Smart Grid Management for Building Energy Patent Landscape
Smart Grid Management for Building Energy Patent Landscape in 2026
The corpus is very small at 5 patent families in scope, with VITO (Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek) holding the largest position among ranked applicants. Activity is dominated by power-supply and grid-systems techniques, with India as the leading filing jurisdiction; the field is nascent and the competitive structure remains highly fragmented outside the top filer.
VITO leads a highly fragmented, early-stage field
VITO (Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek) ranks first among all applicants in this corpus, followed by Kyocera Corporation. No other applicant holds more than one patent record in the ranking.
The top five filers account for 69% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signalling meaningful concentration at the very top despite the small absolute volumes. Below those leaders, the field fragments quickly into individual researchers and academic institutions each holding a single record.
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VITO (Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek) | 5 | |
| 2 | Kyocera Corporation | 3 | |
| 3 | PARAMESHWARI M | 1 | |
| 4 | CMRIT | 1 | |
| 5 | DR SUGANDA P | 1 | |
| 6 | Vardhaman College of Engineering | 1 | |
| 7 | DR JOEL OSEI-ASIAMAH | 1 | |
| 8 | HARSHA R TEMBHEKAR | 1 | |
| 9 | DR ROHIT SHARMA | 1 | |
| 10 | R M K COLLEGE OF ENG & TECH | 1 |
VITO’s lead, anchored in H02J power-supply and grid-systems techniques, and Kyocera’s multi-branch coverage spanning grid systems and communications, suggest that established research institutes and electronics manufacturers currently define the frontier. The rest of the field consists largely of academic and individual inventors.
The most recent filing years are subject to publication lag and likely under-represent actual activity; conclusions on trajectory should be treated as indicative rather than definitive. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.
Activity has only just appeared, concentrated in power-grid and business-data classes
The annual filing trend and the technology composition chart together reveal a field that is embryonic in volume and skewed heavily toward foundational grid-control IP.
Annual filing trend
Recorded filings show zero activity from 2017 through 2024, with the first entries appearing in 2025 and 2026. Because recent years are subject to publication lag, the true filing baseline may be modestly higher than shown; the apparent concentration of activity in 2025–2026 should be read as the earliest visible signal rather than a confirmed surge.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaTechnology composition
H02J (Power supply and grid systems) dominates the technology mix, reflecting the core electrical infrastructure focus of the field. G06Q (Business, commerce and administrative data processing) is the second-largest branch, pointing to energy-management software and demand-response business logic as a meaningful secondary theme. Branches such as G05B (Control and regulating systems), G06N (AI models), H04M (Telephonic communication), and H04Q (Switching and selecting) each account for a small share, indicating that control-systems and connectivity angles remain sparsely covered.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaHighly cited patent families surfaced by the query
Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.
System for electricity grids for adjusting or matc…
A smart grid management system and method where aggregators do not need to have knowledge about the topology of the electricity grid, the physical location of the end-points they control, or the congestion level of the grid. Instead, the smart grid system and method provides maximum freedom of operation to the aggregators to balance electricity supply and… (excerpt from the patent abstract)
| # | Patent | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | System for electricity grids for adjusting or matc… | 14 |
| 2 | System for electricity grids for adjusting or matc… | 8 |
| 3 | System for electricity grids for adjusting or matc… | 4 |
| 4 | System for electricity grids for adjusting or matc… | 3 |
| 5 | Power control device, power control method, and po… | 2 |
| 6 | Power control apparatus, power control method, and… | 2 |
Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.
What the landscape structure means for R&D investment
The combination of very low total volume, high top-filer concentration, and a nascent filing timeline shapes both the risk profile and the opportunity map for new entrants.
Nascent field with no established life-cycle stage confirmed
The lifecycle stage is not confirmed by the evidence — the corpus is too small and too recent to assign a standard growth or maturity label. Filings appear only from 2025 onward in the visible record, suggesting the field is in its earliest formative phase. R&D teams entering now would face limited prior-art density but also limited signal on where standardisation is heading.
Early-stageTop five filers hold 69% of the leading hundred filers’ combined total
Concentration is high relative to corpus size: VITO and Kyocera Corporation together already separate themselves from a long tail of single-record academic and individual applicants. This tier gap means that a focused, multi-family filing programme by a well-resourced entrant could rapidly reorder the ranking. The fragmented lower tier also signals that there is no broad-based incumbent coalition to contend with.
High concentrationNo co-applicant relationships detected in the corpus
Evidence pending — no collaboration links are present in the data. All applicants appear to file independently. This absence of co-filing activity is consistent with the nascent state of the field and suggests that ecosystem partnerships, consortia, or joint-development agreements have not yet produced visible IP output in this specific topic area.
No co-filing detectedIndia leads filings; Europe and the US are secondary jurisdictions
India is the leading filing jurisdiction, reflecting the concentration of academic and individual inventors active in this corpus. Europe (EPO) and the United States each appear as secondary destinations, and one WIPO (PCT) filing indicates at least one applicant is pursuing multi-jurisdictional protection. The geographic spread is narrow, leaving major markets potentially unprotected by existing filings.
India-led, sparse globallyGo beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.
Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.
VITO and Kyocera Corporation define the leading tier by patent records
Two organisations stand clearly above the rest of the field. VITO concentrates on core grid-systems IP, while Kyocera Corporation extends into communications branches alongside grid-systems coverage.
VITO (Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek)
VITO holds 5 patent records, the largest position in the corpus, concentrated entirely in H02J power-supply and grid-systems techniques. Applicant momentum data is not available for this filer, so trajectory cannot be characterised beyond the current standing. As a publicly funded research institute, VITO’s IP may be available for licensing, which could represent a path for commercial entrants.
patent records: 5Kyocera Corporation
Kyocera Corporation holds 3 patent records, covering H02J grid-systems classes as well as H04M telephonic communication and H04Q switching and selecting — a broader technology spread than the leader. This multi-branch profile suggests Kyocera is pursuing an integrated grid-communications approach. Applicant momentum data is not available for this filer.
patent records: 3Control systems and AI modelling are under-served relative to the dominant grid-power class
Several IPC branches appear at low share in the corpus alongside the dominant H02J class. These represent areas of relative sparsity that may warrant monitoring, though their commercial viability as entry points depends on technical fit and strategic intent.
G05B · Control and regulating systems
G05B accounts for 7% of the branch-level record count, representing only 2 patent records. Building-energy grid management relies heavily on real-time control logic — supervisory control, setpoint management, and feedback regulation — yet this class is almost absent from the corpus. An entrant with existing G05B expertise in building automation or industrial control could file into a largely open adjacency with direct technical relevance to the core H02J theme.
Search this in Eureka →G06N · Computing based on AI models
G06N also accounts for 7% of branch-level records, with only 2 patent records present. AI-driven load forecasting, demand-response optimisation, and anomaly detection are increasingly central to smart-grid management, yet the AI-model branch remains sparse in this specific corpus. Teams already working on machine-learning energy applications could find this an accessible adjacent space, though the low current count may also reflect the novelty of the field rather than a confirmed commercial gap.
Search this in Eureka →How leaders differ by technology route
Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.
| Player | H02J 3 · Power supply & grid systems | G06Q 50 · Business, commerce & admin data processing | G06N 3 · Computing based on AI models | G06Q 10 · Business, commerce & admin data processing | H04M 11 · Telephonic communication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VITO (Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek) | Strong · 5 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent |
| Kyocera Corporation | Strong · 3 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Strong · 2 |
| CMRIT | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Absent |
| DR JOEL OSEI-ASIAMAH | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Absent | Absent |
| DR ROHIT SHARMA | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Absent | Absent |
Frequently asked questions
The corpus covers 5 patent families in scope. This is a very small dataset, and conclusions should be treated as early-stage signals rather than statistically robust findings.
VITO (Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek) holds the most patent records among all ranked applicants, followed by Kyocera Corporation with 3 patent records.
India is the leading filing jurisdiction in this corpus, followed by Europe (EPO) and the United States. One WIPO (PCT) filing is also present.
H02J (Power supply and grid systems) is the dominant IPC class, reflecting the foundational electrical infrastructure focus of the field. G06Q (Business, commerce and administrative data processing) is the second-largest branch.
No co-applicant relationships are detected in the evidence. All filers in the corpus appear to operate independently, which is consistent with the nascent and fragmented state of the field.
G05B (Control and regulating systems) and G06N (Computing based on AI models) each account for only 7% of branch-level records — 2 patent records each — making them the most prominent under-served adjacent branches relative to the dominant H02J class.
Map your own smart grid building energy landscape
Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.