Side channel resistance patents for post-quantum cryptography implementations
29.3% concentration. The top 5 assignees hold 108 of 369 records in scope — a field with a clear head but still open beneath it. Filings ran from 30 in 2017 to a peak of 36 in 2019, then declined to 19 by 2024 — a 34% drop across that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as publications catch up to filing dates, so they should not yet be read as a continued decline.
- 1ARM LTD35
- 2QUALCOMM INC22
- 3IRDETO BV20
- 4CRYPTOGRAPHY RESEARCH INC18
- 5MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC13
See the full side channel resistance of pqc analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions on this landscape
What counts as side-channel resistance in post-quantum cryptography patents?
In this dataset it covers countermeasures against attacks that exploit physical implementation leakage rather than mathematical weaknesses — masking at a given masking order, differential power analysis resistance, fault injection attack countermeasures, shuffling countermeasures, randomness generation for masking, and leakage detection methods. These techniques are searched in combination with terms describing the specific countermeasure mechanism, such as performance penalty trade-offs. The scope is implementation-level hardening, applicable to both classical and post-quantum cryptographic schemes running on the same hardware.
Who are the leading patent holders in side-channel resistant PQC implementations?
The ranking covers 100 assignees across 369 records, with the leading assignee holding 35 records and a further concentration where the top 5 hold 108 records (29.3% of the field) and the top 10 hold 168 (45.5%). Beyond that, the field spreads across a long tail of assignees with much smaller counts each. No single company controls a majority of the claim space, though the leader has a clear structural advantage over the rest of the ranked group.
Is patent filing in this space slowing down?
Filings peaked in 2019 at 36 records and had fallen to 19 by 2024, a 34% decline over that three-year window — a real cooling trend based on complete filing years. The 2025 and 2026 figures in any chart should be read with caution, since publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months and those years are still filling in. The honest conclusion is that activity has cooled from its 2019 peak through the last fully-reported year, not that it has stopped.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Side Channel Resistance of PQC covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.