Book a demo

SMR Modular / Factory-Built Patent Snapshot 2026

SMR Modular / Factory-Built Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
SMR Modular / Factory-Built Patent Snapshot in 2026

The SMR modular and factory-built patent field is highly concentrated, with NuScale Power LLC alone accounting for the largest share of the top filers’ combined activity. The field is in a Growth stage on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak and recent years remain understated by publication lag.

11
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

NuScale dominates an emerging, highly concentrated field

NuScale Power LLC is the clear leader in this space, holding the top position in the applicant ranking ahead of Westinghouse Electric Corp and General Electric Co. The visible assignee structure is narrow, with established nuclear OEMs and one specialist SMR developer accounting for the bulk of documented filings.

The top five filers collectively hold 95% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, indicating an exceptionally concentrated field with little meaningful activity outside a small cluster of players. There is a pronounced tier gap between NuScale and the remaining applicants.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1NuScale Power LLC8
2Westinghouse Electric Corp5
3General Electric Co3
4Xi’an Jiaotong University1
5French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)1
6Natura Resources LLC1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

NuScale’s lead position reflects a deliberate, sustained patenting strategy in reactor design and nuclear power plant configurations, suggesting it has established early IP fences around core modular reactor architectures. The presence of Westinghouse and GE indicates that established nuclear primes are beginning to stake out positions, though their current patent records in this specific modular/factory-built segment trail NuScale substantially.

The most recent 18 to 24 months of filing data are subject to publication lag and likely understate current activity; the apparent quiet after 2023 should not be read as a slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A sharp 2023 activity spike and a reactor-centric technology mix

The filing trend reveals a field that was dormant until 2021 and then surged in 2023, while the IPC composition shows overwhelming concentration in nuclear reactor and nuclear power plant classes with several adjacent branches represented at low levels.

Annual filing trend

Filings were essentially absent from 2017 through 2020, with a single record appearing in 2021 and then a pronounced spike to nine records in 2023. The 2024 and 2025 data points reflect publication lag and do not represent a true decline; the field’s multi-year growth rate remains strongly positive at 800% recent versus prior window.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 9 in 2023.02017020180201902020120210202292023020241202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G21C (Nuclear reactors) and G21D (Nuclear power plants) together are visible in the technology mix, confirming that current IP activity is concentrated in core reactor architecture rather than balance-of-plant or auxiliary systems. Notably, C25B (Electrolytic production of compounds) holds a meaningful share, reflecting NuScale’s interest in hydrogen co-production from SMR heat. Adjacent branches such as F01K, F01D, and F03D each appear at very low counts, signalling under-served areas.

Technology compositionG21C · Nuclear reactors leads with 18; G21D · Nuclear power plants 12.G21C · Nuclear reactors18G21D · Nuclear power pla…12C25B · Electrolytic prod…5F01K · Steam & thermal p…2E21B · Earth & rock dril…1F01D · Turbines & non-po…1F03D · Wind motors (wind…1F22G · Steam superheating1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20250292924A1Published 2025-09-18

Method for refurbishing a nuclear power plant init…

Commissariat A L’ENERGIE Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives

A method for retrofitting a nuclear power plant which include dismantling and removing all the components of the primary circuit apart from the LWR reactor vessel, which is essentially emptied of all material and neutralized, subsequently replacing a part of these components with subassemblies that are each made up of an integrated SMR reactor and a mixed… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Method for refurbishing a nuclear power plant init… — patent drawingMethod for refurbishing a nuclear power plant init… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Modular nuclear reactor for a land-based power pla…128
2SLIMM-Scalable Liquid Metal Cooled Small Modular R…24
3Slimm-scalable liquid metal cooled small modular r…12
4Small modular reactor safety systems9
5Modular nuclear reactor for a land-based power pla…9
6Small modular reactor safety systems3
7Modular nuclear reactor for a land-based power pla…3
8Wind-solar reactor system and working method thereof2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · NuScale Power LLC

NuScale Power LLC

NuScale Power LLC leads the applicant ranking with 8 patent records and is classified as a new entrant on momentum — meaning all of its documented activity arrived within the recent filing window. Its technology focus spans nuclear reactor design (G21C 1), nuclear power plants (G21D 1), and electrolytic compound production (C25B 1), the last of which points to hydrogen co-generation as a differentiated use-case. This broad G21C/G21D/C25B spread suggests NuScale is building an integrated IP position covering both the reactor core and downstream energy products.

patent records: 8
Challenger · Westinghouse Electric Corp

Westinghouse Electric Corp

Westinghouse Electric Corp holds 5 patent records and concentrates its technology emphasis across multiple G21C subclasses covering reactor cooling systems (G21C 15), reactor safety and shutdown (G21C 9), and general reactor design (G21C 1). No momentum trend data is available for Westinghouse in the current evidence, but its presence across three distinct G21C subclasses indicates a systems-level rather than single-component approach to modular reactor IP.

patent records: 5
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
General Electric CoNatura Resources LLC+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.