Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (33 records) with 2024 (6) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,976 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape covers patent families whose title, abstract or claims reference servovalves, direct drive valves or electrohydraulic servo valves alongside core mechanical elements such as spool valves, flapper-nozzle stages, torque motors or pressure-gain characteristics. The scope spans 2015 through mid-2026 and captures 1,976 published records, drawing on assignee filings from aerospace actuation specialists, industrial hydraulics suppliers and a wider field of smaller filers.
The dataset is weighted toward flight-control and industrial actuation applications rather than mobile or agricultural hydraulics, reflecting the search terms' emphasis on torque-motor and flapper-nozzle architectures typical of aerospace-grade servo valves. Receiving-office distribution points to the United States and Europe as the primary filing jurisdictions, with the United Kingdom, Japan and Germany also carrying meaningful volume.
Two views of the same 1,976 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filings ran near 127-133 a year through 2017-2018, then declined steadily; 2021's 33 records fell to 6 by 2024, an 82% drop. The final one to two years are undercounted because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025-2026 should not yet be read as continued decline.
F15B (fluid-pressure actuators & systems) and F16K (valves & taps) together anchor the field, appearing on 51.9% and 20.5% of records respectively. Aerospace-specific classes — F02C (gas-turbine plants) at 9.9% and B64C (aeroplanes & helicopters) at 7.7% — confirm the flight-control weighting, while electric-motor and control-system classes (H02K, G05D, H01F, G05B) each sit at or under 6.8%, marking the electromechanical interface as a comparatively thinner claim area. Records can carry multiple classes, so shares sum above 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,976 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about servo valves and hydraulic control components and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaAn electrohydraulic servo valve (EHSV) includes a housing assembly, a spool valve, an armature, a control mechanism, and a feedback spring. The spool valve is movably disposed within the housing assembly. The armature is rotationally mounted on the housing assembly. The control mechanism is coupled to the armature and is rotatable therewith. The feedback spring is coupled between the control mechanism and the spool valve, and includes a helical coil that is disposed on and engages the control mechanism, and a cantilever portion that extends from the helical portion to a terminus that engages the spool valve.Filed by Honeywell International, published 2019-03-21 — illustrates the feedback-spring/armature mechanical linkage that recurs across the torque-motor branch of this landscape.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5806805A | Fault tolerant actuation system for flight control actuators | 235 |
| 2 | US4472780A | Fly-by-wire lateral control system | 214 |
| 3 | US4046262A | Anthropomorphic master/slave manipulator system | 190 |
| 4 | US20140290266A1 | Fuel and actuation system for gas turbine engine | 177 |
| 5 | US6494039B2 | Force-controlled hydro-elastic actuator | 173 |
| 6 | US5337262A | Apparatus for and method of testing hydraulic/pneumatic apparatus using computer controlled test equipment | 116 |
| 7 | US5715674A | Hydromechanical control for a variable delivery, positive displacement fuel pump | 110 |
| 8 | US6349543B1 | Regenerative adaptive fluid motor control | 109 |
| 9 | US20130328277A1 | Electronically adjustable damper and system | 96 |
| 10 | US4909535A | Vehicle suspension system, and method of operating same | 96 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings — read these as signals of influence on later art, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-outs from the concentration, trend and composition data above.
With the five leading assignees holding 37.6% of all records and the ten leading holding 45.6%, the spool-valve and torque-motor mechanical core is densely claimed by a small group of aerospace actuation specialists. New entrants competing on the base architecture are filing into occupied space; differentiation is more likely to succeed on adjacent electromechanical or control elements.
Filings peaked at 133 in 2018 and dropped 82% between 2021 and 2024. That is a real decline in the last complete years of data, but the 2025-2026 counts are still filling in given the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication, so the most recent apparent drop should not be read as continued deceleration.
F15B and F16K together cover the mechanical fluid path on the majority of records, while control-electronics classes such as G05B and G05D sit below 5% each. That gap suggests the software and control-logic layer around servo valves is comparatively lightly claimed relative to the hardware itself.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to servo valves and hydraulic control components, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked leaders are aerospace actuation and industrial hydraulics incumbents; recent-year momentum across nearly all of them has fallen to zero, consistent with the broader 2021-2024 decline.
The top-ranked assignee holds 311 records, well ahead of the fifth-place holder at 58 and tenth place at 29 — a steep drop-off that marks a genuine leader rather than a cluster of near-equal filers.
Several of the most active historical filers, including the leading assignee, show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with one recording a -100% year-on-year change. This tracks the broader 2021-2024 pullback rather than signalling any single company's exit, given the publication lag on the newest filings.
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest linking a major hydraulics specialist with its own subsidiary filings. Co-filing is not a common route into this space; most records carry a single assignee.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Hamilton Sundstrand Corp | 0 | — |
| Moog Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| General Electric Co | 0 | — |
| HR Textron | 0 | — |
| Honeywell International Inc | 0 | — |
| VICKERS INC | 0 | — |
| United Technologies Corp | 0 | — |
| ABEX CORP | 0 | — |
The landscape points to where the mechanical core is occupied and where the control-electronics layer remains comparatively open.
Run the specific spool, torque-motor or feedback-spring geometry you are developing against the leading assignees' portfolios before committing engineering resources to the core mechanical architecture.
Explore assignee portfolios in EurekaGiven the thin coverage on G05B and G05D relative to F15B and F16K, a claim built around condition-monitoring or digital control logic layered on a conventional servo valve body may face less prior art.
Run a white-space search in EurekaThe assignee ranking for this dataset covers 100 companies across 1,976 records, and it is dominated by aerospace actuation and industrial hydraulics specialists rather than a broad spread of newer entrants. The leading assignee alone holds 311 records, well ahead of the fifth-place holder at 58 and tenth place at 29, so the field has one clear leader plus a fast-thinning group behind it. Beyond the ranked leaders, most of the remaining assignees appear with only a handful of filings each, forming a long tail typical of a mature mechanical technology area.
Filings peaked in 2018 at 133 records and have declined since, falling from 33 in 2021 to 6 in 2024, an 82% drop over that three-year span. That is a genuine slowdown in the last years for which data is essentially complete. However, patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the very newest years in any dataset understate real activity, and the 2025-2026 figures should not be read as evidence the decline is continuing at the same rate.
Fluid-pressure actuation and mechanical valve hardware dominate: F15B (fluid-pressure actuators and systems) appears on 51.9% of the 1,976 records in scope, and F16K (valves and taps) on 20.5%. Aerospace-specific classes tied to gas-turbine and aircraft applications, F02C and B64C, appear on 9.9% and 7.7% of records respectively, reflecting the flight-control weighting of this search scope. Control-electronics and electromechanical classes such as G05B, G05D, H02K and H01F each sit at or below 6.8%, indicating comparatively lighter claim density around the control-logic and sensing layer.
The clearest gap sits between the heavily claimed fluid-pressure mechanical core (F15B, F16K) and the much thinner control-electronics classes (G05B, G05D), which each cover under 5% of records. That suggests digital control loops, condition-monitoring logic and sensing integration layered on conventional servo valve hardware face less prior-art density than the underlying spool, flapper-nozzle or torque-motor mechanics themselves. A first claim in this space would likely centre on a control or monitoring method applied to an existing valve architecture rather than a new mechanical arrangement.
It is moderately concentrated: the five leading assignees hold 37.6% of all 1,976 records in scope, and the ten leading assignees hold 45.6%. That leaves more than half the field spread across a long tail of smaller filers, including many with only one or two records. Co-filing between assignees is rare, with only ten identified co-assignee pairs across the entire dataset, so most records represent a single company's independent filing rather than joint development.
Go past this page: query the whole servo valves and hydraulic control components corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.