Silica Aerogel Blanket Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
Silica Aerogel Blanket Manufacturing Patents
47.5% concentration. The five most active filers account for 799 of the 1,682 records in scope — a market where the process know-how sits with a small group. Volume rose to a peak of 172 records in 2020, then eased — 2021 to 2024 fell 33%, from 141 to 94 records. 2025 and 2026 figures are still low by comparison, but that reflects the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication rather than a real drop in activity; the last year that can be read as a complete signal is 2024.
- 1LG CHEM LTD19.3%
- 2ASPEN AEROGELS INC19.0%
- 3RESONAC CORP4.2%
- 4ZHUO DA NEW MATERIAL TECH GRP2.9%
- 5CABOT CORP2.2%
See the full silica aerogel blanket manufacturing analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions on this landscape
Who holds the most patents on silica aerogel blanket manufacturing?
Filing is concentrated: the single leading assignee holds 325 of the 1,682 records in scope, and the five most active filers together hold 47.5% of the field. Past the top five, the count drops quickly — tenth place holds only 22 records — so the ranked 100 companies include a long tail of firms with narrow, specific filings rather than broad process portfolios. A freedom-to-operate search should prioritise the top handful of assignees first, then check the specific sub-area a new filing targets against the long tail.
What is the difference between supercritical drying and ambient pressure drying in aerogel patents?
Both terms appear as core search criteria in this corpus because they represent the two competing drying routes used to remove solvent from a silica wet gel without collapsing its porous structure. Supercritical drying uses high-pressure CO2 or similar fluids above their critical point and dominates the commercial literature, which is reflected in the size of the C01B and B01J IPC classes in this dataset. Ambient pressure drying avoids the pressure vessel entirely by relying on surface modification chemistry, and shows up as a distinct, comparatively thinner branch of filings worth checking separately for white space.
Why did aerogel blanket patent filings drop after 2020?
Filing volume peaked at 172 records in 2020 and eased to 94 by 2024, a 33% decline from the 2021 level of 141. That reads as a real cooling in new filing activity for the period that has fully published, but the 2025 and 2026 figures in any raw chart will look even lower purely because patent publication lags filing by roughly 18 months — those years are still filling in and should not be read as a continuing decline yet.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silica Aerogel Blanket Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.