Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.
Small and distributed hydropower covers low-head turbines, fish-friendly intake design, civil-works cost reduction, grid interconnection and remote operation for generation sites too small for conventional hydro development. The patent record in this dataset is compact: 18 published records span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with activity concentrated in a handful of years rather than spread evenly across the window. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the apparent drop-off in the most recent years understates what has actually been filed.
The technology composition points to a mechanically-focused field: turbine and hydraulic-machine claims (F03B) appear in the large majority of records, while electrical generation (H02K), marine/civil structures (B63B) and digital monitoring or forecasting (G06F, G06G) show up far less often. That imbalance is itself informative for anyone deciding where to file next.
Two views of the same 18-record dataset: how filings moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filings were absent in 2017, climbed to a peak of 9 in 2020, then declined; the 2021-to-2024 span shows a -100% change, dropping from 2 filings to 0. Because 2024 is the most recent year that can be treated as complete, that -100% figure is the one to cite — later years are still being backfilled by the normal publication lag and should not be read as continued decline.
F03B (hydraulic machines and engines) appears in 88.9% of the 18 records, far ahead of H02K electric generators at 27.8%, B63B marine/civil structures at 16.7%, and digital-processing classes G06F and G06G at 11.1% and 5.6% respectively. Records can carry more than one class, so these shares overlap rather than sum to 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 18 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about small and distributed hydropower and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filing addresses noise and blockage from debris entanglement and sudden intake or discharge changes by narrowing the water-stream cross-section in an eddy-current speed-adjusting movable passage, converting roughly half the pressure energy into high-velocity kinetic energy stored in a helical tube. The stated aim is a general-purpose water wheel that holds efficiency across varying water quantity while simplifying the flow-tracking operation needed to keep total cost down.Filed by Hatsuo Haba; published 2019-01-03.
View full record| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20090076790A1 | System and Method for Data Processing and Transferring in a Multi Computer Environment for Energy Reporting a… | 88 |
| 2 | US7844568B2 | System and method for data processing and transferring in a multi computer environment for energy reporting a… | 12 |
| 3 | US20210246866A1 | Systems and methods for hydro-based electric power generation | 8 |
| 4 | US11319920B2 | Systems and methods for hydro-based electric power generation | 4 |
| 5 | WO2020185564A1 | Systems and methods for hydro-based electric power generation | 4 |
| 6 | US11835025B2 | Systems and methods for hydro-based electric power generation | 1 |
| 7 | US20220228550A1 | Systems and methods for hydro-based electric power generation | 1 |
Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older records; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.
Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (7 of 7 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-outs from the trend, the citation table and the technology composition, translated into what they imply for someone deciding where to place claims.
Filings dropped from 2 in 2021 to 0 in 2024, after peaking at 9 in 2020. Because publication trails filing by about 18 months, that 2024 zero is the last data point solid enough to trust, and it should not be read together with 2025-2026 figures as evidence the field is dying.
Nearly nine in ten records touch hydraulic machinery classification, while grid interconnection, remote operation and forecasting elements sit in a small minority of filings (G06F at 11.1%, G06G at 5.6%). That gap is where less-crowded claim territory sits.
The ranking returned by this dataset covers only four assignees, and the leader alone accounts for 13 records. That is a narrow, lightly populated competitive set rather than a crowded one — useful context before assuming freedom to operate is scarce.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to small and distributed hydropower, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked field is small: four assignees account for the entire dataset the ranking endpoint returns, with one clear leader and three names with far fewer records.
One assignee holds the majority of records in this dataset, well ahead of the other three ranked names. That concentration sits inside a very small ranked set, so it says more about a narrow field than about broad market control.
The dataset surfaces a single meaningful co-assignee pairing. Outside that link, filings in this space appear to be pursued independently rather than through joint development or cross-licensing arrangements visible in the record.
Every one of the four ranked assignees shows zero filings in the latest year captured. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this reflects incomplete recent-year data more than a stopped field, and should be revisited once later filings publish.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Super Moon Electric Power Company | 0 | — |
| HABA HATSUO | 0 | — |
| MERRITT EDWARD | 0 | — |
| FEIN GENE S | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or identifying a filing gap.
Before drafting claims in low-head turbine or intake design, screen against the leading assignee's filings specifically, since that single filer accounts for the majority of the ranked field.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka →Grid interconnection, remote operation and flow-variability forecasting show low representation in the IPC composition relative to the mechanical turbine art, suggesting more open claim space there.
Explore white space in Eureka →The current -100% figure covers only the 2021-2024 window that can be treated as complete; the true recent trajectory will not be clear until the publication lag closes.
Track filing trends in Eureka →This dataset contains 18 published records spanning 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, matched against search terms covering small hydropower, distributed hydro generation, low-head turbines, fish-friendly design, civil-works cost, grid interconnection, flow variability and remote operation. That is a small, tightly scoped field rather than a broad one, and the assignee ranking behind it lists only four companies. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the true current total is likely somewhat higher than what has published so far.
The ranked field in this dataset covers four assignees, with the leader holding 13 of the 18 records in scope. The other three ranked assignees hold considerably fewer records each, and none show fresh filings in the most recent year captured. This is a narrow competitive set, so a new entrant should not assume the space is crowded — but should specifically screen against the leader's claims given its outsized share.
Filings peaked at 9 in 2020 and then declined, with the 2021-to-2024 window showing a -100% change from 2 filings down to 0. That 2024 figure is the most recent year reliable enough to call complete. Filings from 2025 onward are still publishing, so it would be a mistake to read the current near-zero count as proof the field has stopped moving; the honest read is that the trend is unresolved until later years catch up.
AU2016404873A1 claims an impulse-type hydro turbine that narrows the water-stream cross-section in a movable passage to convert roughly half the pressure energy into high-velocity kinetic energy, stored in a helical tube, aimed at maintaining efficiency across varying flow while simplifying flow-tracking operation. It is relevant prior art for anyone designing eddy-current speed-adjusting passages or similar pressure-to-kinetic-energy conversion mechanisms in impulse turbines. It does not, on its own, cover unrelated approaches such as reaction turbines, fish-passage geometry, or grid-interconnection control schemes.
The IPC composition shows F03B hydraulic-machine claims in 88.9% of the 18 records, while digital monitoring and control classes (G06F at 11.1%, G06G at 5.6%) and marine/civil structure classes (B63B at 16.7%) are comparatively thin. That gap suggests remote operation, flow-variability forecasting, grid-interconnection controls and civil-works cost reduction are less densely claimed than the turbine mechanics themselves, making them reasonable areas to scope a first claim before assuming the space is occupied.
Go past this page: query the whole small and distributed hydropower corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.