SPAD Design Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- 37.1% of all 383 records sit with just five assignees, but the ranking still runs 91 companies deep — leadership is concentrated without shutting out new entrants.
- Filing fell 38% from 2021 to 2024 (40 → 25 records), after a 2022 peak of 43 — the strongest filing window for SPAD design has likely passed, though 2025-26 counts are still filling in.
- H01L carries 69.5% of records while G06F (digital processing) sits at just 3.4% — signal-processing and readout-side claims are comparatively thin against the core device art.
Filing growth compares 2021 (40 records) with 2024 (25) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 383 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Single photon avalanche diode (SPAD) design patenting spans device physics claims — guard ring geometry, breakdown voltage uniformity, fill factor — alongside the imaging and sensing systems that consume SPAD arrays. This landscape draws on 383 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, searched against dark count rate, photon detection probability, afterpulsing, guard ring and related design-specific terms rather than the SPAD concept alone. That keeps the corpus centred on how a SPAD is built, not just where one is used.
Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in the trend chart are still incomplete — treat the drop-off in those two years as a data artefact, not a signal that design activity has stopped.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 383 records: how filing volume moved year over year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses (a record can carry more than one class, so shares sum past 100%).
Filing rose to a 2022 peak, then cooled
Annual filings climbed from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 43 in 2022, then declined to 25 by 2024 — a 38% drop over that three-year span. The 2025-26 figures are undercounts pending publication lag and should not be read as continued decline.
Device physics dominates over readout and processing
H01L (semiconductor devices) appears in 69.5% of the 383 records, far ahead of G01J (16.7%), H04N (15.4%) and H10F (13.3%). G06F (digital processing) and G02B (optics) sit under 4% each, suggesting the bulk of claim activity is still concentrated on the diode structure itself rather than the surrounding signal chain.
Shares are the percentage of the 383 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Single Photon Avalanche Diode Design with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about single photon avalanche diode design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records in the corpus
Semiconductor element with a single photon avalanche diode and manufacturing method (US9935231B2, AMS AG, 2018)
The patent claims a manufacturing method for a SPAD's guard ring structure built through sequential doping steps: a first well laterally surrounding the multiplication zone at a defined lateral distance, followed by a second doping process. The structure and process together set breakdown voltage uniformity around the avalanche region.Abstract trimmed for length; full claim language available in the source record.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20130193546A1 | Single photon avalanche diode for CMOS circuits | 191 |
| 2 | US20150054111A1 | Single photon avalanche diode | 177 |
| 3 | US20130342835A1 | Time resolved laser raman spectroscopy using a single photon avalanche diode array | 149 |
| 4 | US9178100B2 | Single photon avalanche diode for CMOS circuits | 138 |
| 5 | US20150200222A1 | Single photon avalanche diode imaging sensor for complementary metal oxide semiconductor stacked chip applica… | 131 |
| 6 | US9209320B1 | Method of fabricating a single photon avalanche diode imaging sensor | 108 |
| 7 | US6384663B2 | Circuit for high precision detection of the time of arrival of photons falling on single photon avalanche dio… | 108 |
| 8 | WO2012032353A2 | Single photon avalanche diode for CMOS circuits | 89 |
| 9 | US20100019295A1 | Single photon avalanche diodes | 88 |
| 10 | US20180019268A1 | Stacked-chip backside-illuminated SPAD sensor with high fill-factor | 84 |
Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — read them as a measure of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three findings from the dataset that change how a freedom-to-operate or whitespace assessment should be scoped.
Leadership is real but not exclusive
The top five assignees hold 142 of 383 records combined. That is meaningful concentration, but it leaves nearly two-thirds of the corpus spread across a long tail — the ranking runs 91 companies deep, so a new entrant is not filing into a two-player field.
The 2022 peak has not been repeated
Filings peaked at 43 in 2022 and fell to 25 by 2024, a 38% decline over three complete filing years. Several of the largest historical filers show zero records in the latest tracked year, though that reflects the current filing lull more than an exit from the space.
Device structure claims outweigh processing claims by a wide margin
H01L claims cover more than two-thirds of the corpus, while G06F (digital processing) sits at 3.4%. Readout electronics and on-chip processing tied to SPAD arrays look comparatively open relative to the diode structure itself.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to single photon avalanche diode design, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
The assignee ranking spans 91 companies, from a single leader with 49 records down through a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants. Co-assignee pairings show that several of the top filers work jointly with university partners rather than filing solo.
One filer sets the pace
The leading assignee holds 49 of the 383 records in scope, ahead of a fifth-place assignee at 21 and a tenth-place assignee at 11 — a steep drop-off after the top few names rather than a gradual taper.
University-industry pairings anchor part of the corpus
The strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset links two university partners across 12 shared records, and a foundry-linked pairing appears at 8 shared records — collaborative filing is a real pattern here, not an edge case.
Even leading filers show a quiet latest year
Multiple assignees that rank in the top tier of the corpus show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, with some down 100% year over year. Given the 18-month publication lag, this is best read as a pipeline gap still filling in rather than confirmed withdrawal.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| STMicroelectronics (Research & Development) Limited | 0 | — |
| PixArt Imaging Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC) | 0 | -100% |
| OmniVision Technologies, Inc. | 0 | — |
| austriamicrosystems AG (ams AG) | 0 | — |
| Commonwealth of Australia | 0 | — |
| Heriot-Watt University | 0 | — |
| Egis Technology Inc. | 0 | — |
Where to take this from here
The landscape points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace scoping, or tracking a named competitor.
Check claim scope against the most-cited records
The five most-cited patents in this corpus, several tied to CMOS-integrated SPAD structures, set much of the citation graph other filings build on. Any new device claim touching guard ring or CMOS-stack integration should be checked against these first.
Explore in EurekaScope the under-claimed branches before drafting
G06F and G02B carry the lowest IPC shares in this corpus. Before assuming an idea is novel, verify it actually falls in this thinner territory rather than restating a H01L device claim in different language.
Run a whitespace search in EurekaTrack momentum on named leaders, not just totals
Several top-ranked assignees show a flat or zero latest-year count. Given publication lag, that needs monitoring over the next reporting cycle rather than treated as settled.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaCommon questions on SPAD design patenting
One assignee leads the ranked field with 49 of the 383 records in scope, well ahead of the fifth-ranked assignee at 21 and the tenth-ranked at 11. The top five assignees combined hold 37.1% of all records, but the ranking still extends to 91 companies, so the field is concentrated at the top without being a duopoly. Anyone doing competitive tracking should watch both the leader and the handful of firms just behind it, since the drop-off after fifth place is steep.
Filing peaked in 2022 at 43 records and had fallen to 25 by 2024, a 38% decline over that three-year window using the last years with complete data. That is a real cooling trend, not noise. However, publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so the lower counts shown for 2025 and 2026 in most datasets are undercounts still being filled in, not confirmation that the decline is continuing at the same rate.
H01L, the general semiconductor devices classification, appears in 69.5% of the 383 records in this corpus, making it the dominant class by a wide margin. G01J (radiation and light measurement), H04N (pictorial communication) and H10F (photovoltaic and light-sensitive devices) each sit between 13% and 17% of records. Digital processing (G06F) and optics (G02B) are both under 4%, indicating that most claim activity centres on the diode structure itself rather than downstream signal handling.
The IPC composition points to G06F and G02B as the thinnest branches relative to the core H01L device claims, meaning digital readout, timestamping and microlens/fill-factor integration are comparatively under-claimed. That does not guarantee an open path — it means fewer records carry those classes, so a targeted search is still needed before drafting. Guard ring geometry for newer stacked-chip architectures is another area worth checking, since it sits at the intersection of two well-filed classes rather than being covered outright by either.
US9935231B2, assigned to AMS AG, claims a manufacturing method for building a SPAD's guard ring structure through sequential doping steps — a first well laterally surrounding the multiplication zone at a set distance, followed by a second doping process. It is a process claim tied to breakdown voltage uniformity around the avalanche region, not a claim on SPAD devices generally. Anyone designing a guard ring using a similar staged-doping sequence at a comparable lateral offset should review this claim closely, but alternative guard ring architectures that do not rely on this specific doping sequence would sit outside its scope.
Research Single Photon Avalanche Diode Design in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole single photon avalanche diode design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.