Book a demo

Sensory Feedback Prosthetic Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026

Sensory Feedback Prosthetic Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
Data to 2026-07-31

Sensory Feedback in Prosthetic Limbs Patents

A field with one dominant filer. the ranked leader holds 33 of the tracked families against a fifth-place count of 1 — this is a small, concentrated dataset, not a crowded one. Activity sat at zero through 2017 and stayed low until a sharp rise to 28 records in 2024, the peak year so far. With too few complete post-lag years to compute a reliable growth rate, treat this as a technology that arrived late and concentrated rather than one with a steady multi-year build-up.

Filing trend, 2015-2026
Complete Incomplete
Filing trend, 2015-20260815233002017201820192020202120222023282024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.
33
Published Records
WO
Leading Jurisdiction
6
Active Filers Ranked
2024
Peak Filing Year
Top filers · published records
  1. 1THE RGT UNIV OF MICHIGAN33
  2. 2UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE3
  3. 3TONG LUNG METAL IND CO LTD2
  4. 4MARTIN DAVID C1
  5. 5CEDERNA PAUL S1
Published by Patsnap Research·

See the full sensory feedback in prosthetic limbs analysis in Eureka

  • The complete ranking, not just the top five
  • Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
  • The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Read more about this analysis in Eureka
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Who holds the most patents for sensory feedback in prosthetic limbs?+

Within this dataset of 33 published records, the ranked leader holds 33 tracked families, a University of Michigan-affiliated filer working with a small group of named inventors on regenerative peripheral nerve interface technology. The next-closest institution in the six-name ranking is a fair distance behind, and the fifth-place assignee holds only 1 family. This is a concentrated field led by academic research groups rather than a broad set of competing manufacturers, so freedom-to-operate work should start with the leader’s family tree before looking elsewhere.

What does a regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) actually claim?+

The representative record in this dataset, US9808616B2, claims an RPNI built from an insulating substrate carrying a thin-film metallic electrode array, part of it coated with a conductive polymer and a layer of decellularized small intestinal submucosa (SIS), with a second conductive polymer electrochemically polymerized through the SIS and muscle tissue placed in contact with the assembly. In practice this locks down a specific electrode-coating and tissue-interface construction rather than the general concept of nerve interfacing. Designs that avoid the SIS coating and dual-polymer polymerization step have more room to operate, though they still need to clear the wider family of related filings from the same assignee.

Is patent filing in this field growing or slowing down?+

Filing activity was near zero through 2017 and stayed low for several years before jumping to a peak of 28 records in 2024. There are not yet enough complete years after accounting for publication lag to state a reliable growth rate, so any trend line drawn from this data should be treated as provisional. What can be said is that the field’s patent activity is recent and concentrated around a short window rather than built up steadily since 2015.

Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.

Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Sensory Feedback in Prosthetic Limbs covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.