https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/silicone-elastomer-process-automation-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Polymers & Composites
Silicone Elastomer Process Automation Patents: Where Filing Has Cooled and Where It Hasn't
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 68 families, then declined through the 2022 midpoint of 39 — this is a maturing filing cycle, not a growing one.
  • Material analysis and testing (G01N) outweighs shaping (B29C), 138 records versus 107, meaning more of the recent claim activity sits in characterization and QC than in the molding step itself.
  • The United States receives more than four times the filings of any single country office, 341 against 122 at WIPO and 98 at the EPO, concentrating enforcement risk and prior art in one jurisdiction.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
792
Published Records
25%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-54%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review covers patent families combining silicone elastomer or polysiloxane chemistry with automated processing — automated liquid silicone rubber (LSR) molding, automated dispensing, and general process automation claims. The corpus spans 792 published families filed between 2015 and 2026, with the 2026 count necessarily partial because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months.

The technology composition points to a field that is as much about measurement and formulation as about the molding hardware itself: testing and lab-apparatus subclasses (G01N, B01L) together outweigh the shaping subclass (B29C), and coatings chemistry (C09D) and condensation-polymer claims (C08G) sit close behind additive and polymer-composition filings (C08K, C08L).

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1Q210070
  2. 2VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC39
  3. 33M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO30
  4. 4INTELLIPACK INC30
  5. 5AVIVA BIOSCIENCES CORP26
  6. 6BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST26
  7. 7BIOTIX INC22
  8. 8PREGIS LLC22
  9. 9ACTNANO INC20
  10. 10CYTEC TECHNOLOGY CORP19
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology mix

Annual filing counts and IPC subclass distribution for the 792 families in this corpus, drawn directly from the underlying dataset.

A cycle that has already peaked

Filings rose from 15 in 2017 to a peak of 68 in 2021, then fell back toward the 2022 midpoint of 39. A declining trend after a 2021 peak suggests the core automated-molding and dispensing claims were staked out early in this window, with later filers working narrower or adjacent ground.

A cycle that has already peaked020406080152017201820192020682021202220232024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Testing and lab apparatus outweigh shaping

G01N (material analysis and testing) leads at 138 records and B01L (lab apparatus) follows at 113, ahead of B29C (shaping of plastics) at 107. That ordering indicates the busiest recent claim territory is verification and dispensing infrastructure around the silicone process, not the molding step itself, with polymer chemistry subclasses (C08L, C08K, C08G) and coatings (C09D) forming a secondary cluster.

Testing and lab apparatus outweigh shapingG01N · Material analysis & testing13817.4%B01L · Lab apparatus11314.3%B29C · Shaping of plastics10713.5%B29D · Specific plastic articles769.6%C08L · Polymer compositions688.6%C08K · Use of additives in polymers607.6%C08G · Condensation polymers577.2%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks556.9%Other1,272160.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 792 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Silicone Elastomer Process Automation with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about silicone elastomer process automation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

A representative claim and the most-cited prior art

Representative Record
US6613185B12003-09-02

US6613185B1 — Curable silicone elastomer and process of production thereof and method of bonding therewith

SPECIALTY SILICONE PRODUCTS, INC.

A composition is disclosed that cures to form a high strength adhesive bond with properties suitable for use in sealing the parts of ranges and other appliances together, without the necessity for a controlled humidity curing environment and without necessity for special ventilation equipment. The present invention describes a self-bonding curable silicone elastomer containing, inter alia, certain unsaturated aliphatic trialkoxysilanes, such as allyltrimethoxysilane, and having physical properties ideal for bonding glass or metal substrates in glass-top or ceramic-top ranges and ovens.Filed by Specialty Silicone Products, Inc.; granted 2003.

US6613185B1 — patent drawing 1
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5683724AAutomated process for inhibition of microbial growth in aqueous food transport or process streams431
2US20070202536A1Methods and compositions for separating rare cells from fluid samples249
3US20100183814A1Silicone compositions, methods of manufacture, and articles formed therefrom181
4US20050075714A1Gradient coated stent and method of fabrication179
5US20060252054A1Methods and compositions for detecting non-hematopoietic cells from a blood sample172
6US5863970AEpoxy resin composition with cycloaliphatic epoxy-functional siloxane160
7US20090143761A1Agent delivery system and uses of same157
8US20070148409A1Silicone compositions, methods of manufacture, and articles formed therefrom146
9US5128104ACuvette for automated testing machine141
10US20090162651A1Silicone compositions, methods of manufacture, and articles formed therefrom137

Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older publications; treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not of current filing activity.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting or diligence begins.

Filing cycle
68 in 2021 → 39 by 2022
peak to midpoint decline

The core claim space was staked out early

The 2021 peak followed by a decline through the 2022 midpoint indicates the foundational automated-molding and dispensing mechanics were largely claimed in the 2019-2021 window. New entrants after that point are more likely working formulation variants or downstream QC than the base process.

Trend data, 2017-2026
Claim distribution
G01N 138 vs B29C 107
testing vs shaping records

Measurement infrastructure is the denser subclass

More records sit in material analysis and testing than in the shaping step itself, which means process-control sensors, in-line testing and dispensing verification are more heavily claimed territory than the mold or dispense mechanism.

IPC composition
Jurisdiction concentration
US 341 of 792
receiving-office share

Enforcement risk clusters in one office

The United States receives more than four times the filings of the next office (WIPO PCT at 122), so freedom-to-operate work in this field should start with the US register even for entities headquartered elsewhere.

Receiving offices
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to silicone elastomer process automation, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Assignees and where activity has slowed

Recent-year momentum across the tracked assignees is low across the board, consistent with a filing cycle past its peak rather than one still accelerating.

Momentum
1 filing
latest-year count, leading assignee

Even the most active assignee has slowed to a trickle

Ecolab USA shows just one filing in the latest tracked year, the highest count of any assignee in this recent-momentum set — the rest, including Q2100, Ventana Medical Systems, 3M Innovative Properties and the University of Texas System, show none in the same period.

Recent-year momentum
Collaboration
5 co-assignee pairs
across the corpus

Co-filing is rare and concentrated

Only five co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest link between Biodex and Motadel Arta at four shared families, and two pairs involving Intellipack at two each. Most filers in this space act alone.

Co-assignee pairs
Geography
US 341, PCT 122, EPO 98
top three receiving offices

Filing strategy is US-anchored with selective international coverage

Canada, Australia and Japan each receive a comparatively small share (46, 45 and 24 respectively), suggesting most assignees treat US filing as primary and extend selectively rather than filing broadly across all major offices.

Receiving offices
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth watching
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core molding and dispensing claims.
in-line cure-state sensing for LSRautomated dispense-head calibrationsilicone-specific coating adhesion testingcondensation-cure additive metering
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Ecolab USA Inc.1
Q2100, Inc.0
Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.0
3M Innovative Properties Company0
INTELLIPACK INC0
Board of Regents, The University of Texas System0
Biodex Medical Systems, Inc.0
Tenglong Technology Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and assignee data point to specific next steps depending on whether you are drafting, clearing, or scouting for partners.

Check freedom-to-operate against the US register first

With 341 of 792 families receiving in the United States, any clearance search that skips the US register is checking the smaller share of the field.

Run a claim-scope check in Eureka

Look past the top-cited records for current relevance

The most-cited records in this corpus date back well before the 2021 filing peak; use them to understand foundational technique, not to gauge what is currently being claimed.

Trace citation lineage in Eureka

Draft around the thin subclasses, not the crowded ones

In-line cure-state sensing and dispense-head calibration show thinner filing density than the core molding claims, which is where a narrower claim is more likely to clear.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Silicone Elastomer Process Automation in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole silicone elastomer process automation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.