Book a demo

Smart Ring Patent Landscape 2026

Smart Ring Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Smart Ring Patent Landscape in 2026

Samsung Electronics dominates a highly concentrated smart ring patent field, holding a commanding lead over challengers Qualcomm and Intel. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2022 peak, with activity centred heavily on the United States.

1,104
Patent families in scope
45%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+39%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung leads a concentrated field, with Qualcomm and Intel forming a distant second tier

Samsung Electronics holds the top position with 257 patent families, more than 1.6 times the tally of second-ranked Qualcomm (154 patent families). Intel (93), Meta Platforms Technologies (42), and Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC (34) complete the top five.

The top five filers account for 45% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating a moderately concentrated competitive structure. A pronounced gap separates Samsung and Qualcomm from the rest of the field, establishing a clear two-player leadership tier ahead of Intel and the challengers below.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.257
2Qualcomm Incorporated154
3Intel Corporation93
4Meta Platforms Technologies LLC42
5Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC34
6JOHNSON & JOHNSON VISION CARE INC29
7Google LLC28
8Oura Ring Inc28
9Xiaomi Inc27
10IYO Inc25
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.25
12FuturePlay24
13BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.21
14Quanata LLC17
15Ultrahuman Healthcare Pte Ltd16
16eBay Inc14
17IBM Corporation14
18Toyota Motor Corporation14
19Immersion Corporation14
20Beijing BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.14
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Samsung’s scale advantage, combined with its active co-filing programme with Korean universities, suggests it is building layered IP across core interaction and sensor functions rather than defending a single narrow claim set.

Filing counts for 20242026 are understated due to standard patent publication lag; apparent softening in those years should not be read as reduced R&D activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth remains positive, with digital-processing and wireless communication dominating the technology mix

The filing trend chart traces the field’s expansion from 2017 to date, while the technology composition chart reveals how different IPC branches contribute to the overall portfolio.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed from 61 in 2017 to a peak of 196 in 2022, reflecting a rapid acceleration phase. Annual volume eased to 180 in 2023 and 139 in 2024; figures for 2025 and 2026 are substantially understated due to publication lag and should not be interpreted as a real decline. The recent three-year window remains well above the prior three-year window, confirming continued multi-year growth.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 196 in 2022.6120176320187020191172020183202119620221802023139202491202542026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

Electric digital data processing (G06F) dominates the portfolio by a wide margin, reflecting the centrality of on-device computation and user-interface logic. Wireless communications (H04W, H04L) and telephonic communication (H04M) form the next tier, underscoring the smart ring’s role as a connected peripheral. Health-adjacent branches — Diagnosis and surgery (A61B) and Healthcare informatics (G16H) — are present but proportionally smaller, signalling room for deeper specialisation in clinical monitoring.

Technology compositionG06F · Electric digital data processing leads with 1,103; H04W · Wireless communication networks 380.G06F · Electric digital …1,103H04W · Wireless communic…380H04M · Telephonic commun…343H04L · Digital informati…267A61B · Diagnosis & surgery177G06Q · Business, commerc…134H04R · Loudspeakers & au…131G06N · Computing based o…113↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240249618A1Published 2024-07-25

Non-visual outputs for a smart ring

QUANATA, LLC

A smart ring device includes a ring band having a plurality of surfaces. The plurality of surfaces can include an inner surface and an outer surface opposite to the inner surface. The inner surface can be configured to contact a user when the ring band is worn by the user. The smart ring device further can include a processor disposed within the ring band… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Non-visual outputs for a smart ring — patent drawingNon-visual outputs for a smart ring — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Smart device421
2Systems and methods for computer assisted operation324
3Methods and devices for mode switching257
4Systems and methods for food analysis, personalize…245
5System having a miniature portable electronic devi…242
6Hearing aid adapted for wireless power reception213
7Method and apparatus for providing notification198
8Unified control of privacy-impacting devices192

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

The combination of a Growth lifecycle stage, a concentrated leader, active academic collaboration, and US-dominant jurisdiction coverage shapes where defensible R&D positions remain available.

Growth

Growth stage with peak behind it — expand depth, not breadth

The field carries a Growth lifecycle designation: the recent three-year filing window sits well above the prior three-year period, but annual volume has eased from its 2022 peak. Entrants building broad platform positions now face accumulated prior art; targeted investment in under-served branches — health monitoring, audio, AI inference — offers better freedom-to-operate prospects than duplicating core interaction patents.

Growth · post-2022 peak
Concentration

Two-tier structure: Samsung and Qualcomm well ahead of the pack

The top five filers hold 45% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output, with Samsung alone accounting for more than a quarter of that group’s total. A mid-tier cluster — Meta, Strong Force VCN, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Google, Oura Ring — is closely bunched between 28 and 42 patent families, meaning positional gains in that tier are achievable with focused filing programmes. New entrants IYO Inc and Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC have entered with notable recent momentum.

High concentration
Collaboration

Samsung anchors a dense academic co-filing network; Google–Harman partnership notable in audio

Samsung Electronics co-files most actively with Seoul National University R&DB Foundation (6 joint families), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (5), and Korea University (3). Secondary co-filing relationships connect Samsung with Hanyang University, Chosun University, DGIST, UNIST, and POSTECH. Google LLC co-files with Harman International Industries (2 joint families), pointing to an audio-oriented collaboration thread. Competitors without comparable university partnerships face a structural disadvantage in recruiting early-stage research into IP pipelines.

Samsung-led ecosystem
Geography

US-dominant filing with thin coverage in key consumer markets

The United States is by far the most-filed jurisdiction, followed by Europe (EPO) and India. South Korea — home to Samsung and several challengers — shows comparatively modest filing volume, as does China despite BOE Technology Group and Xiaomi being active assignees. WIPO PCT filings indicate some intent to pursue broader protection. Japan, Canada, and Australia each have thin coverage, creating potential enforcement gaps for commercially important hardware markets.

US-centric
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Seoul National University R&DB Foundation6
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)5
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.高丽大学校产学协力团3
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.汉阳大学校产学协力团2
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.朝鲜大学校产学协力团2
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST)2
Google LLCHarman International Industries Inc2
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST)1
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.浦项工科大学校产学协力团1
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.延世大学校产学协力团1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration data reflects co-applicant patent families; jurisdiction data is at the patent-record level.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung and Qualcomm lead by route emphasis; IYO and Strong Force are fast-moving newcomers

The top applicants differ sharply in technology focus: Samsung spans interaction, power and communication; Qualcomm concentrates on wireless protocol; Intel on memory and system architecture. Three new entrants show strong recent-period momentum from low prior bases.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

Samsung leads with 257 patent families and a strong upward trajectory (3.3× recent vs prior three-year period). Its portfolio centres on device management and power control (G06F 1), user-interface and input methods (G06F 3), and mobile telephony integration (H04M 1), reflecting a strategy to own the smart ring’s role as a primary wearable controller. The broad academic co-filing network further reinforces its IP breadth.

families: 257
Challenger · Qualcomm

Qualcomm Inc

Qualcomm holds 154 patent families and grew modestly by 12% in the recent period. Its emphasis on wireless resource management (H04W 72), telephony (H04M 1), and multi-carrier transmission (H04L 5) positions it as the leading claimant on the radio layer that enables smart ring connectivity. This makes Qualcomm a critical IP node for any device relying on Bluetooth or cellular offload protocols.

families: 154
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top 100 filers, including momentum scores and technology-route heat maps.
Intel CorpMeta Platforms Technologies LLC+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.95▲ 3.3× vs prior 3-yr
Qualcomm Incorporated66▲ +12%
Intel Corporation44▬ +5%
Meta Platforms Technologies LLC8▼ -74%
Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC32▲ new entrant
Google LLC11▲ new entrant
IYO Inc16▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Patent family counts are at the family level; momentum trends compare the most recent three-year period to the prior three-year period.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in health sensing, business logic, and audio worth monitoring

Several IPC branches appear in the smart ring corpus at lower share levels relative to the dominant G06F cluster. Three of them combine plausible technical value with realistic entry paths for focused filers.

A61B · Diagnosis & surgery — health sensing

With 177 patent records and a 5% share among the top branches, A61B is the largest under-served domain adjacent to the dominant digital-processing cluster. Smart rings are physically positioned for continuous photoplethysmography, skin temperature, and electrodermal activity measurement — modalities that map directly to A61B 5. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care is currently the most focused claimant here, but no single player dominates. An entrant with strong biosensor IP and clinical-grade signal-processing algorithms could establish a defensible position before the branch matures.

Search this in Eureka →

H04R · Loudspeakers & audio transducers — bone-conduction and open-ear audio

H04R carries 131 patent records at a 3% share, and IYO Inc — a new entrant with all of its 25 patent families filed in the recent period — has staked a focused position in ring-based audio (H04R 1 and H04R 5 dominate its portfolio). The Google–Harman collaboration also touches this branch. Ring-worn bone-conduction and open-ear audio is technically distinct from earbuds, yet IP coverage remains sparse relative to the commercial interest. Entry is feasible for players combining acoustic transducer hardware with on-device signal processing expertise.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See patent density, filing velocity, and freedom-to-operate signals across all IPC branches in the smart ring corpus.
G06Q · Business and commerce data processingG06N · Computing based on AI models+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures represent each class’s patent records as a proportion of the top-branch set, not of total families.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders diverge across interaction, wireless, health, and audio routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerG06F 1 · Electric digital data processingG06F 3 · Electric digital data processingH04M 1 · Telephonic communicationH04W 4 · Wireless communication networksA61B 5 · Diagnosis & surgery
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 114Strong · 104Strong · 85Strong · 72Emerging · 20
Qualcomm IncorporatedStrong · 32AbsentStrong · 42Strong · 23Absent
FuturePlayStrong · 9Strong · 16Strong · 12Strong · 13Absent
Oura Ring IncStrong · 17Strong · 10AbsentModerate · 4Strong · 12
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care IncAbsentAbsentAbsentModerate · 14Strong · 28
Xiaomi IncStrong · 10AbsentStrong · 17Moderate · 8Absent
Meta Platforms Technologies LLCStrong · 14Strong · 16AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own smart ring patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.