https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/site-specific-antibody-conjugation-chemistry-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Novel Small-Molecule Modalities
Site-Specific Antibody Conjugation Chemistry Patents: Who Holds the Key Claims
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 9 records, then activity dropped to zero by the 2022 midpoint — a sharp cool-down rather than a steady build, worth checking against your own pipeline timing before assuming the field is still heating up.
  • A single leader holds 9 of the ranked records against a fifth-place count of 2 so the field has one clear front-runner and a shallow tail of six other named assignees, not a crowded multi-way race.
  • 94.7% of the 19 records in scope sit in A61K and 89.5% in C07K meaning claim density concentrates on formulation and peptide/protein chemistry, while enzymatic-synthesis routes (C12P, 5.3%) remain almost untouched.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
19
Published Records
-89%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
7
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (9 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Site-specific conjugation chemistry addresses a manufacturing problem as much as a chemistry one: stochastic lysine or cysteine coupling produces antibody-drug conjugates with a spread of drug-to-antibody ratios, and that heterogeneity complicates manufacturability, batch release and regulatory comparability. The 19 records in this scope search for filings that explicitly claim homogeneity, conjugation efficiency or control of residual free payload alongside engineered-cysteine, enzymatic or other site-specific conjugation methods.

This is a narrow, term-anchored slice of the broader ADC patent space rather than a survey of all conjugation art. It is useful for scoping freedom-to-operate around manufacturability claims specifically, not for benchmarking overall ADC filing volume.

Filing activity, 2015–2026 (2026 partial)
  1. 1JANSSEN BIOTECH INC9
  2. 2GENENTECH INC3
  3. 3PFIZER INC2
  4. 4BYONDIS BV2
  5. 5BAILI BIO (CHENGDU) PHARM CO LTD2
  6. 6GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA REPRESENTED BY THE SEC OF COMMERCE1
  7. 7THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Site-Specific Antibody Conjugation Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 19-record set: activity over time, and where those records sit across the IPC classification.

A short, sharp filing window

Filings opened at 3 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 9 in 2021, then fell to 0 by 2022 and have stayed low since. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the final one or two years understate real activity — but the drop from peak predates that lag window, so the cooling trend itself is not an artefact of reporting delay.

A short, sharp filing window0358103201720182019202092021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentration in formulation and protein chemistry

A61K (medicinal preparations) appears in 94.7% of the 19 records and C07K (peptides and proteins) in 89.5%, confirming that most claims are anchored on the therapeutic composition and the protein backbone rather than on the enzymatic machinery. C12N (genetic engineering, 36.8%) and C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis, 5.3%) are comparatively thin, which is where enzymatic-conjugation-specific claims would sit.

Concentration in formulation and protein chemistryA61K · Medicinal preparations1894.7%C07K · Peptides & proteins1789.5%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…736.8%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…210.5%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…15.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 19 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Site-Specific Antibody Conjugation Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Site-Specific Antibody Conjugation Chemistry with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about site-specific antibody conjugation chemistry and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this set

Representative Filing
US20220047711A12022-02-17

Photocrosslinking peptides for site specific conjugation to Fc-containing proteins

GENENTECH, INC.

Provided herein are peptides having a photocrosslinking moiety useful for the synthesis of antibody-drug conjugates as well as methods of making and using such conjugates.Filed by Genentech, Inc.; published 2022-02-17 as US20220047711A1.

US20220047711A1 — patent drawing 1US20220047711A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation filings, 2015–2026
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2020123275A1Photocrosslinking peptides for site specific conjugation to FC-containing proteins5
2US20170204445A1In vivo site-specific protein tagging using engineered sortase variants5
3US20220047711A1Photocrosslinking peptides for site specific conjugation to fc-containing proteins3

Citation counts inside this corpus favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on subsequent art, not of current commercial relevance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (3 of 3 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Site-Specific Antibody Conjugation Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, the classification split and the citation table.

Timing
Peak 2021 → 0 by 2022
records per year

The core wave has already broken

Nine records published in 2021 against zero by the 2022 midpoint suggests the first wave of site-specific-conjugation manufacturability claims has largely been filed and published. New entrants should expect to build on, or design around, an established base rather than stake early ground.

Trend data, 2015-2026
Classification
94.7% in A61K
of 19 records

Claims cluster on the composition, not the enzyme

With A61K and C07K each covering the large majority of records, most protection sits on the drug-conjugate composition and the protein scaffold. C12P at 5.3% signals that claims narrowly tied to the enzymatic synthesis step itself are still sparse.

IPC composition, 19 records
Influence
Cited 5x
top citation count

Photocrosslinking and sortase-tagging set the reference points

The two most-cited records in this set both address alternatives to cysteine engineering — photocrosslinking peptides and engineered sortase variants — and each carries 5 citations within this corpus, the highest of the set. Later filers in either sub-route inherit this prior art directly.

Most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to site-specific antibody conjugation chemistry, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Site-Specific Antibody Conjugation Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate is

The ranked assignee list returns 7 companies for this search; it is the complete set the data endpoint returns for this scope, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.

Leader
9 records
leading assignee

One assignee well ahead of the rest

The top-ranked assignee holds 9 records against a fifth-place count of 2, putting clear distance between the leader and the remaining six named assignees. That gap matters for freedom-to-operate scoping: a single portfolio review of the leader's claims will cover more ground than reviewing the rest of the ranking combined.

Assignee ranking, 7 companies
Field shape
7 companies ranked
total in ranking

A shallow tail, not a crowded field

Beyond the leader, the ranking drops quickly to single- and low-digit filing counts. This is a specialist corner of ADC chemistry with few repeat filers rather than a saturated field with many similar claims stacked on top of each other.

Assignee ranking
Momentum
0 in latest year
all ranked assignees

No assignee is currently active by publication date

Every ranked assignee shows zero records in the latest year captured, consistent with the broader trend collapse after 2021. Given the ~18-month publication lag, this understates true recent filing activity, but it also means no single company can be pointed to as currently accelerating in this data.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth scouting
Branches with thin representation in this 19-record set, based on the IPC composition split.
Enzymatic conjugation via fermentation-derived tags (C12P)Residual free-payload quantification methodsNon-cysteine engineered handle chemistriesSortase-variant tagging outside Fc regionsPhotocrosslinking peptide alternatives to lysine coupling
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Janssen Biotech, Inc.0
Genentech, Inc.0
Pfizer Inc.0
Byondis B.V.0
Baili Bio (Chengdu) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.0
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Site-Specific Antibody Conjugation Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and classification data point to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for open claim space.

Map the leader's full claim set

With one assignee holding 9 of the ranked records, a focused claim-chart review of that single portfolio will tell you more about freedom-to-operate risk than a broad sweep of the remaining six assignees.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka →

Probe the C12P gap directly

Fermentation and enzymatic-synthesis claims sit at just 5.3% of the 19 records — before filing in that space, check whether the low count reflects genuine white space or search-term boundary effects.

Run a deeper classification query in Eureka →

Watch for the lag-delayed 2024-2026 wave

Because publication trails filing by about 18 months, the apparent drop to zero after 2021 may partially reverse as more recent filings publish. Re-run this scope in six to twelve months to see if the trend holds.

Set up a monitoring alert in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Site-Specific Antibody Conjugation Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Site-Specific Antibody Conjugation Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Site-Specific Antibody Conjugation Chemistry in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole site-specific antibody conjugation chemistry corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.