https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/soil-and-groundwater-remediation-permeable-reactive-barrier-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Soil & Groundwater Remediation
Permeable Reactive Barrier Patents: Filing Trends, Leaders and White Space
Get a prior-art report on your approach
972
Published Records
10%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-27%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (83 records) with 2024 (61) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 972 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the permeable reactive barrier patent record shows

Permeable reactive barrier (PRB) technology sits at the intersection of soil reclamation and water treatment: a barrier of reactive material intercepts a contaminant plume in situ and treats it as groundwater passes through. The 972 records captured here span IPC classes covering water and wastewater treatment (C02F) and soil and contaminated land reclamation (B09C), with secondary activity in catalysis, filtration, foundations and cement chemistry. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so activity in the most recent year is understated by construction.

Filing activity built through the late 2010s, peaked in 2021, and has since eased back — a pattern consistent with a field where core barrier chemistry and construction methods are well established and filers are now working narrower variations rather than staking out new ground.

Filings by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1SPECIALTY MINERALS MICHIGAN INC23
  2. 2YEDA RES & DEV CO LTD23
  3. 3CHINESE RES ACAD OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCI20
  4. 4BCEG ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION CO LTD18
  5. 5NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIV14
  6. 6SOLUTIONS IES14
  7. 7CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORP13
  8. 8GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS INC13
  9. 9ENI SPA12
  10. 10NANJING INST OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCI MINIST OF ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA12
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Soil & Groundwater Remediation: Permeable Reactive Barrier Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The figures below use patent families as the unit of count, which neutralises aggressive continuation filing and multi-jurisdiction duplication that can inflate raw document totals.

A 2021 peak, then a pullback

Annual filings ran from 22 in 2017 up to a peak of 83 in 2021, then declined to 61 by 2024 — a -27% move over that span. Because 2025 and 2026 filings are still being published, treat the apparent drop-off in those years as incomplete data rather than evidence of a cooling field.

A 2021 peak, then a pullback0255075100222017201820192020832021832022202320242025122026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in water treatment and soil reclamation

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) appears on 83.3% of the 972 records and B09C (soil and contaminated land reclamation) on 33.8%, confirming these two classes as the technical core. Secondary classes — B01J catalysis at 15.9%, B01D separation at 8.6%, and smaller shares in foundations, cement and detoxification chemistry — mark where PRB claims overlap with adjacent process engineering rather than standing alone.

Concentrated in water treatment and soil reclamationC02F · Water & wastewater treatment81083.3%B09C · Soil & contaminated land recla…32933.8%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …15515.9%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…848.6%E02D · Foundations & earth drilling424.3%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories272.8%A62D · Chemical protection & detox232.4%B09B · Solid waste disposal212.2%Other23924.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 972 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Soil & Groundwater Remediation: Permeable Reactive Barrier Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Soil & Groundwater Remediation: Permeable Reactive Barrier Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about soil & groundwater remediation: permeable reactive barrier patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The prior art shaping freedom to operate

Representative filing
US20220347729A12022-11-03

US20220347729A1 — Permeable reactive barrier

IMAM ABDULRAHMAN BIN FAISAL UNIVERSITY

A permeable reactive barrier having two or more layers of a geotextile fabric inoculated with a bioremediation microbe is provided. The permeable reactive barrier further includes two or more layers of coarse-grained geological material separating the two or more layers of geotextile fabric such that any pair of adjacent layers of geotextile fabric is separated by a layer of coarse-grained geological material. The permeable reactive barrier includes a perforated metal casing surrounding and containing the layers of coarse-grained geological materials and geotextile fabric.Filed by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, published 2022-11-03. Combines a layered geotextile-and-microbe architecture with a perforated metal casing — a structural claim distinct from the reactive-media chemistry that dominates older, more-cited filings.

US20220347729A1 — patent drawing 1US20220347729A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20060060464A1Plasma formed in a fluid200
2US6719902B1Fe(o)-based bioremediation of aquifers contaminated with mixed wastes134
3US6398960B1Method for remediation of aquifers81
4US7963720B2Polymer coated nanoparticle activation of oxidants for remediation and methods of use thereof75
5US20080179253A1Porous Particulate Material For Fluid Treatment, Cementitious Composition and Method of Manufacture Thereof66
6US20050155936A1Halogen-enhanced oxidizing composition60
7CN103252344A一种电动强化的土壤原位淋洗修复装置和方法58
8US6423531B1Advanced organic-inorganic solid-chemical composition and methods for anaerobic bioremediation54
9US6834720B1Method and apparatus for injecting particulate media into the ground47
10WO1998049106A1Fe(o)-based bioremediation of aquifers contaminated with mixed wastes47

Citation counts reflect influence inside this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; use them to understand which foundational claims later filers had to design around, not as a measure of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Soil & Groundwater Remediation: Permeable Reactive Barrier Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing and freedom-to-operate decisions

Three patterns recur across the concentration, geography and citation data.

Concentration
10.1%
share of 972 records held by the top 5 assignees

A visible leader, then a long tail

The leading assignee holds 23 records, more than any competitor, but the top 5 combined still account for only 10.1% of the 972 records in scope and the top 10 for 16.7%. No single organisation controls the field; most of the 100 ranked assignees hold only a handful of filings each.

Ranked-assignee data
Geography
572 vs 101
China vs United States receiving-office filings

Filing activity is concentrated in China

China's receiving office recorded 572 filings against 101 in the United States, 78 in South Korea and 47 via WIPO's PCT route. Anyone assessing enforcement exposure or licensing partners should weight Chinese prior art and Chinese assignees heavily rather than defaulting to a US-centric search.

Receiving-office counts
Trajectory
-27%
change from 2021 peak (83) to 2024 (61)

Past peak, not necessarily past relevance

Filings dropped from a 2021 peak of 83 to 61 in 2024. That decline sits alongside high existing claim density in C02F and B09C, which is more consistent with an established field where filers are refining narrower variations than with a technology losing commercial interest.

Filing trend, complete years only
Prior art
200 citations
on the most-cited record in this dataset

Foundational chemistry claims sit on old, heavily cited filings

The most-cited records in this dataset date back well before the 2015 window and cover fundamentals — zero-valent iron bioremediation, aquifer remediation methods, nanoparticle-activated oxidants. New filings in reactive-media chemistry inherit this dense citation base; structural and deployment variations, like layered geotextile assemblies, face a thinner prior art trail.

Most-cited records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to soil & groundwater remediation: permeable reactive barrier patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Soil & Groundwater Remediation: Permeable Reactive Barrier Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Take this further

The figures on this page describe the field as a whole. Narrowing to a specific claim, jurisdiction or competitor requires working the underlying records directly.

Check freedom to operate on a specific barrier design

Run a targeted search against the reactive-media or structural claim you plan to file, rather than relying on the aggregate view here.

Search this space in Eureka

Track a specific assignee's filing pattern

The ranked leaders here file at very different rates; pull an individual assignee's history to see whether their activity is accelerating or winding down.

Explore assignee filings in Eureka

Watch the 2025-2026 filing years fill in

Publication lag means the most recent years understate real activity; revisit the trend once later filings publish.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Soil & Groundwater Remediation: Permeable Reactive Barrier Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on permeable reactive barrier patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Soil & Groundwater Remediation: Permeable Reactive Barrier Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Soil & Groundwater Remediation: Permeable Reactive Barrier Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole soil & groundwater remediation: permeable reactive barrier patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.