Book a demo

SMR Nuclear Safety & Licensing Patent Snapshot 2026

SMR Nuclear Safety & Licensing Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
SMR Nuclear Safety & Licensing Patent Snapshot in 2026

The SMR nuclear safety and licensing patent space is highly concentrated, with Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power and Westinghouse Electric collectively anchoring the field and the top five filers accounting for 83% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total. Filing activity was largely dormant from 2018 through 2021 before recovering sharply in 2024, reflecting the accelerating global push to license small modular reactor designs.

14
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
South Korea
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power leads a tightly held field

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. Ltd ranks first with 7 patent records, followed closely by Westinghouse Electric Corp with 6, establishing a two-player lead tier that defines the assignee snapshot.

The top five filers — Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power, Westinghouse Electric, Advanced Reactor Concepts LLC, Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research & Design Institute, and UNIST — together account for 83% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, signaling a strongly concentrated field with a steep drop-off beyond the top tier.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1KOREA HYDRO & NUCLEAR POWER CO LTD7
2Westinghouse Electric Corp6
3Advanced Reactor Concepts LLC3
4SHANGHAI NUCLEAR ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN INS…2
5UNIST (ULSAN NAT INST OF SCI & TECH)1
6China Nuclear Power Design Company1
7China Nuclear Power Engineering Company Ltd1
8Nuclearis Corp1
9Nuwell Energy Inc1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The dominance of these two lead players, one Korean state utility and one legacy US nuclear OEM, suggests that licensing-grade safety IP is tightly held by organisations with direct regulatory engagement, creating a meaningful barrier for new entrants seeking standards-compliant protection.

Records published in the most recent 18–24 months are likely under-counted due to standard patent-publication lag; the apparent volume in 20252026 should be treated as a floor, not a ceiling. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A dormant middle decade gives way to a 2024 surge; reactor-core IP dominates the technology mix

The two charts below reveal both the temporal rhythm of SMR safety filing activity and the technology sub-classes that attract the most protection.

Annual filing trend

After a burst of three records in 2017, filings were silent from 2018 through 2021 — a period when SMR licensing frameworks were still nascent. A single record appeared in each of 2022 and 2023, then volume jumped to six records in 2024 before settling to three in 2025. The 2025 and 2026 counts should be read as provisional given publication lag.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 6 in 2024.32017020180201902020020211202212023620243202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G21C (Nuclear reactors) is visible in with 22 records, followed by G21D (Nuclear power plants) with 11 — together accounting for the large majority of the filing corpus. G05B (Control and regulating systems) and G06F (Electric digital data processing) each hold 6 records, indicating a meaningful secondary interest in digital instrumentation and control relevant to licensing submissions. Four branches — conveying and material handling, earth drilling, pressure vessels, and geothermal systems — each appear just once, flagging them as sparsely covered adjacent areas.

Technology compositionG21C · Nuclear reactors leads with 22; G21D · Nuclear power plants 11.G21C · Nuclear reactors22G21D · Nuclear power pla…11G05B · Control & regulat…6G06F · Electric digital …6B65G · Conveying & mater…1E21B · Earth & rock dril…1F17C · Pressure vessels …1F24T · Geothermal systems1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20190206580A1Published 2019-07-04

Small modular reactor power plant with load follow…

Advanced Reactor Concepts LLC

Provided herein is a small modular nuclear reactor plant that can comprise a reactor core comprising a primary sodium comprising cool primary sodium flow and heated primary sodium flow. Heated primary sodium flow can enter one or more IHXs where heated primary sodium exchanges heat with secondary sodium flowing through at least one intermediate sodium loop… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Small modular reactor power plant with load follow… — patent drawingSmall modular reactor power plant with load follow… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Small modular reactor safety systems58
2一种自充压堆芯补水系统15
3Small modular reactor power plant with load follow…13
4Small modular reactor safety systems9
5Small modular reactor power plant with load follow…8
6Small modular reactor safety systems3
7Small modular Reactor including the passive safety…2
8小型模块化反应堆的专设安全系统1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. Ltd

With 7 patent records, Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power holds the top position and is classified as a new entrant on recent-window momentum — meaning its filings are concentrated in the most recent period rather than spread across the full decade. Its technology emphasis spans G21C 1 (reactor design), G21D 3 (plant systems), and G05B 9 (control and regulating systems), reflecting the integrated, licensing-ready safety portfolio expected of a national utility pursuing SMR export certification.

patent records: 7
Challenger · Westinghouse Electric

Westinghouse Electric Corp

Westinghouse Electric Corp holds 6 patent records and concentrates its coverage on G21C 15 (reactor coolant systems) and G21C 9 (emergency core cooling / passive safety), with additional G21C 1 (reactor design) records. No momentum data is available for Westinghouse in the recent-window analysis, suggesting its records are distributed across a broader timeframe rather than clustered in the latest filing surge. Its passive-safety focus aligns with the AP-series and SMR design lineages for which it is seeking regulatory approval in multiple jurisdictions.

patent records: 6
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Advanced Reactor Concepts LLCShanghai Nuclear Engineering Research & Design Institute+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.