Silicon Nitride Ceramic Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- Flat filing activity, not a growth curve. Filings peaked at 4 in 2023 and the midpoint year (2022) sits at 3 — this is a mature, cyclical filing pattern rather than an expanding one.
- No single assignee is filing consistently. Recent-year momentum across tracked assignees is effectively zero except for one filer with a single record — no organisation is compounding a lead right now.
- Sintering-additive chemistry is where the influential prior art sits. The most-cited records in this set are composite-powder and high-toughness sintering patents from the 1990s, still anchoring citation counts decades later.
What this landscape covers
Silicon nitride ceramic manufacturing spans powder synthesis, sintering-additive selection, gas-pressure or hot-press densification, and the shaping steps — tape casting, injection moulding — that turn a sintered body into a substrate or structural part. This dataset tracks 39 patent families filed against IPC classes covering sintered ceramics (C04B35/587, C04B35/64, C04B35/626), narrowed to records whose title or claims name a silicon nitride or Si3N4 ceramic together with a gas-pressure sintering, tape-casting, sintering-additive or manufacturing-process term.
Coverage runs from 2015 through the mid-2026 data cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend line will understate actual filing activity — treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional floors, not final counts.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 39-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the underlying documents actually sit in.
A flat, low-volume filing curve
Filings moved from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 4 in 2023, with the 2022 midpoint at 3 and 2026 (partial year) at 1. There is no sustained upward trend in this window — activity looks episodic rather than compounding, consistent with a technology where the core sintering chemistry was substantially claimed years ago and new filings address incremental process or application variants.
Concentrated in ceramics, with spillover into electronics substrates
Every record in this set carries a C04B (ceramics, cement, refractories) classification, as expected from the search construction. The next largest groups are C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds, 8 records) and H05K (printed circuit assemblies, 5 records), with H01L (semiconductor devices, 4) and H10W (4) close behind. That spillover into circuit-board and semiconductor classes signals that a meaningful share of this filing activity is aimed at silicon nitride as a substrate material for power electronics, not just as a bulk structural ceramic.
Shares are the percentage of the 39 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Silicon Nitride Ceramic Manufacturing Process with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about silicon nitride ceramic manufacturing process and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaKey patents and the representative claim
EP0661245A3 — Silicon nitride ceramic material (Honda)
A ceramic material composed mainly of silicon nitride, combined with a sintering additive drawn from aluminum oxide, yttrium oxide, ytterbium oxide, lanthanum oxide, neodymium oxide or cerium oxide. The mixture is sintered in a nitrogen atmosphere at a temperature above the point where the ceramic reaches maximum density, producing a sintered material with increased thermal conductivity.Filed by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha, published 1995-10-25.
| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5525556A | Silicon nitride/silicon carbide composite powders | 62 |
| 2 | US5643843A | Silicon nitride/silicon carbide composite densified materials prepared using composite powders | 27 |
| 3 | US5556815A | High temperature resistant silicon nitride ceramic | 21 |
| 4 | US5449649A | Monolithic silicon nitride having high fracture toughness | 20 |
| 5 | US20090224399A1 | Silicon nitride substrate, method of manufacturing the same, and silicon nitride circuit board and semiconduc… | 12 |
| 6 | CN106631042A | 制作氮化硅陶瓷电路基板的生产工艺 | 10 |
| 7 | JP2004277234A | Silicon nitride ceramic porous material having vent holes and its manufacturing process | 10 |
| 8 | US4500482A | Method of manufacture silicon nitride ceramic molded articles | 7 |
| 9 | CN109574680A | 一种气固反应结合液相烧结法制备多孔氮化硅陶瓷的方法 | 6 |
| 10 | CN101255058A | 一种超塑性纳米Si3N4基陶瓷材料及其制备方法 | 6 |
Citation counts are drawn from a corpus that favours older, longer-indexed documents — read them as a signal of foundational influence, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for a filing decision
Three signals stand out once family counts, IPC spread and citation concentration are read together.
A small, stable field — not a gold rush
At a peak of 4 families in a single year and a total of 39 over more than a decade, this is a narrow, specialist filing space. Freedom-to-operate searches here are tractable by hand rather than requiring heavy analytics, but that also means each individual grant carries more relative weight in the landscape.
Europe and the US lead filing office counts, China is rising
European and US receiving offices account for the largest shares of filings, with China at 8 and Japan, India and Canada each in single digits. For a company weighing where to seek protection, EPO and USPTO coverage tracks where most existing rights already sit — China's smaller count may reflect real white space or simply a filing lag not yet visible in a 2026 cut-off.
Foundational chemistry patents still anchor the citation graph
The most-cited records in this set are composite-powder and high-fracture-toughness silicon nitride patents from the mid-1990s. Their citation counts reflect decades of indexing, not present-day relevance — but they remain the baseline prior art that any new sintering-additive or powder-composite claim will be examined against.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to silicon nitride ceramic manufacturing process, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps are
No assignee in this dataset shows sustained multi-year filing momentum, and recent-year activity across tracked players is close to flat. That pattern points to a field where individual grants — rather than portfolio depth — carry the competitive weight.
Recent activity has nearly stalled
Of the assignees tracked for recent-year momentum, only one shows a filing in the latest year, and it is a single record. The rest show zero in the most recent year — consistent with the overall flat-to-declining trend rather than any one competitor pulling ahead.
A long tail rather than a concentrated leader
With 39 total families spread across research institutes, industrial ceramics makers and diversified chemical companies, ownership is dispersed. There is no single dominant portfolio holder visible in this window, which lowers the barrier for a new entrant to secure a defensible position with a modest number of well-targeted filings.
Research institutes sit alongside industrial filers
The assignee set mixes established ceramics and materials companies with university and research-institute filers, a pattern typical of a field where sintering-additive and processing know-how still originates partly in academic labs before being licensed or commercialised.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| NITERRA MATERIALS Co., Ltd. | 1 | — |
| The Dow Chemical Company | 0 | — |
| OCI Company Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Amotech Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Ceramic Technology Innovation Engineering Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Yanshan University | 0 | — |
| Tokuyama Corporation | 0 | — |
| Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
This landscape identifies the filing pattern and the citation anchors. The next layer of work is claim-level: mapping specific sintering-additive ratios and process windows against what is already granted.
Run a claim-level freedom-to-operate check
With only 39 families in scope, a full claim chart against the most-cited records is feasible before committing to a specific additive chemistry or sintering profile.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaTrack the under-claimed branches
Substrate lamination and low-temperature densification show thinner coverage than the core sintering claims — worth monitoring for new entrants filing into that gap.
Set up monitoring in Patsnap EurekaCommon questions on silicon nitride ceramic manufacturing patents
Gas-pressure sintering densifies silicon nitride powder under an elevated nitrogen or inert-gas atmosphere pressure, which suppresses the decomposition of silicon nitride at the high temperatures needed for densification. It is a standard route in this dataset's claim language because it lets a manufacturer reach near-theoretical density without hot-pressing equipment. Patents in this space typically claim a specific pressure-temperature-time window combined with a named sintering additive, so the exact combination — not the general gas-pressure concept — is usually what is protected.
This dataset of 39 families shows a dispersed ownership pattern rather than one or two dominant portfolio holders. Industrial ceramics companies, diversified chemical firms, and university or research-institute filers all appear in the assignee set, and recent-year filing momentum is close to flat across nearly all of them. That means competitive position in this field currently depends more on the strength of individual grants than on breadth of portfolio.
Rare-earth and alkaline-earth oxides dominate the claim language in this space — yttrium oxide, aluminum oxide, ytterbium oxide, lanthanum oxide, neodymium oxide and cerium oxide all appear as sintering additives in representative filings. These additives form a liquid phase at sintering temperature that promotes densification and, depending on the blend, can also raise the thermal conductivity of the finished ceramic. Blend ratios and combinations of two or more of these oxides remain an area with visible room for new, narrowly claimed filings.
The IPC spread in this dataset shows meaningful filing activity in H05K (circuit assemblies) and H01L (semiconductor devices) alongside the core C04B ceramics classification, which reflects silicon nitride's growing role as a substrate for power modules. Its combination of high thermal conductivity, mechanical strength and electrical insulation makes it suited to applications where a ceramic substrate must both carry heat away from a power device and withstand thermal cycling. Manufacturing-process claims for these substrate applications increasingly involve tape-casting and lamination steps rather than only bulk sintering.
Filing volume in this dataset is flat to declining rather than growing: activity moved from 2 families in 2017 to a peak of 4 in 2023, with the 2022 midpoint at only 3 and the most recent partial year showing just 1. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one or two years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be, but the broader multi-year pattern does not show sustained growth. That makes this a field where core process chemistry is largely staked out, with new filings addressing incremental variants rather than a fast-expanding frontier.
Research Silicon Nitride Ceramic Manufacturing Process in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole silicon nitride ceramic manufacturing process corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.