https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/sodium-ion-battery-quality-control-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Updated 2026
Sodium-Ion Battery Quality Control Patents: Filing Trends and Who Owns the Grading Claims
  • Filing activity has plateaued, not accelerated. The 2022 midpoint (51 families) already sits close to the 2024 peak (76), and momentum at several leading filers has dropped sharply in the latest year.
  • One family dominates citation influence. A 2008-era lithium/sodium iron fluorophosphate cathode filing draws far more citations than any capacity-grading or in-line-inspection filing that followed it.
  • Cathode-adjacent chemistry outweighs test methodology in claim volume. C01G and C01B compound classes carry more filings than the measurement-specific G01R class, meaning most 'quality control' claims are anchored to material composition, not to instrumentation.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
480
Published Records
70%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+300%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
EP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (19 records) with 2024 (76) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 480 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What sodium-ion battery quality control patenting actually covers

Sodium-ion battery quality control, as claimed across this dataset, spans cell testing, in-line inspection and capacity grading methods layered on top of sodium-ion cell and cathode chemistry. Most records are not pure test-equipment patents; they are cathode or electrolyte composition filings that fold a grading or inspection step into the claim to establish a manufacturing-quality tie-in. That pattern shows up directly in the IPC mix: H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) and C01G/C01B (metal and non-metallic inorganic compounds) dominate, while G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) — the class most associated with dedicated test instrumentation — accounts for a small fraction of filings.

That composition matters for freedom-to-operate work: a search limited to measurement and instrumentation classes will miss the majority of relevant prior art, because most quality-control claims in this space are written as method-of-manufacture or composition claims with an inspection or grading step attached, not as standalone test-equipment patents.

Filing volume by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1FARADION LTD203
  2. 2SHARP KK38
  3. 3CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY (HONG KONG) LIMITED34
  4. 4CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO LTD34
  5. 5NINGDE AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY LTD28
  6. 6ATLAS POWER TECHNOLOGIES INC14
  7. 7CENT NAT DE LA RECH SCI (C N R S)13
  8. 8SORBONNE UNIVERSITE12
  9. 9COLLEGE DE FRANCE12
  10. 10GUANGZHOU TINCI MATERIALS TECH9
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Sodium-Ion Battery Quality Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing & Classification Data

Filing trend and technology composition

480 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 make up this dataset, filed across six major receiving offices led by the EPO and the United States. The trend line and IPC breakdown below frame where activity has concentrated and where it has thinned out.

A plateau, not a ramp

Filings rose from 5 in 2017 to a peak of 76 in 2024, but the 2022 figure of 51 was already most of the way there — growth flattened well before the peak year, and the partial 2026 count (8, likely understated given publication lag) does not suggest a renewed climb.

A plateau, not a ramp02040608052017201820192020202120222023762024202582026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Chemistry classes outnumber measurement classes

H01M carries 391 of 480 records and C01G and C01B together add 170 more, while G01R — the class most tied to dedicated measurement and electrical/magnetic sensing — holds only 7. Quality-control claims in this field are overwhelmingly chemistry-first.

Chemistry classes outnumber measurement classesH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells39181.5%C01G · Compounds of other metals11824.6%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…5210.8%G02F · Optical control & modulation194.0%H01G · Capacitors153.1%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …102.1%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement71.5%C01D · Alkali-metal compounds51.0%Other4810.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 480 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Sodium-Ion Battery Quality Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Sodium-Ion Battery Quality Control with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about sodium-ion battery quality control and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The filings shaping this landscape

Representative Recent Filing
SG10202401468RA2025-12-30

A high safety sodium ion battery and its capacity grading method and application

BENAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD

Filed by BENAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD, this filing pairs a sodium-ion cell construction with a capacity-grading method and its downstream application, reflecting the dataset's dominant pattern of tying a grading or inspection step to a specific cell chemistry rather than claiming a generic test method.Publication date 2025-12-30 — near the edge of the dataset's coverage window, so its claim scope has not yet been tested by later filings.

View filing details
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20080153002A1Mixed Lithium/Sodium Ion Iron Fluorophosphate Cathodes for Lithium Ion Batteries59
2WO2014009710A1Doped nickelate compounds35
3WO2014057258A1Doped nickelate compounds27
4US20150194672A1Doped nickelate compounds26
5WO2014009724A1Doped nickelate compounds26
6WO2014009722A1Doped nickelate compounds26
7US20180301696A1X/hard carbon composite material and method of preparing the x/hard carbon composite material23
8WO2022238985A2Electrolyte compositions22
9US20220069313A1Graphene-protected lithiophilic or nathiophilic metal anode for an alkali metal battery20
10WO2013140174A2Metallate electrodes20

Citation counts favour older filings simply by virtue of having had more time to be cited; treat this table as a map of influence, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Sodium-Ion Battery Quality Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Landscape Insights

What the numbers say about this field

Four patterns stand out once filing volume, citation weight and classification are read together.

Filing Trend
51 → 76
2022 to 2024 families

Growth flattened before the peak

The jump from 51 families in 2022 to 76 in 2024 looks like acceleration until you note that 2017's count was just 5 — most of the multi-year growth had already happened by the midpoint. The most recent partial year (8 in 2026) is not evidence of a slowdown by itself given publication lag, but it is not evidence of continued growth either.

Read the trend as plateaued pending the next 12-18 months of filings.
Citation Influence
59 citations
Top-cited record

Influence sits with a 2008-era cathode patent, not a QC method

The most-cited record in the corpus is a lithium/sodium iron fluorophosphate cathode filing from 2008, cited 59 times — well ahead of anything filed as a dedicated grading or inspection method. Several of the next most-cited records are also cathode composition filings (doped nickelate compounds), not test methodology.

Citation leadership here tracks cathode chemistry, not QC instrumentation.
Classification Mix
7 of 480
G01R (measurement) records

Measurement-class claims are a small minority

Only 7 of 480 records sit in G01R, the class built for electric and magnetic measurement. The overwhelming majority of 'quality control' claims are filed under battery/cell classes or inorganic-compound classes, with the QC step embedded as a method claim inside a chemistry patent.

Searching G01R alone would miss most of this landscape.
Collaboration
6 pairs
Co-assignee filings

Co-filing is rare and mostly academic-industry

Only six co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset. The strongest pairing links a battery materials company with an electronics manufacturer, while other pairings connect a US research university with another US research university, and a French national research body with a university — suggesting most collaboration here is either commercial-supply-chain or academic, with little cross-over between the two.

Co-filing volume is too thin to signal a consolidating ecosystem yet.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to sodium-ion battery quality control, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Sodium-Ion Battery Quality Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Assignee landscape and recent momentum

Filing activity is led by a small number of specialist and diversified filers, several of which have pulled back sharply in the most recent tracked year — a signal worth separating from genuine field-wide decline given publication lag.

Momentum Leader
3 filings
Latest year, 0% YoY

One filer held steady while others pulled back

The leading filer in the latest tracked year posted 3 families with flat year-on-year momentum, in contrast to several other named filers whose latest-year counts dropped to zero.

Flat momentum here reads as resilience relative to peers.
Sharp Pullback
-90% YoY
One major Chinese cell maker

A steep drop from a high-volume filer

One of the dataset's more active assignees shows a 90% year-on-year decline in the latest tracked period, and a related entity in the same corporate family shows a full drop to zero — a pattern consistent with either a filing pause or a lag in publication rather than an abandoned program.

Treat single-year drops as provisional until the next data cut.
Zero-Activity Filers
0 in latest year
Multiple named assignees

Several historically active filers show no latest-year output

A number of assignees that have contributed meaningfully to the corpus — including a major electronics manufacturer and a national research organisation — show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Given the 18-month publication lag typical for this field, this is more likely a reporting gap than a full stop.

Watch the next 12-18 months before reading this as retreat.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth scouting
Branches where filing density is thin relative to the core chemistry claims
in-line electrode thickness inspectionnon-destructive capacity-fade sensingautomated cell-sorting by impedance signatureelectrolyte moisture in-process monitoringsodium dendrite optical detection
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Faradion Limited30%
Ningde Amperex Technology Limited (ATL)1-90%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. (CATL)0-100%
Sharp Corporation0
French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)0
ATLAS POWER TECHNOLOGIES INC0-100%
Hong Kong CATL New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.0-100%
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Sodium-Ion Battery Quality Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate, tracking a competitor, or looking for open claim space.

Map claim scope against your own process

Run the capacity-grading and in-line-inspection claim language from the most-cited and most-recent filings against your own manufacturing test steps to spot overlap early.

Explore claims in Eureka

Track the momentum shift

Several leading filers show sharp year-on-year drops; confirm whether that reflects a real pullback or a publication-lag gap before making a competitive call.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Scope the under-claimed branches

Measurement-class filings are thin relative to chemistry claims — sub-areas like non-destructive capacity-fade sensing warrant a dedicated novelty search before drafting.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Sodium-Ion Battery Quality Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on sodium-ion battery QC patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Sodium-Ion Battery Quality Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Sodium-Ion Battery Quality Control in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole sodium-ion battery quality control corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.