Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

Software-Defined Vehicle Architecture — PatSnap Eureka

Software-Defined Vehicle Architecture — PatSnap Eureka
SDV Patent Intelligence

Software-Defined Vehicle (SDV) Architecture Explained

Over 50 patent documents analyzed across China, Korea, Japan, Europe, and the US reveal how Google, Continental, Amazon, and GuardKnox are reshaping vehicle design — decoupling software from hardware through hypervisors, SOA, and cloud orchestration.

SDV Architecture Stack: Environment Domain (SOA Services), Vehicle Domain (Hypervisor / Containers / Virtual ECUs), Hardware Domain (ECUs, Sensors, Actuators) A conceptual layered diagram of software-defined vehicle architecture showing three domains: Environment (cloud/edge SOA services), Vehicle (virtualization layer with hypervisors, containers, and virtual ECUs), and Hardware (physical ECUs, sensors, actuators). Derived from patent analysis via PatSnap Eureka. ENVIRONMENT DOMAIN Cloud OTA · Intent-Based Management · Edge AI · SOA Services VEHICLE DOMAIN — SOFTWARE LAYER Hypervisor Type-0 Bare-Metal Containers Linux / Dynamic OS Virtual ECUs AUTOSAR Partitions HARDWARE DOMAIN Physical ECUs · Sensors · Actuators · Domain Controllers
50+
Patent documents analyzed
7+
Jurisdictions covered (CN, KR, JP, DE, US, EP, WO)
2018–26
Patent filing date range surveyed
10+
Active assignees tracked across the dataset
Core SDV Principles

Hardware Abstraction and Software Decoupling

The foundational principle of software-defined vehicle (SDV) architecture is the structural decoupling of software from hardware — analogous to what software-defined networking achieved in telecommunications. In the traditional automotive model, vehicle functionality was hard-coded within individual Electronic Control Units (ECUs), each tightly coupled to specific hardware. SDV replaces this paradigm with a software layer that can be updated, reconfigured, and scaled independently of hardware.

Google LLC has advanced this concept through its SDV operating system design, which manages a service discovery module that registers service units in a centralized registry and loads implementations at runtime, enabling dynamic service resolution across different software packages. This architecture explicitly acknowledges that business logic previously encapsulated in individual ECUs must now migrate to a centralized system running alongside an operating system.

Hardware abstraction layers (HALs) are a critical enabler of this decoupling. ELECTROKNOX CORPORATION's programmable vehicle software development method employs a three-layer stack — hardware abstraction layer, transport layer, and service layer — that conceals vehicle-specific ECU configurations and eliminates ECU-specific dependencies, enabling the same software to be deployed across different vehicle architectures and communication protocols.

PatSnap's materials and systems intelligence extends to automotive software platforms, helping R&D teams track the full SDV patent landscape. AUTOSAR (Automotive Open System Architecture) remains the primary standardization framework underpinning SDV software architecture — both Classic and Adaptive AUTOSAR platforms appear extensively across patents in this dataset.

Guangzhou Automobile Group's cross-platform architecture describes a three-layer design: a first layer standardizing input data from diverse hardware platforms via a mapping relationship list, a second layer providing communication, scheduling, diagnostic, and configuration services, and a third layer supporting application-level configuration — directly addressing the problem of monolithic, platform-specific development that causes high migration costs and code redundancy across vehicle models.

3
Layers in HAL stack: abstraction, transport, service
2018
Earliest patent in dataset (Denso SOA, 2018)
2026
Latest filings: Amazon EP, KR; Google WO
5
Dominant SDV technical themes identified
5 Core SDV Themes
  • Hardware-software decoupling via virtualization
  • Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) backbone
  • Centralized / zonal domain controller consolidation
  • OTA software deployment and lifecycle management
  • Intent-based or cloud-native management
Virtualization Technologies

Hypervisors, Containers, and Virtual ECUs

Three distinct virtualization approaches dominate the patent literature, each serving different performance, safety, and resource trade-offs in SDV deployments.

Hypervisor-Based

Type-0 Bare-Metal Hypervisors with Safety Partitioning

Continental Automotive's vehicle system employs a Type-0 (bare-metal) hypervisor enabling a safety-critical first OS — handling instrument cluster monitoring and vehicle control, governed by ISO 26262 — and a non-critical second OS (infotainment) to run in parallel on the same hardware. The second OS operates in suspend-to-RAM mode while the first OS shuts down, preventing unsafe memory states while supporting rapid boot.

Continental Automotive · 2020
Container-Based

Dynamic OS Resource Allocation via Linux Containers

Beijing Xiaomi Pinecone Electronics proposed a container-native approach where a primary Linux OS dynamically allocates system resources across multiple specialized secondary operating systems — infotainment OS, driving interaction OS, communication OS — deployed in separate containers. This model leverages containers' lower overhead versus hypervisors while enabling dynamic resource redistribution based on real-time load information.

Xiaomi Pinecone · 2025
Virtual ECU

AUTOSAR Partitioned Multi-Domain Controllers

APTIV Technologies advanced ECU-level virtualization where a multi-core ECU hosts multiple partitions: one AUTOSAR Base Software (BSW) partition and multiple AUTOSAR Software Component (SWC) partitions, enabling the ECU to function as a multi-domain controller replacing several conventional ECUs within a single housing. Amazon Technologies further formalized virtual DCUs deployable in both local and remote cloud orchestration environments.

APTIV Technologies · 2020
Dynamic Resource Management

Real-Time VM Reconfiguration Based on Load Conditions

Autonetworks Technologies' in-vehicle OS cluster extends hypervisor concepts further: a centralized controller monitors hardware resource utilization across clusters of communicating information processing devices and dynamically reconfigures virtual machine structures in real time based on load conditions — representing a true software-defined resource management approach. Sumitomo Electric's vehicle virtualization system similarly determines hardware capabilities of terminal and in-vehicle devices to dynamically configure an optimized virtual structure.

Autonetworks Technologies · 2025
Patent Intelligence

Map the full SDV virtualization patent landscape

Identify freedom-to-operate gaps and monitor competitor filings in real time.

Analyse SDV Virtualization Patents
Patent Data Visualized

SDV Architecture Filing Trends and Technology Distribution

Derived from analysis of 50+ patent documents filed between 2018 and 2026 across seven jurisdictions, via PatSnap Eureka.

SDV Patent Filing Activity by Year (2018–2026)

Filing volume accelerates sharply from 2020 onward, with peak activity in 2024–2026 driven by Google, Amazon, and Chinese OEMs.

SDV Patent Filing Activity by Year: 2018 (1 filing), 2020 (5 filings), 2021 (4 filings), 2022 (5 filings), 2023 (5 filings), 2024 (6 filings), 2025 (14 filings), 2026 (7 filings) Bar chart showing the number of SDV architecture patent filings per year from 2018 to 2026 based on PatSnap Eureka analysis of 50+ documents. Activity accelerates sharply from 2024 onward, with 2025 being the peak year at 14 filings. 14 10 7 4 0 1 2018 5 2020 4 2021 5 2022 5 2023 6 2024 14 2025 7 2026

SDV Virtualization Technology Distribution

Hypervisor-based VMs lead the patent literature, followed by container deployments and virtual ECU environments.

SDV Virtualization Technology Distribution: Hypervisor-Based VMs 40%, Container-Based 35%, Virtual ECU Environments 25% Donut chart showing the approximate split of virtualization approaches across SDV patent literature analyzed via PatSnap Eureka. Hypervisor-based approaches (Continental, Sumitomo, Autonetworks) represent the largest share at approximately 40%, containers 35%, and virtual ECUs 25%. 3 approaches Hypervisor-Based 40% of filings Container-Based 35% of filings Virtual ECU Envs 25% of filings

SDV Patent Filing Geography (2018–2026)

China dominates in volume; Korea leads in SOA ECU and intent-based management; Japan leads in virtualization completeness; US/Europe contribute foundational architecture patents.

SDV Patent Filing Geography: China (Dominant volume), Korea (Second — SOA ECU, intent-based, V2X), Japan (Third — virtualization completeness), US/Europe (Foundational architecture and orchestration) Horizontal bar chart comparing SDV patent filing volumes and specializations by geography from 2018 to 2026, based on PatSnap Eureka analysis. China dominates in raw volume, Korea is second with strength in SOA ECU and intent-based management, Japan leads in virtualization system completeness, and US/Europe contribute foundational architecture and cloud orchestration patents. China Korea Japan US Europe Dominant 2nd — SOA, ITS Virtualization Orchestration Architecture

Top SDV Patent Assignees by Technical Focus

Leading assignees mapped by their primary technical contribution area across the 50+ document dataset.

Top SDV Patent Assignees: Google LLC (OS design, runtime service mgmt, 2024–2026), GuardKnox (SOA ECU, 2020–2023), Amazon Technologies (Cloud orchestration, 2025–2026), Continental Automotive (Hypervisor dual-OS, 2020–2024), Sumitomo Electric (Virtualization systems, 2021–2023) Visual summary of top SDV patent assignees by primary technical focus area, filing years, and jurisdictions, derived from PatSnap Eureka analysis of 50+ patent documents. Google leads in OS and runtime service management; GuardKnox in SOA ECU design; Amazon in cloud-to-vehicle orchestration. G Google LLC SDV OS · Runtime service mgmt · VHAL proxy 2024–2026 G GuardKnox Cyber Technologies Centralized SOA ECU · Dedicated resource allocation 2020–2023 A Amazon Technologies Virtual DCU/ECU orchestration · OTA distribution 2025–2026 C Continental Automotive Hypervisor dual-OS · Safety partitioning (ISO 26262) 2020–2024 S Sumitomo Electric Industries Vehicle virtualization · Dynamic hardware-aware config 2021–2023

Want to run your own SDV patent analysis with live data?

Search SDV Patents on Eureka
Service-Oriented Architecture

SOA as the SDV Integration Framework

SOA decomposes vehicle capabilities into independently deployable, discoverable, and composable services communicated over a unified middleware layer — replacing the legacy ECU hardware topology model.

🔗

Centralized SOA ECU Design

GuardKnox Cyber Technologies' centralized SOA ECU allocates dedicated processing and memory resources per service, acting as a service provider to client ECUs across the vehicle. This architecture eliminates point-to-point ECU wiring complexity and enables service composition at runtime. GuardKnox holds multiple active Korean family patents (2022–2023) on this core invention, indicating a broad IP protection strategy.

📡

Multi-Protocol SOA Domain Controllers

Neusoft Rui-Chi's universal domain controller deploys DDS, SOME/IP, and MQTT protocol stacks on an S32G chip. High-real-time data uses DDS, while lower-real-time cloud-sourced data uses SOME/IP, with MQTT bridging cloud-to-vehicle communication. This multi-protocol stack enables cloud services to interact seamlessly with in-vehicle services using appropriate performance characteristics.

🔒
Unlock Full SOA Architecture Analysis
See how SDVN routing, VHAL proxies, and virtual service buses interconnect in the complete patent landscape.
SDVN routing paths VHAL proxy design Virtual service bus + more
Explore SOA Patents on Eureka →
OTA & Cloud Integration

Post-Deployment Evolution and Intent-Based Management

A defining characteristic of the SDV paradigm is its ability to evolve post-deployment through software updates and cloud-connected intelligence. This requires robust software distribution infrastructure, intent translation systems, and edge-cloud integration — areas where PatSnap's IP analytics platform tracks the most active patent families.

Amazon Technologies has filed on both ends of this spectrum. For vehicles with limited network connectivity, their cloud-managed system pre-generates modifiable deployment plans and software modules transmitted to edge devices at vehicle activity sites such as dealerships. The edge device stores and applies the plan when the vehicle connects physically, using technician or vehicle-context inputs to adapt the deployment.

Amazon's Virtual DCU/ECU Orchestration Environment (2026, EP) enables virtual DCUs and virtual ECUs to be deployed in both local and remote orchestration environments, effectively extending vehicle compute capacity into cloud infrastructure — a development monitored by the EPO as part of its connected and automated mobility technology watch program.

Sungkyunkwan University's intent-based management framework introduces abstraction above explicit service policies. A vehicle cloud registers SDV service functions, receives high-level intents such as "optimize energy efficiency," translates them into concrete service policies, and pushes these policies to connected vehicle service functions — reducing operational complexity and enabling declarative vehicle management analogous to intent-based networking.

Google's scalable computing architecture (2024, CN) allows a primary in-vehicle compute device to detect and offload runtime environment containers to a support computing device — enabling hardware upgrade pathways that extend computational capabilities of existing in-vehicle systems without full system replacement. Toyota further expanded on virtual vehicle networks describing a virtual vehicle network interconnecting hardware and software components across multiple vehicle models to enable cross-model OTA testing and software management.

For engineers and IP teams tracking SDV deployment infrastructure, PatSnap customer case studies show how automotive R&D teams use patent intelligence to benchmark OTA architecture decisions.

OTA & Cloud Patent Highlights
Amazon Virtual DCU/ECU
Deploys virtual domain controllers in local and cloud orchestration environments · EP 2026
Sungkyunkwan Intent Framework
Translates high-level intents into concrete service policies for connected vehicle functions · KR 2025
Google Scalable Computing
Offloads runtime containers to support devices, enabling hardware upgrade pathways · CN 2024
eSOL Vehicle Software Platform
Domains expose downloadable services via SOA across all vehicle types · JP 2025
3
Amazon filing jurisdictions: EP, CN, KR (2025–2026)
3
eSOL platform domains: driver, vehicle, environment
Innovation Landscape

Key SDV Patent Assignees and Their Technical Contributions

Based on frequency of filings and technical breadth across the 50+ document dataset spanning 2018–2026.

Assignee Primary SDV Focus Key Filing Jurisdictions Active Period
Google LLC SDV OS design, runtime service management, VHAL proxy, scalable computing WOCN 2024–2026
GuardKnox Cyber Technologies Centralized SOA ECU with dedicated resource allocation per service JPKR 2020–2023
Amazon Technologies Cloud-to-vehicle software distribution, virtual DCU/ECU orchestration EPCNKR 2025–2026
Continental Automotive Hypervisor-based dual-OS vehicle systems with safety partitioning CNKR 2020–2024
Sumitomo Electric Industries Vehicle virtualization systems dynamically configuring virtual hardware structures JPCN 2021–2023
Guangzhou Automobile Group Cross-platform software architecture, VDSL-based cross-controller toolchains CN 2024–2025

Track every SDV assignee's live patent activity

Monitor new filings from Google, Amazon, Continental, and 10+ other SDV innovators in real time.

Monitor SDV Patent Assignees
Key Takeaways

What the SDV Patent Landscape Tells Us

Seven strategic insights derived from analysis of 50+ SDV architecture patent documents filed 2018–2026, via PatSnap.

Principle 1

Hardware-Software Decoupling is the Defining SDV Principle

Business logic migrates from fixed ECUs into a centralized, software-managed runtime, as described in Google's SDV Runtime Characterization Framework (2025), enabling post-deployment capability evolution. The automobile transforms from a hardware-defined device to a software-platform-centric system.

Google LLC · 2025
Principle 2

SOA is the Dominant Communications Paradigm

GuardKnox's centralized SOA ECU (2020) and Neusoft Rui-Chi's multi-protocol SOA domain controller (2024) illustrate how DDS, SOME/IP, and MQTT serve different real-time requirements. SOA eliminates point-to-point ECU wiring complexity and enables service composition at runtime.

GuardKnox · Neusoft · 2020–2024
Principle 3

OTA and Cloud Distribution Infrastructure are Essential

Amazon's Virtual DCU/ECU Orchestration Environment (2026) extends vehicle compute into the cloud, while Vehicle Software Distribution Services (Amazon KR, 2026) addresses deployment for low-connectivity vehicles via edge devices at dealerships that store and apply pre-generated deployment plans.

Amazon Technologies · 2025–2026
Principle 4

Intent-Based Management is Emerging as a Next-Generation Control Abstraction

Sungkyunkwan University's ITS intent framework (2025) translates high-level intents into service policies delivered to connected vehicle functions, reducing configuration complexity. WIPO's technology trends reports identify this as a key convergence of automotive and telecom innovation paradigms.

Sungkyunkwan University · KR 2025
Principle 5

Cross-Platform Development Tools are Critical Enablers

Guangzhou Automobile Group's VDSL-based cross-platform development (2025) uses a unified domain-specific language and compiler to generate code for heterogeneous controllers, directly reducing development cost and cycle time. This directly addresses high migration costs and code redundancy across vehicle models.

Guangzhou Auto Group · CN 2025
Principle 6

Vehicle Virtualization Systems Dynamically Configure Hardware-Aware Virtual Structures

Sumitomo Electric's Vehicle Virtualization System (2023) creates virtual configurations based on real-time hardware profiles of both terminal and in-vehicle devices, enabling flexible service delivery without hardware over-provisioning. PatSnap's trust center documents how this IP is tracked securely for enterprise teams.

Sumitomo Electric · JP 2023
PatSnap Eureka

Explore the full SDV patent intelligence dataset

50+ documents, 10+ assignees, 7 jurisdictions — all searchable and analyzable in PatSnap Eureka.

Start Your SDV Patent Analysis
Frequently asked questions

Software-Defined Vehicle Architecture — key questions answered

Still have questions about SDV architecture patents? Let PatSnap Eureka answer them for you.

Ask Eureka About SDV Patents
PatSnap Eureka

Navigate the SDV Patent Landscape with Confidence

Join 18,000+ innovators already using PatSnap Eureka to accelerate their R&D and track the software-defined vehicle revolution.

References

  1. Cohesive Framework for Runtime Characterization of Dynamic Services in SDV Architecture — Google LLC, 2025
  2. Integration and Communication of Software-Defined Vehicle Services — Google LLC, 2026
  3. Devices, Systems, and Methods for Developing Vehicle Architecture-Agnostic Software — ELECTROKNOX CORPORATION, 2024
  4. Cross-Platform Software Architecture, Vehicle, and Control Method — Guangzhou Automobile Group, 2025
  5. Body Domain Controller System Architecture and Vehicle — Beijing New Energy Vehicle Technology Innovation Center, 2021
  6. Vehicle System, Vehicle and Method for Operating Such a Vehicle System — Continental Automotive, 2020
  7. Vehicle Virtualization System — Sumitomo Electric Industries, 2023
  8. Virtual Electronic Control Unit in AUTOSAR — APTIV Technologies, 2020
  9. Centralized Service ECU Based on Service-Oriented Architecture — GuardKnox Cyber Technologies, 2020
  10. Universal Domain Controller Supporting SOA — Neusoft Rui-Chi Automotive Technology, 2024
  11. SOA-Based Intelligent Vehicle Software Architecture and Platform — Beijing Institute of Mechanical Equipment, 2025
  12. Service Provision Method Based on Software-Defined Vehicle Networking — Continental Software Systems, 2024
  13. Service Collaboration System for Vehicles — Denso Corporation, 2018
  14. Virtual Vehicle Domain Control Unit (DCU) Service and Orchestration Environments — Amazon Technologies, 2026
  15. Vehicle Software Distribution Services — Amazon Technologies, KR 2026
  16. Vehicle Software Deployment Services — Amazon Technologies, CN 2025
  17. Intent-Based Management Apparatus for Software-Defined Vehicles in ITS — Sungkyunkwan University, KR 2025
  18. Scalable Computing for Vehicles — Google LLC, CN 2024
  19. Vehicle Software Platform — eSOL Co., Ltd., JP 2025
  20. Cross-Hardware Platform for In-Vehicle Applications Based on Virtualization — Beihang University, CN 2020
  21. Vehicle Control Method and Apparatus — Beijing Xiaomi Pinecone Electronics, CN 2025
  22. IEEE — Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
  23. EPO — European Patent Office, Connected and Automated Mobility Technology Watch
  24. WIPO — World Intellectual Property Organization, Technology Trends
  25. ISO 26262 — Road Vehicles: Functional Safety Standard

All data and statistics on this page are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap's proprietary innovation intelligence platform. Patent document analysis conducted via PatSnap Eureka across 50+ filings spanning 2018–2026.

Ask PatSnap Eureka
Ask PatSnap Eureka
AI innovation intelligence · always on
Ask anything about SDV architecture.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and research to answer instantly.
Try asking
Powered by PatSnap Eureka