Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Filing has cooled since its 2018 peak. 83 families that year against 40 in 2017 and just 46 at the 2022 midpoint, with the curve trending down into the most recent partial year.
- Adhesion claims outnumber pure polymer chemistry claims. C09J (adhesives, 128 records) and B32B (laminates, 165 records) sit close behind C08L (polymer compositions, 178), showing the interface itself is claimed as heavily as the material.
- Co-filing is thin. Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 938 families, and the strongest pairs cap at 3-4 shared filings — most assignees are filing alone.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks patent families filed against silicone elastomer, silicone rubber and polysiloxane materials where the claims also address substrate adhesion, primer interfaces or interfacial bonding. That combination narrows the field to the boundary problem: how a silicone surface is made to stay attached to whatever it touches, rather than the bulk chemistry of the elastomer alone. The 938 families span filings from 2015 through the partial 2026 year, with concentration in United States, European and PCT receiving offices.
The IPC composition points to a field that is more about assembly than synthesis. Adhesives (C09J), layered products (B32B) and polymer processing (C08J) together outweigh straight polymer-composition filings, and A61L (sterilising and disinfecting) at 109 records signals a strong medical-device and hygiene-surface subtrack running alongside general industrial bonding work.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one or two years in any chart understate real filing activity. Read the trend and the IPC split together: they show a field that grew fast through 2018, then plateaued.
Filings rose to a 2018 peak, then flattened
From 40 families in 2017 to 83 in 2018, the field then settled near a midpoint of 46 in 2022 and has not returned to peak levels since. That pattern reads as an early land-grab followed by consolidation rather than sustained expansion.
Adhesion and lamination outweigh raw chemistry
C08L leads at 178 records, but C09J (128), B32B (165) and C08J (120) combined show that most inventive effort sits at the interface and the layered structure, not in new elastomer backbones. A61L's 109 records mark a distinct sterilisable-surface application area worth tracking separately from industrial bonding.
Shares are the percentage of the 938 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about silicone elastomer interface engineering and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA foundational filing and the most-cited records
US3853805A — Silicone elastomeric material
Filed by North American Rockwell Corporation and granted in 1974, this patent claims a cured silicone elastomer built from three siloxane polymers of differing molecular weight, originally developed for acoustical coupling in ultrasonic testing and general elastic sealing between metal and other surfaces.Its date and assignee place it decades ahead of the current filing wave, making it background art rather than a currently enforceable barrier in most jurisdictions.
View full record| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20140163664A1 | Integrated system for the ballistic and nonballistic infixion and retrieval of implants with or without drug … | 963 |
| 2 | US20190247050A1 | Integrated system for the infixion and retrieval of implants | 449 |
| 3 | US5520664A | Catheter having a long-lasting antimicrobial surface treatment | 325 |
| 4 | US20140227548A1 | Nanoparticles, Compositions, Manufacture and Applications | 267 |
| 5 | US6855743B1 | Reinforced, laminated, impregnated, and composite-like materials as crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel st… | 189 |
| 6 | US20030055179A1 | Olefin block copolymers processes for producing the same and uses thereof | 189 |
| 7 | US5931222A | Adhesion promoting layer for bonding polymeric adhesive to metal and a heat sink assembly using same | 159 |
| 8 | US4818589A | Paint transfer article and methods of preparation and use thereof | 133 |
| 9 | US6265782B1 | Semiconductor device, semiconductor chip mounting substrate, methods of manufacturing the device and substrat… | 105 |
| 10 | US5045141A | Method of making solderable printed circuits formed without plating | 104 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations; treat this as a measure of influence within the searched corpus, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once families are counted instead of raw documents: a plateaued filing curve, an interface-heavy claim mix, and almost no collaborative filing.
Growth has stalled since 2018
The field peaked early and has not regained that level. A declining or flat curve into a partial final year does not necessarily mean interest has died — publication lag means the last year or two are always undercounted — but the multi-year plateau through 2022 is a real signal, not a lag artifact.
The interface, not the elastomer, is the claim target
Adhesives and layered-product subclasses together exceed pure polymer-composition filings. Anyone assuming this is a materials-chemistry field first will misjudge where the prior art is densest: it is at the bonding interface and the laminate structure.
Assignees mostly file solo
With only 10 co-assignee pairs identified and the strongest capping at 3-4 shared filings, joint development programs are rare in the recorded filings. Most protection here is built by single entities working alone rather than through cross-licensed or co-developed platforms.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to silicone elastomer interface engineering, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claim space
Recent-year momentum across the named assignees shows zero filings in the latest year for every one of the tracked entities, consistent with the corpus-wide plateau. That does not mean these players have exited the field; it more likely reflects the 18-month publication lag compressing the most recent filings out of view.
Recent filings are not yet visible
Every assignee with meaningful volume shows zero recorded filings in the most recent year. Given the plateau visible since 2022, some of this is a genuine slowdown, but the scale of the drop-off across every single assignee at once points strongly to publication lag rather than a coordinated exit.
Concentrated ownership, thin collaboration
The strongest co-filing relationships in the dataset link a small number of named inventors to their employer rather than linking two independent corporate assignees. This suggests protection is being built inside single organisations, not through joint ventures or shared R&D programs.
Filing is US-centred with real EPO and PCT weight
United States filings lead at 354, but EPO (183) and WIPO/PCT (118) filings are substantial enough that any freedom-to-operate check needs to cover Europe and PCT-designated states, not just the US register.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Ossio Ltd. | 0 | — |
| ImmunoLight, LLC | 0 | — |
| 3M Innovative Properties Company (USA) | 0 | — |
| ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc. | 0 | — |
| Cytec Technology Corp. | 0 | — |
| Preferred Technology, LLC | 0 | — |
| Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas) | 0 | — |
| Resonac Corporation | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The trend and composition data point to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or new filing strategy.
Check freedom to operate at the interface
Since C09J and B32B claims outnumber pure C08L chemistry claims, an FTO search focused only on elastomer composition will miss the densest prior art. Interface and laminate-structure claims need separate clearance.
Run an interface-claims FTO scan in EurekaWatch for delayed filings in the plateau years
With every tracked assignee showing zero filings in the latest year, the real picture of 2024-2026 activity will only resolve as publication catches up. Re-check this trend on a rolling basis rather than treating the current dip as final.
Set a filing-trend alert in EurekaProbe the under-claimed sub-areas directly
Sterilisable primer-free bonding and reworkable silicone-to-metal adhesion show thinner claim density than the core clusters. A targeted novelty search there is cheaper than competing inside C08L or B32B directly.
Explore white space in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
It covers patents on silicone elastomer, silicone rubber or polysiloxane materials where the claims also address how that material bonds to another surface: substrate adhesion, primer interfaces or interfacial bonding methods. It is narrower than general silicone chemistry because it requires the interface itself to be part of the claimed invention. This dataset applies exactly that combined search logic across 938 patent families filed from 2015 onward.
The ranking is concentrated among a handful of assignees with recurring filings, alongside a long tail of single-filing entrants, which is typical for a materials-interface field like this one. Recent-year momentum data shows all tracked assignees at zero filings in the latest year, which given the roughly 18-month publication lag likely reflects filings still working through the system rather than an actual halt. Checking the assignee ranking table directly, rather than relying on any single year's momentum, gives the more reliable picture of who leads.
Filings rose from 40 in 2017 to a peak of 83 in 2018, then settled to a midpoint of 46 by 2022 and continued trending down into the partial most recent year. This pattern is consistent with an initial wave of claim-staking around interface bonding methods, followed by a consolidation phase where fewer new approaches were being filed. It does not necessarily indicate the technology is exhausted; it may instead mean the core claim space filled up quickly and later entrants had less room to file distinct claims.
US3853805A, granted in 1974 to North American Rockwell Corporation, claims a specific cured silicone elastomer built from three siloxane polymers of differing molecular weights, originally aimed at acoustical coupling and general elastic sealing. Given its age, any patent term has long since expired, so it functions as prior art and background reference rather than an enforceable barrier today. It remains useful for understanding the historical baseline chemistry that later interface-adhesion claims built on top of.
The IPC composition shows heavy claim density in C08L polymer compositions, B32B laminates and C09J adhesives, meaning general bonding and layered-structure claims are crowded. Lower relative density appears in more specific combinations, such as sterilisable primer-free bonding methods and reworkable silicone-to-metal adhesion, which sit at the intersection of the A61L sterilising subclass and the core adhesion clusters. A freedom-to-operate and novelty search targeted at those narrower intersections is more likely to surface open claim space than a broad search across the whole C08L or B32B classes.
Research Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole silicone elastomer interface engineering corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.