Book a demo

Silicone Elastomer Synthesis Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Silicone Elastomer Synthesis Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/silicone-elastomer-polymer-synthesis-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Polymers & Composites · Patent Landscape
Silicone Elastomer Polymer Synthesis Patents: Filing Trends and Who Holds the Claims
  • Filing has cooled since its 2021 peak. 54 families filed that year against 23 in 2017 and just 7 in the most recent (partial) year — growth is flat-to-declining, not accelerating.
  • Condensation chemistry dominates the claim map. C08G accounts for 250 of 857 records, nearly triple the smallest tracked subclass, meaning polysiloxane condensation routes are the most heavily fenced ground.
  • One 1980s patent still anchors the citation graph. US4260725A, on thermally bonded hydrophilic polysiloxanes for contact lenses, carries 1,111 citations — more than 4x the next most-cited record.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
857
Published Records
26%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-48%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (54 records) with 2024 (28) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 857 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Silicone elastomer polymer synthesis spans the chemistry used to build, cure and stabilise polysiloxane networks — from condensation and addition polymerisation routes through to crosslinking chemistry and additive packages that tune the final rubber or coating. This dataset pulls 857 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 whose title, abstract or claims combine silicone elastomer or polysiloxane terminology with synthesis, crosslinking or polymerization language. Families, not raw document counts, are the unit used throughout — this neutralises the effect of continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates on the ranking.

Coverage runs to a 2026-07-31 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend chart will always undercount true filing activity — read the tail as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1ALCON INC61
  2. 23M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO53
  3. 3JOTUN AS48
  4. 4SHIN ETSU CHEMICAL CO LTD35
  5. 5NOVARTIS AG24
  6. 6KONICA CORP24
  7. 7MITSUBISHI CHEM CORP23
  8. 8MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE MATERIALS INC23
  9. 9UNIV OF VIRGINIA PATENT FOUND23
  10. 10GENENTECH INC22
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Polymer Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 857-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those families distribute across IPC subclasses.

A peak in 2021, then a pullback

Filings rose from 23 in 2017 to a peak of 54 in 2021, then eased to 16 by the 2022 midpoint and down to 7 in the most recent partial year. That trajectory reads as a maturing, consolidating field rather than an emerging one — new entrants are filing into already-dense prior art rather than opening new ground.

A peak in 2021, then a pullback015304560232017201820192020542021202220232024202572026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Condensation chemistry leads by a wide margin

C08G (condensation polymers) tops the IPC breakdown at 250 records, ahead of C08L polymer compositions (185) and C09D coatings (156). C08K additives (113), C07F organo-metallic compounds (99), C08F addition polymers (93), C08J processing (92) and G02B optics (86) round out a composition spread across eight subclasses — evidence that synthesis work here routes through several adjacent disciplines rather than sitting in one code.

Condensation chemistry leads by a wide marginC08G · Condensation polymers25029.2%C08L · Polymer compositions18521.6%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks15618.2%C08K · Use of additives in polymers11313.2%C07F · Organo-metallic & non-carbon c…9911.6%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)9310.9%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions9210.7%G02B · Optical elements & systems8610.0%Other988115.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 857 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Polymer Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Silicone Elastomer Polymer Synthesis with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about silicone elastomer polymer synthesis and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

Key patents and citation anchors

Representative Filing
US6805556B22004-10-19

US6805556B2 — Silicone rubber resin composite for denture bonding

BITEC GLOBAL JAPAN INC.

Filed by BITEC Global Japan, this patent covers a silicone rubber with improved adhesive properties formed by adding methyl methacrylate to a linear polysiloxane and polymerising it in a molding cavity, producing methyl polymethacrylate on the silicone rubber surface. The resulting composite bonds a base member — resin, metal or a denture bed section — firmly and directly to the rubber, with a specific application to denture manufacture.Dated 2004-10-19 — now outside its core term in most jurisdictions, but its bonding-layer approach remains a reference point for later biocompatible-adhesion claims.

US6805556B2 — patent drawing 1US6805556B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4260725AHydrophilic contact lens made from polysiloxanes which are thermally bonded to polymerizable groups and which…1,111
2US5145886ARadiation activated hydrosilation reaction234
3US9097840B2Amphiphilic siloxane-containing (meth)acrylamides and uses thereof227
4US9103965B2Amphiphilic siloxane-containing vinylic monomers and uses thereof211
5US9475827B2Tris(trimethyl siloxyl)silane vinylic monomers and uses thereof205
6WO2014097309A1Stimuli responsive self cleaning coating173
7US4808638AThiolene compositions on based bicyclic 'ene compounds159
8US6348237B2Jet plasma process for deposition of coatings136
9US6203898B1Article comprising a substrate having a silicone coating129
10US4838876ASilicone rubber catheter having improved surface morphology113

Citation counts are pulled from the searched corpus only and skew toward older filings — treat them as a signal of foundational influence, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Polymer Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the data actually shows

Three read-throughs from the filing trend, IPC composition and citation graph, each with a direct implication for where to focus diligence.

Filing Momentum
54 → 7
peak (2021) vs. most recent year

The field has passed its filing peak

Volume climbed steadily from 23 filings in 2017 to 54 in 2021, then fell back through a 2022 midpoint of 16 to 7 in the latest partial year. Even discounting for publication lag, the shape is a plateau-then-decline, not renewed acceleration.

Read the last one to two years as understated, not as zero activity.
Claim Density
250 records
C08G condensation polymers

Condensation routes are the most fenced

C08G alone accounts for nearly a third of all 857 families, ahead of C08L compositions and C09D coatings. New filers targeting classic condensation-cure polysiloxane chemistry are competing against the largest single block of prior art in this dataset.

Dense filing here signals occupied claim space, not necessarily better technology.
Citation Anchor
1,111 citations
US4260725A

One legacy patent still shapes the field

US4260725A, on thermally bonded hydrophilic polysiloxane contact lens material, holds more than four times the citations of the next-ranked record, US5145886A on radiation-activated hydrosilation. Its influence sits mainly in optical and biomedical silicone chemistry.

High citation counts in this corpus favour older filings by construction.
Collaboration Pattern
10 pairs
co-assignee combinations tracked

Co-filing is limited and concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest pairing occurs at 15 shared filings — a modest number that points to mostly independent, single-owner research programmes rather than joint-development norms in this space.

Co-filing volume this low makes any single strong pair worth checking for licensing or supply ties.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to silicone elastomer polymer synthesis, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Polymer Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where momentum has stalled

Recent-year momentum diverges sharply from historical filing weight: several long-standing assignees show zero filings in the latest year, while one newer name is still active.

Momentum Outlier
6 filings
latest year

One assignee still filing while others go quiet

Genentech posted 6 filings in the most recent year, the only meaningful latest-year activity among the tracked assignees. Every other major name in the momentum table — Novartis, Jotun, 3M, Shin-Etsu Chemical, Konica — shows zero.

3M's year-over-year change is recorded at -100%, the sharpest documented pullback.
Legacy Filers
0 filings
latest year, multiple assignees

Established chemistry names have gone quiet

Shin-Etsu Chemical and Novartis both appear among the strongest co-assignee pairings historically, yet both register zero filings in the latest tracked year. That combination — historical weight, no current activity — is consistent with the broader post-2021 filing decline.

Zero-filing status may reflect publication lag as much as an actual stop in R&D.
Co-filing Ties
15 filings
Konica + Mitsubishi Chemical

The strongest collaboration link in the dataset

Konica (Konica Corporation) and Mitsubishi Chemical (Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation) share the largest co-assignee count at 15, ahead of the Novartis–Shin-Etsu pairing at 10. These recurring pairs are the clearest signal of a working supply or joint-development relationship in this corpus.

Co-filing pairs this concentrated are worth checking directly for licensing terms.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a freedom-to-operate look
Areas where filing density is thin relative to the core condensation and coatings chemistry.
Radiation-cured hydrosilation systemsAmphiphilic siloxane vinylic monomersOrgano-metallic (C07F) crosslink initiatorsAddition-cure (C08F) elastomer blendsOptical-grade polysiloxane (G02B) interfaces
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Genentech6
Novartis AG0
Jotun Group0
3M Innovative Properties Company0-100%
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.0
Konica Corporation0
Rhone-Poulenc Chimie0
Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Polymer Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The landscape points to a mature, condensation-chemistry-heavy field with a narrow band of continuing activity. The following moves turn that read into action.

Map claims against the C08G block directly

Before filing into condensation-cure polysiloxane chemistry, run a claim-by-claim comparison against the 250-record C08G set rather than the dataset as a whole — this is where collision risk concentrates.

Explore the IPC breakdown in Eureka

Track the Genentech filings for direction

With every other tracked assignee flat or declining, Genentech's continuing filings are the clearest live signal of where new silicone elastomer synthesis work is still being claimed.

Follow assignee momentum in Eureka

Verify co-assignee ties before assuming independence

The Konica–Mitsubishi Chemical and Novartis–Shin-Etsu pairings suggest active supply or joint-development relationships; confirm these before treating either party's portfolio as standalone.

Check co-assignee networks in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Polymer Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on silicone elastomer synthesis patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Polymer Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Silicone Elastomer Polymer Synthesis in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole silicone elastomer polymer synthesis corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.