https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/small-modular-reactors-small-reactor-fuel-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Nuclear Fission & Fusion Energy
Small reactor fuel patents: who is filing, what they claim, and where the field is still open
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,828
Published Records
30%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+5%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
JP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (39 records) with 2024 (41) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,828 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape covers 2,828 published records filed against small reactor fuel search terms combined with the G21C nuclear reactor classification, spanning 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off. The scope captures fuel assembly design, fuel material composition, and the hardware that supports fuel handling inside compact reactor cores, with most records also carrying secondary classifications in power plant systems, radiation shielding, alloys and material testing.

Because a single filing can span jurisdictions and continuations, the family-level view in the assignee ranking is the more reliable way to read who actually leads. Raw document counts by receiving office instead show where applicants are choosing to seek protection, which is a separate question from who invented what first.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1KK TOSHIBA207
  2. 2UK ATOMIC ENERGY AUTHORITY193
  3. 3WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP150
  4. 4COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES149
  5. 5GENERAL ELECTRIC CO140
  6. 6HITACHI LTD140
  7. 7THE UNITED STATES AS REPRESENTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY76
  8. 8FRAMATOME SA76
  9. 9SIEMENS AG61
  10. 10NUCLEAR FUEL INDS58
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Small Modular Reactors: Small Reactor Fuel Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 2,828 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the fuel-related claims actually sit in.

A steady climb, understated at the edges

Filings ran from 36 in 2017 to a peak of 46 in 2018, then held in a comparable band through 2021 (39) and 2024 (41) — a 5% increase over that three-year span. Counts fall off after 2024 and drop to 7 by 2026, but that reflects the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication, not a genuine pullback in R&D activity.

A steady climb, understated at the edges013253850362017462018201920202021202220232024202572026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in reactor and plant classes, with a material-science tail

Almost every record (99.7% of the 2,828 in scope) sits in G21C nuclear reactors, as the search scope requires. The next-largest classes are G21D nuclear power plants at 6.3% and G21F radiation protection at 2.3%, with smaller but consistent representation in alloys (C22C, 1.9%), metal compounds (C01G, 1.1%) and material testing and non-ferrous treatment (each under 1%) — evidence that fuel cladding and structural material work is a real but minority strand within the broader fuel filing activity.

Concentrated in reactor and plant classes, with a material-science tailG21C · Nuclear reactors2,82099.7%G21D · Nuclear power plants1796.3%G21F · Radiation protection & shieldi…662.3%C22C · Alloys541.9%C01G · Compounds of other metals311.1%G01T · Nuclear & X-radiation measurem…271.0%C22F · Non-ferrous metal treatment240.8%G01N · Material analysis & testing240.8%Other48317.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,828 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Small Modular Reactors: Small Reactor Fuel Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Small Modular Reactors: Small Reactor Fuel Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about small modular reactors: small reactor fuel patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

What the most-cited and most representative filings show

Representative recent filing
US20250029738A12025-01-23

Small modular reactor including small fuel assemblies

KOREA HYDRO & NUCLEAR POWER CO., LTD

The filing describes a small modular reactor whose fuel material is arranged in a first, closely-packed arrangement region surrounded by multiple second arrangement regions holding differently sized fuel assemblies — a sectioned core layout aimed at compact reactor geometries rather than a conventional uniform core.Filed by Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd, published 2025-01-23.

US20250029738A1 — patent drawing 1US20250029738A1 — patent drawing 2
View filing details
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5030412AFuel assembly debris screen126
2US4684495AFuel assembly bottom nozzle with integral debris trap117
3US4684496ADebris trap for a pressurized water nuclear reactor97
4US4900507ANuclear fuel assembly debris filter bottom nozzle93
5US4832905ALower end fitting debris collector93
6US4280872ACore catcher device74
7US4675154ANuclear fuel assembly with large coolant conducting tube73
8US4968479AFuel assembly for nuclear reactor65
9US3957575AMechanical design of a light water breeder reactor64
10US4449403AGuide tube inserted liquid level sensor61

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to be cited; treat them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Small Modular Reactors: Small Reactor Fuel Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

Reading the concentration and the trend together

Three findings that shape where a new filer or a licensing team should focus attention.

Concentration
29.7% / 44.2%
share of 2,828 records held by top 5 / top 10 assignees

A leader plus a long tail, not a closed field

The leading assignee alone accounts for 207 records, and the top five combined hold 29.7% of all 2,828 records in scope. That still leaves more than 70% of filings distributed across a long tail of entities, including many single-filing entrants — a structure that rewards a well-targeted claim more than it punishes a late one.

Ranked leaders, 100 companies tracked
Filing momentum
39 → 41 (+5%)
filings 2021 to 2024

Growth is real but modest, and recent years understate it

Filing volume grew 5% from 2021 to 2024, the last year that can be read as complete. The visible decline after 2024 is a publication-lag effect — records filed in 2025 and 2026 are still working through the roughly 18-month gap before they appear in this dataset.

Peak year to date: 2018 at 46 filings
Technology mix
6.3% G21D
share of records also classed in nuclear power plants

Fuel claims rarely sit in isolation

Beyond the core G21C reactor classification, a meaningful minority of records also touch power plant systems (6.3%), radiation shielding (2.3%) and structural alloys (1.9%). That overlap signals that fuel assembly claims are frequently bundled with plant-level or material-level protection rather than filed as narrow, standalone fuel claims.

Classes overlap; shares are of the 2,828-record total, not additive
Jurisdiction
690 filings
Japan, the leading receiving office

Filing geography favours Japan and the UK over the US

Japan (690) and the United Kingdom (656) each outpace the United States (365) as receiving offices, with China (216), the EPO (200) and South Korea (189) forming a second tier. A filer weighing where to seek protection should note that the busiest offices are not the ones a US-centric search would surface first.

Receiving office counts, not family-adjusted
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to small modular reactors: small reactor fuel patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Small Modular Reactors: Small Reactor Fuel Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The figures above answer where the field stands today. The next questions are usually about specific claims and specific competitors.

Map the white space

Identify which fuel assembly sub-branches remain thinly claimed relative to the debris-handling and cladding clusters that already carry dense prior art.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track a specific assignee

Follow filing behaviour for any of the ranked leaders over time, including which IPC classes they concentrate in and where their claims overlap with co-assignees.

Search assignees in Eureka

Check freedom to operate

Run a specific fuel assembly or core-layout concept against the most-cited debris screen and fuel filter families before committing engineering time.

Run an FTO check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Small Modular Reactors: Small Reactor Fuel Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about small reactor fuel patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Small Modular Reactors: Small Reactor Fuel Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Small Modular Reactors: Small Reactor Fuel Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole small modular reactors: small reactor fuel patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.