Fastest
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/single-cell-sequencing-technology-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Life Science ToolsSingle-Cell Sequencing Patents: Filing Trends and Where the Claim Space Sits Open
- One assignee dominates the ranked leaders, with 22 records against a fifth-place count of 3 and a tenth-place count of 1 across the 12 ranked companies.
- Filing activity peaked in 2021 at 18 records, then fell back toward the 2022 midpoint of 3 — momentum has flattened rather than kept climbing.
- Every record in scope carries a C12Q classification, while G01N, C40B, B01L and G06F appear in a small minority — signalling where multiomic and instrumentation claims are still thin.
36
Published Records
-89%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
WO
Leading Jurisdiction
12
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview
What the single-cell sequencing patent record shows
The scope here covers 36 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine single-cell or droplet-barcoding sequencing language with claim elements around cell capture efficiency, doublet rate, ambient RNA, library complexity or multiomic readout, classified under C12Q1, B01L3 or C12N15. That is a narrow, claim-language-anchored slice of a much larger single-cell literature, built to surface the assignees and sub-branches actually contesting these specific technical problems rather than every sequencing-adjacent filing. Filing rose sharply through the late 2010s, peaked in 2021, and has since pulled back — a pattern consistent with an early land-grab phase giving way to consolidation around a smaller set of dominant claim positions.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 counts in the trend chart understate real filing activity in those years; treat the recent-year drop as partly an artefact of the data cut-off, not solely a market signal.
Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single-Cell Sequencing Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Data
Filing trend and technology composition
The two views below cover the same 36 records from different angles: one tracks when the work was filed, the other tracks what technical ground it claims.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Activity climbed from 2 records in 2017 to a peak of 18 in 2021, then declined toward 3 at the 2022 midpoint and lower still afterward, partly reflecting publication lag near the 2026-07-31 cut-off.
IPC subclass composition
C12Q covers every one of the 36 records in scope by construction of the search; C12N appears in 33.3% of records, G01N in 13.9%, C40B in 8.3%, and B01L and G06F each in 2.8% — since records carry multiple classes, these shares sum to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 36 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single-Cell Sequencing Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.
Go deeper on Single-Cell Sequencing Technology with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about single-cell sequencing technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaKey Patents
Most-cited records and a representative recent filing
Representative recent filing
WO2025040599A1 — Single cell sequencing (Cambridge Enterprise, filed 2025-02-27)
CAMBRIDGE ENTERPRISE LIMITED
The filing covers methods of performing single-cell RNA sequencing, methods of designing or providing a composition for that sequencing, and methods of analysing the resulting data. Its core technical move is a plurality of target-specific capture reagents, each tied to a respective target transcript, where the concentration of at least a first capture reagent differs from others in the set — a targeted-enrichment approach to sequencing library composition rather than whole-transcriptome capture.Abstract trimmed for length; concentration-differentiation detail is the operative claim element.
Highest-cited records in scope
| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20170260584A1 | Cell population analysis using single nucleotide polymorphisms from single cell transcriptomes | 264 |
| 2 | WO2020190509A1 | Methods for using spatial arrays for single cell sequencing | 163 |
| 3 | WO2018172726A1 | Single cell DNA sequencing | 158 |
| 4 | US20220145361A1 | Methods for using spatial arrays for single cell sequencing | 150 |
| 5 | WO2017139690A1 | Cell population analysis using single nucleotide polymorphisms from single cell transcriptomes | 87 |
| 6 | US20230212656A1 | Methods of spatially resolved single cell sequencing | 20 |
| 7 | US20200347449A1 | Methods for determining spatial and temporal gene expression dynamics during adult neurogenesis in single cel… | 19 |
| 8 | WO2021188838A1 | Single-cell combinatorial indexed cytometry sequencing | 13 |
| 9 | WO2021168455A1 | Methods of spatially resolved single cell RNA sequencing | 12 |
| 10 | WO2020190509A9 | Methods for using spatial arrays for single cell sequencing | 10 |
Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within this searched corpus; read them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single-Cell Sequencing Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Where to run it
For builders
MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Insights
What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns in this dataset matter more than the raw counts: where citations concentrate, how the technology mix skews, and how flat the recent trend really is.
Citation concentration
264 citations
top-cited record
Influence sits with a handful of early filings
The most-cited record, US20170260584A1 on cell population analysis from single-cell transcriptome SNPs, carries 264 citations — well ahead of the next tier. Two of the five most-cited records share the same underlying spatial-array method described in different filings, suggesting a single technical approach re-filed across jurisdictions or continuations rather than five independent breakthroughs.
Read citation rank as historical influence, not current filing priority.
Technology skew
33.3% C12N
of 36 records
Genetic engineering claims trail enzymatic/DNA measurement claims by a wide margin
Every record in scope touches C12Q measurement and testing claims by design of the search, but only 33.3% also carry C12N genetic-engineering classification, and single digits touch G01N material analysis, C40B combinatorial libraries, or B01L lab apparatus. That gap suggests the apparatus and library-construction side of single-cell workflows is claimed far less densely than the measurement and analysis side.
Apparatus and library-chemistry claims remain a comparatively open lane.
Filing momentum
18 → 3
peak (2021) vs. 2022 midpoint
Activity has flattened since its 2021 peak
Filing rose from 2 records in 2017 to 18 in 2021, then dropped to 3 by the 2022 midpoint and lower afterward. None of the leading assignees show any filings in the latest year of the dataset, which is consistent with the broader pullback rather than any single company exiting the space.
Expect the true 2025-2026 count to rise once publication catches up.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to single-cell sequencing technology, with the prior art for and against each one.
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single-Cell Sequencing Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players
Who holds the claim space
The ranking below covers the 12 companies the data endpoint returns for this search — not a top-50 or top-100 list — and it is heavily front-loaded.
Leader
22 records
vs. 3 at fifth place
One assignee holds a wide lead over the rest of the ranking
The top-ranked assignee in this set holds 22 records, more than six times the fifth-place count of 3 and over twenty times the tenth-place count of 1. That gap is steep enough that a newcomer's freedom-to-operate analysis should start with this assignee's portfolio before looking anywhere else in the ranking.
A single dominant filer, then a fast drop-off.
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest pair: 11 shared records
Co-filing clusters around a small set of repeat partnerships
Ten distinct co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pair shares 11 records together — evidence of a sustained joint-filing relationship rather than one-off collaboration. A second pairing shares 3 records and a third shares 2, so co-filing activity outside the lead pair is thin.
Check joint ownership before assuming a single-assignee license covers a filing.
Recent momentum
0 in latest year
across every named leading assignee
No leading assignee shows fresh activity in the most recent year
Every one of the six assignees tracked for recent-year momentum, including the portfolio leader, registers zero filings in the latest year of the dataset. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this likely reflects filings still working through the pipeline rather than a genuine stop in R&D.
Treat the zero as a data-lag artefact, not a market exit signal.
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| The Regents of the University of California | 0 | — |
| Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, Inc. | 0 | — |
| 10x Genomics, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center | 0 | — |
| President and Fellows of Harvard College | 0 | — |
| Cambridge Enterprise Limited | 0 | — |
| RAMACHANDRAN IYER ESWAR PRASAD | 0 | — |
| MIKKELSEN TARJEI SIGURD | 0 | — |
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single-Cell Sequencing Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a few concrete next steps for anyone deciding whether and where to file.
Map the leader's claim boundaries
With 22 of the ranked records, the top assignee's portfolio defines much of the available claim space in this search. A detailed claim-chart review of that portfolio is the fastest way to find out what is actually blocked before drafting new claims.
Explore assignee portfolios in EurekaWatch the co-filing cluster
The strongest co-assignee pair shares 11 records, a pattern worth tracking for licensing or acquisition signals rather than treating the two organisations as independent filers.
Trace co-assignee relationships in EurekaRevisit after the next data refresh
Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the 2025-2026 filing counts here are still incomplete. A follow-up pull in twelve months will give a truer read on whether the 2021 peak was a one-off or the start of a new cycle.
Set a landscape refresh in EurekaSource: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single-Cell Sequencing Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ
Common questions on single-cell sequencing patents
In this dataset of 36 records, one assignee holds a clear lead with 22 records, well ahead of the fifth-place holder at 3 and the tenth-place holder at 1 among the 12 companies the ranking covers. That concentration means most of the claim space around the searched terms — cell capture efficiency, doublet rate, ambient RNA, library complexity and multiomic readout — sits with a small number of organisations, led by one. Anyone assessing freedom to operate should start there before reviewing the longer tail of single-digit filers.
Filing rose from 2 records in 2017 to a peak of 18 in 2021, then dropped back to 3 at the 2022 midpoint and lower in subsequent years through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. That decline should be read cautiously, because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years are undercounted in any trend chart. The 2021 peak is the most reliable signal in the series; whether filing has genuinely slowed or is simply pending publication will only be clear after a later data refresh.
Every one of the 36 records in scope carries a C12Q classification covering enzyme and DNA measurement and testing, which is expected given the search criteria. Beyond that baseline, 33.3% of records also carry C12N genetic-engineering classification, 13.9% carry G01N material analysis, and single-digit percentages touch C40B combinatorial libraries, B01L lab apparatus and G06F data processing. That skew suggests measurement and analysis methods are far more densely claimed than apparatus or library-construction chemistry.
The IPC composition points to apparatus and library-construction claims as comparatively open ground: B01L lab-apparatus classification appears in only 2.8% of the 36 records, and C40B combinatorial-library classification in just 8.3%, against 100% coverage of the core C12Q measurement claims. Doublet-rate correction, ambient RNA background modelling and multiomic-readout instrumentation are the specific technical themes named in the search criteria that show thin representation in the classification data. A first claim in these areas would likely face less prior art than one written around core transcriptome measurement methods.
WO2025040599A1, filed by Cambridge Enterprise Limited on 2025-02-27, covers methods of performing single-cell RNA sequencing using a plurality of target-specific capture reagents where the concentration of at least one reagent differs from the others in the set, along with related methods for designing such compositions and analysing the resulting sequencing data. The differentiated-concentration capture-reagent approach is its distinguishing technical element over generic single-cell library preparation. Anyone designing a targeted-enrichment single-cell workflow should review this filing's claim scope directly rather than relying on the abstract summary alone.
Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single-Cell Sequencing Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Research Single-Cell Sequencing Technology in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole single-cell sequencing technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.