Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Semi-solid metal processing sits between casting and forging: a metal slurry with a controlled solid fraction and globular microstructure is formed into near-net shapes, reducing porosity compared with conventional die casting. This landscape covers 39 published records filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine rheocasting, thixoforming or semi-solid metal processing terms with claim language on slurry preparation, die filling or porosity reduction, restricted to the core IPC classes for casting and alloy composition.
Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025-2026 counts in the trend chart are necessarily incomplete and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling, on current activity.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 39-record set: how filing activity has moved year on year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.
Filings opened this window at 3 in 2017, peaked at 8 in 2018, fell to zero at the 2022 midpoint, and stood at 2 in the partial 2026 year. The zero midpoint followed by renewed filing reads as a restart rather than a smooth decline.
C22C (alloys) covers 92.3% of the 39 records and B22D (metal casting) 61.5%, confirming the field is defined by alloy-and-casting overlap. Smaller shares in C22F (25.6%), F16D (10.3%) and F27D (7.7%) mark adjacent claim territory in heat treatment, brake components and furnace equipment that fewer filers have entered.
Shares are the percentage of the 39 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about semi-solid and thixoforming processes and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe method applies an electromagnetic field to a vessel holding molten metal, then cools that metal rapidly and uniformly from the vessel wall toward the center, avoiding the latent heat spike that solidification layers cause at early-stage cooling. The molten metal is brought below its liquidus temperature within 1-10 seconds of loading, producing the globular microstructure that semi-solid processing depends on.Filed by Hong, Chun Pyo; published 2004-03-25.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20040055726A1 | Die casting method and apparatus for rheocasting | 55 |
| 2 | US6311759B1 | Semi-solid metal processing | 42 |
| 3 | CN102358922A | 一种轻合金半固态浆料制备装置 | 12 |
| 4 | US20030205351A1 | Method of making precision castings using thixotropic materials | 12 |
| 5 | EP2574411A2 | Rheocasting method and apparatus | 10 |
| 6 | US20040055734A1 | Metallic materials for rheocasting or thixoforming and method for manufacturing the same | 10 |
| 7 | CN114381640A | 一种流变铸造用高强铝合金材料及其应用方法 | 7 |
| 8 | CN108262455A | 一种制造高品质半固态轻合金铸件的一体化流变成形方法 | 7 |
| 9 | US6962189B2 | Method of making precision castings using thixotropic materials | 6 |
| 10 | EP1405684A2 | Metallic materials for rheocasting or thixoforming and method for manufacturing the same | 6 |
Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references; treat them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the trend, the class composition and the assignee ranking are read together.
The trend does not show gradual decline into obsolescence; it shows a full stop at the midpoint followed by fresh filings. That pattern is more consistent with a technology re-entering commercial interest than one winding down, though the partial 2025-2026 counts understate the true current rate.
Almost every record in this set touches C22C alloy composition, and most of those also carry B22D casting claims. A filing that stays purely in casting mechanics without an alloy composition angle is the exception here, not the rule.
The ranked field of 22 companies drops sharply after the leader: fifth place and tenth place both sit at 2 records. Most of the ranking is made up of assignees with one or two filings, which is where freedom-to-operate searches need the most manual review rather than ranking-driven shortcuts.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to semi-solid and thixoforming processes, with the prior art for and against each one.
The assignee ranking is short and top-heavy; the geography and class data point to where less-contested claim space remains.
The leading assignee's 12 records outpace the rest of the ranked field, and the strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset involves this same entity working jointly with a university partner, at 12 shared records.
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year, including one with a -100% year-on-year drop. Given the 18-month publication lag, this likely understates real activity rather than confirming a stop.
Europe leads receiving-office counts, followed closely by the United States and China, with Singapore, WIPO/PCT and Austria each holding smaller counts. No single office dominates the way the leading assignee dominates the ranking.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| The Boeing Company | 0 | — |
| State University of Campinas (UNICAMP) | 0 | — |
| Spartan Light Metal Products | 0 | -100% |
| HONG CHUNPYO | 0 | — |
| Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) | 0 | — |
| University of Science and Technology Beijing | 0 | — |
| T.C.S. Molding Systems | 0 | — |
| SINGAPORE INST OF MFG TECH | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.
With one assignee holding 12 of the ranked records and a strong co-assignee link to a university partner, any filing near the core alloy-and-casting claims should start with a family-level review of that assignee's portfolio.
Run a claims search in EurekaF27D, F16D, B01F and B22C each carry a small fraction of the 39 records. A first claim written specifically into slurry-holding furnace equipment or brake-component forming faces less occupied claim space than a general rheocasting claim.
Explore white space in EurekaThe zero-to-renewed filing pattern around 2022 is unusual enough to warrant a second look once publication catches up on the partial final years, since the current picture likely understates real filing activity.
Track filing trends in EurekaRheocasting forms a metal slurry directly from the liquid state and casts it while it still contains a controlled solid fraction, whereas thixoforming reheats a pre-cast billet with a globular microstructure back into the semi-solid range before forming it. Both aim for the same reduced-porosity, near-net-shape outcome, and patent claims in this dataset frequently cover both routes in a single filing. The choice between them in practice usually comes down to whether the alloy supplier wants to control microstructure at the melt stage or at the reheat stage.
The ranked field in this dataset covers 22 companies, with the leading assignee holding 12 records, well ahead of the fifth- and tenth-place assignees, who each hold 2. Most of the remaining ranked entities hold only one or two filings, so due diligence beyond the top of the ranking requires reviewing individual records rather than relying on ranking position alone. The dataset also shows a strong co-assignee pairing between the leading company and a university research partner.
Filing activity peaked at 8 records in 2018, then fell to zero by the 2022 midpoint before picking back up through 2026. That pattern looks more like a restart of interest than a steady decline, though the 2025-2026 counts are partial because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months. Anyone tracking this space should expect the true recent-year count to be higher than currently published.
C22C, covering alloy composition, appears on 92.3% of the 39 records in this dataset, and B22D, covering metal casting methods, appears on 61.5%. Most filings combine claims from both classes rather than sitting in only one, so a new filing that addresses only casting mechanics without an alloy composition angle sits outside the pattern most competitors follow. Smaller classes such as C22F, F16D and F27D mark adjacent, less-crowded claim territory.
The smaller IPC shares in this dataset point to under-claimed territory: F27D furnace and slurry-holding equipment sits at 7.7% of records, F16D clutch and brake component forming at 10.3%, and B01F mixing and stirring equipment and B22C foundry moulding each at 5.1%. These branches carry far fewer filings than the core C22C alloy and B22D casting claims, which suggests less occupied claim space for a first filer working specifically in equipment design rather than alloy or casting method claims.
Go past this page: query the whole semi-solid and thixoforming processes corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.