Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (35 records) with 2024 (28) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 733 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Silicon carbide and silicon nitride structural ceramics cover reaction-bonded and sintered bodies engineered for fracture toughness, thermal shock resistance, and wear performance in bearing and cutting applications. The claim space tracked here spans sintering additive chemistry, reaction-bonding process routes, and end-use forms such as bearing balls and cutting inserts, anchored in the C04B ceramics classification with meaningful overlap into F16C bearings and B23B turning and boring.
733 patent families are captured across the 2015-to-2026 window, giving a fairer view of activity than raw publication counts because families collapse continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates into a single count per invention.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 733-family dataset: the year-by-year filing trend, and how those families distribute across IPC subclasses. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year is undercounted and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.
Filings rose from 12 in 2017 toward a peak of 47 in 2025, but the 2022 midpoint of 33 sits well below a straight-line path to that peak. Read together with the partial 2026 count of 7, this looks like a technology that expanded through the late 2010s and has since settled into a steady, non-accelerating filing rate rather than one still building momentum.
728 of the 733 families sit in C04B (ceramics, cement and refractories), confirming this is fundamentally a materials-composition landscape. The next largest groups — F16C bearings at 33 and B23B turning and boring at 20 — mark where the ceramic claims meet mechanical end-use, and are the subclasses worth watching for cross-domain filings.
Shares are the percentage of the 733 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about silicon carbide and nitride structural ceramics and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA process for preparing a self-reinforced silicon nitride ceramic body of high fracture toughness by hot-pressing a powder mixture containing silicon nitride, a densification aid, a conversion aid, and a compound that enhances growth of beta-silicon nitride whiskers, under conditions that drive densification and in-situ whisker formation with a high aspect ratio. The resulting ceramic has a beta-silicon nitride crystalline phase in which a significant volume fraction forms as elongated whiskers, raising both fracture toughness and fracture strength relative to conventional sintered silicon nitride.Filed by The Dow Chemical Company; still a frequently cited reference point for whisker-reinforcement approaches to toughening silicon nitride.
View full filing| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4004934A | Sintered dense silicon carbide | 240 |
| 2 | US6733907B2 | Hybrid ceramic material composed of insulating and structural ceramic layers | 213 |
| 3 | US20030207155A1 | Hybrid ceramic material composed of insulating and structural ceramic layers | 168 |
| 4 | US5486496A | Graphite-loaded silicon carbide | 131 |
| 5 | US5543368A | Graphite-loaded silicon carbide | 120 |
| 6 | US4304576A | Silicon nitride ceramic tools and a process for their production | 116 |
| 7 | US20030109371A1 | Silicon carbide ceramic composition and method of making | 112 |
| 8 | US4837230A | Structural ceramic materials having refractory interface layers | 104 |
| 9 | EP0121797A2 | Carbon composite article and method of making same | 87 |
| 10 | US4179299A | Sintered alpha silicon carbide ceramic body having equiaxed microstructure | 85 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older records disproportionately; treat this table as a map of foundational influence, not of current commercial weight.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Read together, the trend, classification spread, and citation pattern point to a mature, geographically shifted, densely claimed field rather than an emerging one.
The rise from 12 filings in 2017 to a 2025 peak of 47 looks strong until the 2022 midpoint of 33 is factored in — the path there was not a steady climb. This is consistent with a field that saw a wave of process and composition filings mid-decade and has since stabilised.
China's 301 filings compare to 119 in the United States and 105 at the EPO. Any freedom-to-operate review for manufacturing or export into China needs to start from this dataset first, not from US or European filings alone.
Almost every family sits in C04B, ceramics and refractories. The smaller but real overlaps into F16C bearings (33) and B23B turning and boring (20) mark the mechanical end-use claims worth separate tracking.
The most-cited record in this corpus, on sintered dense silicon carbide, and the graphite-loaded silicon carbide filings behind it, carry citation counts far above anything filed in the last decade. New entrants are building on art that is decades old, not on recent priority filings.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to silicon carbide and nitride structural ceramics, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing activity concentrates among a small group of established ceramics and materials companies, with recent-year momentum flat across the most active assignees rather than shifting toward a new leader.
Only four co-assignee pairings appear across 733 families, and each of the strongest pairs recurs just twice. Most filings in this space are single-assignee efforts rather than joint development programmes.
Every one of the most active historical assignees shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this understates true current activity, but it also means no single assignee is visibly pulling ahead right now.
With Japanese, European, US and Chinese entities all represented among the most active assignees, this is not a single-region technology. Competitive tracking needs to cover all four major offices, not just the domestic one.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| The Dow Chemical Company | 0 | — |
| Carborundum Company | 0 | — |
| Hoechst AG | 0 | — |
| Toshiba Corporation | 0 | — |
| Cerco Corporation | 0 | — |
| NGK Spark Plug Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Kennametal Inc. | 0 | — |
| Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences | 0 | -100% |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, sourcing, or new filing strategy.
With 301 of 733 families filed in China, any manufacturing, sourcing or export plan touching this material class should map its own process and composition claims against that filing base before committing capital.
Run a China-focused claim comparisonWhisker-reinforcement chemistries and reaction-bonded bearing geometries show thinner filing density than the core sintering-additive claims. A targeted novelty search in these branches can surface a genuine first-filer opening.
Search white space branchesThe highest-cited records in this corpus predate the current filing window by decades. Any design-around strategy needs to trace forward from those foundational compositions, not just from recent filings.
Trace the citation networkThe dataset shows a set of established ceramics and materials companies with the largest historical filing counts, but none of them show any filings in the most recent tracked year. That flat recent-year picture, combined with only four recorded co-assignee pairings across 733 families, indicates a field led by a handful of long-standing single-assignee filers rather than one dominant company still actively expanding its position. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the true current leader may not yet be visible in the data.
Not in a straight line. Filings rose from 12 in 2017 to a peak of 47 in 2025, but the 2022 midpoint of 33 shows the path there was uneven rather than steadily accelerating. Combined with a partial 2026 count of 7, the most reasonable reading is that the field expanded through the late 2010s and has since settled into a flatter filing rate. Anyone planning a multi-year filing strategy should treat this as a mature, steady-state technology rather than one still in a growth phase.
China, by a clear margin: 301 of the tracked families were filed there, compared with 119 in the United States and 105 at the EPO, with Japan, Canada and the WIPO PCT route trailing further behind. This makes China the first venue to check for freedom-to-operate work involving silicon carbide or silicon nitride structural ceramics. It also suggests that manufacturing or sourcing decisions tied to this material class should weight Chinese patent risk more heavily than has historically been the norm for ceramics IP.
US5160508A, assigned to The Dow Chemical Company, covers a process for hot-pressing a silicon nitride powder mixture with a densification aid, a conversion aid, and a whisker-growth-enhancing compound to produce a self-reinforced silicon nitride body with a high volume fraction of elongated beta-silicon nitride whiskers. It is a process-plus-composition claim tied specifically to in-situ whisker formation for toughening. Work using different toughening mechanisms, such as different reinforcement phases or non-whisker microstructures, sits outside its claim scope, but anyone pursuing whisker-reinforced silicon nitride via hot-pressing with a similar additive combination should review it closely before filing.
The clearest under-claimed areas relative to the dense core sintering-additive and composition claims are whisker-reinforced toughening additive chemistries, reaction-bonded bearing ball geometries, low-temperature sintering aid formulations, thermal-shock-resistant coating interfaces, and biomedical-grade silicon nitride variants. These sit adjacent to the heavily filed C04B core but show thinner documented activity, particularly in the mechanical end-use overlap with F16C bearings and B23B machining classes. A first claim in these branches would need to specify a novel additive-and-process combination rather than a bare composition to clear the dense prior art around basic sintered silicon carbide and silicon nitride.
Go past this page: query the whole silicon carbide and nitride structural ceramics corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.