Book a demo

Self-Healing Concrete SHM Patent Snapshot 2026

Self-Healing Concrete SHM Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Self-Healing Concrete SHM Patent Snapshot in 2026

The self-healing concrete structural health monitoring patent corpus is at a very early, nascent stage with only 5 patent families on record, all filed in India and concentrated among individual inventors and academic institutions. Activity is fragmented across twelve applicants, each holding a single patent record, with no dominant commercial player yet established.

5
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··4 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Twelve applicants, each with one record — a highly fragmented, pre-commercial field

A Anandraj holding the top-ranked position at 1 patent record — identical to every other filer. No single entity has established a commanding portfolio.

The top five filers account for 42% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, which in a field this small signals extreme fragmentation rather than meaningful consolidation. There is no discernible tier gap between a leader and challengers; all applicants are at parity.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1A Anandraj1
2Mrs S Priya1
3IIMT Business Incubator Foundation1
4Premkumar1
5Dr S Dhavamanidoss1
6Mr Ravichandra Honnalli1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
7Mrs V Sumathi1
8Asansol Engineering College1
9IIMT University Meerut1
10Chennai Institute of Technology1
11Mr Jayadevan N M1
12Swami Vivekananda Subharti University1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The absence of large corporate assignees and the presence of multiple Indian engineering colleges and universities suggest that self-healing concrete SHM remains an academic research pursuit rather than an area of active commercial IP strategy. This creates an open field for any organization prepared to file systematically.

The most recent filings (20252026) are subject to publication lag and are likely under-counted; the true volume of recent activity may be higher than currently reflected. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

All recorded activity concentrated in 2025–2026, with a broad but shallow technology mix

The filing trend and technology composition together show a field that has only just begun to generate patent activity, with a technology spread that ranges well beyond core construction materials into diagnostics and AI.

Annual filing trend

Zero filings are recorded from 2017 through 2024; all 5 patent records appear in 2025 (3 records) and 2026 (2 records). Because 2025 and 2026 filings are subject to publication lag, these figures are likely under-counted and should be treated as a floor, not a ceiling. The apparent surge is an artifact of when this field began attracting formal patent filings rather than evidence of rapid acceleration.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 3 in 2025.02017020180201902020020210202202023020243202522026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G01N (Material analysis and testing) is the visible IPC branch with 4 records, followed by C04B (Ceramics, cement and refractories) and G01M (Testing machine and structure balance) at 2 records each. Fourteen distinct IPC branches appear across only 5 families, indicating that applicants are taking broad, exploratory claim strategies rather than focusing on a narrow technical core. Branches such as G06N (AI models), B82Y (Nanotechnology), and G16B (Bioinformatics) signal early-stage cross-disciplinary experimentation.

Technology compositionG01N · Material analysis & testing leads with 4; C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories 2.G01N · Material analysis…4C04B · Ceramics, cement …2G01M · Testing machine &…2A61B · Diagnosis & surgery1B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…1C08J · Polymer processin…1C09D · Coatings, paints …1E04B · Building structur…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
IN202511087256APublished 2025-10-03

Adaptive self-healing concrete with embedded senso…

Iimt University Meerut

An adaptive self-healing concrete composite integrates embedded micro-sensor arrays to monitor structural integrity in real-time. The invention relates to an adaptive self-healing concrete composite incorporating embedded micro-sensors for real-time structural health monitoring and autonomous repair activation. The concrete matrix includes microcapsules… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · A Anandraj

A Anandraj

A Anandraj holds 1 patent record and ranks first in the corpus by virtue of filing parity with all other applicants. No applicant momentum data is available, so trajectory cannot be assessed. Technology emphasis data is not separately provided for this individual filer in the evidence.

patent records: 1
Challenger · Chennai Institute of Technology

Chennai Institute of Technology

Chennai Institute of Technology holds 1 patent record, with a technology focus spanning B82Y (Nanotechnology applications), C08J (Polymer processing and solutions), and C09D (Coatings, paints and inks) — the most materials-science-forward profile among the academic filers. No momentum trend data is available. This combination of nanotechnology and coatings suggests an interest in nano-enabled self-healing agents at the material level.

patent records: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Swami Vivekananda Subharti UniversityIIMT University Meerut+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map the self-healing concrete SHM Snapshot for your own R&D strategy?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.