Book a demo

Silicon Photonics Cost Reduction Patent Snapshot

Silicon Photonics Cost Reduction Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
Silicon Photonics Cost Reduction Patent Snapshot in 2026

Intel Corp dominates a highly concentrated field, holding the largest share among the top-ranked filers, with optical-element integration and semiconductor packaging as the central technical routes. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak and the most recent years remain understated by publication lag.

18
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Intel leads a concentrated field with a steep tier gap below the top filer

Intel Corp is the clear leader, ranking first with 10 patent records, followed by Nokia of America Corp at 6 and Electronics & Telecomm Research Institute at 5. The top five filers account for 75% of the combined total among the ranked applicants visible in this query, signaling a strongly consolidated assignee snapshot.

The drop from the leader to the second tier is sharp: Intel’s count is nearly double that of Nokia of America Corp, and challengers such as Huawei Technologies and the Regents of the University of California each hold 3 patent records. This tier gap suggests that a small number of organizations set the technical agenda while the remainder occupy narrower niches.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Intel Corporation10
2Nokia of America Corporation6
3ELECTRONICS & TELECOMM RES INST5
4Regents of the University of California3
5Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.3
6Aeponyx Inc.2
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
7Ghent University2
8IMEC (Interuniversitair Micro-Electronics Centrum)2
9RPX Corporation1
10Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.1
11NTT Innovative Devices Corporation1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Intel’s visible position, grounded in optical-element integration and semiconductor packaging, implies that prospective entrants face both a volume disadvantage and a citation-authority challenge, given that the most-cited works in this space focus on heterogeneous material bonding and waveguide alignment — techniques closely aligned with Intel’s portfolio emphasis.

Filings from the most recent 18–24 months are likely under-counted due to standard patent publication lag; the apparent plateau in 20242025 should not be read as a reversal of the multi-year growth trend. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Activity accelerated from 2020 onward, with optical elements dominating the technology mix

Two charts together reveal how the field has matured: the annual filing trend shows a distinct ramp starting in 2020 and peaking in 2023, while the technology composition chart shows that optical-element and systems patents are the structural backbone of this corpus.

Annual filing trend

Filing activity was negligible through 2019, then rose to 4 records in 2020, dipped in 2021–2022, surged to a peak of 5 in 2023, and has moderated since. The 2024–2025 counts are likely understated due to publication lag and should not be interpreted as a genuine decline. The recent three-year window sits well above the prior three-year window, consistent with a Growth lifecycle stage.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 5 in 2023.02017020180201942020120212202252023420242202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G02B (Optical elements and systems) is the visible branch with 23 patent records, far ahead of H01L (Semiconductor devices) and H01S (Lasers and stimulated emission) at 8 each. G02F (Optical control and modulation) contributes 5 records. Branches such as B33Y (Additive manufacturing) and C03B (Glass manufacture and shaping) each hold only 1 record, marking them as sparse adjacent areas relative to the optical-integration core.

Technology compositionG02B · Optical elements & systems leads with 23; H01L · Semiconductor devices 8.G02B · Optical elements …23H01L · Semiconductor dev…8H01S · Lasers & stimulat…8G02F · Optical control &…5H04B · Transmission (gen…2H10P2B33Y · Additive manufact…1C03B · Glass manufacture…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US9042691B2Published 2015-05-26

Optical coupling module for silicon photonics chip

Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute

An optical coupling module for a silicon photonics chip in which a grating is formed on an optical waveguide, and a material having an intermediate refractive index between refractive indexes of a core and a cladding for side surface optical coupling of the silicon photonics chip is provided. The optical coupling module which is optically coupled with an… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Optical coupling module for silicon photonics chip — patent drawingOptical coupling module for silicon photonics chip — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Bonding of heterogeneous material grown on silicon…50
2Buried dual taper waveguide for passive alignment …45
3Co-integration of photonic devices on a silicon ph…23
4Optical coupling module for silicon photonics chip17
5Multi-frequency hybrid tunable laser12
6Buried dual taper waveguide for passive alignment …12
7Tunable Optical Apparatus11
8Optical multichip package with multiple system-on-…10

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Intel Corp

Intel Corp

Intel Corp leads with 10 patent records, concentrating on G02B optical-element and systems integration (9 records at the sub-class level) and H01L semiconductor-device packaging. Its applicant momentum is marked as a new entrant in the recent window with 3 recent records, indicating continued active filing rather than a legacy-only position. The most-cited works in the corpus — on heterogeneous material bonding and dual-taper waveguide alignment — align directly with Intel’s integration-focused portfolio.

patent records: 10
Challenger · Nokia of America Corp

Nokia of America Corp

Nokia of America Corp holds 6 patent records and is distinctly differentiated by its focus on H01S lasers and stimulated emission (6 records at the sub-class level) alongside G02B optical elements. This laser-centric emphasis — absent from Intel’s visible IPC codes — positions Nokia of America Corp as the field’s principal challenger on the light-source integration sub-problem of cost reduction. Its trajectory and momentum data are not separately listed in the recent-window evidence, but its overall record count places it firmly in the second tier.

patent records: 6
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Electronics & Telecomm Research InstituteHuawei Technologies+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.