https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/servo-valves-and-hydraulic-control-components-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Aircraft Hydraulics & Actuation
Servo valve and hydraulic control component patents: mapping who holds the claims
  • Concentrated at the top. The five leading assignees together hold 37.6% of all 1,976 records in scope, and the ten leading assignees hold 45.6% — a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants fills the rest.
  • Filing has cooled from its peak. After a 2018 peak of 133 records, filings fell from 33 in 2021 to 6 in 2024, an 82% drop over that span — though 2025-2026 counts are still filling in as publication lags filing.
  • Fluid-pressure actuation dominates the IPC mix. F15B (fluid-pressure actuators & systems) appears on 51.9% of records and F16K (valves & taps) on 20.5%, while control-electronics classes like G05B sit under 5%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,976
Published Records
38%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-82%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (33 records) with 2024 (6) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,976 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape covers patent families whose title, abstract or claims reference servovalves, direct drive valves or electrohydraulic servo valves alongside core mechanical elements such as spool valves, flapper-nozzle stages, torque motors or pressure-gain characteristics. The scope spans 2015 through mid-2026 and captures 1,976 published records, drawing on assignee filings from aerospace actuation specialists, industrial hydraulics suppliers and a wider field of smaller filers.

The dataset is weighted toward flight-control and industrial actuation applications rather than mobile or agricultural hydraulics, reflecting the search terms' emphasis on torque-motor and flapper-nozzle architectures typical of aerospace-grade servo valves. Receiving-office distribution points to the United States and Europe as the primary filing jurisdictions, with the United Kingdom, Japan and Germany also carrying meaningful volume.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP311
  2. 2MOOG INC154
  3. 3GENERAL ELECTRIC CO111
  4. 4HR TEXTRON108
  5. 5HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC58
  6. 6GOODRICH ACTUATION SYST34
  7. 7VICKERS INC33
  8. 8ABEX CORP33
  9. 9MOOG CONTROLS31
  10. 10WOODWARD INC29
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Servo Valves and Hydraulic Control Components covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,976 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings ran near 127-133 a year through 2017-2018, then declined steadily; 2021's 33 records fell to 6 by 2024, an 82% drop. The final one to two years are undercounted because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025-2026 should not yet be read as continued decline.

Filing trend, 2017-20260387511315012720171332018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

F15B (fluid-pressure actuators & systems) and F16K (valves & taps) together anchor the field, appearing on 51.9% and 20.5% of records respectively. Aerospace-specific classes — F02C (gas-turbine plants) at 9.9% and B64C (aeroplanes & helicopters) at 7.7% — confirm the flight-control weighting, while electric-motor and control-system classes (H02K, G05D, H01F, G05B) each sit at or under 6.8%, marking the electromechanical interface as a comparatively thinner claim area. Records can carry multiple classes, so shares sum above 100%.

IPC subclass compositionF15B · Fluid-pressure actuators & sys…1,02551.9%F16K · Valves & taps40520.5%F02C · Gas-turbine plants1959.9%B64C · Aeroplanes & helicopters1537.7%H02K · Electric motors & generators1356.8%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…954.8%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…954.8%G05B · Control & regulating systems944.8%Other93547.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,976 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Servo Valves and Hydraulic Control Components covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Servo Valves and Hydraulic Control Components with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about servo valves and hydraulic control components and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited records

Representative filing
US20190085870A12019-03-21

US20190085870A1 — Electro-hydraulic servo valve with coil-type feedback spring

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.

An electrohydraulic servo valve (EHSV) includes a housing assembly, a spool valve, an armature, a control mechanism, and a feedback spring. The spool valve is movably disposed within the housing assembly. The armature is rotationally mounted on the housing assembly. The control mechanism is coupled to the armature and is rotatable therewith. The feedback spring is coupled between the control mechanism and the spool valve, and includes a helical coil that is disposed on and engages the control mechanism, and a cantilever portion that extends from the helical portion to a terminus that engages the spool valve.Filed by Honeywell International, published 2019-03-21 — illustrates the feedback-spring/armature mechanical linkage that recurs across the torque-motor branch of this landscape.

US20190085870A1 — patent drawing 1US20190085870A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5806805AFault tolerant actuation system for flight control actuators235
2US4472780AFly-by-wire lateral control system214
3US4046262AAnthropomorphic master/slave manipulator system190
4US20140290266A1Fuel and actuation system for gas turbine engine177
5US6494039B2Force-controlled hydro-elastic actuator173
6US5337262AApparatus for and method of testing hydraulic/pneumatic apparatus using computer controlled test equipment116
7US5715674AHydromechanical control for a variable delivery, positive displacement fuel pump110
8US6349543B1Regenerative adaptive fluid motor control109
9US20130328277A1Electronically adjustable damper and system96
10US4909535AVehicle suspension system, and method of operating same96

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings — read these as signals of influence on later art, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Servo Valves and Hydraulic Control Components covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the concentration, trend and composition data above.

Concentration
37.6% / 45.6%
top 5 / top 10 share of 1,976 records

The core mechanical claims are occupied

With the five leading assignees holding 37.6% of all records and the ten leading holding 45.6%, the spool-valve and torque-motor mechanical core is densely claimed by a small group of aerospace actuation specialists. New entrants competing on the base architecture are filing into occupied space; differentiation is more likely to succeed on adjacent electromechanical or control elements.

Based on the assignee ranking of 1,976 records
Filing trend
-82%
2021 (33) to 2024 (6)

Activity has pulled back from its 2018 peak

Filings peaked at 133 in 2018 and dropped 82% between 2021 and 2024. That is a real decline in the last complete years of data, but the 2025-2026 counts are still filling in given the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication, so the most recent apparent drop should not be read as continued deceleration.

Peak year 2018 at 133 records
Technology mix
51.9%
records tagged F15B

Fluid-pressure actuation carries the bulk of claim density

F15B and F16K together cover the mechanical fluid path on the majority of records, while control-electronics classes such as G05B and G05D sit below 5% each. That gap suggests the software and control-logic layer around servo valves is comparatively lightly claimed relative to the hardware itself.

IPC shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple classes
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to servo valves and hydraulic control components, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Servo Valves and Hydraulic Control Components covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claims, and where activity has gone quiet

The ranked leaders are aerospace actuation and industrial hydraulics incumbents; recent-year momentum across nearly all of them has fallen to zero, consistent with the broader 2021-2024 decline.

Leader
311 records
leading assignee

A single incumbent holds a clear lead

The top-ranked assignee holds 311 records, well ahead of the fifth-place holder at 58 and tenth place at 29 — a steep drop-off that marks a genuine leader rather than a cluster of near-equal filers.

From a ranking of 100 companies across 1,976 records
Momentum
0 in latest year
across ranked leaders

Recent-year filing has gone quiet at the top

Several of the most active historical filers, including the leading assignee, show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with one recording a -100% year-on-year change. This tracks the broader 2021-2024 pullback rather than signalling any single company's exit, given the publication lag on the newest filings.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Collaboration is limited and concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest linking a major hydraulics specialist with its own subsidiary filings. Co-filing is not a common route into this space; most records carry a single assignee.

Strongest pair recorded 6 shared filings
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches adjacent to the core mechanical claims where filing density thins out
Feedback-spring control-logic integrationDirect-drive valve digital control loopsSilting-resistant spool geometriesTorque-motor/armature electromechanical interfacesPressure-gain sensing for condition monitoring
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Hamilton Sundstrand Corp0
Moog Inc.0-100%
General Electric Co0
HR Textron0
Honeywell International Inc0
VICKERS INC0
United Technologies Corp0
ABEX CORP0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Servo Valves and Hydraulic Control Components covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this

The landscape points to where the mechanical core is occupied and where the control-electronics layer remains comparatively open.

Map a freedom-to-operate position

Run the specific spool, torque-motor or feedback-spring geometry you are developing against the leading assignees' portfolios before committing engineering resources to the core mechanical architecture.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Test the control-logic white space

Given the thin coverage on G05B and G05D relative to F15B and F16K, a claim built around condition-monitoring or digital control logic layered on a conventional servo valve body may face less prior art.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Servo Valves and Hydraulic Control Components covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about servo valve patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Servo Valves and Hydraulic Control Components covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Servo Valves and Hydraulic Control Components in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole servo valves and hydraulic control components corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.