Book a demo

Seed Treatment Manufacturing Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Seed Treatment Manufacturing Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/seed-treatment-technology-manufacturing-process-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Agriculture Technology · Patent Landscape
Seed Treatment Manufacturing Process Patents: Who Holds the Coating and Pelleting Claims
  • Filing has cooled, not accelerated. the trend runs from 5 families in 2017 to a 2025 peak of 13, with the flat 2022 midpoint showing growth stalled well before the recent spike.
  • China now files more than the US. 36 China receiving-office filings versus 33 for the United States, with Europe, Canada, India and PCT routes trailing well behind.
  • Co-filing is thin and personal, not corporate. only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 146 families, and the strongest links center on a handful of named inventors rather than joint-venture assignees.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
146
Published Records
45%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-75%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (12 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 146 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 146 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine seed treatment terminology — coating, pelleting, priming — with explicit manufacturing-process language and the A01C planting/sowing classification. It is a process-level view: claims here describe how a coating or priming step is carried out, not just the agrochemical or polymer formulation being applied. A01C covers all but one of the 146 families, confirming the corpus is centred on the mechanical and process side of seed treatment rather than on active-ingredient chemistry alone.

The overlap with A01N biocide/agrochemical classification (94 of 146 records) shows most process claims are still filed alongside an active-ingredient claim rather than standing on process novelty by itself. Fertiliser mixture classes (C05G, C05F) and plant-breeding classification (A01H) appear in single-digit or low double-digit counts, marking those as adjacent rather than core to this corpus.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1BASF SE36
  2. 2HODDER & TAYLORS LTD9
  3. 3BIOLUMIC7
  4. 4KUMIAI CHEM IND CO LTD7
  5. 5ANDES AG INC6
  6. 6ADAMA MAKHTESHIM LTD6
  7. 7EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO4
  8. 8VOESTE DIRK4
  9. 9NI BING RUI3
  10. 10Qingdao Runhua Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd.3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Seed Treatment Technology Manufacturing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 146-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years in the trend chart will under-count true filing activity.

A flat-to-declining trend with a late spike

Families rose from 5 in 2017 to a midpoint of 5 again in 2022 — effectively no growth over five years — before climbing to a peak of 13 in 2025. A single peak year after a flat stretch is more consistent with a batch of related filings from one or two applicants than with a sustained shift in R&D investment; the 2026 figure (2 so far) is a partial year and should not be read as a drop-off.

A flat-to-declining trend with a late spike048111552017201820192020202120222023202413202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Process claims dominate, chemistry claims ride along

A01C appears in 145 of 146 families, making it effectively the definitional class for this corpus. A01N (94) and A01P (44) show that most process claims are paired with an agrochemical or pesticide-activity claim, while A01G, C05G, A01H, C05F and C07D each register in the single or low double digits, marking horticulture, fertiliser-mixture and heterocyclic-compound angles as adjacent rather than heavily contested ground.

Process claims dominate, chemistry claims ride alongA01C · Planting & sowing14599.3%A01N · Biocides / agrochemicals9464.4%A01P · Pesticide activity4430.1%A01G · Horticulture & forestry1510.3%C05G · Fertiliser mixtures128.2%A01H · New plants / plant breeding106.8%C05F · Organic & waste-derived fertil…74.8%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds64.1%Other4832.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 146 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Seed Treatment Technology Manufacturing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Seed Treatment Technology Manufacturing Process with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about seed treatment technology manufacturing process and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The prior art carrying the most citation weight

Representative filing
US20180124995A12018-05-10

Superabsorbent Polymer Seed Coating Compositions (US20180124995A1)

SEED ENHANCEMENTS LLC

Disclosed herein are several exemplary seed coating compositions, and exemplary methods for creating and using the same. Also disclosed are several exemplary seed coating manufacturing processes, and the products created by such processes. The seed coating compositions are for decreasing dusting and increasing the quality of coated seeds, and comprise an effective amount of clay mineral.Filed by Seed Enhancements LLC, published 2018-05-10.

View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US8181388B2Liquid seed dressing method for dressing small quantities of seed81
2WO2009021986A1Seed treatment compositions and methods73
3WO2007128756A1Use of arylcarboxylic acid biphenylamides for seed treatment70
4US20080171658A1Method For Producing Aqueous Polymer Dispersions Containing Pesticides And Use Thereof67
5WO2005077169A1Formulation for seed treatment61
6US5994265ASeed coating composition of gypsum with molybdenum59
7US20160073599A1Methods of seed treatment and resulting products34
8CN101233861A高活性生物抗旱种子包衣剂及其制备和使用方法26
9CN108184851A一种玉米种子包衣剂及其制备方法18
10CN110915810A一种草种包衣剂及包衣工艺17

Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not a ranking of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Seed Treatment Technology Manufacturing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC composition and receiving-office data are read together.

Filing pace
5 → 13
families, 2017 to 2025 peak

A late spike after a flat middle

The jump to 13 families in 2025 came after a 2022 midpoint that matched the 2017 starting level. That shape usually means a small number of applicants filed a cluster of related applications rather than the field broadly accelerating.

2026 figure is partial due to publication lag.
Geography
36 vs 33
China vs US receiving-office filings

China has overtaken the US as first-filing venue

China's 36 filings against 33 for the United States, with Europe at 16 and Canada, India and PCT all in single-to-low-double digits, shows filing activity has shifted east even though the underlying chemistry and equipment IP has historically been US- and Europe-heavy.

Receiving office ≠ inventor nationality.
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs across 146 families

Collaboration is sparse and inventor-led

Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist in the whole corpus, and the strongest links are between a corporate assignee and named individual inventors rather than between two companies. This is a field of mostly solo-assignee filings, not joint ventures.

No pair exceeds single-digit co-filing counts.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to seed treatment technology manufacturing process, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Seed Treatment Technology Manufacturing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Assignee landscape and where the gaps sit

Recent-year momentum data shows several established assignees recording zero families in the latest year, including one with a full year-over-year drop. That is consistent with the filing trend's flat middle: a handful of names built up prior art earlier in the window and are not currently active filers.

Momentum
0 filings
latest-year count for several top assignees

Established names have gone quiet

Multiple long-standing assignees, including large agrochemical and seed-technology names, show zero families filed in the most recent year, with at least one recording a full year-over-year decline. Recent activity in the corpus is not concentrated among the historically largest filers.

Based on recent-year momentum data.
Concentration
146 families
total in the ranking

A long tail behind a short list of repeat filers

With only 10 co-assignee pairs across the full set, most of the 146 families trace to single assignees filing independently. That pattern favours a freedom-to-operate search targeted at specific process claims rather than a broad clearance against a handful of dominant portfolios.

Co-assignee count: 10 pairs total.
Geography
China 36 · US 33
top two receiving offices

First-filing venue has shifted toward China

China and the United States are close at the top of the receiving-office table, with Europe, Canada, India and PCT well behind. New entrants weighing where to file first should note China is no longer a secondary venue for this technology.

EPO 16, Canada 11, PCT 9, India 8.
🔍
Under-claimed process sub-areas
Branches with low IPC representation relative to the core A01C class, suggesting room for narrowly drafted process claims.
Priming process parameter controlOrganic-waste-derived seed coatings (C05F)Heterocyclic seed-treatment carriers (C07D)Horticultural/forestry seed enhancement (A01G)Plant-breeding-linked coating claims (A01H)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
BASF SE0
HODDER & TAYLORS LTD0
Kumiai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.0
BioLumic Limited0-100%
Adama Makhteshim Ltd.0
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (USA)0
Andes Agro Company0-100%
VOESTE DIRK0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Seed Treatment Technology Manufacturing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, sourcing new claim space, or tracking competitor activity.

Run a claim-level FTO check

With co-filing this sparse, a freedom-to-operate search should target individual process claims (coating, pelleting, priming steps) rather than assume a small set of dominant portfolios covers the field.

Start an FTO search in Eureka

Track the quiet incumbents

Several established assignees show zero filings in the latest year. Watching for a resumption in their filing activity, or a competitor filling the gap, is worth setting up as a standing alert.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Draft around the under-claimed branches

C05F, C07D and A01G representation is thin relative to the A01C core, suggesting narrowly drafted claims in organic-waste-derived coatings or heterocyclic carrier systems face less crowded prior art.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Seed Treatment Technology Manufacturing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about seed treatment manufacturing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Seed Treatment Technology Manufacturing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Seed Treatment Technology Manufacturing Process in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole seed treatment technology manufacturing process corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.