Book a demo

Smart Bedding Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Smart Bedding Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/smart-bedding-and-sleep-environment-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Sleep Health Technology
Smart Bedding and Sleep Environment Patents
  • 69.6% concentration. The top 5 of 12 ranked assignees hold 16 of the 23 records in scope — a field with a defined leading group rather than a wide-open race.
  • +500% filing growth. Filings rose from 1 in 2021 to 6 in 2024, the peak year so far, before the usual 18-month publication lag thins out the 2025-2026 count.
  • A47C dominates, G16H is thin. 73.9% of records sit in beds/mattresses (A47C) while only 21.7% touch healthcare informatics (G16H) — the sensing-to-software link is comparatively unclaimed.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
23
Published Records
70%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+500%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
IN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (6) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 23 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Smart bedding and sleep-environment control sits at the intersection of furniture engineering, materials science and personal health monitoring. The search scope spans 23 published records filed against terms covering smart mattresses, temperature-regulating bedding, thermal comfort, phase-change materials, zoned firmness and sensor integration. It is a small, young corpus: filing activity was negligible before 2021 and only became a discernible trend from 2021 onward.

Because the field is early-stage, a handful of assignees account for most of the activity, and the technical classification skews heavily toward mechanical bed and mattress structures rather than the health-informatics layer that would sit on top of them. That gap between structure and software is one of the more decision-relevant signals in the dataset.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1PROHIBITION X PTE LTD5
  2. 2DREAMWELL LTD4
  3. 3EMBR LABS IP LLC3
  4. 4JIS COLLEGE OF ENG2
  5. 5IFUTURELAB INC2
  6. 6GLA UNIV MATHURA1
  7. 7DP TECHNOLOGIES INC1
  8. 8LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY1
  9. 9Zhao Yuxian1
  10. 10PANIPAT INST OF ENG & TECH PIET1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Bedding and Sleep Environment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 23 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings moved from a flat 0 in 2017 to a peak of 6 in 2024, with 2021's single filing marking the start of sustained activity — a +500% rise to 2024. Treat 2025 and 2026 as undercounts rather than a slowdown, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

Filing trend, 2017-2026023560201720182019202020212022202362024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

A47C (chairs, sofas and beds) covers 73.9% of the 23 records, confirming that most claims still describe the physical bed or mattress structure. A61B (diagnosis and surgery) at 34.8% and G16H (healthcare informatics) at 21.7% show a smaller but real push toward biometric sensing and data processing layered onto that structure. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100% of the record total.

IPC subclass distributionA47C · Chairs, sofas & beds1773.9%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery834.8%G16H · Healthcare informatics521.7%A61H · Physical therapy & massage417.4%A47G · Household & table equipment313.0%A61F · Implants & prostheses313.0%G06F · Electric digital data processi…313.0%A61M · Devices for body fluids28.7%Other1043.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 23 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Bedding and Sleep Environment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Smart Bedding and Sleep Environment with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about smart bedding and sleep environment and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and citation leaders

Representative Record
US20230404286A12023-12-21

Personalized pillow and/or mattress selection (US20230404286A1)

DREAMWELL, LTD.

Processes for personalizing a mattress or pillow for a consumer generally includes analyzing data identifying one or more target areas based on surface temperature and/or pressure on a consumer's existing mattress and additively manufacturing a lattice structure to address the one or more target areas so to provide support, pressure point relief, and/or a desired temperature modulation.Filed by Dreamwell, Ltd., published 2023-12-21 — ties surface temperature and pressure sensing directly to an additively-manufactured lattice response.

US20230404286A1 — patent drawing 1US20230404286A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US11253079B1Multi-zone adjustable bed with smart adjustment mechanism14
2CN112987585A适用于居住房间的睡眠环境控制系统及方法3
3US20230404286A1Personalized pillow and/or mattress selection2
4CN2227926Y自动调温被褥2

Citation counts favour older records simply by virtue of being searchable longer; they signal influence within this corpus, not current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (4 of 4 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Bedding and Sleep Environment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the data means for R&D and IP strategy

Three findings stand out once the filing trend, technology composition and citation pattern are read together.

Concentration
69.6%
of 23 records held by top 5 of 12 ranked assignees

A defined leading group, not an open field

With 16 of 23 records held by the five leading assignees, and 91.3% held by the top 10, this is not a landscape with dozens of equally-weighted competitors. New entrants are filing into a space where a small group already holds most of the mechanical bed and mattress claims.

Top 10 combined: 21 of 23 records (91.3%)
Momentum
+500%
filing growth, 2021 to 2024 (peak year)

Growth is real but the corpus is still small

The rise from 1 filing in 2021 to 6 in 2024 is a genuine acceleration, not noise, but the base is small enough that a handful of new filings from any single assignee could reorder the ranking. The 2025-2026 figures are undercounts given typical publication lag.

Peak year so far: 2024 at 6 filings
Technology gap
21.7%
of records touch G16H healthcare informatics

Sensing hardware is ahead of the software layer

A47C claims (73.9% of records) describe the physical bed; comparatively few records extend into G16H informatics or G06F data processing (13.0%). The link between in-bed sensors and downstream health analytics is thinner than the sensing hardware itself.

A47C 73.9% vs. G16H 21.7% of 23 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to smart bedding and sleep environment, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Bedding and Sleep Environment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where the claim space is still open

Twelve assignees make up the entire ranked list this dataset returns. Filing activity clusters around a leading handful, with a long tail of single- or double-filing entrants including university and institutional applicants.

Leader position
5
records held by the top-ranked assignee

One assignee sets the pace

The leading assignee holds 5 of the 23 records in scope, ahead of a group clustered around 2 records at fifth place. That gap between first and the rest of the top group suggests an early but genuine head start rather than a tie.

Fifth place: 2 records
Long tail
1
record held at tenth place

Institutional and university filers round out the field

Beyond the leading group, filers include engineering colleges and university research groups alongside individual inventors, each holding small numbers of records. This pattern is typical of an early-stage field where academic labs are testing claim territory ahead of scaled commercial filing.

12 assignees make up the full ranked list
Recent momentum
1
filing in the latest year by the most active recent filer

Momentum has shifted away from earlier filers

Several assignees that filed in prior years show 0 filings in the latest year, some down -100% year over year, while one institutional filer recorded the only new filing in the latest year. This suggests the leading group's early advantage has not translated into sustained recent output.

Latest-year activity is thin across the board
🔍
Under-claimed technical branches
Sub-areas where filing density is still low relative to the core bed/mattress structure claims — candidates for first-mover claim drafting.
Phase-change material zoningIn-bed biometric-to-informatics pipelinesCleaning-requirement sensingPerceived-benefit feedback loopsZoned firmness actuation control
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
PANIPAT INST OF ENG & TECH PIET1
PROHIBITION X PTE LTD0
Junwei Company0
JIS COLLEGE OF ENG0-100%
IFUTURELAB INC0-100%
Embr Labs IP LLC0
Zhao Yuxian0
Lovely Professional University0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Bedding and Sleep Environment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space claim drafting, or monitoring a competitor.

Check claim scope before filing into A47C

With 73.9% of records already in the bed/mattress structural class, a freedom-to-operate review of the leading assignees' independent claims is worth doing before drafting new structural claims.

Explore claims in Eureka →

Draft into the informatics gap

The thinness of G16H and G06F coverage relative to A47C suggests room for claims that tie in-bed sensor data to specific health-informatics outputs.

Map white space in Eureka →

Track the leading assignee's filing cadence

Given the concentration at the top of the ranking, monitoring the leader's publication cadence gives early warning of where the claim space will tighten next.

Set up monitoring in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Bedding and Sleep Environment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about smart bedding patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Bedding and Sleep Environment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Smart Bedding and Sleep Environment in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole smart bedding and sleep environment corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.