Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (2) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 82 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Semiconductor process control and advanced process control (APC) patents cover the feedback loop between fab sensors and equipment: run-to-run adjustment, virtual metrology, chamber-drift compensation, and the statistical models that decide when a wafer lot needs correction rather than scrap. This dataset pulls 82 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine APC or run-to-run control language with virtual metrology, chamber drift, yield correlation, statistical process control, or sensor-fusion claims, filtered to IPC classes covering semiconductor devices (H01L21), control and regulating systems (G05B19), and semiconductor testing (H01L22).
Filing offices are led by the United States, with China, South Korea, Taiwan, and WIPO PCT filings trailing behind — a spread consistent with a technology tied to fab operators and equipment vendors rather than a single national manufacturing base. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the apparent falloff toward 2026 understates real filing activity in the most recent year or two.
Two views of the same 82 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 4 in 2018, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 1 per year. That pattern points to a technology area where the core control-loop concepts were staked out early and subsequent filing has been incremental rather than expansionary — though the most recent one to two years are undercounted due to publication lag.
G05B (control and regulating systems) appears in 58 of 82 families and H01L (semiconductor devices) in 50, meaning most filings straddle both a control-systems claim and a device or process claim. G06F (data processing) shows up in 17 families, reflecting the software and modeling layer behind virtual metrology, while G06N (AI-based computing) and G01R (electrical measurement) remain thin at 3 each — an indication that machine-learning-driven APC is still a minority claim strategy in this corpus.
Shares are the percentage of the 82 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about semiconductor process control and apc and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaDefines a manufacturing model, processes a run of semiconductor devices under that model, then runs both an APC analysis and an SPC analysis on the output, feeding both back into modifications of the manufacturing facility itself.Filed by GLOBALFOUNDRIES, granted 2003 — this record sits at the intersection of the SPC and APC frameworks that most later virtual-metrology and run-to-run claims still have to reference.
| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5576629A | Plasma monitoring and control method and system | 739 |
| 2 | US5939886A | Plasma monitoring and control method and system | 593 |
| 3 | US20050187649A1 | Method and apparatus for the monitoring and control of a semiconductor manufacturing process | 253 |
| 4 | US6556884B1 | Method and apparatus for interfacing a statistical process control system with a manufacturing process contro… | 126 |
| 5 | US7123980B2 | Method and apparatus for the monitoring and control of a semiconductor manufacturing process | 100 |
| 6 | US20200110390A1 | Adaptive chamber matching in advanced semiconductor process control | 91 |
| 7 | US20200333774A1 | Adaptive chamber matching in advanced semiconductor process control | 44 |
| 8 | US7213478B2 | Method for automatic configuration of processing system | 42 |
| 9 | WO2004031875A1 | Method and apparatus for the monitoring and control of a semiconductor manufacturing process | 38 |
| 10 | US6630360B2 | Advanced process control (APC) of copper thickness for chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) optimization | 37 |
Citation counts favor older filings simply because they have had more years to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a measure of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the filing trend, IPC mix, and citation graph are read together.
With the peak year already behind it at 4 filings in 2018 and the 2022 midpoint down to 1, this is not a field in an expansion phase. New filers are more likely to be defending a specific sensor or algorithm claim than staking out fresh ground.
G05B appears in more families than H01L, meaning the control algorithm and feedback architecture — not the underlying semiconductor process step — is where filers are staking their claims most often.
The two most-cited records both cover plasma monitoring and control and date from the mid-1990s. Their citation counts dwarf everything published since, which is typical of foundational filings in a searched corpus rather than evidence that plasma monitoring remains the active frontier.
Only 3 of the 82 families sit in G06N, and G01R (electrical measurement) is equally thin. Sensor-fusion and AI-driven virtual metrology are referenced in search terms but have not yet produced a deep body of dedicated claims.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to semiconductor process control and apc, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee activity in this corpus spans fab operators, equipment vendors, and foundries, with no single filer showing growth in the latest tracked year.
Every major assignee tracked in the recent-momentum data — including Tokyo Electron, Applied Materials, TSMC, AMD, and SMIC — shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with publication lag rather than a genuine stop in R&D, but it also means the visible pipeline looks quiet.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across 82 families, and the strongest repeated pairings all involve Tokyo Electron with named individual inventors — suggesting joint filings here are more often inventor partnerships within one company than cross-company alliances.
The United States receives roughly twice the filings of China, the next largest office, with South Korea, Taiwan, and WIPO PCT trailing further behind. That distribution tracks where fab-equipment R&D and IP strategy are headquartered rather than where wafers are actually processed.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) | 0 | — |
| Tokyo Electron Limited | 0 | — |
| Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) | 0 | — |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 0 | — |
| National Cheng Kung University | 0 | — |
| Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) Shanghai | 0 | — |
| KLA Corporation | 0 | — |
| DB HiTek Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
The filing and citation patterns above point to a mature core with a thin AI-driven periphery. The next step is testing a specific claim against that periphery before committing R&D or filing budget.
Run a candidate virtual-metrology or sensor-fusion claim against the plasma-monitoring and SPC-framework patents that anchor this landscape's citation graph.
Open Eureka →Recent-year filings across every major assignee in this corpus read as zero — verify whether that is publication lag or a genuine pipeline slowdown before making a competitive call.
Open Eureka →APC patents in this corpus cover the feedback systems that adjust fab equipment settings based on sensor and metrology data, including run-to-run control, virtual metrology, and chamber-drift compensation. They typically pair a control-systems claim (IPC G05B) with a semiconductor-device or process claim (IPC H01L), which is why both subclasses appear in the majority of the 82 families reviewed here. The distinguishing feature versus general statistical process control is the closed-loop adjustment of equipment recipes rather than simple monitoring.
The filing trend in this dataset peaked at 4 in 2018 and dropped to around 1 per year by the 2022 midpoint, suggesting the core control-loop architectures were claimed early and later filings have been incremental refinements. Part of the apparent decline toward 2026 is a publication-lag artifact, since patents filed in the last 18 months typically have not published yet. Even accounting for that lag, the absence of a filing surge suggests this is a well-established rather than fast-moving claim space.
The assignee set in this corpus includes fab equipment vendors, major foundries, and semiconductor manufacturers, with Tokyo Electron showing the most co-assignee filing activity of any tracked entity. Notably, every major assignee tracked for recent-year momentum — including Tokyo Electron, Applied Materials, TSMC, AMD, and SMIC — shows zero filings in the most recent tracked year, which likely reflects publication lag rather than an actual halt in filing. Ranking by total family count, rather than recent momentum, gives a clearer picture of long-run investment.
US6556884B1 claims the specific interface between a statistical process control (SPC) system and a manufacturing process control framework, where both SPC and APC analyses feed back into modifications of the manufacturing facility itself. Anyone building a system that runs both SPC and APC analysis on the same processed lot and uses both outputs to adjust the facility needs to check this claim's scope carefully, since it sits close to that exact architecture. Designing around it typically means separating the SPC and APC feedback paths, or routing the facility modification through a different intermediate model than the one this patent specifies.
The thinnest IPC coverage in this corpus sits in G06N (AI-based computing) and G01R (electrical measurement), each appearing in only 3 of 82 families, despite the search terms explicitly targeting sensor-fusion and virtual-metrology language. That gap suggests AI-driven virtual metrology models and sensor-fusion fault detection are more discussed than claimed, leaving room for a well-drafted first claim that ties a specific machine-learning model architecture to a specific fab sensor input. Cross-tool yield correlation is a related area with limited dedicated coverage in this dataset.
Go past this page: query the whole semiconductor process control and apc corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.