Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This review tracks patent families filed against smart irrigation, precision irrigation and irrigation control language, cross-referenced against water-use efficiency and loss-reduction claim text, and bounded by IPC classes covering irrigation apparatus and climate-adaptation technology. The corpus spans 101 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, with the most recent year necessarily undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months.
The technology sits at the intersection of horticultural apparatus and control engineering: nearly a third of records also classify under control and regulating systems, and a smaller but growing share pull in AI-based computing classifications. That overlap is the story of this landscape — irrigation hardware claims are increasingly wrapped around software and sensing logic rather than standing alone.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 101-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses.
Annual filings rose from 2 in 2017 to 23 in 2026, with the midpoint year (2022) sitting at only 6. That shape — a slow first half and a steep back half — indicates the field is still in an early filing rush rather than a mature, saturated one, though the newest year's count will revise upward as later publications land.
All 101 records classify under A01G (horticulture and forestry), but 33 also carry G05B control-system classifications and 26 carry G06Q business-data-processing classifications. A smaller cluster of 16 records already touches G06N AI-model computing, signalling that irrigation scheduling logic is starting to be claimed as a computing method rather than purely as mechanical apparatus.
Shares are the percentage of the 101 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about smart irrigation system efficiency enhancement and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe present invention is related to internet of things based smart irrigation system for water resource management. The objective of present invention is to solve the abnormalities presented in the prior art techniques related to monitoring agriculture parameters and controlling irrigation according to availability of water resources.Abstract as filed; drawing references omitted.
View full record| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CN103493715A | 基于作物根区土壤水分与根系分布的灌溉控制方法与系统 | 53 |
| 2 | US9258952B2 | Volumetric budget based irrigation control | 46 |
| 3 | US20160113220A1 | Volumetric budget based irrigation control | 28 |
| 4 | US10188050B2 | Volumetric budget based irrigation control | 26 |
| 5 | WO2011044289A1 | Volumetric budget based irrigation control | 22 |
| 6 | CN101411299A | 植物叶片膨压感应节水灌溉自动控制方法 | 18 |
| 7 | CN109997658A | 智能喷灌系统以及喷灌控制方法 | 16 |
| 8 | US20190110415A1 | Volumetric budget based irrigation control | 16 |
| 9 | CN120436047A | 融合气象数据的节水灌溉控制方法、装置、设备及介质 | 15 |
| 10 | CN106933166A | 一种农田智能化灌溉管理系统 | 12 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of foundational status, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the filing trend, geography and citation data are read together.
India and China together account for roughly 78% of receiving-office activity, while the United States, Australia, EPO and the Netherlands split the remainder in single digits. A filing strategy built only around US or European coverage will miss most of the activity in this field.
A third of the corpus pairs irrigation apparatus classification with control-and-regulation classification, and a quarter also touches business-data-processing classes. New filings that treat irrigation scheduling as pure mechanics, without a control or data layer, are increasingly the exception.
The most-cited family in this corpus centres on volumetric budget-based irrigation control, appearing across several related US and WO filings. Any new control-logic claim in this space should be checked against that family line before drafting.
Only four co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest of them all involve the same corporate assignee paired with different named inventors. Most applicants in this field are filing solo rather than through joint ventures or research partnerships.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to smart irrigation system efficiency enhancement, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee activity is led by academic institutions rather than a single dominant corporate filer, and recent-year momentum is thin across the board.
Engineering colleges and universities, rather than agritech corporations, show the most recent-year filing activity in this dataset, with counts still in the low single digits.
Institutions with filing history earlier in the window show zero activity in the latest year, a pattern consistent with a field where entrants file once or twice around a research project rather than sustaining a filing programme.
Rain Bird's co-assignee pairs and historical presence in the corpus mark it as an established filer, but its latest-year count sits at zero in this dataset, suggesting its foundational control-logic patents are not being followed by a fresh wave of continuations.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| SRI KRISHNA COLLEGE OF ENG & TECH | 2 | — |
| SR UNIVERSITY | 2 | — |
| SAVEETHA ENG COLLEGE | 1 | 0% |
| Rain Bird | 0 | — |
| Lovely Professional University | 0 | -100% |
| China Agricultural University | 0 | — |
| Zhejiang University | 0 | — |
| Beijing Forestry University | 0 | — |
The landscape data points to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for a filing gap.
Before drafting any irrigation scheduling or control claim, review the volumetric-budget-control family line that anchors the citation ranking in this corpus — it is the most-referenced prior art here.
Explore citation data in EurekaWith nearly 80% of receiving-office activity concentrated in India and China, competitive monitoring focused only on US or EPO filings will miss most new entrants in this field.
Set up jurisdiction alerts in EurekaThe growing share of records also classified under AI-model computing suggests scheduling-logic claims are moving toward software framing; check draft claims against that overlap early.
Run a claim comparison in EurekaThis landscape identifies 101 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine smart, precision or irrigation-control language with water-use efficiency or loss-reduction claim text, filtered to relevant irrigation and climate-adaptation IPC classes. That is a bounded search set, not a count of every irrigation patent worldwide, so broader or narrower search terms will return different totals. The most recent year's count will also rise as publications with an 18-month filing lag continue to appear.
Filing activity in this dataset is led by academic and engineering institutions rather than a single dominant corporation, with the strongest historical corporate presence coming from an established irrigation-control filer whose family line anchors the citation rankings. Recent-year momentum, however, sits mostly with colleges and universities filing small numbers of applications rather than sustained corporate programmes. Anyone tracking competitive activity here should watch institutional filers alongside corporate ones, not instead of them.
India and China are the dominant receiving offices in this corpus, together accounting for roughly 78% of the 101 records, with the United States a distant third. Australia, the European Patent Office and the Netherlands each contribute only a handful of filings. A freedom-to-operate review limited to US or European jurisdictions would miss most of the activity captured here.
Start with the volumetric budget-based irrigation control family, which carries the highest citation counts in this corpus and appears across multiple related US and international filings. A third of all records in this landscape also classify under control-and-regulation systems, so scheduling and control-logic claims are the most crowded area. Checking that family line and its citing patents before drafting new control claims will reduce the risk of overlap.
Yes, based on the IPC composition data: subclasses covering soil-working integration, material-analysis-based water-loss diagnostics, and non-electric control variables each show single-digit record counts compared with over a hundred in the core horticultural class. Combined with the small but growing overlap into AI-based scheduling models, these lower-density branches suggest room for claims that link irrigation control to specific sensing or planting-system integration rather than general scheduling logic. High filing density in the core control class means that area is occupied, not that it is closed to well-differentiated claims.
Go past this page: query the whole smart irrigation system efficiency enhancement corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.