https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/semi-solid-and-thixoforming-processes-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Metal Forming & Special Processes
Semi-Solid and Thixoforming Process Patents: Who Holds the Core Claims
  • Filing rebuilt after a 2022 gap. annual filings dropped to zero at the 2022 midpoint before picking back up, a pattern that looks like accelerating renewed interest rather than steady growth.
  • One filer dominates the ranked field. the leading assignee holds 12 records against a fifth-place and tenth-place count of just 2 each, leaving a long tail of single- and double-filing entrants.
  • Alloys and casting classes overlap heavily. C22C (alloys) appears on 92.3% of the 39 records and B22D (metal casting) on 61.5%, showing that nearly every filing straddles both classes rather than sitting in one.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
39
Published Records
+100%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
EP
Leading Jurisdiction
22
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this patent set covers

Semi-solid metal processing sits between casting and forging: a metal slurry with a controlled solid fraction and globular microstructure is formed into near-net shapes, reducing porosity compared with conventional die casting. This landscape covers 39 published records filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine rheocasting, thixoforming or semi-solid metal processing terms with claim language on slurry preparation, die filling or porosity reduction, restricted to the core IPC classes for casting and alloy composition.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025-2026 counts in the trend chart are necessarily incomplete and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling, on current activity.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1THE BOEING CO12
  2. 2UNIV ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS UNICAMP12
  3. 3SPARTAN LIGHT METAL PRODS5
  4. 4HONG CHUNPYO3
  5. 5CHIPLESS METALS2
  6. 6UNIV OF SCI & TECH BEIJING2
  7. 7CHUNPYO HONG2
  8. 8AGENCY FOR SCI TECH & RES2
  9. 9T C S MOLDING SYST2
  10. 10SINGAPORE INST OF MFG TECH2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Semi-Solid and Thixoforming Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 39-record set: how filing activity has moved year on year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings opened this window at 3 in 2017, peaked at 8 in 2018, fell to zero at the 2022 midpoint, and stood at 2 in the partial 2026 year. The zero midpoint followed by renewed filing reads as a restart rather than a smooth decline.

Filing trend, 2017-2026024683201782018201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

C22C (alloys) covers 92.3% of the 39 records and B22D (metal casting) 61.5%, confirming the field is defined by alloy-and-casting overlap. Smaller shares in C22F (25.6%), F16D (10.3%) and F27D (7.7%) mark adjacent claim territory in heat treatment, brake components and furnace equipment that fewer filers have entered.

IPC subclass compositionC22C · Alloys3692.3%B22D · Metal casting2461.5%C22F · Non-ferrous metal treatment1025.6%F16D · Clutches & brakes410.3%F27D · Furnace details & accessories37.7%B01F · Mixing & stirring25.1%B22C · Foundry moulding25.1%C21D · Heat treatment of metals12.6%Other12.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 39 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Semi-Solid and Thixoforming Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Semi-Solid and Thixoforming Processes with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about semi-solid and thixoforming processes and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative claim

Representative Filing
US20040055734A12004-03-25

US20040055734A1 — Metallic materials for rheocasting or thixoforming and method for manufacturing the same

HONG, CHUN PYO

The method applies an electromagnetic field to a vessel holding molten metal, then cools that metal rapidly and uniformly from the vessel wall toward the center, avoiding the latent heat spike that solidification layers cause at early-stage cooling. The molten metal is brought below its liquidus temperature within 1-10 seconds of loading, producing the globular microstructure that semi-solid processing depends on.Filed by Hong, Chun Pyo; published 2004-03-25.

US20040055734A1 — patent drawing 1US20040055734A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this set
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20040055726A1Die casting method and apparatus for rheocasting55
2US6311759B1Semi-solid metal processing42
3CN102358922A一种轻合金半固态浆料制备装置12
4US20030205351A1Method of making precision castings using thixotropic materials12
5EP2574411A2Rheocasting method and apparatus10
6US20040055734A1Metallic materials for rheocasting or thixoforming and method for manufacturing the same10
7CN114381640A一种流变铸造用高强铝合金材料及其应用方法7
8CN108262455A一种制造高品质半固态轻合金铸件的一体化流变成形方法7
9US6962189B2Method of making precision castings using thixotropic materials6
10EP1405684A2Metallic materials for rheocasting or thixoforming and method for manufacturing the same6

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references; treat them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Semi-Solid and Thixoforming Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the trend, the class composition and the assignee ranking are read together.

Filing Pattern
0 filings at 2022 midpoint
then renewed activity through 2026

A restart, not a steady climb

The trend does not show gradual decline into obsolescence; it shows a full stop at the midpoint followed by fresh filings. That pattern is more consistent with a technology re-entering commercial interest than one winding down, though the partial 2025-2026 counts understate the true current rate.

Read alongside the 2018 peak of 8 filings.
Class Overlap
92.3% carry C22C
of 39 records in scope

Alloy claims are the common denominator

Almost every record in this set touches C22C alloy composition, and most of those also carry B22D casting claims. A filing that stays purely in casting mechanics without an alloy composition angle is the exception here, not the rule.

61.5% of records also carry B22D.
Assignee Spread
12 vs 2
leader vs fifth-place record count

One filer, then a long tail

The ranked field of 22 companies drops sharply after the leader: fifth place and tenth place both sit at 2 records. Most of the ranking is made up of assignees with one or two filings, which is where freedom-to-operate searches need the most manual review rather than ranking-driven shortcuts.

22 companies make up the entire ranked list.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to semi-solid and thixoforming processes, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Semi-Solid and Thixoforming Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The assignee ranking is short and top-heavy; the geography and class data point to where less-contested claim space remains.

Leading Filer
12 records
leader in the ranked field

A single filer well ahead of the field

The leading assignee's 12 records outpace the rest of the ranked field, and the strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset involves this same entity working jointly with a university partner, at 12 shared records.

Ranked field covers 22 companies in total.
Recent Momentum
0 in latest year
across tracked assignees

No ranked assignee filed in the most recent year

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year, including one with a -100% year-on-year drop. Given the 18-month publication lag, this likely understates real activity rather than confirming a stop.

Interpret alongside the partial 2026 filing count.
Geography
EPO 13, US 10, China 7
of the tracked receiving offices

Filing splits across three main offices

Europe leads receiving-office counts, followed closely by the United States and China, with Singapore, WIPO/PCT and Austria each holding smaller counts. No single office dominates the way the leading assignee dominates the ranking.

SG, WIPO and AT each hold 1-2 filings.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer freedom-to-operate look
Based on the smaller IPC shares in this dataset, these sub-areas carry fewer filings relative to the core alloy-and-casting claims.
furnace slurry-holding equipment (F27D)semi-solid brake component forming (F16D)post-forming heat treatment of non-ferrous alloys (C22F)mixing and stirring for slurry preparation (B01F)foundry mould design for globular microstructure (B22C)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
The Boeing Company0
State University of Campinas (UNICAMP)0
Spartan Light Metal Products0-100%
HONG CHUNPYO0
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)0
University of Science and Technology Beijing0
T.C.S. Molding Systems0
SINGAPORE INST OF MFG TECH0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Semi-Solid and Thixoforming Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's family

With one assignee holding 12 of the ranked records and a strong co-assignee link to a university partner, any filing near the core alloy-and-casting claims should start with a family-level review of that assignee's portfolio.

Run a claims search in Eureka

Watch the under-claimed IPC branches

F27D, F16D, B01F and B22C each carry a small fraction of the 39 records. A first claim written specifically into slurry-holding furnace equipment or brake-component forming faces less occupied claim space than a general rheocasting claim.

Explore white space in Eureka

Re-check the trend once 2025-2026 data settles

The zero-to-renewed filing pattern around 2022 is unusual enough to warrant a second look once publication catches up on the partial final years, since the current picture likely understates real filing activity.

Track filing trends in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Semi-Solid and Thixoforming Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Semi-Solid and Thixoforming Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Semi-Solid and Thixoforming Processes in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole semi-solid and thixoforming processes corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.