Book a demo

Smart Textile Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Smart Textile Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/smart-and-electronic-textiles-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Smart & Electronic Textiles
Smart and Electronic Textiles Patents: Filing Trends and Where Claim Space Is Still Open
  • Flat, not growing. Filings peaked at 7 in 2023 and the 2022 midpoint of 4 shows no sustained climb through the period tracked.
  • No single owner dominates. The most-cited records date back to the early 2000s woven-electronic-textile family, but recent-year momentum shows every tracked assignee at zero or -100% YoY.
  • Garments and diagnostics overlap heavily. A41D outerwear (43) and A61B diagnosis (44) run almost neck and neck with D03D weaving (40), meaning most filings sit at the intersection of wearable structure and sensing, not in either alone.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
83
Published Records
69%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+50%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the smart textile patent record actually shows

The dataset covers 83 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 against a search built on conductive yarn, washability, stretchable interconnects, signal quality and power supply claims within woven fabrics, textile finishing and biomedical sensing IPC classes. Filing activity is thin by the standards of a mainstream electronics field: the entire tracked period never exceeds single-digit annual counts, and the peak year so far is 2023 at 7. That is consistent with a technology area still defined by a small number of foundational filings rather than a broad, fast-moving industry.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in any trend line understate real filing activity; treat the most recent one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling. The composition data below matters more than the raw trend for deciding where to look: it shows where claim density is concentrated across garment structure, weaving, printed-circuit integration and clinical sensing.

Top assignees by patent family count
  1. 1SMART SOLUTIONS TECH19
  2. 2SARNOFF CORP14
  3. 3KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV12
  4. 4PHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY7
  5. 5BHATTACHARYA RABIN5
  6. 6THE HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIV5
  7. 7ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART5
  8. 8TEXAVIE TECHNOLOGIES INC5
  9. 9LABORATORY FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN DESIGN LIMITED5
  10. 10HONDA MOTOR CO LTD3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart and Electronic Textiles covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 83 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A flat filing curve with one visible peak

Annual filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 7 in 2023, but the 2022 midpoint of 4 and the modest 2026 partial-year count of 4 do not describe sustained growth. This reads as a field with periodic bursts of activity around specific product cycles rather than compounding year-on-year interest.

A flat filing curve with one visible peak024682201720182019202020212022720232024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Garment structure, weaving and diagnostics carry the most claims

A61B (diagnosis and surgery, 44 records) and A41D (outerwear and garments, 43) lead, closely followed by D03D (woven fabrics and weaving, 40) and H05K (printed circuits and assemblies, 34). A61N (electrotherapy, 19), D02G (yarn texturing, 17), H01R (connectors, 8) and G02F (optical control, 7) trail well behind, marking those as the thinner, less-contested branches of the same search.

Garment structure, weaving and diagnostics carry the most claimsA61B · Diagnosis & surgery4453.0%A41D · Outerwear & garments4351.8%D03D · Woven fabrics & weaving4048.2%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies3441.0%A61N · Electrotherapy & radiation the…1922.9%D02G · Yarn texturing & crimping1720.5%H01R · Connectors & current collectors89.6%G02F · Optical control & modulation78.4%Other5566.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 83 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart and Electronic Textiles covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Smart and Electronic Textiles with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about smart and electronic textiles and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The records other filings build on

Representative filing
EP2481268A12012-08-01

Electronic textile with local energy supply devices (EP2481268A1)

KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.

The filing describes a textile substrate carrying at least one substrate conductor and multiple electronic energy-consuming devices, each wired to that conductor for power from a main supply. It adds a set of local energy supply devices arranged on the same substrate, positioned to supply power to those devices independently of the main feed.Filed by Koninklijke Philips N.V., published 2012-08-01.

View full filing
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20030211797A1Plural layer woven electronic textile, article and method396
2US20040009729A1Woven electronic textile, yarn and article271
3US7144830B2Plural layer woven electronic textile, article and method184
4US7592276B2Woven electronic textile, yarn and article148
5WO2010032173A1Electronic textile and method for determining a functional area of an electronic textile78
6CN1650057A复数层编织电子纺织品、物品和方法54
7US20120118427A1Electronic textile, article and method53
8US20070049147A1Plural layer woven electronic textile, article and method51
9WO2014001577A1Electronic textile assembly44
10CN1649539A编织电子纺织品、纱和物品44

Citation counts reward age inside a searched corpus: the two most-cited pairs date to the early 2000s woven-electronic-textile filings and their continuations, so treat these as markers of foundational influence rather than current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart and Electronic Textiles covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on rather than just noting.

Filing pace
Peak 7 (2023)
highest single year

Bursts, not a curve

The trend from 2 filings in 2017 to a peak of 7 in 2023, with 2022 sitting at 4, does not describe compounding growth. Activity looks tied to discrete product or research cycles rather than an accelerating race for claim space, which changes how urgently a competitor needs to respond to any single filing.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Technology overlap
A61B 44 · A41D 43 · D03D 40
near-tied IPC counts

Three classes, one claim zone

Diagnosis (A61B), garments (A41D) and woven fabrics (D03D) sit within five records of each other. Filings that only address one of the three without touching the others are likely narrower than they need to be to block competitors working across the full garment-to-sensor pipeline.

IPC subclass composition
Ownership churn
0 or -100% YoY
recent-year momentum, all tracked assignees

No current leader by recent activity

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year, several with a -100% year-on-year drop from prior activity. Historical citation leaders are not the same organisations showing recent filing behaviour, which is a signal that the field's active filers may not yet be visible in this window.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Jurisdiction spread
US 18 · WIPO 13 · EPO 11
top receiving offices

US and PCT routes dominate filing strategy

United States filings lead at 18, with WIPO PCT applications close behind at 13 and Europe at 11; China, India and Australia each sit in single-to-low-double digits. A PCT-first strategy appears common among the more active filers, suggesting multi-jurisdiction intent even from a modest base of 83 families.

Receiving office distribution
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to smart and electronic textiles, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart and Electronic Textiles covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Assignees and where they are not filing

Co-assignee pairs point to a small number of collaborative clusters rather than a dispersed field of solo filers, but recent momentum data shows none of them currently active at pace.

Collaboration density
10 co-assignee pairs
recorded pairings

A handful of tight collaborations

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest pairings each recording 5 shared filings. These cluster around a university-and-institute pairing and a corporate-and-individual-inventor pairing, suggesting the field advances through specific research partnerships rather than broad industry participation.

Co-assignee pair strength
Momentum check
-100% YoY
for multiple tracked assignees

Past leaders have gone quiet

Assignees with historically notable activity, including university and corporate research groups, show zero filings in the latest tracked year and year-on-year drops of -100% where prior-year activity existed. That does not mean the technology is abandoned; publication lag means the most recent 12-18 months of real filing activity are not yet visible in this data.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Foundational IP
396 citations
top-cited record

Early filings still anchor the field

The two most-cited record pairs, both centred on woven electronic textile and yarn constructions, carry citation counts far above the rest of the corpus. Newer filers are working in the shadow of that foundational IP whether or not they cite it directly, particularly on conductive-yarn and woven-substrate claims.

Most-cited records
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas sit behind the dominant garment, weaving and diagnostic classes and carry comparatively thin claim density.
Stretchable interconnect routing at seamsWashable connector interfaces (H01R)Optical signal modulation in fabric (G02F)Yarn-level power distributionLocal energy supply integration
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Intelligent Solutions Technology Corporation0
Sarnoff Corporation0
Koninklijke Philips N.V.0
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University0-100%
Royal College of Art0-100%
Artificial Intelligence Design Research Institute Limited0-100%
TEXAVIE TECHNOLOGIES INC0
BHATTACHARYA RABIN0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart and Electronic Textiles covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this

The dataset flags where claim density sits today; deciding whether to file, license or design around it needs a closer read of the specific claims.

Map your concept against the near-tied IPC classes

If a design touches garment structure, weaving and sensing at once, check A61B, A41D and D03D together rather than treating them as separate searches.

Run a claim map in Eureka →

Watch for filings publishing behind the lag

Recent-year momentum reads as flat because of the roughly 18-month publication lag; re-check assignee activity once 2025-2026 filings clear examination.

Set an alert in Eureka →

Test the under-claimed branches

Stretchable interconnects, washable connectors and fabric-level optical modulation carry noticeably fewer records than the core garment and weaving classes.

Explore white space in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart and Electronic Textiles covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Questions practitioners ask about this space

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart and Electronic Textiles covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Smart and Electronic Textiles in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole smart and electronic textiles corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.