Book a demo

Single-Photon Detector Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Single-Photon Detector Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/single-photon-detector-technology-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Photonics & Optics · Patent Landscape
Single-photon detector patents: where SPAD and photon-counting filings concentrate, and where they don't
  • Filing has cooled since its 2018 peak. 16 families published that year against a flat-to-declining midpoint of 8 in 2022, with the most recent year still filling in as publications lag filing.
  • Semiconductor and radiometric claims dominate over imaging. H01L and G01J each cover roughly half the corpus (57 and 55 of 105 families), while H04N pictorial-communication claims sit at 28 — a narrower slice than the sensor and detection layers beneath it.
  • The United States receives more than half of all filings. 56 of the tracked records were filed at the USPTO, more than triple the EPO count of 18, concentrating the enforceable claim space in one jurisdiction.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
105
Published Records
40%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+125%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Single-photon detector patents span the diode physics of the single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD), the Geiger-mode circuitry that arms and quenches it, and the downstream photon-counting and time-of-flight logic that turns a single click into a usable signal. This landscape tracks 105 patent families published between 2015 and 2026 under IPC classes covering semiconductor photodetectors, radiation measurement and pictorial communication sensors, reflecting how the same avalanche-diode core is claimed differently depending on whether the applicant is protecting the device, the timing electronics, or the imaging array built on top of it.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent filing year in any trend chart undercounts real activity; treat the last one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1AUSTRIAMICROSYSTEMS AG12
  2. 2COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA9
  3. 3ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FEDERALE DE LAUSANNE (EPFL)9
  4. 4APPLE INC7
  5. 5MICRO PHOTON DEVICES SRL5
  6. 6POLITECNICO DI MILANO5
  7. 7STMICROELECTRONICS (GRENOBLE 2) SAS5
  8. 8STMICROELECTRONICS (RES & DEV) LTD5
  9. 9TRUPIXEL INC5
  10. 10FASTREE3D4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single-Photon Detector Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 105-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those families split across the IPC subclasses that define device, measurement and imaging claims.

A 2018 peak followed by a flat-to-declining plateau

Filings rose to 16 in 2018 from 5 in 2017, then settled near a midpoint of 8 by 2022. That pattern reads less like a technology in early growth and more like a claim space that filled quickly and has since seen incremental rather than accelerating activity.

A 2018 peak followed by a flat-to-declining plateau0510152052017162018201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Semiconductor and measurement classes carry the corpus

H01L (semiconductor devices) and G01J (radiation and light measurement) each appear in roughly half the families, with G01S (radar, sonar and positioning) and H04N (pictorial communication) both at 28 — evidence that time-of-flight ranging and imaging are treated as downstream applications of a shared detector core rather than separately dominant claim territories.

Semiconductor and measurement classes carry the corpusH01L · Semiconductor devices5754.3%G01J · Radiation & light measurement5552.4%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning2826.7%H04N · Pictorial communication (video…2826.7%H10N · Other electric solid-state dev…65.7%G02B · Optical elements & systems32.9%G06N · Computing based on AI models32.9%H03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…32.9%Other2221.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 105 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single-Photon Detector Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Single-Photon Detector Technology Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about single-photon detector technology landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The prior art shaping this space

Representative filing
US10312275B22019-06-04

US10312275B2 — Single-photon avalanche diode image sensor with photon counting and time-of-flight detection capabilities

SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES, LLC

A back side illuminated image sensor may operate using the single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD) concept in a Geiger mode of operation for single photon detection. The image sensor may be implemented using two layer stacking with a silicon on insulator (SOI) chip. The chip-to-chip electrical connections between the top level image sensing chip and the second level ASIC circuit chip may be realized at each pixel with a single bump connection per pixel. A light level signal may be obtained from pixels that have photon counting capabilities while a distance measurement signal for 3-dimensional imaging may be obtained from pixels that have time-of-flight (ToF) detection capabilities.Assigned to Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC; published 2019-06-04.

US10312275B2 — patent drawing 1US10312275B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20130300838A1Methods and devices for generating a representation of a 3D scene at very high speed247
2US20180209846A1SPAD Detector Having Modulated Sensitivity145
3US20150115131A1Stacked chip SPAD image sensor132
4US9516244B2Methods and devices for generating a representation of a 3D scene at very high speed128
5US20140217264A1Systems and methods for imaging using single photon avalanche diodes104
6US9831283B2Systems and methods for imaging using single photon avalanche diodes66
7EP2469301A1Methods and devices for generating a representation of a 3D scene at very high speed56
8US9299732B2Stacked chip SPAD image sensor53
9US20190302242A1Active Quenching For Single-Photon Avalanche Diode Using One-Shot Circuit49
10US9728659B2SPAD device with radiation blocking rings and vias and related arrays and methods41

Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; use them as a signal of influence on subsequent claim drafting, not as a marker of present-day relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single-Photon Detector Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the corpus is broken down by year, geography and citation weight.

Filing momentum
16 → 8
peak year to 2022 midpoint

Growth has flattened, not accelerated

The corpus peaked at 16 published families in 2018 and had settled to a midpoint of 8 by 2022. Combined with the 18-month publication lag, this points to a technology whose core claim space filled early rather than one still in an expansion phase.

Read the recent-year dip as incomplete data, not necessarily a real slowdown.
Jurisdictional concentration
56 of 105
filings at the USPTO

The US is the primary enforcement venue

More than half of all tracked filings went through the USPTO, with the EPO a distant second at 18 and China at 14. Freedom-to-operate work should weight US prosecution history heavily before assuming European or Chinese equivalents exist.

WIPO/PCT filings (10) suggest some applicants are still deciding where to nationalize.
Claim layering
57 & 55
H01L and G01J family counts

Device and measurement claims outweigh imaging claims

H01L (semiconductor devices) and G01J (radiation and light measurement) each sit near half the corpus, ahead of H04N (pictorial communication) at 28. Detector-level physics is more heavily claimed than the imaging systems built on top of it.

That gap is where system-level integration claims may still have room.
Citation weight
247 citations
on the top-cited record

A handful of early filings anchor the field

The most-cited records date to the early-to-mid 2010s and concern 3D scene generation and stacked-chip SPAD imaging. Their high citation counts reflect age and foundational status within this corpus rather than current filing activity.

Newer entrants still have to design around these anchor claims.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to single-photon detector technology landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single-Photon Detector Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where momentum has stalled

Co-assignee pairings are sparse in this corpus — only 8 pairs total — and the strongest links reflect research-institute and industrial-partner arrangements rather than broad alliance networks. Several previously active assignees show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, consistent with the overall plateau.

Research-industry pairing
5 co-filings
strongest pair count

Politecnico di Milano and Micro Photon Devices

The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset pairs Politecnico di Milano with Micro Photon Devices at 5 joint filings, an academic-to-spinout pattern typical of SPAD research groups commercializing detector modules.

A second pairing at the same strength links STMicroelectronics R&D with its Grenoble 2 entity.
Momentum check
0 in latest year
for six tracked assignees

Multiple established filers have gone quiet

AMS, the Australian federal government, EPFL, Apple, Politecnico di Milano and STMicroelectronics R&D all show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with Apple recording a full -100% year-over-year drop. This is consistent with the broader flat-to-declining trend rather than isolated to one company.

Confirm whether this reflects a real pause or simply publication lag before treating any single assignee as exited.
Institutional depth
1 co-filing
MIT pairing

MIT appears at the edge of the collaboration network

MIT's single recorded co-filing, with an individual inventor, signals early-stage or narrowly scoped academic work rather than an established industrial partnership — worth tracking for future spinout activity rather than current claim density.

Academic-origin filings often precede a licensing or spinout wave by several years.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches with visibly thinner claim density relative to the core SPAD/avalanche-diode space:
Dark count suppression circuitryAI-assisted photon-counting readout (G06N overlap)Pulse-shaping logic for Geiger-mode arming (H03K overlap)Non-silicon SPAD material stacksOptical element integration (G02B overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
ams AG0
Commonwealth of Australia0
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)0
Apple Inc.0-100%
Politecnico di Milano0
STMicroelectronics R&D Ltd.0
STMicroelectronics (Grenoble 2) SAS0
Micro Photon Devices S.r.l.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single-Photon Detector Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy, or identifying open claim territory.

Map claims against the anchor patents

Before drafting in the SPAD imaging space, check claim scope against the most-cited records in this corpus — several date to the early 2010s and still anchor downstream 3D-imaging and stacked-chip designs.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Watch for renewed filing from quiet assignees

Several major filers show zero activity in the latest tracked year. A renewed filing from any of them, once publication lag clears, would be an early signal worth monitoring.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

AI-assisted readout and non-silicon material stacks show thinner claim density than the core diode and Geiger-mode circuitry. A first-filer advantage may still be available there.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single-Photon Detector Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about single-photon detector patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Single-Photon Detector Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Single-Photon Detector Technology Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole single-photon detector technology landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.