https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/smart-irrigation-system-environmental-durability-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Agriculture Technology
Smart irrigation systems built for weatherproof, outdoor-rated durability: the patent picture
  • Small but accelerating. filings sit at just 15 families total, yet the count is still climbing toward a 2026 peak rather than tapering off.
  • Sensor housings dominate citation activity. the most-cited records all cover the same rain-sensing housing lineage out of Rain Bird, suggesting that claim territory is well staked.
  • Filing is US-and-India led with academic co-inventors. 11 of the records enter through the United States and 4 through India, and several of the strongest co-filing pairs are university researchers rather than corporate R&D teams.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
15
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
14
Active Filers Ranked
2026
Peak Filing Year
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape isolates patent families at the intersection of irrigation control and environmental durability claims: weatherproof enclosures, dust and water resistance, outdoor durability and UV resistance language layered onto smart or precision irrigation systems. It excludes irrigation patents that make no durability claim, and durability patents that are not tied to irrigation control, so the set is deliberately narrow: 15 published families across just over a decade of activity.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2026 figure in the trend below is necessarily incomplete and will rise as later filings publish. The composition data points to sensor and environmental-monitoring hardware, not control-software claims, as the centre of gravity in this space.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1RAIN BIRD CORP11
  2. 2DR B MADHU KIRAN1
  3. 3DR B DASU1
  4. 4AJAY KUMAR GARG ENG COLLEGE1
  5. 5SAGE UNIV1
  6. 6DR G KEERTHI1
  7. 7DR G V S N R V PRASAD1
  8. 8VENUGOPAL LENIN KALYANASUNDARAM1
  9. 9DR L R SRINIVAS1
  10. 10DR G BHARTHI1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Irrigation System Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 15-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings moved from zero in 2017 to a midpoint of 2 families in 2022 and a current peak of 3 in 2026. The curve is still rising at the point the data was cut off, which is unusual for a field this small and suggests durability claims are a recent addition to irrigation filings rather than a legacy category.

Filing trend, 2017-202601223020172018201920202021202220232024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

Every family in the set touches A01G (horticulture and forestry), and the large majority also carry G01W (meteorology) or G01K (temperature measurement) codes, confirming that durability claims here are being written around environmental sensing rather than mechanical enclosure design alone. Control-systems codes (G05B, G05D) and materials or soil-working codes (A01B, F24S, G01N) appear only once or twice each, marking them as thin, largely unclaimed branches.

IPC subclass distributionA01G · Horticulture & forestry15100.0%G01W · Meteorology1280.0%G01K · Temperature measurement1066.7%G05B · Control & regulating systems213.3%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…213.3%A01B · Soil working in agriculture16.7%F24S · Solar heat collectors16.7%G01N · Material analysis & testing16.7%Other320.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 15 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Irrigation System Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Smart Irrigation System Environmental Durability with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about smart irrigation system environmental durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records

Representative filing
US20170038497A12017-02-09

US20170038497A1 — Sensor device for use in controlling irrigation

RAIN BIRD CORPORATION

The family describes a wireless rain sensor housed in a weatherproof enclosure, using a moisture-absorptive material that physically expands and contracts with rainfall to drive a controller and wireless transmitter reporting irrigation-relevant signals.Filed by Rain Bird Corporation; part of a lineage of related sensor-housing families that dominate the citation table.

US20170038497A1 — patent drawing 1US20170038497A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited families in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US9500770B2Sensor device for use in controlling irrigation20
2US10345487B2Sensor device for use in controlling irrigation18
3US20170038497A1Sensor device for use in controlling irrigation17
4US20190278004A1Sensor device for use in controlling irrigation13
5US10732320B2Sensor device for use in controlling irrigation12
6US11346981B2Sensor device for use in controlling irrigation8
7US20240085588A1Sensor device for use in controlling irrigation4
8US11822048B2Sensor device for use in controlling irrigation4
9US20220260751A1Sensor device for use in controlling irrigation4
10US20200386910A1Sensor device for use in controlling irrigation3

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and are skewed toward older publications; a low count on a 2024-2026 filing does not mean the claim is weak.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Irrigation System Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once family counts, citations and IPC codes are read together.

Concentration
5 of 15 records share one lineage
top-cited records

Citation weight sits on one sensor-housing family

The five most-cited records are all variants of the same Rain Bird 'sensor device for use in controlling irrigation' filing. That concentration means the core moisture-sensing, weatherproof-housing approach is well covered prior art, and a new entrant claiming a similar expand-and-contract rain sensor faces a crowded reference set.

Citation data favours earlier filings; treat as influence, not current relevance.
Composition
12 of 15 also code G01W
meteorology overlap

Durability claims are being written through weather sensing

Nearly all families combine irrigation control (A01G) with meteorology (G01W) or temperature measurement (G01K) codes. Enclosure and material-durability claims are riding alongside sensing claims rather than standing alone, which shapes how a freedom-to-operate search should be scoped.

Based on IPC subclass counts across the 15-family set.
Geography
US 11 · India 4
receiving offices

Filing is concentrated in two offices

All 15 records route through either the United States or India, with no other receiving office represented. That narrows freedom-to-operate exposure geographically but also means the field has not yet been tested through examination in other major markets.

Receiving-office counts from the full dataset.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to smart irrigation system environmental durability, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Irrigation System Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The assignee base is a mix of a single established irrigation manufacturer and a long tail of individual academic co-inventors filing in pairs, a pattern that differs sharply from more mature agtech categories.

Momentum
1 family in the latest year
per active filer

No single filer is pulling ahead

Recent-year momentum is evenly spread: each of the named assignees, including Venugopal Lenin Kalyanasundaram, Seshadri Rao Gudlavalleru Engineering College, Sampathkumar Karthikeyan Moothampalayam and Sage University, shows exactly one filing in the latest year. Nobody has yet built a multi-filing streak.

Momentum reflects latest-year counts only.
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
across 15 families

Co-filing is common but shallow

Ten co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, each pair linked by a single shared filing. The strongest pairings, such as Venugopal Lenin Kalyanasundaram with Sampathkumar Karthikeyan Moothampalayam, and Seshadri Rao Gudlavalleru Engineering College with its named co-inventors, look like academic research partnerships rather than sustained corporate collaboration.

Co-assignee pair counts from the full dataset.
Incumbency
5 top-cited records, 1 assignee
Rain Bird lineage

One corporate filer anchors the prior art

Rain Bird Corporation is the only party in this set with a citation-heavy, multi-generation family, giving it the clearest incumbent position on rain-sensing housing claims. Everyone else in the ranking is a recent, single-filing entrant.

Based on the most-cited records table.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
IPC codes with only one or two records suggest thin coverage, not necessarily low value.
UV-stabilised enclosure polymerssolar-powered sensor housingssoil-material durability testingdust-ingress-rated control unitscombined moisture-and-soil sensing modules
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
VENUGOPAL LENIN KALYANASUNDARAM1
SESHADRI RAO GUDLAVALLERU ENG COLLEGE1
SAMPATHKUMAR KARTHIKEYAN MOOTHAMPALAYAM1
SAGE UNIV1
DR MALLADI R CH SASTRY1
DR L R SRINIVAS1
DR G V S N R V PRASAD1
DR G KEERTHI1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Irrigation System Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this

The dataset points to a narrow but still-forming field. Two directions are worth pursuing before committing to a filing strategy.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the Rain Bird lineage

Before drafting claims around weatherproof rain or moisture sensing, review the five most-cited records in detail; they share enough structural overlap that a new filing needs to differentiate clearly on mechanism or material.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Scope claims toward the thinly-covered branches

Soil-material durability, UV-stabilised housings and combined sensing modules each carry only one or two families. That is where drafting a defensible first claim is most realistic given current coverage.

Map white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Irrigation System Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Smart Irrigation System Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Smart Irrigation System Environmental Durability in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole smart irrigation system environmental durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.