Silicon Carbide Power MOSFETs Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
- Filings peaked in 2023 at 70 and have since flattened, with 2022's midpoint of 67 suggesting the field is consolidating claim positions rather than still expanding them.
- China now receives more filings than any other office (184), ahead of the United States (140), Europe (36), the PCT route (28), Japan (16) and South Korea (7).
- Momentum has stalled across the named leaders, with the most active assignees in the ranking all showing zero filings in the latest recorded year — a sign of a lag-affected cut-off, not necessarily retreat.
Filing growth compares 2021 (35 records) with 2024 (59) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 427 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This review covers 427 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, filtered to documents claiming a silicon carbide MOSFET, SiC power device or SiC MOSFET with claim language touching gate oxide reliability, channel mobility, trench structure, avalanche capability or on-resistance, and classified under H01L29, H01L21 or H02M1. The scope is deliberately narrow: it is the claim-level intersection of SiC device structure and the specific reliability and performance mechanisms that separate commercial parts from lab demonstrations.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in any trend chart are undercounts of what has actually been filed — treat the recent-year drop as a data artefact first, a market signal second.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology mix
Two views of the same 427-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
A flattening curve after a 2023 peak
Filings rose from 19 in 2017 to a peak of 70 in 2023, with 2022 already at 67 — the growth curve was essentially flat through the 2022-2023 window rather than still accelerating. Read the 2024-2026 tail with the publication lag in mind rather than as evidence of a real slowdown.
Concentrated in core semiconductor-device classes
H01L absorbs nearly all of the corpus (419 of 427 records), with H10D and H10P also carrying substantial weight, consistent with a field defined by device structure rather than by the power-conversion circuits (H02M, 11 records) that sit downstream of it.
Shares are the percentage of the 427 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Silicon Carbide Power MOSFETs with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about silicon carbide power mosfets and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe documents setting the reference points
Silicon carbide MOSFET device and method for manufacturing the same
The device splits its gate oxide layer into two sections of different thickness, giving the layer a staircase profile that lowers electric field strength at the gate oxide without disturbing threshold voltage or gate control. On-resistance is addressed separately by widening the JFET region.Filed by Zhuzhou CRRC Times Electric Co., Ltd., published 2019-11-12 as US10475896B2.
| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20040119076A1 | Vertical JFET limited silicon carbide power metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistors and methods of… | 162 |
| 2 | US5726463A | Silicon carbide MOSFET having self-aligned gate structure | 161 |
| 3 | WO2004036655A1 | Silicon carbide semiconductor device and its manufacturing method | 95 |
| 4 | US7221010B2 | Vertical JFET limited silicon carbide power metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistors | 79 |
| 5 | US20120217513A1 | Silicon carbide semiconductor device and manufacturing method thereof | 64 |
| 6 | US20130313570A1 | Monolithically integrated sic mosfet and schottky barrier diode | 60 |
| 7 | JP2006511961A | 縦型JFET制限型シリコンカーバイドパワー金属酸化膜半導体電界効果トランジスタおよび縦型JFET制限型シリコンカーバイド金属酸化膜半導体電界効果トランジスタを製造する方法 | 60 |
| 8 | US20150084066A1 | High voltage mosfet devices and methods of making the devices | 42 |
| 9 | US7923320B2 | Methods of fabricating vertical JFET limited silicon carbide metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transisto… | 40 |
| 10 | US20100224886A1 | P-channel silicon carbide mosfet | 36 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus skew toward older filings by construction — read them as markers of foundational influence, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern signals
Three structural readings of the dataset that matter more than any single ranking.
Growth has plateaued, not accelerated
With 2022 at 67 and 2023 at 70, the two years immediately before the peak were already close together. That pattern is more consistent with a field settling into its claim structure than with one still in a land-grab phase.
China is now the larger filing venue
China's receiving-office count (184) has overtaken the United States (140), with Europe, the PCT route, Japan and South Korea each taking a smaller share. Freedom-to-operate work that stops at the USPTO and EPO will miss the largest single filing pool.
The claim space is structural, not circuit-level
Almost the entire corpus sits in H01L (semiconductor devices), with H02M (power conversion circuits) accounting for only 11 records. Most of the contested ground is the device itself — gate oxide, trench, channel — not the converter topology built around it.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to silicon carbide power mosfets, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the field is still open
The assignee ranking spans established power-semiconductor manufacturers alongside Chinese research institutes and newer fabless entrants; several of the most active filers by cumulative count show no activity in the latest recorded year, which given the 18-month publication lag is expected rather than a sign of exit.
A wide filer base with a long tail
The 427 families are attributed across a broad set of assignees, with only ten co-assignee pairs recorded — collaboration is the exception, and most filings are held solely by a single entity.
Collaboration is rare and localised
The strongest co-filing links sit between a Chinese state research institute and a regional third-generation semiconductor innovation centre, appearing across multiple pair records — a sign of a regional industry-institute alliance rather than a broad cross-industry pattern.
Recent-year counts understate current activity
Every assignee with strong cumulative filing history shows zero records in the most recent year captured. Given the review's own publication-lag caveat, this reads as a reporting gap rather than a genuine pause across the field's most active filers.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Wave Semiconductor Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Monolith Semiconductor Inc. | 0 | — |
| University of Electronic Science and Technology of China | 0 | — |
| China Electronics Technology Group Corporation No. 55 Research Institute | 0 | — |
| Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | 0 | — |
| Hangzhou Puxi Guangjing Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Chengdu Rongxi Semiconductor Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or competitive tracking.
Run a freedom-to-operate check against the dense core
Gate oxide profile, trench structure and JFET-region claims carry the heaviest citation weight in this corpus; any new device design should be checked against the most-cited records before committing to a structure.
Explore claims in EurekaMap the under-claimed branches to a first draft claim
The gate chips above mark areas with comparatively thin coverage relative to the core — a useful starting point for scoping a first independent claim rather than a guaranteed clear path.
Draft claim language in EurekaTrack assignees through the next publication cycle
Because recent-year momentum is understated by the publication lag, re-running this assignee view in 6-12 months will surface filings that are currently invisible.
Set up monitoring in EurekaCommon questions on SiC power MOSFET patents
The assignee ranking spans established power-semiconductor manufacturers, Chinese research institutes and universities, and smaller fabless entrants, with 427 families distributed across the field rather than concentrated in a single hand. Some of the most cited foundational filings, such as US20040119076A1 and US5726463A, predate the current wave of Chinese institutional filing and remain reference points for gate structure and JFET-limited designs. Because collaboration is rare in this dataset (only ten co-assignee pairs), most families are held by a single entity, so checking the assignee table directly is more informative than assuming a duopoly.
Filings rose steadily from 19 in 2017 to a peak of 70 in 2023, but the immediately preceding year, 2022, was already at 67, showing that growth had slowed before the peak rather than after it. Part of the apparent drop in 2024-2026 is a publication-lag artefact: patent applications typically publish around 18 months after filing, so the most recent years in any count are always undercounted. A genuine slowdown cannot be confirmed until the later years finish publishing, but the flattening trend through 2022-2023 is real and predates the lag effect.
US10475896B2, assigned to Zhuzhou CRRC Times Electric Co., Ltd. and published in 2019, claims a gate oxide layer built from two sections of different thickness, forming a staircase profile that reduces electric field strength without affecting threshold voltage or gate control, combined with a widened JFET region to cut on-resistance. It does not block gate oxide designs generally; it blocks the specific combination of a stepped multi-thickness gate oxide plus JFET-region widening used to achieve that dual effect. Designs using a uniform-thickness gate oxide, or a different mechanism for field reduction such as shielding structures, sit outside this specific claim combination, though a full clearance opinion should compare claim language directly.
Relative to the dense core of gate oxide and trench-structure claims, this corpus shows comparatively thin coverage in areas like trench sidewall channel mobility enhancement, JFET region width optimisation as a standalone claim element, and avalanche capability under repetitive stress conditions. Power-conversion circuit integration (H02M) is also thin, with only 11 of 427 records touching that subclass, suggesting device-level claims dominate over system-level integration claims. These are not guaranteed clear paths, but they are areas where the claim density in this specific dataset is measurably lower than in the gate oxide and trench core.
China's receiving office leads with 184 filings in this corpus, ahead of the United States at 140, followed by Europe (EPO, 36), the PCT route (28), Japan (16) and South Korea (7). This shifts the practical filing and freedom-to-operate calculus: a review limited to US and European offices would miss the largest single jurisdiction by volume. The PCT figure of 28 also indicates a meaningful share of applicants are still pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection rather than filing nationally from the outset.
Research Silicon Carbide Power MOSFETs in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole silicon carbide power mosfets corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.