Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This landscape covers 771 published patent records filed between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, drawn from filings that reference liquid silicone rubber, high-consistency silicone rubber or silicone rubber grades alongside cure systems, compression set, tear strength, medical or food-grade use, self-lubricating grades, or liquid injection molding. The scope spans platinum-cure and peroxide-cure chemistries together, since both routes are described in overlapping claim language across the corpus.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent year in the trend line is understated by construction, not because activity has actually stopped. Family counts, not raw document counts, are used for the assignee ranking so that multi-jurisdiction filing by the same applicant does not inflate its position.
Two views of the same 771 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density today.
Annual filings rose to 48 in 2017, the peak so far, then fell through the 2022 midpoint of 4. That pattern reads as a field where core cure-system and compression-set claims were staked early, with later years adding narrower refinements rather than new foundational filings.
C08L (polymer compositions) appears on 53.6% of the 771 records and C08K (additives) on 37.4%, well ahead of B29C shaping (16.0%) or C08J processing (16.2%). Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100% — the concentration in C08L and C08K signals that formulation and additive claims, not molding equipment, are the busiest part of the space.
Shares are the percentage of the 771 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about silicone rubber grades (lsr and hcr) and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaDescribes a method for producing a molded silicone rubber product from a liquid silicone rubber (LSR) base comprising a vinyl siloxane polymer and a hydride crosslinker, fed alongside a separate inhibitor master batch and catalyst master batch rather than pre-mixed. The split-feed approach lets the inhibitor and catalyst be metered independently of the base polymer at the point of injection molding.Filed by Bluestar Silicones USA Corp., granted 2012-06-12.
| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EP0242219A2 | Method for producing silicone rubber powder | 309 |
| 2 | US5507834A | Transparent silicone suction socket | 187 |
| 3 | US4742142A | Method for producing silicone rubber powder | 179 |
| 4 | JP1992008788A | Cover sponge packing assembly for hard disc device | 114 |
| 5 | US6337120B1 | Gasket for layer-built fuel cells and method for making the same | 96 |
| 6 | US5008307A | Liquid silicone rubber composition capable of yielding a thermal conductive vulcanized product | 90 |
| 7 | JP1988077942A | Production of particulate silicone rubber | 85 |
| 8 | EP1094091A1 | Liquid silicone rubber composition and method for manufacture and method for manufacturing foamed silicone ru… | 74 |
| 9 | US4743670A | Method for producing silicone rubber powder | 72 |
| 10 | WO1999056922A1 | Liquid injection molding process to produce reinforced silicone rubber articles | 67 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favor older filings simply because they have had more time to be cited — read this as a measure of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-throughs from the concentration, technology mix and citation data, aimed at where a new filing would or would not find open ground.
Just five assignees account for just under half of all records in scope, and the top ten push that past 60%. New entrants are more likely to find room in narrower additive or application-specific claims than in broad cure-system composition claims, where the largest players have been filing consistently since before the 2017 peak.
Polymer composition and additive classes (C08L, C08K) together dominate the corpus far more than shaping or molding classes (B29C, C08J). A team with a genuinely new processing method — rather than a new formulation — is filing against a comparatively thinner prior-art base.
The leading assignees by cumulative filings show flat or zero activity in the most recent year, consistent with the overall downward trend from the 2017 peak. That does not mean the chemistry is settled — it means the easy composition claims were filed early, and what remains open is more specific.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to silicone rubber grades (lsr and hcr), with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked leaders in this corpus are large industrial silicone producers with decades of continuous filing; below them sits a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants.
The leading assignee's record count is more than six times that of the fifth-place company (28 records), a gap that marks it as the reference point for cure-system and composition prior art in this space.
Filing counts fall sharply from the leader to fifth place, then flatten out toward tenth. That plateau suggests a group of similarly sized industrial players competing on formulation variants rather than one company running away with the field.
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus, and the strongest of them link a parent company to its regional or divisional counterpart rather than independent joint ventures — consistent with internal corporate structuring rather than cross-company R&D partnerships.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Dow Corning Toray Silicone Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Dow Silicones Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| Dow Corning Toray Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Elkem Silicones USA Corp. | 0 | — |
| Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. | 0 | — |
| BASF SE | 0 | — |
| Wacker Chemie AG | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, a new filing, or tracking a competitor.
With one assignee holding 183 records and the top 5 covering 49.5% of the 771 records in scope, any new composition claim in cure-system or compression-set chemistry should be checked against that leader's portfolio first.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaSelf-lubricating grades, food-grade certification and textile-coating overlap show thinner IPC density than the core C08L/C08K classes, making them a reasonable starting point for a narrower first claim.
Explore white space in EurekaFiling has fallen from its 2017 peak, and recent-year momentum for the leading assignees is flat or negative — worth monitoring in case activity picks back up around a new cure chemistry.
Set up monitoring in EurekaLiquid silicone rubber (LSR) claims typically center on two-part platinum-cure systems fed through liquid injection molding, with vinyl siloxane polymers and hydride crosslinkers metered as separate streams, as in the representative filing US8198357B2. High-consistency silicone rubber (HCR) claims more often describe peroxide-cure or platinum-cure gum stocks processed by compression or transfer molding rather than liquid injection. Both routes appear together in this corpus because search terms for cure system, compression set and tear strength cover overlapping claim language. In practice, LSR filings skew toward feed and mixing methods while HCR filings skew toward the base polymer and filler composition itself.
The ranked leaders in this 771-record corpus are large industrial silicone producers with continuous filing histories going back well before the 2017 peak year. The top assignee alone holds 183 records, more than six times the fifth-place count of 28, and the top 5 combined account for 49.5% of all records in scope. Below the top 10 — which together hold 60.2% — the ranking thins into a long tail of companies with far fewer filings each, so competitive tracking should focus on the handful of large filers rather than the full 100-company list.
No — filing activity peaked in 2017 at 48 records and has declined since, with the 2022 midpoint at just 4. That is a sign of a mature, well-claimed field rather than an emerging one, though publication lag of roughly 18 months means the most recent one or two years in any trend chart will always look lower than they eventually turn out to be. Recent-year momentum data for the leading assignees also shows flat or zero activity, reinforcing the slowdown rather than contradicting it.
The technology composition data shows polymer composition (C08L, 53.6% of records) and additive use (C08K, 37.4%) carrying far more density than layered products (B32B, 9.2%) or textile treatment (D06M, 9.1%). Sub-areas like self-lubricating grade additives, food-grade certification claims, and silicone-to-metal laminate bonding sit in that thinner overlap territory. A new filing targeting one of those narrower intersections is more likely to clear prior art than one aimed at core cure-system composition, where the leading assignees have been filing for years.
US8198357B2, assigned to Bluestar Silicones USA Corp. and granted 2012-06-12, covers a method for producing molded silicone rubber products from a liquid silicone rubber base combined with a separately fed inhibitor master batch and catalyst master batch, rather than a single pre-mixed formulation. The claims center on the split-feed process and the compositions of the base, inhibitor batch and catalyst batch as used together in liquid injection molding. It does not claim peroxide-cure HCR processing or compression molding, so it constrains split-feed LSR injection methods specifically rather than silicone rubber molding broadly.
Go past this page: query the whole silicone rubber grades (lsr and hcr) corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.