Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Silicon carbide abrasive production spans the Acheson resistance-furnace route and adjacent solid-state carbothermal reduction processes, together with the downstream steps of crushing, grading and purity control that turn furnace output into graded green and black SiC grit. The scope here pulls records tagged against resistance furnace, green and black SiC, crushing and grading, purity and free carbon and energy consumption claim language, filtered to IPC classes covering non-metallic compound production, ceramics and bonded abrasives.
22 published records sit in scope across the 2015-01-01 to 2026-07-31 window, ranked into patent families held by 14 companies. Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent filing year is understated relative to where activity has actually settled.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 22-record set: how filings have moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 6 in 2021. The 2022 midpoint holds at 6, meaning the second half of the window has not exceeded the first — a flat or declining trajectory rather than a growth curve, though the final year or two is always undercounted due to publication lag.
C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) appears in 86.4% of the 22 records in scope, confirming that most claims sit on the core carbothermal reduction chemistry rather than downstream processing. C30B (crystal growth) and F27D (furnace details) each reach 22.7%, with C04B (ceramics and refractories) at 13.6% and smaller shares in furnace design, mixing, catalysis and wastewater treatment — since records can carry multiple classes, these shares add up to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 22 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about silicon carbide abrasive production and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe process combines carbon powder and silica powder — at least about 25% carbon by weight — in a crucible, creates a substantially inert atmosphere around it, and heats the crucible through a first time interval to a working temperature of at least 1,500°C before further staged heating. The claims tie the reaction conditions (atmosphere, temperature ramp, carbon ratio) together as a specific apparatus-plus-process combination rather than claiming the SiC chemistry in the abstract.Filed by SICREATE GMBH, published 2023-03-22.
| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CN101928148A | 一种基于硅烷偶联剂低温高致密碳化硅陶瓷制造方法 | 11 |
| 2 | US5180698A | Method of preparing refractory chromium-containing material | 7 |
| 3 | EP4151596A1 | Process and apparatus for silicon carbide production by means of a solid-state carbothermal reduction process | 3 |
| 4 | CN215626825U | 采用单炉多层流化熔融炉的碳化硅生产系统 | 1 |
| 5 | CN214470080U | 一种碳化硅电阻炉炉头及其构成的碳化硅生产用电阻炉 | 1 |
Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not of current commercial weight.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (5 of 5 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three findings that shape where to look next, drawn directly from the citation table and receiving-office split.
The top-cited record in scope addresses low-temperature high-density silicon carbide ceramic manufacture using a silane coupling agent — a densification route distinct from the furnace-scale Acheson process, and the one later filers reference most.
Older US filings on refractory material preparation continue to accumulate citations simply by virtue of tenure in the corpus — a reminder to weight citation counts by age when judging technical importance.
14 of the 22 records in scope route through the China receiving office, versus 2 each for Europe and the United States and single filings in Australia, Malaysia and Russia — freedom-to-operate work should start with Chinese family coverage.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to silicon carbide abrasive production, with the prior art for and against each one.
14 companies make up the entire ranked list this dataset returns — not a top-50 or top-100 cut. Concentration sits at the top: the top 5 combined account for 63.6% of all 22 records, and the top 10 reach 86.4%, leaving a short tail of single-and-double-filing entrants.
The top-ranked assignee holds 6 of the 22 records in scope. That is a real lead, but well short of the kind of concentration that forecloses design-around work — four other assignees still combine for most of the remaining top-5 share.
Fifth place holds 2 records, and tenth place holds 1 — a gradual taper rather than a sharp cutoff, consistent with a field where furnace and grading process variants are still being filed by smaller regional players.
Every assignee checked for recent-year activity, including the current leader, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this likely understates true recent activity rather than signalling an abandoned field.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| SICREATE Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Lianyungang Woxin High-tech Materials Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Shihezi Fengtuo Silicon Materials Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Ningbo University | 0 | — |
| Beijing Lvqing Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Zhenjiang Subaixin Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Wuhu Pinlei New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Gansu Jintu New Energy Materials Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.
With 14 of 22 records routed through China, any commercial launch touching furnace design or crushing and grading claims should start family-level FTO checks there before other jurisdictions.
Explore assignee families in EurekaThe most recently granted high-visibility filing ties atmosphere, temperature ramp and carbon ratio together as a combination claim — narrower alternatives on any one variable may still be open.
Review claim scope in EurekaThe flat 2021-2022 plateau may understate current activity given normal publication lag; a follow-up pull in 12-18 months will clarify whether the field is genuinely stalled.
Set a tracking alert in EurekaWithin the 22 records in this dataset, filings are ranked across 14 companies, with the top-ranked assignee holding 6 records. The top 5 combined account for 63.6% of all records in scope, and the top 10 reach 86.4% — a field with a clear leading group but no single dominant monopoly holder. The tail beyond that is thin, with several assignees holding only one or two filings each.
Filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 6 in 2021, and the 2022 midpoint also sits at 6, meaning the second half of the tracked window has not exceeded the first. That pattern reads as flat-to-declining rather than growing. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any such trend will always look lower than they eventually turn out to be, so this should not be read as a hard stop in activity.
The core chemistry sits in IPC class C01B, non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds, which appears in 86.4% of the 22 records in scope — the largest single category by a wide margin. Furnace details (F27D) and crystal growth (C30B) each appear in 22.7% of records, and ceramics and refractories (C04B) in 13.6%, showing that most claim activity concentrates on the core carbothermal reaction rather than on downstream ceramic finishing or furnace engineering alone.
EP4151596A1 claims a solid-state carbothermal reduction process that ties together specific reaction parameters: a carbon powder ratio of at least about 25% by weight, a substantially inert atmosphere around the crucible, and a staged heating profile reaching at least 1,500°C. It does not claim silicon carbide production or carbothermal reduction in the abstract — the protection sits on that specific combination of atmosphere, ratio and temperature staging. A process that varies any one of those elements meaningfully, or that uses a different atmosphere-generation method, sits outside the literal claim scope, though a full infringement read requires checking the dependent claims and file history.
The technology composition data shows thin coverage in furnace exhaust and wastewater treatment (C02F, 4.5% of records), mixing and stirring pre-reaction stages (B01F, 4.5%), and catalytic pathway variants (B01J, 4.5%), compared to the 86.4% concentration in core C01B chemistry. These branches sit adjacent to the dense furnace and reduction claims but are not yet heavily claimed, making them worth a closer freedom-to-operate and prior-art check before assuming they are open, rather than assuming they are automatically available.
Go past this page: query the whole silicon carbide abrasive production corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.