Book a demo

SMR Operation AI/ML Patent Snapshot 2026

SMR Operation AI/ML Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
SMR Operation AI/ML Patent Snapshot in 2026

Patent activity applying AI and machine learning to small modular reactor (SMR) operation is at a very early stage, with just 4 patent families in scope and activity concentrated in academic institutions across China and India. Northwestern Polytechnical University holds the leading position, and virtually all filings cluster in core AI model computing, signalling that this field remains largely open for industrial entrants.

4
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··4 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Academic institutions dominate a nascent, highly concentrated field

Northwestern Polytechnical University leads the applicant ranking with 2 patent records, ahead of a long tail of individual academic contributors each holding 1 patent record. The top five filers account for 46% of the combined total across the ranked applicants visible in this query.

The field is extremely concentrated: the leading institution holds twice as many records as any other named applicant, and the remaining filers are spread across a mix of Indian engineering colleges and one Chinese university. There is no visible industrial or commercial assignee in the current corpus.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Northwestern Polytechnical University2
2Mr. Sreenarayanan N.M., Galgotias University1
3Dr. Ganga Sharma, Galgotias University1
4Ms. Neetu Garg, Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology1
5Dr. Sampath Kumar K., Galgotias University1
6Ms. Kajol Dahiya, Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
7Dr. Jeba Shiney O., Chandigarh University1
8Dr. Deepak Kumar Goyal, Vaish College of Engineering1
9MS PRIYA PORWAL GL BAJAJ INST OF TECH & MANAGEMENT1
10MS ISHA GUPTA HMR INST OF TECH & MANAGEMENT1
11Changchun University1
12Ms. Sneha Mishra, Noida International University1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The absence of industry participants implies that core SMR-specific AI/ML methods have not yet been claimed by reactor vendors or energy companies, leaving the technical ground substantially open for early movers with domain-specific expertise.

Filing data for the most recent 18–24 months is subject to publication lag and may understate actual activity; the corpus should be treated as a lower-bound snapshot of current filing momentum. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Sparse filing history with a recent cluster; AI computing dominates the technology mix

The annual trend and technology composition charts together reveal both the immaturity of this field and its near-exclusive focus on general AI model computing methods rather than SMR-specific algorithmic approaches.

Annual filing trend

No filings appear before 2022; a single record was filed in 2022, followed by a gap in 2023–2024, and then three records in 2025. The 2025 cluster may be partially undercounted due to publication lag, so it should be read as a floor rather than a ceiling. The overall pattern is consistent with a pre-commercialisation field just beginning to attract academic attention.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 3 in 2025.02017020180201902020020211202202023020243202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

Computing based on AI models (G06N) covers all 4 records in scope, confirming that current work targets foundational ML methods. Radar, sonar and positioning (G01S) appears as a secondary branch with 2 records, driven by Northwestern Polytechnical University’s emphasis on sensing and positioning. Electric digital data processing (G06F), data recognition and presentation (G06K), and image data processing (G06T) each account for 1 record, suggesting exploratory work across perception and data pipelines.

Technology compositionG06N · Computing based on AI models leads with 4; G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning 2.G06N · Computing based o…4G01S · Radar, sonar & po…2G06F · Electric digital …1G06K · Data recognition …1G06T · Image data proces…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
CN121144709APublished 2025-12-16

一种吸附增强甲烷水蒸气重整氢气产率预测方法

长春大学

本发明提出了一种吸附增强甲烷水蒸气重整氢气产率预测方法,旨在解决现有吸附增强甲烷水蒸气重整(SE‑SMR)氢气产率预测方法存在的问题,通过创新的Transformer‑Bagging模型,采用K折交叉验证方法对模型进行训练后,能更准确地预测SE‑SMR过程中的氢气产率,降低实验成本和时间消耗,解决现有机器学习方法在预测时,无法有效捕捉输入参数间非线性关系、非稳态工况下预测精度欠佳的问题。为SE‑SMR制氢工艺的优化和实际生产提供可靠的技术支持,具有显著的经济价值和良好的工程适用性。 (excerpt from the patent abstract)

一种吸附增强甲烷水蒸气重整氢气产率预测方法 — patent drawing一种吸附增强甲烷水蒸气重整氢气产率预测方法 — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Northwestern Polytechnical University

Northwestern Polytechnical University

Northwestern Polytechnical University holds 2 patent records, the largest share among all named filers. Its technology focus spans radar and positioning methods (G01S 13, G01S 7) combined with neural computing (G06N 3), indicating work on AI-assisted sensing and situational awareness that could be relevant to reactor monitoring or autonomous navigation within SMR environments. Momentum data is not available for this applicant in the recent-period breakdown.

patent records: 2
Challenger · Galgotias University (multi-author consortium)

Galgotias University consortium

Multiple individual researchers affiliated with Galgotias University together account for several of the remaining patent records, each focusing on data recognition (G06K 9), AI model computing (G06N 3), and image data processing (G06T 7). All named individual contributors from this consortium are flagged as new entrants in the recent period, suggesting a coordinated academic effort launched in 2025. The shared technical profile across these co-applicants implies a single collaborative filing campaign rather than independent parallel programs.

patent records: 1 per named author
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityChangchun University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.