Book a demo

Smart Grid Management for Residential Energy Patents

Smart Grid Management for Residential Energy Patents
Competitive Landscape

Smart Grid Management for Residential Energy Patent Landscape in 2026

This is a highly concentrated, early-stage niche: Sacramento Municipal Utility District and Kyocera Corporation together account for the bulk of documented filings, anchored in power-supply and grid-systems technology. Annual filing volume has eased from its 2018 peak, leaving the field thinly covered and open to new entrants across several adjacent technology branches.

9
Patent families in scope
58%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-67%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Sacramento Municipal Utility District leads a heavily concentrated field

Sacramento Municipal Utility District holds the top position with 5 patent records, followed by Kyocera Corporation with 3 patent records; together they dominate the upper tier of this niche corpus.

The top five filers account for 58% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, indicating a steep concentration gradient with a wide gap between the two institutional leaders and the long tail of individual and academic filers each holding a single record.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Sacramento Municipal Utility District5
2Kyocera Corporation3
3SUBBARATNAM B1
4DR N LAVANYA1
5RAGHU Y1
6KUMAR NELLORE MANOJ1
7DEVI CHITRA S1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
8SWAROOP ANAND B1
9SRIKANTH S1
10Toshiba Corporation1
11ANGAYARKANNI N1
12Florida Atlantic University1
13MITTAL SHAILENDRA KUMAR1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect institutional R&D by a public utility and a Japanese electronics manufacturer, suggesting that sustained grid-integration expertise — rather than broad portfolio coverage — defines the frontier here.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are subject to publication lag and likely undercount current activity; trend readings for 20252026 should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity has eased from its 2018 peak; power-grid systems dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend reveals intermittent activity since 2017, peaking in 2018 and again in 2021, while the technology composition is anchored in H02J power-supply and grid-systems patents with secondary coverage in business-process and AI-computing branches.

Annual filing trend

Filings spiked briefly in 2018 and 2021 before easing; 2025–2026 values are provisional due to publication lag and should not be read as a sustained recovery or further decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2018.02017220181201902020220210202212023020241202522026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H02J (power supply and grid systems) is the dominant branch, with G06Q (business and commerce data processing) as a secondary cluster; branches covering AI models, EV propulsion, and communications protocols each hold only a small share, marking them as relatively under-served.

Technology compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems leads with 13; G06Q · Business, commerce & admin data processing 7.H02J · Power supply & gr…13G06Q · Business, commerc…7B60L · Electric vehicle …2G06N · Computing based o…2H04M · Telephonic commun…2H04Q · Switching & selec…2G05B · Control & regulat…1G06F · Electric digital …1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20170324245A1Published 2017-11-09

Power control apparatus, power control method, and…

Kyocera Corporation

A power control apparatus (<b>10</b>) includes a communication interface (<b>21</b>) that transmits and receives signals; a memory (<b>22</b>) that stores information related to power control to perform upon the communication interface (<b>21</b>) receiving a signal of a notification related to power consumption; and a controller (<b>20</b>) that, upon the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Power control apparatus, power control method, and… — patent drawingPower control apparatus, power control method, and… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Energy Control And Storage System For Controlling …6
2Energy control and storage system for controlling …2
3Power control apparatus, power control method, and…2
4Power control device, power control method, and po…2
5Systems and methods for smart grid data analysis a…1
6Energy Control And Storage System For Controlling …1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a declining lifecycle signal, steep concentration, absent recorded collaborations, and a US-led jurisdiction profile shapes the risk and opportunity calculus for any new entrant or incumbent looking to expand.

Decline

Field is in decline from a shallow 2018 peak

The lifecycle stage is classified as Decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2018 peak. The corpus is small in absolute terms, which means the decline reflects low overall volume rather than a crowded, maturing technology. New filings could meaningfully shift the landscape.

Lifecycle: Decline
Concentration

Two institutional leaders dominate; the remainder are individuals or academics

The top five filers hold 58% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, and the gap between second-ranked Kyocera Corporation and the rest is stark. Individual inventors and academic institutions each register only one patent record, indicating no strong second tier of corporate challengers. This leaves room for a focused corporate entrant to establish a clear ranking position quickly.

High concentration
Collaboration

No recorded co-applicant activity in this corpus

Evidence for cross-organization collaboration filings is pending — no co-applicant pairs are recorded in this dataset. The absence of consortium or joint-assignment activity suggests that the field has not yet attracted the collaborative R&D structures common in more mature grid-technology domains. This could represent either an untapped partnership opportunity or a signal that the niche is too narrow to have motivated formal alliances to date.

Collaboration: none recorded
Geography

United States leads; India and Europe show early but real presence

The United States accounts for the largest single jurisdiction count, followed by India, with Europe (EPO) and WIPO (PCT) each contributing a smaller share. Brazil appears as an outlier jurisdiction. India’s presence — driven primarily by individual and academic filers — suggests growing academic interest in residential smart-grid solutions outside traditional utility-market leaders.

US-led, India emerging
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Cards are grounded in lifecycle, applicant ranking, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Sacramento Municipal Utility District and Kyocera Corporation lead on different technology emphases

The two institutional leaders diverge in approach: the public utility concentrates on grid-systems and business-process integration, while Kyocera extends into communication protocols alongside core grid technology.

Leader · Sacramento Municipal Utility District

Sacramento Municipal Utility District

Holds 5 patent records — the largest share in this corpus — focused on H02J power-supply and grid systems alongside G06Q business and administrative data processing. This dual emphasis reflects a utility operator’s perspective: grid-level power management paired with the data and billing infrastructure needed to serve residential customers. No momentum trend is recorded for the top applicant in the available data.

patent records: 5
Challenger · Kyocera Corporation

Kyocera Corporation

Holds 3 patent records, with technology emphasis spanning H02J power-supply and grid systems, H04M telephonic communication, and H04Q switching and selecting. The communication-layer coverage distinguishes Kyocera from the utility-operator leader and points toward device-level or home-energy-management system integration. No recent-period momentum trend is separately recorded for Kyocera in the available applicant momentum data.

patent records: 3
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access rankings, technology profiles, and momentum trends for all filers in this landscape.
Toshiba CorporationFlorida Atlantic University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
SWAROOP ANAND B1▲ new entrant
SUBBARATNAM B1▲ new entrant
SRIKANTH S1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player profiles are derived from applicant ranking and technology-focus evidence.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in AI models, EV integration, and control systems

Several IPC branches present in the corpus hold very low patent-record counts relative to the dominant H02J class, making them worth monitoring as adjacent areas where new filings could establish an early position.

G06N · Computing based on AI models

This branch accounts for only 2 patent records and a 7% share of the technology composition. Given the growing practical relevance of machine-learning approaches to demand forecasting, load balancing, and anomaly detection in residential grids, the current sparsity suggests that AI-native grid-management methods are not yet well covered in this specific residential context. Florida Atlantic University is the only academic filer with explicit G06N focus, alongside a small cluster of individual inventors, leaving the branch open to a corporate entrant with applied AI capabilities.

Search this in Eureka →

G05B · Control & regulating systems

G05B holds only 1 patent record — the smallest share among all recorded branches at 3%. Control and regulation systems underpin home energy management hardware, including smart thermostats, inverter controllers, and demand-response actuators. The near-absence of coverage here, combined with the plausible technical link to residential grid management, makes it an observable gap. Entry would likely require combining grid-communication expertise with embedded control-system know-how.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all under-served IPC branches, filing gaps by year, and suggested search queries for this topic.
B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion and grid chargingH04Q · Switching and selecting for home energy networks+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are identified by low patent-record counts relative to the dominant IPC class.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH02J 3 · Power supply & grid systemsG06Q 50 · Business, commerce & admin data processingB60L 53 · Electric vehicle propulsionG06Q 10 · Business, commerce & admin data processingH02J 7 · Power supply & grid systems
Sacramento Municipal Utility DistrictStrong · 5Strong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsent
Kyocera CorporationStrong · 3AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Florida Atlantic UniversityStrong · 1Strong · 1AbsentStrong · 1Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own residential energy patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.