Book a demo

Separation & Purification Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Separation & Purification Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/separation-and-purification-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Separation & Purification
Separation and purification patents: who is filing, what they claim, and where filing has cooled
  • Filing has pulled back 21% since 2021. 2021 filings (330) fell to 260 by 2024 — the last year clean of publication-lag distortion — a meaningful cool-down after the 2020 peak of 388.
  • No single filer dominates. The leader holds 689 records but the top 5 combined account for just 14.2% of all 11,323 records in scope, and the top 10 only 19.8% — concentration is shallow.
  • Catalysis and separation overlap heavily with fermentation. C07C compounds (23.1%) and B01J catalysis (18.3%) lead, but C12P fermentation (10.0%) and C12N microorganisms (7.1%) show biological routes are a real, separately-claimed track.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
11.3K
Published Records
14%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-21%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (330 records) with 2024 (260) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 11,323 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

The corpus spans 11,323 published records filed against separation, purification and mass-transfer process claims — spanning acyclic and carbocyclic chemistry, catalytic processing, fermentation routes and separation hardware. Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-08-31 data cut-off, so the most recent filing years are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates roughly 18 months earlier. The scope draws together chemical separation, process stream and mass transfer claim language with phase separation and heat transfer terms, which is why refining, catalysis and biological synthesis all surface together.

Reading the field this way surfaces a market with a large, diffuse base of filers rather than a small cartel of blocking patents. That matters for freedom-to-operate work: the risk is less a handful of dominant estates and more a dense floor of overlapping mid-size portfolios across catalysis, hydrocarbon refining and biological purification routes.

Filing volume and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1XYLECO INC689
  2. 2VELOCYS INC266
  3. 3EASTMAN CHEM CO247
  4. 4GRUPO PETROTEMEX SA DE CV219
  5. 5EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC189
  6. 6CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORP159
  7. 7BATTELLE MEMORIAL INST132
  8. 8SHELL OIL CO130
  9. 9BP EXPLORATION OPERATING CO LTD108
  10. 10GD SEARLE & CO99
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Separation & Purification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 11,323-record corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those records split across the IPC subclasses that define the field's technical center of gravity.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 347 in 2017 to a peak of 388 in 2020, then eased to 330 in 2021 and 260 by 2024 — a 21% pullback over that span. 2025 and 2026 figures (down to 49 in 2026) reflect publication lag rather than an actual filing collapse, since publication trails filing by roughly 18 months.

Filing trend, 2017–20260100200300400347201720182019388202020212022202320242025492026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

C07C acyclic/carbocyclic compounds (23.1% of records) and B01J catalysis (18.3%) anchor the field, with B01D separation processes (14.3%) close behind. Fermentation (C12P, 10.0%) and microorganism engineering (C12N, 7.1%) mark a distinct biological-route cluster running alongside the classical chemical-process claims; shares sum past 100% because records carry multiple IPC classes.

Technology composition by IPC subclassC07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds2,61923.1%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …2,06818.3%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…1,61614.3%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…1,12710.0%A61K · Medicinal preparations1,0098.9%G01N · Material analysis & testing9828.7%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining8097.1%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…8057.1%Other13,524119.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 11,323 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Separation & Purification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Separation & Purification Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about separation & purification patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this field

Representative Filing
US7520917B22009-04-21

Devices with extended area structures for mass transfer processing of fluids

BATTELLE MEMEROIAL INSTITUTE

A microchannel device includes several mass transfer microchannels to receive a fluid media for processing at least one heat transfer microchannel in fluid communication with a heat transfer fluid defined by a thermally conductive wall, and at several thermally conductive fins each connected to the wall and extending therefrom to separate the mass transfer microchannels from one another. In one form, the device may optionally include another heat transfer microchannel and corresponding wall positioned opposite the first wall, with fins and mass transfer microchannels extending therebetween.US7520917B2, published 2009-04-21 — a Battelle Memorial Institute filing that anchors the microchannel mass-transfer sub-branch of this landscape.

US7520917B2 — patent drawing 1US7520917B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4016218AAlkylation in presence of thermally modified crystalline aluminosilicate catalyst1,177
2US3769329AProduction of carboxylic acids and esters795
3US5650234AElectrophilic polyethylene oxides for the modification of polysaccharides, polypeptides (proteins) and surfac…689
4US6627770B1Method and apparatus for sequesting entrained and volatile catalyst species in a carbonylation process646
5US5932100AMicrofabricated differential extraction device and method634
6US5498809APolymers derived from ethylene and 1-butene for use in the preparation of lubricant dispersant additives563
7WO2005037214A2Macrocyclic carboxylic acids and acylsulfonamides as inhibitors of HCV replication523
8WO2008073186A2Processing biomass497
9US20190247050A1Integrated system for the infixion and retrieval of implants451
10US5942400AAssays for detecting beta -secretase434

Citation counts favour older filings by construction — a 1970s alkylation patent will always out-cite a 2020 filing simply by having had more years to accumulate citations. Read these as markers of foundational influence, not current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Separation & Purification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the numbers mean for strategy

Three cuts of the same dataset that matter for different decisions: where filing volume sits today, how concentrated ownership is, and which citation anchors still shape freedom-to-operate analysis.

Filing Momentum
-21%
2021→2024 filing change

The post-2020 pullback is real, not a lag artefact

Filings dropped from 330 in 2021 to 260 in 2024 — both years clean of the ~18-month publication lag that understates 2025-2026. That is a genuine cooling after the 2020 peak of 388, not a data artefact.

Compare against pre-2020 filing years for full context.
Ownership Concentration
14.2%
share held by top 5 of 11,323 records

No single estate controls the field

The leading assignee holds 689 records, but the top 5 combined account for only 14.2% of all 11,323 records in scope, and the top 10 reach just 19.8%. That is a long tail of mid-size and single-filing entrants, not a cartel.

Concentration figures use the full 11,323-record base, not the ranked subset.
Technical Center of Gravity
23.1%
records tagged C07C

Classical chemistry still leads, biological routes run alongside

C07C acyclic/carbocyclic compounds (23.1%) and B01J catalysis (18.3%) dominate, but C12P fermentation (10.0%) and C12N microorganisms (7.1%) mark a separately-claimed biological purification track worth tracking on its own terms.

Shares exceed 100% combined because records carry multiple IPC classes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to separation & purification patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Separation & Purification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Filers, collaboration patterns and where activity has stalled

The ranked leaders span integrated refiners, specialty chemical majors and a handful of microchannel-process specialists. Recent-year momentum data shows several previously active filers — including a microchannel-technology specialist and an integrated chemicals major — recording zero filings in the latest tracked year, a -100% year-on-year change consistent with the broader post-2021 pullback.

Leader
689
records held by the top-ranked assignee

A clear leader, but not a dominant one

The top-ranked assignee holds 689 records against a field of 11,323 — enough to lead comfortably but far short of gatekeeping the space, given the top 5 combined sit at only 14.2% of all records.

Fifth place holds 189 records; tenth place holds 99.
Collaboration
42
records in the strongest co-assignee pair

Joint filing is concentrated in a few pairs

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the data; the strongest pair co-files 42 records together, well ahead of the next strongest pairings at 23 and 11. This points to a small number of durable technical partnerships rather than a broad collaboration network.

Ten co-assignee pairs recorded in total.
Momentum
0
latest-year filings across several tracked assignees

Several established filers have gone quiet

Multiple assignees that were active earlier in the window — including a microchannel-process specialist and an integrated chemicals producer — show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with year-on-year changes as steep as -100%.

Recent-year momentum data should be read alongside the publication-lag caveat.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the field's core catalysis and separation clusters.
Microchannel heat-transfer fin geometriesEnzymatic purification of biologicsCarbonylation catalyst species sequestrationDifferential microfabricated extraction devicesThermally modified aluminosilicate alkylation catalysts
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Xyleco, Inc.0
Eastman Chemical Company0-100%
Velocys, Inc.0
ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc.0
Celanese International Corporation0
Battelle Memorial Institute0-100%
Grupo Petrotemex, S.A. de C.V.0
Shell Oil Company0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Separation & Purification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The landscape numbers point to specific next moves depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate clearance, licensing strategy or R&D prioritisation.

Map claim scope against the microchannel cluster

The most-cited records include microchannel mass-transfer and extraction devices — a technically narrow but heavily cited sub-branch worth a dedicated claim-chart pass before committing to hardware-based separation designs.

Explore claim scope in Eureka

Track the fermentation and microorganism track separately

C12P and C12N together mark a biological purification route that runs alongside the classical chemistry majority. Portfolios built there should be benchmarked against that sub-cluster, not the field average.

Run a sub-cluster search in Eureka

Watch for renewed filing after the 2021-2024 pullback

The 21% drop from 2021 to 2024 is real, but publication lag means 2025-2026 data is still incomplete. Re-check filing momentum in 12-18 months before concluding the field has permanently cooled.

Set a filing-trend alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Separation & Purification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on separation & purification patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Separation & Purification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Separation & Purification Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole separation & purification patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.