 2018-05-10.
View full filing| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US8181388B2 | Liquid seed dressing method for dressing small quantities of seed | 81 |
| 2 | WO2009021986A1 | Seed treatment compositions and methods | 73 |
| 3 | WO2007128756A1 | Use of arylcarboxylic acid biphenylamides for seed treatment | 70 |
| 4 | US20080171658A1 | Method For Producing Aqueous Polymer Dispersions Containing Pesticides And Use Thereof | 67 |
| 5 | WO2005077169A1 | Formulation for seed treatment | 61 |
| 6 | US5994265A | Seed coating composition of gypsum with molybdenum | 59 |
| 7 | US20160073599A1 | Methods of seed treatment and resulting products | 34 |
| 8 | CN101233861A | 高活性生物抗旱种子包衣剂及其制备和使用方法 | 26 |
| 9 | CN108184851A | 一种玉米种子包衣剂及其制备方法 | 18 |
| 10 | CN110915810A | 一种草种包衣剂及包衣工艺 | 17 |
Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not a ranking of current commercial importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC composition and receiving-office data are read together.
A late spike after a flat middle
The jump to 13 families in 2025 came after a 2022 midpoint that matched the 2017 starting level. That shape usually means a small number of applicants filed a cluster of related applications rather than the field broadly accelerating.
China has overtaken the US as first-filing venue
China's 36 filings against 33 for the United States, with Europe at 16 and Canada, India and PCT all in single-to-low-double digits, shows filing activity has shifted east even though the underlying chemistry and equipment IP has historically been US- and Europe-heavy.
Collaboration is sparse and inventor-led
Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist in the whole corpus, and the strongest links are between a corporate assignee and named individual inventors rather than between two companies. This is a field of mostly solo-assignee filings, not joint ventures.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to seed treatment technology manufacturing process, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee landscape and where the gaps sit
Recent-year momentum data shows several established assignees recording zero families in the latest year, including one with a full year-over-year drop. That is consistent with the filing trend's flat middle: a handful of names built up prior art earlier in the window and are not currently active filers.
Established names have gone quiet
Multiple long-standing assignees, including large agrochemical and seed-technology names, show zero families filed in the most recent year, with at least one recording a full year-over-year decline. Recent activity in the corpus is not concentrated among the historically largest filers.
A long tail behind a short list of repeat filers
With only 10 co-assignee pairs across the full set, most of the 146 families trace to single assignees filing independently. That pattern favours a freedom-to-operate search targeted at specific process claims rather than a broad clearance against a handful of dominant portfolios.
First-filing venue has shifted toward China
China and the United States are close at the top of the receiving-office table, with Europe, Canada, India and PCT well behind. New entrants weighing where to file first should note China is no longer a secondary venue for this technology.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| BASF SE | 0 | — |
| HODDER & TAYLORS LTD | 0 | — |
| Kumiai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| BioLumic Limited | 0 | -100% |
| Adama Makhteshim Ltd. | 0 | — |
| E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (USA) | 0 | — |
| Andes Agro Company | 0 | -100% |
| VOESTE DIRK | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, sourcing new claim space, or tracking competitor activity.
Run a claim-level FTO check
With co-filing this sparse, a freedom-to-operate search should target individual process claims (coating, pelleting, priming steps) rather than assume a small set of dominant portfolios covers the field.
Start an FTO search in EurekaTrack the quiet incumbents
Several established assignees show zero filings in the latest year. Watching for a resumption in their filing activity, or a competitor filling the gap, is worth setting up as a standing alert.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaDraft around the under-claimed branches
C05F, C07D and A01G representation is thin relative to the A01C core, suggesting narrowly drafted claims in organic-waste-derived coatings or heterocyclic carrier systems face less crowded prior art.
Explore white space in EurekaCommon questions about seed treatment manufacturing patents
This dataset identifies 146 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine seed treatment or coating terminology with manufacturing-process language and A01C planting/sowing classification. Families, not raw document counts, are the fairer unit here because they neutralise duplicate filings across jurisdictions and continuation applications. The true figure for the most recent one to two years is understated because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.
The assignee ranking spans 146 families with only 10 co-assignee pairs, meaning most filings trace to single companies or inventors rather than joint efforts. Several historically active assignees, including large agrochemical names, show zero filings in the latest recorded year, so current leadership by volume does not necessarily reflect current filing momentum. Anyone assessing competitive position should weight recent-year activity alongside total historical family count rather than relying on either alone.
The trend is flat to declining through most of the window, with families rising from 5 in 2017 to a matching 5 at the 2022 midpoint before a peak of 13 in 2025. That shape, a flat middle followed by a late spike, is more typical of a concentrated batch of related filings from one or two applicants than of broad-based growth across the field. The partial 2026 count of 2 families should not be read as a decline given the normal reporting lag.
IPC composition shows A01C present in nearly every family (145 of 146), while adjacent classes such as C05F (organic and waste-derived fertilisers), C07D (heterocyclic compounds) and A01G (horticulture and forestry) each appear in single digits to low double digits. That gap suggests narrowly drafted process claims connecting seed coating manufacturing to organic-waste-derived formulations or heterocyclic carrier chemistry currently sit on thinner prior art than the core coating and pelleting claims.
US20180124995A1, assigned to Seed Enhancements LLC and published in 2018, covers seed coating compositions and manufacturing processes built around an effective amount of clay mineral to reduce dusting and improve coated-seed quality. It blocks manufacturing methods that fall within its specific compositional and process claims, not seed coating generally; a workable design-around needs to avoid its specific clay-mineral-based formulation and process steps. Anyone drafting in this space should read the full claim set rather than the abstract, since the abstract describes the invention broadly while the enforceable scope is narrower.
Research Seed Treatment Technology Manufacturing Process in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole seed treatment technology manufacturing process corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.