https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/sic-mosfet-gate-driver-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Power Electronics
SiC MOSFET gate driver patents: who leads and where the claim space is still open

A patent landscape analysis of SiC MOSFET gate driver technology: filing trends, leading assignees, IPC composition, and white space, covering 111 records from 2015 through 2026.

111
Published Records
37%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+225%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (4 records) → 2024 (13); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 111 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the SiC MOSFET gate driver patent record actually shows

SiC MOSFET gate drivers sit at the intersection of power conversion and pulse-logic circuit design, and the patent record reflects that split: nearly every record touches H03K pulse-technique claims, while a smaller but substantial share also claims H02M power-conversion territory. That overlap is structural, not incidental — a gate driver claim almost always has to describe both the switching logic and the power stage it drives, which is why the two classes co-occur so heavily in this dataset.

Filing activity peaked in 2017 and has since rebuilt through a sharp 2021-to-2024 run, with the most recent one or two years understated because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Concentration at the top is moderate rather than extreme: the leading assignee holds 13 records, but the ranked field runs to 67 companies, and the top 10 combined account for just over half of all records in scope.

Filing trend and IPC composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1RAYTHEON CO13
  2. 2HITACHI LTD12
  3. 3INDIAN INST OF TECH MADRAS7
  4. 4GENERAL ELECTRIC CO5
  5. 5ROHM CO LTD4
  6. 6MURATA MFG CO LTD3
  7. 7VOLVO CAR CORP3
  8. 8UNIV HOUSTON SYST3
  9. 9HEFEI UNIV OF TECH3
  10. 10YASA LIMITED3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on SiC MOSFET Gate Driver Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 111 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak, then a 2021–2024 rebuild

Filings hit 15 in 2017, the high point of the tracked period, before easing back and then climbing sharply again — 2021's count of 4 grew to 13 by 2024, a +225% increase over that span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in given typical publication lag, so the apparent tail-off in the newest years should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak, then a 2021–2024 rebuild04811151520172018201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

IPC composition: pulse-logic claims dominate

H03K (pulse technique and logic circuits) appears in 82.9% of the 111 records, far ahead of H02M power conversion at 36.9%. Smaller classes — H03F amplifiers, H10D semiconductor devices, H05K assembly, H02H protection and H02J power supply — each sit under 11%, and the ones below 2% mark territory that is claimed only lightly relative to the core gate-drive logic.

IPC composition: pulse-logic claims dominateH03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…9282.9%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)4136.9%H01L · Semiconductor devices1715.3%H03F · Amplifiers1210.8%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)76.3%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies32.7%H02H · Protective circuit arrangements21.8%H02J · Power supply & grid systems21.8%Other1311.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 111 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on SiC MOSFET Gate Driver Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on SiC MOSFET Gate Driver Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about sic mosfet gate driver patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative Record
US20230326973A12023-10-12

Multi-level gate driver applied to SiC MOSFET

UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA

Filed by University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, this record describes a gate driver built from three linked subsystems: a SiC MOSFET information detection circuit covering drain-source voltage and current sensing, a signal level shifting circuit, and a segmented driving circuit split into separate turn-on and turn-off stages. The detection circuit's outputs feed the segmented stages so that switching behaviour can be adjusted based on measured device state during turn-on and turn-off transitions.Filed 2023-10-12 · illustrates the trend toward sensing-integrated, multi-stage drive rather than a single fixed drive waveform.

US20230326973A1 — patent drawing 1US20230326973A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record in Eureka
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US7570085B2Gate driver circuit for switching device42
2WO2013011289A2Switching circuits34
3US20070200613A1Gate driver circuit for switching device30
4US20100265746A1Drive circuit of semiconductor device22
5CN113872420A一种抑制SiC—MOSFET桥臂串扰的改进门极驱动电路14
6WO2015132835A1Power conversion apparatus12
7EP2242179A1Drive circuit of semiconductor device12
8CN115037129A一种基于SiC MOSFET并联均流的控制电路11
9CN113067567A超高压绝缘隔离SiC MOSFET栅驱动电路11
10US20210203309A1Methods and apparatus for transistor health monitoring11

Citation counts favour older filings inside any searched corpus — treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not a ranking of current-generation designs.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on SiC MOSFET Gate Driver Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing or freedom-to-operate decision

Four read-throughs from the assignee, geography and technology data that matter for a practical next step.

Concentration
36.9%
of 111 records held by the top 5 assignees

No single company controls the field

The leading assignee holds 13 records out of 111, and the top 5 combined reach only 36.9% of all records in scope. With 67 companies in the ranked field, this is a landscape with a moderate leading group and a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants rather than one or two dominant blockers.

Ranked field: 67 companies, counted in records.
Growth
+225%
filing growth, 2021 to 2024

Activity rebuilt sharply after a 2017 peak

Filings peaked at 15 in 2017, cooled, then climbed from 4 in 2021 to 13 in 2024 — a +225% increase over that three-year span. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the softer-looking 2025–2026 counts understate real filing activity rather than signalling a real decline.

Peak year: 2017 at 15 filings.
Claim geography
82.9%
of records carry an H03K pulse-logic claim

Pulse-logic claims dominate the claim space

H03K appears in 82.9% of the 111 records, well ahead of H02M power-conversion claims at 36.9%. Classes such as H02H protection and H02J power supply sit at 1.8% each, marking areas where the drive-logic core is heavily claimed but adjacent protection and supply integration is not.

A record can carry multiple IPC classes, so shares exceed 100% in total.
Filing geography
36
China-received filings, the largest single office

China leads receiving offices, ahead of a multi-jurisdiction spread

China accounts for 36 filings, more than the United States (23), WIPO/PCT (13) and Europe (10) combined receiving-office counts individually. Germany and India each register single-digit-to-low-double-digit counts, suggesting most applicants are not yet pursuing dense multi-region protection outside their home jurisdiction.

Receiving offices: CN 36, US 23, WIPO 13, EP 10, IN 9, DE 4.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to sic mosfet gate driver patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on SiC MOSFET Gate Driver Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is filing strategy, freedom-to-operate, or competitor tracking.

Map the white space in protective and supply-integration claims

H02H and H02J each sit under 2% of records despite being natural adjacencies to gate-drive logic — a candidate area for a first claim rather than a crowded one.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the long tail of few-filing entrants

With 67 companies ranked and the top 10 covering only about half of all records, new entrants are still establishing position; watching this list quarter over quarter is more informative than watching the leader alone.

Set up assignee tracking

Re-run the citation view before committing to a design

The most-cited records skew toward older filings; validate against recent publications before treating any single citation count as current-state prior art.

Open the citation table
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on SiC MOSFET Gate Driver Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on SiC MOSFET Gate Driver Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research SiC MOSFET Gate Driver Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole sic mosfet gate driver patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.