Book a demo

SPAD Design Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

SPAD Design Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/single-photon-avalanche-diode-design-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Discrete & Analog Devices
Single Photon Avalanche Diode Design Patents: Leaders, Trends and Where the Field Is Still Open
  • 37.1% of all 383 records sit with just five assignees, but the ranking still runs 91 companies deep — leadership is concentrated without shutting out new entrants.
  • Filing fell 38% from 2021 to 2024 (40 → 25 records), after a 2022 peak of 43 — the strongest filing window for SPAD design has likely passed, though 2025-26 counts are still filling in.
  • H01L carries 69.5% of records while G06F (digital processing) sits at just 3.4% — signal-processing and readout-side claims are comparatively thin against the core device art.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
383
Published Records
37%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-38%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (40 records) with 2024 (25) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 383 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Single photon avalanche diode (SPAD) design patenting spans device physics claims — guard ring geometry, breakdown voltage uniformity, fill factor — alongside the imaging and sensing systems that consume SPAD arrays. This landscape draws on 383 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, searched against dark count rate, photon detection probability, afterpulsing, guard ring and related design-specific terms rather than the SPAD concept alone. That keeps the corpus centred on how a SPAD is built, not just where one is used.

Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in the trend chart are still incomplete — treat the drop-off in those two years as a data artefact, not a signal that design activity has stopped.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1STMICROELECTRONICS (RES & DEV) LTD49
  2. 2PIXART IMAGING INC27
  3. 3TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD23
  4. 4OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES INC22
  5. 5AUSTRIAMICROSYSTEMS AG21
  6. 6COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA15
  7. 7EGIS TECH14
  8. 8HERIOT WATT UNIV14
  9. 9THE UNIV COURT OF THE UNIV OF GLASGOW12
  10. 10X FAB SEMICONDUCTORS FOUNDRIES AG11
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single Photon Avalanche Diode Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 383 records: how filing volume moved year over year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses (a record can carry more than one class, so shares sum past 100%).

Filing rose to a 2022 peak, then cooled

Annual filings climbed from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 43 in 2022, then declined to 25 by 2024 — a 38% drop over that three-year span. The 2025-26 figures are undercounts pending publication lag and should not be read as continued decline.

Filing rose to a 2022 peak, then cooled013253850142017201820192020202143202220232024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Device physics dominates over readout and processing

H01L (semiconductor devices) appears in 69.5% of the 383 records, far ahead of G01J (16.7%), H04N (15.4%) and H10F (13.3%). G06F (digital processing) and G02B (optics) sit under 4% each, suggesting the bulk of claim activity is still concentrated on the diode structure itself rather than the surrounding signal chain.

Device physics dominates over readout and processingH01L · Semiconductor devices26669.5%G01J · Radiation & light measurement6416.7%H04N · Pictorial communication (video…5915.4%H10F · Photovoltaic & light-sensitive…5113.3%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning4511.7%G01T · Nuclear & X-radiation measurem…225.7%G02B · Optical elements & systems143.7%G06F · Electric digital data processi…133.4%Other6216.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 383 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single Photon Avalanche Diode Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Single Photon Avalanche Diode Design with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about single photon avalanche diode design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in the corpus

Representative Filing
US9935231B22018-04-03

Semiconductor element with a single photon avalanche diode and manufacturing method (US9935231B2, AMS AG, 2018)

AMS AG

The patent claims a manufacturing method for a SPAD's guard ring structure built through sequential doping steps: a first well laterally surrounding the multiplication zone at a defined lateral distance, followed by a second doping process. The structure and process together set breakdown voltage uniformity around the avalanche region.Abstract trimmed for length; full claim language available in the source record.

US9935231B2 — patent drawing 1US9935231B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation SPAD design patents
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20130193546A1Single photon avalanche diode for CMOS circuits191
2US20150054111A1Single photon avalanche diode177
3US20130342835A1Time resolved laser raman spectroscopy using a single photon avalanche diode array149
4US9178100B2Single photon avalanche diode for CMOS circuits138
5US20150200222A1Single photon avalanche diode imaging sensor for complementary metal oxide semiconductor stacked chip applica…131
6US9209320B1Method of fabricating a single photon avalanche diode imaging sensor108
7US6384663B2Circuit for high precision detection of the time of arrival of photons falling on single photon avalanche dio…108
8WO2012032353A2Single photon avalanche diode for CMOS circuits89
9US20100019295A1Single photon avalanche diodes88
10US20180019268A1Stacked-chip backside-illuminated SPAD sensor with high fill-factor84

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — read them as a measure of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single Photon Avalanche Diode Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three findings from the dataset that change how a freedom-to-operate or whitespace assessment should be scoped.

Concentration
37.1% / 5 assignees
of 383 records

Leadership is real but not exclusive

The top five assignees hold 142 of 383 records combined. That is meaningful concentration, but it leaves nearly two-thirds of the corpus spread across a long tail — the ranking runs 91 companies deep, so a new entrant is not filing into a two-player field.

Assignee ranking, 91 companies
Momentum
-38% (2021→2024)
annual filings, complete years

The 2022 peak has not been repeated

Filings peaked at 43 in 2022 and fell to 25 by 2024, a 38% decline over three complete filing years. Several of the largest historical filers show zero records in the latest tracked year, though that reflects the current filing lull more than an exit from the space.

2017-2024 filing counts
Technology mix
69.5% vs 3.4%
H01L vs G06F share of 383 records

Device structure claims outweigh processing claims by a wide margin

H01L claims cover more than two-thirds of the corpus, while G06F (digital processing) sits at 3.4%. Readout electronics and on-chip processing tied to SPAD arrays look comparatively open relative to the diode structure itself.

IPC subclass shares, multi-label
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to single photon avalanche diode design, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single Photon Avalanche Diode Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The assignee ranking spans 91 companies, from a single leader with 49 records down through a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants. Co-assignee pairings show that several of the top filers work jointly with university partners rather than filing solo.

Leader
49 records
single assignee

One filer sets the pace

The leading assignee holds 49 of the 383 records in scope, ahead of a fifth-place assignee at 21 and a tenth-place assignee at 11 — a steep drop-off after the top few names rather than a gradual taper.

Assignee ranking
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest pair: 12 shared records

University-industry pairings anchor part of the corpus

The strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset links two university partners across 12 shared records, and a foundry-linked pairing appears at 8 shared records — collaborative filing is a real pattern here, not an edge case.

Co-assignee pair counts
Momentum
0 in latest year
across several top-10 assignees

Even leading filers show a quiet latest year

Multiple assignees that rank in the top tier of the corpus show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, with some down 100% year over year. Given the 18-month publication lag, this is best read as a pipeline gap still filling in rather than confirmed withdrawal.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Sub-areas with thinner claim density
Based on the IPC composition, these branches carry proportionally fewer records than the core device claims and are worth checking first for open claim space.
On-chip digital timestamping for SPAD arraysGuard ring geometry for stacked-chip SPAD imagersAfterpulsing suppression circuitryOptical fill-factor microlens integrationBreakdown voltage uniformity across large arrays
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
STMicroelectronics (Research & Development) Limited0
PixArt Imaging Inc.0-100%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC)0-100%
OmniVision Technologies, Inc.0
austriamicrosystems AG (ams AG)0
Commonwealth of Australia0
Heriot-Watt University0
Egis Technology Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single Photon Avalanche Diode Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this from here

The landscape points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace scoping, or tracking a named competitor.

Check claim scope against the most-cited records

The five most-cited patents in this corpus, several tied to CMOS-integrated SPAD structures, set much of the citation graph other filings build on. Any new device claim touching guard ring or CMOS-stack integration should be checked against these first.

Explore in Eureka

Scope the under-claimed branches before drafting

G06F and G02B carry the lowest IPC shares in this corpus. Before assuming an idea is novel, verify it actually falls in this thinner territory rather than restating a H01L device claim in different language.

Run a whitespace search in Eureka

Track momentum on named leaders, not just totals

Several top-ranked assignees show a flat or zero latest-year count. Given publication lag, that needs monitoring over the next reporting cycle rather than treated as settled.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single Photon Avalanche Diode Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on SPAD design patenting

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single Photon Avalanche Diode Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Single Photon Avalanche Diode Design in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole single photon avalanche diode design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.