https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/silicone-elastomer-scale-up-and-mass-production-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Polymers & Composites
Silicone Elastomer Scale-Up and Mass Production Patents
  • Filings peaked in 2021 at 55 and have declined since, with the 2022 midpoint at just 17 — the growth phase for this specific claim space looks to be behind it, not ahead.
  • Polymer composition claims (C08L, 317 records) outweigh processing claims (B29C, 130), meaning the dataset is dominated by formulation chemistry rather than the mechanical scale-up equipment itself.
  • Momentum has gone flat across every major assignee tracked, with several logging 0 filings and a -100% YoY drop in the latest year — a sign of a maturing, consolidated claim landscape rather than an active filing race.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
752
Published Records
55%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-78%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (55 records) with 2024 (12) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 752 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of silicone elastomer chemistry — silicone rubber, polysiloxane formulations — and the manufacturing methods used to take them from lab batch to production volume: continuous compounding, high-volume molding, and production scale-up. It spans 752 published families filed between 2015 and 2026, with the most recent year necessarily incomplete because patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

The technology mix leans heavily toward formulation and additive chemistry — polymer compositions, additive use, and processing solutions together account for the bulk of records — with shaping equipment and catalysis claims forming a smaller but still substantial secondary cluster. Filing offices concentrate in the United States and Europe, with a meaningful share routed through the PCT system and into Germany and Canada, indicating deliberate multi-jurisdiction protection rather than purely domestic filing.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1DOW SILICONES CORP163
  2. 2MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE MATERIALS INC89
  3. 3BLUESHIFT MATERIALS INC67
  4. 4OMYA INT AG49
  5. 5CABOT CORP47
  6. 6DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC45
  7. 7DOW CORNING TORAY SILICONE CO LTD38
  8. 8SAINT GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORP32
  9. 9CSP TECHNOLOGIES INC30
  10. 10GENERAL ELECTRIC CO27
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 752-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those filings split across IPC subclasses.

Filings rose to a 2021 peak, then declined

Annual filings climbed from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 55 in 2021, then fell back toward the 2022 midpoint of 17 — a pattern consistent with a technology area where the core claim space has already been staked out and later filers are working narrower, more defensive positions rather than opening new ground.

Filings rose to a 2021 peak, then declined015304560142017201820192020552021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Composition chemistry dominates over processing hardware

C08L (polymer compositions, 317 records) and C08K (additives, 256) together outweigh B29C (shaping of plastics, 130), showing that most applicants are protecting what goes into the silicone compound rather than the machinery that shapes it. B01J (catalysis, 119), C09J (adhesives, 85) and C09D (coatings, 78) form a secondary tier of application-specific claims built on top of that base chemistry.

Composition chemistry dominates over processing hardwareC08L · Polymer compositions31742.2%C08K · Use of additives in polymers25634.0%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions24632.7%C08G · Condensation polymers18925.1%B29C · Shaping of plastics13017.3%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …11915.8%C09J · Adhesives8511.3%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks7810.4%Other68791.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 752 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Silicone Elastomer Scale-Up and Mass Production with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about silicone elastomer scale-up and mass production and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The foundational filing behind this landscape

Representative Record
US5409978A1995-04-25

US5409978A — Method for the continuous preparation of heat-vulcanizing silicone rubber compounds

DOW CORNING TORAY SILICONE COMPANY, LIMITED

The method feeds polydiorganosiloxane gum, reinforcing filler and processing aid continuously into a co-rotating twin-screw extruder, mixes them at 200-300°C, discharges the extrudate, and feeds it into a second, counter-rotating twin-screw extruder for further processing — a continuous, two-stage compounding line built to replace batch mixing at volume.Filed by Dow Corning Toray Silicone Company, Limited; granted 1995-04-25.

US5409978A — patent drawing 1
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20110189440A1Systems, Devices, and/or Methods for Manufacturing Castings289
2EP0787772A2Silicone rubber composition247
3US9315663B2Systems, devices, and/or methods for manufacturing castings201
4US7785098B1Systems for large area micro mechanical systems168
5US5866249APressure-sensitive adhesive based on partially oriented and partially crystallized elastomer138
6US6156285AMethod for densifying particulate silica87
7US4894308AProcess for preparing electrophotographic toner87
8US20160053056A1Organosiloxane compositions and coatings, manufactured articles, methods and uses86
9WO2016023937A1Surface-treated fillers for breathable films84
10US7893413B1Systems, devices, and methods for large area micro mechanical systems79

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older records — read them as a signal of influence on later filings, not as a measure of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern signals

Three read-outs from the trend, citation and co-filing data that matter for a filing or freedom-to-operate decision.

Filing momentum
55 → 0
peak (2021) to latest tracked year

The filing wave has already crested

Annual filings rose from 14 in 2017 to 55 in 2021 before falling back to 17 by the 2022 midpoint, and every major assignee tracked shows 0 filings in the latest year. New entrants are filing into a claim space that earlier applicants have already largely mapped.

Trend data, 2017-2026
Technology weighting
317 vs 130
C08L composition records vs B29C shaping records

Formulation claims outnumber equipment claims by more than two to one

The corpus is weighted toward what the silicone compound is made of — polymer composition, additives, condensation chemistry — rather than how it is physically produced at scale. Anyone entering on the equipment side faces a comparatively thinner prior-art layer than someone entering on formulation.

IPC composition, 8 subclasses
Assignee coordination
45
co-filings, strongest pair

Filing is coordinated within corporate families, not across them

The strongest co-assignee pairing links two entities within the same corporate group at 45 shared filings; the next strongest pairs link a single company to named individual inventors at 18 each. Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the whole dataset, indicating most applicants file solo rather than through joint ventures.

Co-assignee pairs, n=10
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to silicone elastomer scale-up and mass production, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where it's thin

Filing activity concentrates among a small set of established silicone producers, with a long tail of single-filing entrants behind them. Momentum across the leaders has flattened, which changes where a new filer should look.

Leading filer pattern
0 in latest year
recent-year filings, top assignees

Established producers have stopped adding volume here

The assignees with the deepest historical filing in this dataset are logging zero filings in the latest tracked year, with at least two showing a -100% year-on-year drop. That is a maturity signal, not an exit signal — the core compositions are likely already protected and later activity may be showing up under different, narrower search terms.

Momentum by assignee, latest year
Corporate structure
45 co-filings
strongest assignee pair

Filing runs through named corporate pairs, not open collaboration

The strongest co-assignee relationship links two entities inside one corporate group, and the next two strongest link that same corporate filer to named individual inventors. This points to a small number of internal R&D pipelines producing most of the joint filings, rather than cross-company licensing or joint ventures.

Co-assignee pairs, n=10
Jurisdiction spread
216 US / 176 EP
receiving office counts

US and European offices carry the bulk of filings

The United States (216) and the European Patent Office (176) are the two largest receiving offices, with WIPO/PCT (107), Germany (41) and Canada (38) forming a secondary tier. A freedom-to-operate check limited to a single jurisdiction will miss a large share of this corpus.

Receiving offices, top 6
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with comparatively thin filing density relative to the core composition and processing claims above.
Continuous two-stage extrusion controlTwin-screw devolatilization for siloxane meltsIn-line cure monitoring for HTV linesCatalyst recovery in continuous compoundingHigh-volume liquid injection molding tooling
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Dow Silicones Corporation0
Momentive Performance Materials Inc.0
Blueshift Materials, Inc.0-100%
Omya International AG0
Dow Global Technologies LLC0
Cabot Corporation0-100%
Dow Corning Toray Silicone Company, Limited0
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a claim space that is largely staked out on formulation and thinner on continuous-processing equipment. Two directions follow from that.

Check freedom-to-operate on a specific formulation

If the target composition sits inside the C08L/C08K cluster, expect dense prior art and plan a design-around from the outset rather than a clearance search alone.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Map the equipment-side white space in detail

The gap between composition filings and shaping/processing filings suggests underclaimed ground in continuous compounding hardware and process control — worth a dedicated claim chart before committing to a filing strategy.

Explore white space with Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Silicone Elastomer Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Silicone Elastomer Scale-Up and Mass Production in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole silicone elastomer scale-up and mass production corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.