Book a demo

Signaling & Train Control Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Signaling & Train Control Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/signaling-and-train-control-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Rail & Transit Systems
Signaling and train control patents: who holds the ground and where it is still open
  • 27.1% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees hold 919 of 3,397 records in scope, but the other 73% is spread across a long tail of filers.
  • B61L dominates claim space. 77.0% of all records carry a Railway traffic control (B61L) classification, making it the densest single class to search before filing.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2018 peak. Annual filings peaked at 228 in 2018 and fell 23% from 2021 (160) to 2024 (123), the last year with complete publication data.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
3,397
Published Records
27%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-23%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (160 records) with 2024 (123) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 3,397 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 3,397 published patent records filed against a search built around rail signaling, train control and related operational subsystems: train position sensing, wheel-contact detection, traction supply, track condition monitoring and railway operations. The scope spans 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, though the most recent one to two years are understated because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

Records are drawn from filings at receiving offices spanning the United States, Europe, Japan, the WIPO PCT route, India and Australia, giving a view of where applicants are choosing to seek protection rather than only where they are headquartered.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015 – 2026
  1. 1MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP285
  2. 2HITACHI LTD243
  3. 3SIEMENS MOBILITY INC135
  4. 4NIPPON SIGNAL CO LTD130
  5. 5GENERAL ELECTRIC CO126
  6. 6KK TOSHIBA108
  7. 7BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY99
  8. 8CRSC RESEARCH & DESIGN INSTITUTE GROUP CO LTD89
  9. 9CASCO SIGNAL LTD84
  10. 10SIEMENS MOBILITY LTD80
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Signaling & Train Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 3,397 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose to a peak of 228 in 2018, then eased through the following years; the 2021-to-2024 span shows a 23% decline (160 to 123), the last year with complete publication coverage. 2025 and 2026 figures will continue to fill in as publication catches up.

Filing trend, 2017-2026063125188250147201722820182019202020212022202320242025112026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

B61L (railway traffic control) appears on 77.0% of all records, by far the densest classification in scope. B60L (electric vehicle propulsion) and G06F (digital data processing) follow at 11.2% and 6.3% respectively, with wireless communication (H04W), braking (B60T), positioning (G01S), non-electric control (G05D) and commerce/admin data processing (G06Q) each present in single-digit shares. Because records often carry multiple classes, these figures sum to well over 100% of the record total.

IPC subclass compositionB61L · Railway traffic control2,61777.0%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion37911.2%G06F · Electric digital data processi…2156.3%H04W · Wireless communication networks1775.2%B60T · Vehicle brakes & braking1384.1%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning1323.9%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…1263.7%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…992.9%Other1,30238.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 3,397 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Signaling & Train Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Signaling & Train Control Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about signaling & train control patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

Key patents shaping this field

Representative record
US20220140931A12022-05-05

Methods and systems for decentralized rail signaling and positive train control

METROM RAIL, LLC

Systems and methods for decentralized rail signaling and positive train control using a network of wayside units placed on or near tracks and train-mounted units that communicate over ultra-wideband signals as trains come within range, generating control information for use in controlling train movement without reliance on a centralized control system.US20220140931A1, assigned to Metrom Rail, LLC, published 2022-05-05.

US20220140931A1 — patent drawing 1US20220140931A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5129605ARail vehicle positioning system382
2US5623413AScheduling system and method374
3US5828979AAutomatic train control system and method343
4US5420883ATrain location and control using spread spectrum radio communications327
5US6135396ASystem and method for automatic train operation285
6US5794172AScheduling system and method258
7US5398894AVirtual block control system for railway vehicle234
8US20160221592A1Real Time Machine Vision and Point-Cloud Analysis For Remote Sensing and Vehicle Control230
9US20060005738A1Railroad vehicle with energy regeneration226
10EP1600351A1Method and system for detecting defects and hazardous conditions in passing rail vehicles215

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Signaling & Train Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the concentration, classification and citation data that matter for where to search and where to file next.

Concentration
27.1% held by top 5
of 3,397 records

Leadership is real but not a lock

The five leading assignees account for 919 of the 3,397 records in scope, a meaningful concentration, but nearly three-quarters of filings sit outside that group. That long tail includes railway operators, signaling specialists and single-filing entrants working narrower problems than the incumbents.

Top 10 combined reach 40.6% of all records.
Classification density
77.0% carry B61L
of 3,397 records

B61L is occupied ground, not a blank search

More than three in four records classify under B61L, railway traffic control. Filing here means navigating dense prior art; the differentiation is more likely to come from combining B61L with a secondary class like G01S positioning or H04W wireless than from B61L claims alone.

B60L, G06F and H04W are the next-largest secondary classes.
Momentum
-23% (2021-2024)
complete-year filings

Volume has eased from its 2018 peak

Filings peaked at 228 in 2018 and have declined since; the 2021-to-2024 window, the most recent stretch with complete publication data, shows a 23% drop from 160 to 123 filings. Read the 2025-2026 figures as provisional rather than as confirmation the field is shrinking further.

Peak year: 2018 at 228 filings.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to signaling & train control patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Signaling & Train Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked leaders in this dataset span diversified electronics and rail-equipment majors, dedicated signaling specialists and, further down the list, railway operators themselves.

Rank 1
285 records
leader

A diversified electronics incumbent leads

The top assignee holds 285 records, well ahead of fifth place at 126 and tenth place at 80 — a steep drop-off that suggests the leadership tier is thin even where concentration exists.

Gap between rank 1 and rank 5: 159 records.
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships

Corporate-group filings show up as co-assignee pairs

The strongest co-assignee pairs link a parent to its infrastructure-systems or R&D subsidiary, and a major electrical manufacturer to a named inventor, patterns consistent with internal group filing structures rather than external joint ventures.

Strongest pair: 36 shared records.
Momentum
-80% to -100% YoY
among several leaders

Several established filers have gone quiet in the latest year

A number of the historically active assignees show zero or sharply reduced filings in the latest tracked year, a pattern consistent with the broader 18-month publication lag rather than necessarily a pullback in R&D activity.

Only one or two leaders show any latest-year filings above single digits.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches with comparatively thin coverage relative to the core B61L and B60L classes
UWB-based decentralized positive train controlWheel-rail contact condition sensingTrack-condition-linked traction supply managementRadar/positioning fusion for train location (G01S)Commerce/admin data layers for rail operations (G06Q)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
BNSF Railway Company1
CASCO Signal Ltd1-80%
Mitsubishi Electric Corp0-100%
Hitachi, Ltd.0-100%
General Electric Company0
Nippon Signal Co., Ltd.0
QUANTUM ENGINEERING INC0
Toshiba Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Signaling & Train Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this from here

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking or identifying open claim space.

Search before filing in B61L

With 77.0% of records carrying a B61L classification, a freedom-to-operate search needs to go deep on this subclass specifically, not just the field generally.

Run a claim-level search in Eureka

Track the leadership tier's latest activity

Several top assignees show sharp year-over-year drops in the most recent tracked year; watching whether that continues past the publication lag matters more than a single year's count.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Test claims in the under-claimed branches

UWB-based decentralized control and wheel-rail contact sensing show thinner coverage than the core traffic-control classes, worth a focused novelty search before drafting.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Signaling & Train Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Signaling & Train Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Signaling & Train Control Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole signaling & train control patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.