Book a demo

Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/silicone-elastomer-interface-engineering-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Polymers & Composites
Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering Patents: Who Files, Where the Claims Sit
  • Filing has cooled since its 2018 peak. 83 families that year against 40 in 2017 and just 46 at the 2022 midpoint, with the curve trending down into the most recent partial year.
  • Adhesion claims outnumber pure polymer chemistry claims. C09J (adhesives, 128 records) and B32B (laminates, 165 records) sit close behind C08L (polymer compositions, 178), showing the interface itself is claimed as heavily as the material.
  • Co-filing is thin. Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 938 families, and the strongest pairs cap at 3-4 shared filings — most assignees are filing alone.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
938
Published Records
22%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-17%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families filed against silicone elastomer, silicone rubber and polysiloxane materials where the claims also address substrate adhesion, primer interfaces or interfacial bonding. That combination narrows the field to the boundary problem: how a silicone surface is made to stay attached to whatever it touches, rather than the bulk chemistry of the elastomer alone. The 938 families span filings from 2015 through the partial 2026 year, with concentration in United States, European and PCT receiving offices.

The IPC composition points to a field that is more about assembly than synthesis. Adhesives (C09J), layered products (B32B) and polymer processing (C08J) together outweigh straight polymer-composition filings, and A61L (sterilising and disinfecting) at 109 records signals a strong medical-device and hygiene-surface subtrack running alongside general industrial bonding work.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1OSSIO LTD74
  2. 23M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO43
  3. 3IMMUNOLIGHT LLC42
  4. 4EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC28
  5. 5PREFERRED TECH19
  6. 6PETROLIAM NASIONAL BHD19
  7. 7CYTEC TECHNOLOGY CORP19
  8. 8RESONAC CORP15
  9. 9NINGDE AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY LTD15
  10. 10HONDA MOTOR CO LTD14
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one or two years in any chart understate real filing activity. Read the trend and the IPC split together: they show a field that grew fast through 2018, then plateaued.

Filings rose to a 2018 peak, then flattened

From 40 families in 2017 to 83 in 2018, the field then settled near a midpoint of 46 in 2022 and has not returned to peak levels since. That pattern reads as an early land-grab followed by consolidation rather than sustained expansion.

Filings rose to a 2018 peak, then flattened0255075100402017832018201920202021202220232024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Adhesion and lamination outweigh raw chemistry

C08L leads at 178 records, but C09J (128), B32B (165) and C08J (120) combined show that most inventive effort sits at the interface and the layered structure, not in new elastomer backbones. A61L's 109 records mark a distinct sterilisable-surface application area worth tracking separately from industrial bonding.

Adhesion and lamination outweigh raw chemistryC08L · Polymer compositions17819.0%B32B · Layered products & laminates16517.6%C09J · Adhesives12813.6%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions12012.8%C08K · Use of additives in polymers11412.2%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting10911.6%C08G · Condensation polymers9910.6%B29C · Shaping of plastics919.7%Other1,112118.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 938 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about silicone elastomer interface engineering and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

A foundational filing and the most-cited records

Representative early filing
US3853805A1974-12-10

US3853805A — Silicone elastomeric material

NORTH AMERICAN ROCKWELL CORPORATION

Filed by North American Rockwell Corporation and granted in 1974, this patent claims a cured silicone elastomer built from three siloxane polymers of differing molecular weight, originally developed for acoustical coupling in ultrasonic testing and general elastic sealing between metal and other surfaces.Its date and assignee place it decades ahead of the current filing wave, making it background art rather than a currently enforceable barrier in most jurisdictions.

View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20140163664A1Integrated system for the ballistic and nonballistic infixion and retrieval of implants with or without drug …963
2US20190247050A1Integrated system for the infixion and retrieval of implants449
3US5520664ACatheter having a long-lasting antimicrobial surface treatment325
4US20140227548A1Nanoparticles, Compositions, Manufacture and Applications267
5US6855743B1Reinforced, laminated, impregnated, and composite-like materials as crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel st…189
6US20030055179A1Olefin block copolymers processes for producing the same and uses thereof189
7US5931222AAdhesion promoting layer for bonding polymeric adhesive to metal and a heat sink assembly using same159
8US4818589APaint transfer article and methods of preparation and use thereof133
9US6265782B1Semiconductor device, semiconductor chip mounting substrate, methods of manufacturing the device and substrat…105
10US5045141AMethod of making solderable printed circuits formed without plating104

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations; treat this as a measure of influence within the searched corpus, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once families are counted instead of raw documents: a plateaued filing curve, an interface-heavy claim mix, and almost no collaborative filing.

Filing momentum
83 → 46 → 4
families, 2018 peak → 2022 midpoint → latest partial year

Growth has stalled since 2018

The field peaked early and has not regained that level. A declining or flat curve into a partial final year does not necessarily mean interest has died — publication lag means the last year or two are always undercounted — but the multi-year plateau through 2022 is a real signal, not a lag artifact.

Trend data, 2017-2026
Claim distribution
128 + 165
C09J adhesives + B32B laminates records

The interface, not the elastomer, is the claim target

Adhesives and layered-product subclasses together exceed pure polymer-composition filings. Anyone assuming this is a materials-chemistry field first will misjudge where the prior art is densest: it is at the bonding interface and the laminate structure.

IPC composition, C08L/B32B/C09J/C08J
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs across 938 families

Assignees mostly file solo

With only 10 co-assignee pairs identified and the strongest capping at 3-4 shared filings, joint development programs are rare in the recorded filings. Most protection here is built by single entities working alone rather than through cross-licensed or co-developed platforms.

Co-assignee pairs, full corpus
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to silicone elastomer interface engineering, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space

Recent-year momentum across the named assignees shows zero filings in the latest year for every one of the tracked entities, consistent with the corpus-wide plateau. That does not mean these players have exited the field; it more likely reflects the 18-month publication lag compressing the most recent filings out of view.

Momentum note
0 in latest year
across all tracked assignees

Recent filings are not yet visible

Every assignee with meaningful volume shows zero recorded filings in the most recent year. Given the plateau visible since 2022, some of this is a genuine slowdown, but the scale of the drop-off across every single assignee at once points strongly to publication lag rather than a coordinated exit.

Recent-year momentum table
Filing pattern
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest pairs at 3-4 shared filings

Concentrated ownership, thin collaboration

The strongest co-filing relationships in the dataset link a small number of named inventors to their employer rather than linking two independent corporate assignees. This suggests protection is being built inside single organisations, not through joint ventures or shared R&D programs.

Co-assignee pair strength
Sector spread
6 receiving offices
US, EPO, WIPO, India, Canada, Germany

Filing is US-centred with real EPO and PCT weight

United States filings lead at 354, but EPO (183) and WIPO/PCT (118) filings are substantial enough that any freedom-to-operate check needs to cover Europe and PCT-designated states, not just the US register.

Receiving office counts
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These branches show lower filing density relative to the core adhesion and lamination clusters, based on the IPC spread in this corpus.
Sterilisable primer-free silicone bondingLow-modulus interphase gradient layersReworkable silicone-to-metal adhesionCondensation-cure interfacial primersAdditive-modified peel-strength control
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Ossio Ltd.0
ImmunoLight, LLC0
3M Innovative Properties Company (USA)0
ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc.0
Cytec Technology Corp.0
Preferred Technology, LLC0
Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas)0
Resonac Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and composition data point to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or new filing strategy.

Check freedom to operate at the interface

Since C09J and B32B claims outnumber pure C08L chemistry claims, an FTO search focused only on elastomer composition will miss the densest prior art. Interface and laminate-structure claims need separate clearance.

Run an interface-claims FTO scan in Eureka

Watch for delayed filings in the plateau years

With every tracked assignee showing zero filings in the latest year, the real picture of 2024-2026 activity will only resolve as publication catches up. Re-check this trend on a rolling basis rather than treating the current dip as final.

Set a filing-trend alert in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed sub-areas directly

Sterilisable primer-free bonding and reworkable silicone-to-metal adhesion show thinner claim density than the core clusters. A targeted novelty search there is cheaper than competing inside C08L or B32B directly.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Silicone Elastomer Interface Engineering in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole silicone elastomer interface engineering corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.