https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/smart-irrigation-system-efficiency-enhancement-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Agriculture Technology · Patent Landscape
Smart irrigation patents: mapping who controls water-use efficiency claims
  • Filing is accelerating, not maturing. Records climbed from 2 in 2017 to 23 in the most recent year, with the midpoint year (2022) at just 6 — growth is still in its early, steep phase.
  • India and China dominate filing volume. Of 101 published records, receiving offices in India (48) and China (31) account for nearly 80% combined, well ahead of the United States (12).
  • The most-cited prior art is a decade-old US family. Volumetric budget-based irrigation control filings (US9258952B2 and related) carry the heaviest citation counts in the corpus, anchoring the control-logic baseline.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
101
Published Records
26%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+120%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
IN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review tracks patent families filed against smart irrigation, precision irrigation and irrigation control language, cross-referenced against water-use efficiency and loss-reduction claim text, and bounded by IPC classes covering irrigation apparatus and climate-adaptation technology. The corpus spans 101 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, with the most recent year necessarily undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months.

The technology sits at the intersection of horticultural apparatus and control engineering: nearly a third of records also classify under control and regulating systems, and a smaller but growing share pull in AI-based computing classifications. That overlap is the story of this landscape — irrigation hardware claims are increasingly wrapped around software and sensing logic rather than standing alone.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1RAIN BIRD CORP16
  2. 2CHINA AGRI UNIV3
  3. 3LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY3
  4. 4LANDCARE RES NEW ZEALAND LTD2
  5. 5SAVEETHA ENG COLLEGE2
  6. 6HULUNBUIR AGRI RECLAMATION TECH DEV CO LTD2
  7. 7HULUNBUIR INST OF ECOLOGICAL IND & TECH2
  8. 8BEIJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY2
  9. 9ZHEJIANG UNIV2
  10. 10SRI KRISHNA COLLEGE OF ENG & TECH2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Irrigation System Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 101-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses.

Accelerating filings with no plateau in sight

Annual filings rose from 2 in 2017 to 23 in 2026, with the midpoint year (2022) sitting at only 6. That shape — a slow first half and a steep back half — indicates the field is still in an early filing rush rather than a mature, saturated one, though the newest year's count will revise upward as later publications land.

Accelerating filings with no plateau in sight061319252201720182019202020212022202320242025232026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Control and data-processing classes are catching up to horticultural apparatus

All 101 records classify under A01G (horticulture and forestry), but 33 also carry G05B control-system classifications and 26 carry G06Q business-data-processing classifications. A smaller cluster of 16 records already touches G06N AI-model computing, signalling that irrigation scheduling logic is starting to be claimed as a computing method rather than purely as mechanical apparatus.

Control and data-processing classes are catching up to horticultural apparatusA01G · Horticulture & forestry101100.0%G05B · Control & regulating systems3332.7%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…2625.7%G06N · Computing based on AI models1615.8%A01B · Soil working in agriculture1110.9%G01N · Material analysis & testing98.9%A01C · Planting & sowing87.9%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…76.9%Other5049.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 101 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Irrigation System Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Smart Irrigation System Efficiency Enhancement with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about smart irrigation system efficiency enhancement and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The prior art anchoring this space

Representative filing
AU2021104402A42022-04-14

AU2021104402A4 — IoT-based smart irrigation system for water resource management

DEEPAK,TIRUMISHI JADA

The present invention is related to internet of things based smart irrigation system for water resource management. The objective of present invention is to solve the abnormalities presented in the prior art techniques related to monitoring agriculture parameters and controlling irrigation according to availability of water resources.Abstract as filed; drawing references omitted.

View full record
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN103493715A基于作物根区土壤水分与根系分布的灌溉控制方法与系统53
2US9258952B2Volumetric budget based irrigation control46
3US20160113220A1Volumetric budget based irrigation control28
4US10188050B2Volumetric budget based irrigation control26
5WO2011044289A1Volumetric budget based irrigation control22
6CN101411299A植物叶片膨压感应节水灌溉自动控制方法18
7CN109997658A智能喷灌系统以及喷灌控制方法16
8US20190110415A1Volumetric budget based irrigation control16
9CN120436047A融合气象数据的节水灌溉控制方法、装置、设备及介质15
10CN106933166A一种农田智能化灌溉管理系统12

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of foundational status, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Irrigation System Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the filing trend, geography and citation data are read together.

Geography
48 + 31 of 101
India + China receiving-office share

Filing is concentrated in two jurisdictions

India and China together account for roughly 78% of receiving-office activity, while the United States, Australia, EPO and the Netherlands split the remainder in single digits. A filing strategy built only around US or European coverage will miss most of the activity in this field.

Receiving office data, 101 records
Technology overlap
33 of 101
records also classed under G05B

Control-systems claims are now standard, not exceptional

A third of the corpus pairs irrigation apparatus classification with control-and-regulation classification, and a quarter also touches business-data-processing classes. New filings that treat irrigation scheduling as pure mechanics, without a control or data layer, are increasingly the exception.

IPC composition, 101 records
Prior art
Cited 53
top-cited record in corpus

Volumetric budget control is the reference baseline

The most-cited family in this corpus centres on volumetric budget-based irrigation control, appearing across several related US and WO filings. Any new control-logic claim in this space should be checked against that family line before drafting.

Citation ranking, most-cited records
Collaboration
4 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is rare and centres on one company

Only four co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest of them all involve the same corporate assignee paired with different named inventors. Most applicants in this field are filing solo rather than through joint ventures or research partnerships.

Co-assignee pairs, 101 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to smart irrigation system efficiency enhancement, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Irrigation System Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and how fast they are moving

Assignee activity is led by academic institutions rather than a single dominant corporate filer, and recent-year momentum is thin across the board.

Momentum
2 in latest year
SRI KRISHNA COLLEGE OF ENG & TECH

Academic filers lead recent activity

Engineering colleges and universities, rather than agritech corporations, show the most recent-year filing activity in this dataset, with counts still in the low single digits.

Recent-year momentum data
Momentum
-100% YoY
Lovely Professional University

Some early filers have gone quiet

Institutions with filing history earlier in the window show zero activity in the latest year, a pattern consistent with a field where entrants file once or twice around a research project rather than sustaining a filing programme.

Recent-year momentum data
Legacy filer
0 in latest year
Rain Bird

The historical corporate leader has slowed

Rain Bird's co-assignee pairs and historical presence in the corpus mark it as an established filer, but its latest-year count sits at zero in this dataset, suggesting its foundational control-logic patents are not being followed by a fresh wave of continuations.

Co-assignee and momentum data
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before you file
These sub-areas show low record counts relative to the core irrigation-control classes, based on the IPC composition breakdown.
Root-zone soil moisture sensing fusionAI-based irrigation scheduling modelsSoil-working integration with irrigation controlMaterial analysis for water-loss diagnosticsNon-electric variable control for planting systems
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
SRI KRISHNA COLLEGE OF ENG & TECH2
SR UNIVERSITY2
SAVEETHA ENG COLLEGE10%
Rain Bird0
Lovely Professional University0-100%
China Agricultural University0
Zhejiang University0
Beijing Forestry University0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Irrigation System Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The landscape data points to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for a filing gap.

Check the control-logic baseline

Before drafting any irrigation scheduling or control claim, review the volumetric-budget-control family line that anchors the citation ranking in this corpus — it is the most-referenced prior art here.

Explore citation data in Eureka

Watch the India and China filing corridors

With nearly 80% of receiving-office activity concentrated in India and China, competitive monitoring focused only on US or EPO filings will miss most new entrants in this field.

Set up jurisdiction alerts in Eureka

Test claims against the AI-scheduling overlap

The growing share of records also classified under AI-model computing suggests scheduling-logic claims are moving toward software framing; check draft claims against that overlap early.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Irrigation System Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about smart irrigation patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Irrigation System Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Smart Irrigation System Efficiency Enhancement in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole smart irrigation system efficiency enhancement corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.