https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/soft-robot-ai-and-machine-learning-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Robotics & Automation
Soft Robot AI and Machine Learning Patents
  • Small, concentrated field. Only 15 published families sit at the intersection of soft actuation and learning-based control — this is still a narrow, contestable claim space, not a crowded one.
  • Filing peaked in 2024, then stalled. Seven families published in the peak year against a flat-to-zero trend elsewhere, and momentum for every tracked assignee reads zero or negative in the latest year.
  • One filing carries most of the citation weight. US20230364777A1 on reconfigurable modular soft robots is cited well ahead of anything else in the set, making its claim scope the first thing to check before designing a competing arm.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
15
Published Records
67%
Top-5 Share of All Records
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
12
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A narrow field where the learning layer is still being claimed

Soft robot AI and machine learning sits at a genuine intersection: manipulator hardware classified under B25J paired with AI-model computing under G06N, plus scattered claims touching control systems, printed circuits, surgical tooling and even agricultural harvesting. The search corpus behind this page returns just 15 patent families, which is small enough that a single well-drafted filing can still change the competitive picture. Reinforcement learning, sim-to-real transfer and morphological computation are the specific technical routes the search targeted, and the composition data shows most activity is still anchored in core manipulator claims rather than in the learning algorithms themselves.

Filing offices skew toward China, with India, the United States and South Korea contributing smaller but active shares. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the apparent flattening after 2024 likely understates work already filed but not yet public.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1ZHEJIANG UNIV3
  2. 2UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA3
  3. 3GWANGJU INST OF SCI & TECH2
  4. 4SUZHOU UNIV OF SCI & TECH1
  5. 5Huanjiang Laboratory1
  6. 6INDIAN INST OF TECH MADRAS1
  7. 7Suzhou Jason Electric Appliance Co., Ltd.1
  8. 8VARDHAMAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING1
  9. 9TONGJI UNIV1
  10. 10YANGTZE DELTA REGION INST (QUZHOU) UNIV OF ELECTRONIC SCI & TECH OF CHINA1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Soft Robot AI and Machine Learning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The two views below cover the same 15 families from different angles: one tracks when they were filed, the other shows which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend: a 2024 peak, then a drop-off

Filings were absent in the earlier years tracked, rose to a peak of 7 in 2024, and the midpoint year 2022 shows zero activity — evidence of a late, concentrated burst rather than steady growth. The most recent year is partial and should not be read as a decline in real filing activity, only in what has published so far.

Filing trend: a 2024 peak, then a drop-off024680201720182019202020212022202372024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition: manipulator hardware dominates over learning claims

B25J (manipulators & robots) appears in 13 of the 15 records and G06N (AI-model computing) in 7, confirming that most filings anchor their claims in the physical actuator or arm rather than the learning method. Single-record appearances in H05K, A01D, A61B, B65G, F03G and G05B mark adjacent applications — printed circuitry, harvesting, surgical tooling, motors and control systems — that have barely been touched by dedicated filings.

IPC composition: manipulator hardware dominates over learning claimsB25J · Manipulators & robots1386.7%G06N · Computing based on AI models746.7%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies213.3%A01D · Harvesting & mowing16.7%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery16.7%B65G · Conveying & material handling16.7%F03G · Spring/weight & misc. motors16.7%G05B · Control & regulating systems16.7%Other16.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 15 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Soft Robot AI and Machine Learning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Soft Robot AI and Machine Learning with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about soft robot ai and machine learning and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited filings in this dataset

Representative filing
US20230364777A12023-11-16

Reconfigurable modular soft robots and methods of designing the same (US20230364777A1)

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA

Various implementations include a modular soft robot including a base, an arm coupled to the base, and an actuator. The arm includes a first surface and a second surface opposite and spaced apart from the first surface. The first surface defines a plurality of channels, each channel comprising a proximal end at the first surface and a distal end spaced apart from the proximal end. Each channel has a longitudinal axis extending therethrough. The actuator is configured to deform the arm.Filed by The Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama, published 2023-11-16, and the most-cited record in this dataset.

US20230364777A1 — patent drawing 1US20230364777A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20230364777A1Reconfigurable modular soft robots and methods of designing the same3
2CN117182908A基于强化学习的感驱一体软体机器人自主变形系统及方法2
3CN119458348A一种肌肉驱动的仿果蝇幼虫智能体建模与分层运动控制方法1

Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and favour older, earlier-published records; treat them as a signal of influence rather than of present-day importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (3 of 3 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Soft Robot AI and Machine Learning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the ranking and trend data are read together.

Concentration
15 families total
entire dataset

A small enough field to still move

With only 15 published families across the whole search window, no single assignee has built a fortress. The claim space around learning-based soft control remains genuinely open to a well-drafted new filing.

Family count, full corpus
Timing
7 filings in 2024
peak year

A late, short burst rather than steady growth

Activity was flat through the mid-2010s and 2022, then spiked to 7 filings in the peak year. That shape points to a recent trigger — likely improved sim-to-real methods — rather than a maturing, steadily-growing field.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Claim anchor
B25J in 13 of 15
IPC coverage

Hardware claims outnumber learning claims

Thirteen of fifteen records carry a B25J manipulator classification against seven with G06N AI-model classification. Filers are still claiming the actuator and arm mechanics first, with the learning method as a secondary or dependent claim.

IPC subclass counts
Momentum
0 in latest year
across tracked assignees

No assignee shows current-year growth

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum reports zero or a negative year-over-year change. Read cautiously given publication lag, but it means no single lab or company is visibly pulling ahead right now.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to soft robot ai and machine learning, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Soft Robot AI and Machine Learning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the claim space is still open

The assignee base is academic-heavy and fragmented: universities and research institutes account for most of the filings, with only two co-assignee pairings recorded and no repeat filer showing growth into the most recent year.

Filer type
2 co-assignee pairs
out of 15 families

Mostly solo filers, occasional university-industry pairs

Only two co-assignee relationships appear in the dataset, each linking a university to a local institute or company. The rest of the filings are single-assignee, which is typical of an early-stage, research-driven field.

Co-assignee pairs, full corpus
Geography
China 7, India 3, US 3, South Korea 2
receiving offices

Filing offices split across four jurisdictions

China accounts for the largest share of receiving offices, with India, the United States and South Korea each contributing a smaller, comparable share. No single jurisdiction dominates the way concentration figures alone might suggest.

Receiving office counts
Momentum
-100% YoY
for two tracked assignees

Flat or falling activity for every named assignee

The University of Alabama and the Yangtze River Delta institute both show a full drop to zero in the latest tracked year, and no assignee in the recent-momentum list shows growth. This is consistent with the broader flattening seen after the 2024 peak.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Branches touched by only one or two records in this dataset — thin enough that a well-scoped filing could still define the space.
Sim-to-real transfer for soft actuatorsMorphological computation control loopsLearning-based control of printed soft circuitsReinforcement-learned harvesting grippersSoft actuator control in surgical tooling
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
University of Alabama0-100%
Zhejiang University0
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology0
Suzhou University of Science and Technology0
Suzhou Jason Electric Appliance Co., Ltd.0
Yangtze River Delta Research Institute of UESTC, Quzhou0-100%
Huanjiang Laboratory0
Jiangsu Open University (Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Urban Construction)0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Soft Robot AI and Machine Learning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The numbers above establish the shape of the field; the next step is testing a specific claim or design idea against it.

Check freedom-to-operate against the most-cited filing

Before drafting arm or actuator claims, map them against US20230364777A1's channel and actuator geometry to see what is already occupied.

Explore in Eureka

Track the under-claimed branches

Sim-to-real transfer and morphological computation claims are thin in this dataset; a monitoring search now can catch new filings before they compound.

Set up a watch in Eureka

Re-run after the publication lag clears

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 picture will firm up over the next year; revisit the trend then.

Open Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Soft Robot AI and Machine Learning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this patent landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Soft Robot AI and Machine Learning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Soft Robot AI and Machine Learning in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole soft robot ai and machine learning corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.