https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/small-and-distributed-hydropower-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Small & Distributed Hydropower
Small and distributed hydropower patents: who is filing, what they claim, and where the field is still open
  • Filing peaked in 2020 at 9 records, then fell to zero by 2024 (-100% over 2021-2024) — though 2025-2026 figures are still filling in as publication catches up with filing.
  • Hydraulic machinery claims dominate, with F03B present in 88.9% of the 18 records in scope, while data-processing and remote-operation claims (G06F, G06G) barely register.
  • Four assignees make up the entire ranked field, led by a filer with 13 records — a sign of a narrow, largely unconsolidated space rather than a crowded one.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
18
Published Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
2020
Peak Filing Year

Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A small, concentrated field with a short filing history

Small and distributed hydropower covers low-head turbines, fish-friendly intake design, civil-works cost reduction, grid interconnection and remote operation for generation sites too small for conventional hydro development. The patent record in this dataset is compact: 18 published records span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with activity concentrated in a handful of years rather than spread evenly across the window. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the apparent drop-off in the most recent years understates what has actually been filed.

The technology composition points to a mechanically-focused field: turbine and hydraulic-machine claims (F03B) appear in the large majority of records, while electrical generation (H02K), marine/civil structures (B63B) and digital monitoring or forecasting (G06F, G06G) show up far less often. That imbalance is itself informative for anyone deciding where to file next.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1Super Moon Electric Power Company13
  2. 2HABA HATSUO3
  3. 3MERRITT EDWARD2
  4. 4FEIN GENE S2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Small and Distributed Hydropower covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 18-record dataset: how filings moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend: a sharp rise and an unfinished fall

Filings were absent in 2017, climbed to a peak of 9 in 2020, then declined; the 2021-to-2024 span shows a -100% change, dropping from 2 filings to 0. Because 2024 is the most recent year that can be treated as complete, that -100% figure is the one to cite — later years are still being backfilled by the normal publication lag and should not be read as continued decline.

Filing trend: a sharp rise and an unfinished fall0358100201720182019920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition: hydraulic machinery leads by a wide margin

F03B (hydraulic machines and engines) appears in 88.9% of the 18 records, far ahead of H02K electric generators at 27.8%, B63B marine/civil structures at 16.7%, and digital-processing classes G06F and G06G at 11.1% and 5.6% respectively. Records can carry more than one class, so these shares overlap rather than sum to 100%.

Technology composition: hydraulic machinery leads by a wide marginF03B · Hydraulic machines & engines1688.9%H02K · Electric motors & generators527.8%B63B · Ships & marine vessels316.7%G06F · Electric digital data processi…211.1%G06G · Analogue computers15.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 18 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Small and Distributed Hydropower covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Small and Distributed Hydropower with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about small and distributed hydropower and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in this dataset

Representative filing
AU2016404873A12019-01-03

Impulse-type hydro turbine (AU2016404873A1)

HATSUO,HABA

The filing addresses noise and blockage from debris entanglement and sudden intake or discharge changes by narrowing the water-stream cross-section in an eddy-current speed-adjusting movable passage, converting roughly half the pressure energy into high-velocity kinetic energy stored in a helical tube. The stated aim is a general-purpose water wheel that holds efficiency across varying water quantity while simplifying the flow-tracking operation needed to keep total cost down.Filed by Hatsuo Haba; published 2019-01-03.

View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20090076790A1System and Method for Data Processing and Transferring in a Multi Computer Environment for Energy Reporting a…88
2US7844568B2System and method for data processing and transferring in a multi computer environment for energy reporting a…12
3US20210246866A1Systems and methods for hydro-based electric power generation8
4US11319920B2Systems and methods for hydro-based electric power generation4
5WO2020185564A1Systems and methods for hydro-based electric power generation4
6US11835025B2Systems and methods for hydro-based electric power generation1
7US20220228550A1Systems and methods for hydro-based electric power generation1

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older records; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (7 of 7 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Small and Distributed Hydropower covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the trend, the citation table and the technology composition, translated into what they imply for someone deciding where to place claims.

Filing momentum
-100% (2021-2024)
growth over the complete window

The measured decline has run its course, not that the field has stalled

Filings dropped from 2 in 2021 to 0 in 2024, after peaking at 9 in 2020. Because publication trails filing by about 18 months, that 2024 zero is the last data point solid enough to trust, and it should not be read together with 2025-2026 figures as evidence the field is dying.

Source: filing trend, 2021-2024 window
Technology concentration
88.9% of 18 records
carry an F03B hydraulic-machine class

Claim space is dense on the turbine itself, thin on the systems around it

Nearly nine in ten records touch hydraulic machinery classification, while grid interconnection, remote operation and forecasting elements sit in a small minority of filings (G06F at 11.1%, G06G at 5.6%). That gap is where less-crowded claim territory sits.

Source: IPC subclass distribution
Assignee structure
13 records, leader
of a 4-company ranked field

One filer holds a clear lead in a field with no long tail visible in this data

The ranking returned by this dataset covers only four assignees, and the leader alone accounts for 13 records. That is a narrow, lightly populated competitive set rather than a crowded one — useful context before assuming freedom to operate is scarce.

Source: assignee ranking (4 companies)
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to small and distributed hydropower, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Small and Distributed Hydropower covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked field is small: four assignees account for the entire dataset the ranking endpoint returns, with one clear leader and three names with far fewer records.

Leader by volume
13 records
of 18 total in scope

A single filer dominates the ranked field

One assignee holds the majority of records in this dataset, well ahead of the other three ranked names. That concentration sits inside a very small ranked set, so it says more about a narrow field than about broad market control.

Source: assignee ranking
Co-filing pattern
1 pair, strength 2
co-assignee link identified

Collaboration is minimal

The dataset surfaces a single meaningful co-assignee pairing. Outside that link, filings in this space appear to be pursued independently rather than through joint development or cross-licensing arrangements visible in the record.

Source: co-assignee pairs
Recent momentum
0 in the latest year
across every ranked assignee

No ranked assignee shows fresh activity yet

Every one of the four ranked assignees shows zero filings in the latest year captured. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this reflects incomplete recent-year data more than a stopped field, and should be revisited once later filings publish.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas with thin representation in the current IPC composition — a starting point for scoping freedom-to-operate before a filing decision.
Remote operation & telemetry for micro-hydro sitesFish-friendly intake and passage geometryCivil-works cost reduction for run-of-river installsGrid interconnection controls for variable flowFlow-variability forecasting and load balancing
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Super Moon Electric Power Company0
HABA HATSUO0
MERRITT EDWARD0
FEIN GENE S0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Small and Distributed Hydropower covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or identifying a filing gap.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's 13 records

Before drafting claims in low-head turbine or intake design, screen against the leading assignee's filings specifically, since that single filer accounts for the majority of the ranked field.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka →

Scope claims in the under-claimed control and telemetry branches

Grid interconnection, remote operation and flow-variability forecasting show low representation in the IPC composition relative to the mechanical turbine art, suggesting more open claim space there.

Explore white space in Eureka →

Re-run the trend once 2025-2026 filings finish publishing

The current -100% figure covers only the 2021-2024 window that can be treated as complete; the true recent trajectory will not be clear until the publication lag closes.

Track filing trends in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Small and Distributed Hydropower covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about small hydropower patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Small and Distributed Hydropower covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Small and Distributed Hydropower in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole small and distributed hydropower corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.