https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/semiconductor-process-control-and-apc-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Semiconductors
Semiconductor process control and APC patents: filing trends and where the claim space still opens up
  • Filing has plateaued, not grown. The peak year was 2018 at 4 filings, and the 2022 midpoint sits at just 1 — this is a mature, not an accelerating, claim space.
  • Control systems outweigh device claims. G05B (control & regulating systems) appears in 58 of 82 families, ahead of core H01L semiconductor-device claims at 50 — the fight is over the control loop, not the chip.
  • The oldest patents still cast the longest shadow. The two most-cited records date to the mid-1990s (739 and 593 citations) and both cover plasma monitoring — foundational claims that any new sensor-fusion approach has to design around.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
82
Published Records
60%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (2) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 82 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Semiconductor process control and advanced process control (APC) patents cover the feedback loop between fab sensors and equipment: run-to-run adjustment, virtual metrology, chamber-drift compensation, and the statistical models that decide when a wafer lot needs correction rather than scrap. This dataset pulls 82 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine APC or run-to-run control language with virtual metrology, chamber drift, yield correlation, statistical process control, or sensor-fusion claims, filtered to IPC classes covering semiconductor devices (H01L21), control and regulating systems (G05B19), and semiconductor testing (H01L22).

Filing offices are led by the United States, with China, South Korea, Taiwan, and WIPO PCT filings trailing behind — a spread consistent with a technology tied to fab operators and equipment vendors rather than a single national manufacturing base. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the apparent falloff toward 2026 understates real filing activity in the most recent year or two.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD17
  2. 2TOKYO ELECTRON LTD14
  3. 3ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC6
  4. 4SEMICON MFG INT (SHANGHAI) CORP6
  5. 5APPLIED MATERIALS INC6
  6. 6KLA CORP4
  7. 7NAT CHENG KUNG UNIV4
  8. 8GLOBALFOUNDRIES US INC3
  9. 9DONGBU HITEK CO LTD3
  10. 10HUME EDWARD CARL III2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Semiconductor Process Control and APC covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 82 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

A flat-to-declining filing curve

Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 4 in 2018, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 1 per year. That pattern points to a technology area where the core control-loop concepts were staked out early and subsequent filing has been incremental rather than expansionary — though the most recent one to two years are undercounted due to publication lag.

A flat-to-declining filing curve012342201742018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Control systems dominate the classification mix

G05B (control and regulating systems) appears in 58 of 82 families and H01L (semiconductor devices) in 50, meaning most filings straddle both a control-systems claim and a device or process claim. G06F (data processing) shows up in 17 families, reflecting the software and modeling layer behind virtual metrology, while G06N (AI-based computing) and G01R (electrical measurement) remain thin at 3 each — an indication that machine-learning-driven APC is still a minority claim strategy in this corpus.

Control systems dominate the classification mixG05B · Control & regulating systems5870.7%H01L · Semiconductor devices5061.0%H10P2530.5%G06F · Electric digital data processi…1720.7%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement33.7%G06N · Computing based on AI models33.7%C23C · Coating & surface deposition22.4%G01B · Measuring length & dimensions22.4%Other67.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 82 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Semiconductor Process Control and APC covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Semiconductor Process Control and APC with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about semiconductor process control and apc and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The patents setting the boundaries

Representative filing
US6556884B12003-04-29

Method and apparatus for interfacing a statistical process control system with a manufacturing process control framework

GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. INC.

Defines a manufacturing model, processes a run of semiconductor devices under that model, then runs both an APC analysis and an SPC analysis on the output, feeding both back into modifications of the manufacturing facility itself.Filed by GLOBALFOUNDRIES, granted 2003 — this record sits at the intersection of the SPC and APC frameworks that most later virtual-metrology and run-to-run claims still have to reference.

US6556884B1 — patent drawing 1US6556884B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5576629APlasma monitoring and control method and system739
2US5939886APlasma monitoring and control method and system593
3US20050187649A1Method and apparatus for the monitoring and control of a semiconductor manufacturing process253
4US6556884B1Method and apparatus for interfacing a statistical process control system with a manufacturing process contro…126
5US7123980B2Method and apparatus for the monitoring and control of a semiconductor manufacturing process100
6US20200110390A1Adaptive chamber matching in advanced semiconductor process control91
7US20200333774A1Adaptive chamber matching in advanced semiconductor process control44
8US7213478B2Method for automatic configuration of processing system42
9WO2004031875A1Method and apparatus for the monitoring and control of a semiconductor manufacturing process38
10US6630360B2Advanced process control (APC) of copper thickness for chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) optimization37

Citation counts favor older filings simply because they have had more years to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a measure of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Semiconductor Process Control and APC covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about this field

Three patterns stand out once the filing trend, IPC mix, and citation graph are read together.

Filing momentum
Peak 2018 at 4
then flat to 2022

A plateaued technology, not a growing one

With the peak year already behind it at 4 filings in 2018 and the 2022 midpoint down to 1, this is not a field in an expansion phase. New filers are more likely to be defending a specific sensor or algorithm claim than staking out fresh ground.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Classification mix
58 vs 50
G05B vs H01L records

Control-loop claims edge out device claims

G05B appears in more families than H01L, meaning the control algorithm and feedback architecture — not the underlying semiconductor process step — is where filers are staking their claims most often.

IPC subclass counts
Citation concentration
739 & 593 citations
top two records

Plasma-monitoring patents anchor the field

The two most-cited records both cover plasma monitoring and control and date from the mid-1990s. Their citation counts dwarf everything published since, which is typical of foundational filings in a searched corpus rather than evidence that plasma monitoring remains the active frontier.

Citation ranking
AI and sensor claims
3 of 82 records
G06N (AI computing)

Machine-learning APC is still a minority claim

Only 3 of the 82 families sit in G06N, and G01R (electrical measurement) is equally thin. Sensor-fusion and AI-driven virtual metrology are referenced in search terms but have not yet produced a deep body of dedicated claims.

IPC subclass counts
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to semiconductor process control and apc, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Semiconductor Process Control and APC covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

Assignee activity in this corpus spans fab operators, equipment vendors, and foundries, with no single filer showing growth in the latest tracked year.

Equipment vendors
0 in latest year
across tracked assignees

No assignee is currently accelerating

Every major assignee tracked in the recent-momentum data — including Tokyo Electron, Applied Materials, TSMC, AMD, and SMIC — shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with publication lag rather than a genuine stop in R&D, but it also means the visible pipeline looks quiet.

Recent-year momentum
Co-filing patterns
10 co-assignee pairs
in the dataset

Collaboration is limited and vendor-centered

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across 82 families, and the strongest repeated pairings all involve Tokyo Electron with named individual inventors — suggesting joint filings here are more often inventor partnerships within one company than cross-company alliances.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Filing geography
US 32, China 16
leading receiving offices

US filings lead by a wide margin

The United States receives roughly twice the filings of China, the next largest office, with South Korea, Taiwan, and WIPO PCT trailing further behind. That distribution tracks where fab-equipment R&D and IP strategy are headquartered rather than where wafers are actually processed.

Receiving office counts
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Branches with thin IPC coverage relative to the core control-loop claims
AI-driven virtual metrology modelsSensor-fusion fault detectionChamber-drift compensation algorithmsCross-tool yield correlationElectrical measurement-based SPC feedback
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)0
Tokyo Electron Limited0
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)0
Applied Materials, Inc.0
National Cheng Kung University0
Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) Shanghai0
KLA Corporation0
DB HiTek Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Semiconductor Process Control and APC covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The filing and citation patterns above point to a mature core with a thin AI-driven periphery. The next step is testing a specific claim against that periphery before committing R&D or filing budget.

Stress-test a claim against the cited prior art

Run a candidate virtual-metrology or sensor-fusion claim against the plasma-monitoring and SPC-framework patents that anchor this landscape's citation graph.

Open Eureka →

Track assignee filing momentum directly

Recent-year filings across every major assignee in this corpus read as zero — verify whether that is publication lag or a genuine pipeline slowdown before making a competitive call.

Open Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Semiconductor Process Control and APC covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Semiconductor Process Control and APC covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Semiconductor Process Control and APC in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole semiconductor process control and apc corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.