Book a demo

Silicon Carbide Power MOSFETs Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Silicon Carbide Power MOSFETs Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/silicon-carbide-power-mosfets-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Semiconductors
Silicon Carbide Power MOSFET Patents: Who Holds the Ground and Where It's Open
  • Filings peaked in 2023 at 70 and have since flattened, with 2022's midpoint of 67 suggesting the field is consolidating claim positions rather than still expanding them.
  • China now receives more filings than any other office (184), ahead of the United States (140), Europe (36), the PCT route (28), Japan (16) and South Korea (7).
  • Momentum has stalled across the named leaders, with the most active assignees in the ranking all showing zero filings in the latest recorded year — a sign of a lag-affected cut-off, not necessarily retreat.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
427
Published Records
25%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+69%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (35 records) with 2024 (59) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 427 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review covers 427 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, filtered to documents claiming a silicon carbide MOSFET, SiC power device or SiC MOSFET with claim language touching gate oxide reliability, channel mobility, trench structure, avalanche capability or on-resistance, and classified under H01L29, H01L21 or H02M1. The scope is deliberately narrow: it is the claim-level intersection of SiC device structure and the specific reliability and performance mechanisms that separate commercial parts from lab demonstrations.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in any trend chart are undercounts of what has actually been filed — treat the recent-year drop as a data artefact first, a market signal second.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1WOLFSPEED INC40
  2. 2MONOLITH SEMICONDUCTOR INC21
  3. 3FUJI ELECTRIC CO LTD16
  4. 4UNIV OF ELECTRONICS SCI & TECH OF CHINA15
  5. 5NO 55 INST CHINA ELECTRONIC SCI & TECHNOLOGYGROUP CO LTD14
  6. 6SEMICON COMPONENTS IND LLC11
  7. 7MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP10
  8. 8Hangzhou Puxi Guangjing Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd.10
  9. 9STMICROELECTRONICS SRL9
  10. 10ZHUZHOU CRRC TIMES SEMICON CO LTD9
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicon Carbide Power MOSFETs covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 427-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A flattening curve after a 2023 peak

Filings rose from 19 in 2017 to a peak of 70 in 2023, with 2022 already at 67 — the growth curve was essentially flat through the 2022-2023 window rather than still accelerating. Read the 2024-2026 tail with the publication lag in mind rather than as evidence of a real slowdown.

A flattening curve after a 2023 peak020406080192017201820192020202120227020232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in core semiconductor-device classes

H01L absorbs nearly all of the corpus (419 of 427 records), with H10D and H10P also carrying substantial weight, consistent with a field defined by device structure rather than by the power-conversion circuits (H02M, 11 records) that sit downstream of it.

Concentrated in core semiconductor-device classesH01L · Semiconductor devices41998.1%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)12028.1%H10P11326.5%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)112.6%H03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…71.6%H10W40.9%H10B · Memory device manufacture30.7%C23C · Coating & surface deposition20.5%Other61.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 427 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicon Carbide Power MOSFETs covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Silicon Carbide Power MOSFETs with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about silicon carbide power mosfets and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The documents setting the reference points

Representative Filing
US10475896B22019-11-12

Silicon carbide MOSFET device and method for manufacturing the same

ZHUZHOU CRRC TIMES ELECTRIC CO., LTD.

The device splits its gate oxide layer into two sections of different thickness, giving the layer a staircase profile that lowers electric field strength at the gate oxide without disturbing threshold voltage or gate control. On-resistance is addressed separately by widening the JFET region.Filed by Zhuzhou CRRC Times Electric Co., Ltd., published 2019-11-12 as US10475896B2.

US10475896B2 — patent drawing 1US10475896B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20040119076A1Vertical JFET limited silicon carbide power metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistors and methods of…162
2US5726463ASilicon carbide MOSFET having self-aligned gate structure161
3WO2004036655A1Silicon carbide semiconductor device and its manufacturing method95
4US7221010B2Vertical JFET limited silicon carbide power metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistors79
5US20120217513A1Silicon carbide semiconductor device and manufacturing method thereof64
6US20130313570A1Monolithically integrated sic mosfet and schottky barrier diode60
7JP2006511961A縦型JFET制限型シリコンカーバイドパワー金属酸化膜半導体電界効果トランジスタおよび縦型JFET制限型シリコンカーバイド金属酸化膜半導体電界効果トランジスタを製造する方法60
8US20150084066A1High voltage mosfet devices and methods of making the devices42
9US7923320B2Methods of fabricating vertical JFET limited silicon carbide metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transisto…40
10US20100224886A1P-channel silicon carbide mosfet36

Citation counts inside a searched corpus skew toward older filings by construction — read them as markers of foundational influence, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicon Carbide Power MOSFETs covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern signals

Three structural readings of the dataset that matter more than any single ranking.

Filing Trend
70 in 2023
peak year

Growth has plateaued, not accelerated

With 2022 at 67 and 2023 at 70, the two years immediately before the peak were already close together. That pattern is more consistent with a field settling into its claim structure than with one still in a land-grab phase.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Jurisdiction
184 vs 140
CN vs US receiving-office filings

China is now the larger filing venue

China's receiving-office count (184) has overtaken the United States (140), with Europe, the PCT route, Japan and South Korea each taking a smaller share. Freedom-to-operate work that stops at the USPTO and EPO will miss the largest single filing pool.

Receiving-office distribution
Classification
419 of 427
records under H01L

The claim space is structural, not circuit-level

Almost the entire corpus sits in H01L (semiconductor devices), with H02M (power conversion circuits) accounting for only 11 records. Most of the contested ground is the device itself — gate oxide, trench, channel — not the converter topology built around it.

IPC subclass distribution
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to silicon carbide power mosfets, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicon Carbide Power MOSFETs covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

The assignee ranking spans established power-semiconductor manufacturers alongside Chinese research institutes and newer fabless entrants; several of the most active filers by cumulative count show no activity in the latest recorded year, which given the 18-month publication lag is expected rather than a sign of exit.

Assignee Base
427 families
across the ranking

A wide filer base with a long tail

The 427 families are attributed across a broad set of assignees, with only ten co-assignee pairs recorded — collaboration is the exception, and most filings are held solely by a single entity.

Assignee ranking
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships

Collaboration is rare and localised

The strongest co-filing links sit between a Chinese state research institute and a regional third-generation semiconductor innovation centre, appearing across multiple pair records — a sign of a regional industry-institute alliance rather than a broad cross-industry pattern.

Co-assignee pairs
Momentum
0 in latest year
for the most active named assignees

Recent-year counts understate current activity

Every assignee with strong cumulative filing history shows zero records in the most recent year captured. Given the review's own publication-lag caveat, this reads as a reporting gap rather than a genuine pause across the field's most active filers.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas that sit adjacent to the dense core claim territory but carry comparatively few records in this corpus.
Staircase / stepped gate oxide profilesTrench sidewall channel mobility enhancementJFET region width optimisationAvalanche capability under repetitive stressPower-conversion circuit integration (H02M)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Wave Semiconductor Co., Ltd.0
Monolith Semiconductor Inc.0
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China0
China Electronics Technology Group Corporation No. 55 Research Institute0
Fuji Electric Co., Ltd.0
Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC0
Hangzhou Puxi Guangjing Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd.0
Chengdu Rongxi Semiconductor Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicon Carbide Power MOSFETs covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or competitive tracking.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the dense core

Gate oxide profile, trench structure and JFET-region claims carry the heaviest citation weight in this corpus; any new device design should be checked against the most-cited records before committing to a structure.

Explore claims in Eureka

Map the under-claimed branches to a first draft claim

The gate chips above mark areas with comparatively thin coverage relative to the core — a useful starting point for scoping a first independent claim rather than a guaranteed clear path.

Draft claim language in Eureka

Track assignees through the next publication cycle

Because recent-year momentum is understated by the publication lag, re-running this assignee view in 6-12 months will surface filings that are currently invisible.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicon Carbide Power MOSFETs covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on SiC power MOSFET patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicon Carbide Power MOSFETs covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Silicon Carbide Power MOSFETs in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole silicon carbide power mosfets corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.