Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (83 records) with 2024 (61) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 972 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Permeable reactive barrier (PRB) technology sits at the intersection of soil reclamation and water treatment: a barrier of reactive material intercepts a contaminant plume in situ and treats it as groundwater passes through. The 972 records captured here span IPC classes covering water and wastewater treatment (C02F) and soil and contaminated land reclamation (B09C), with secondary activity in catalysis, filtration, foundations and cement chemistry. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so activity in the most recent year is understated by construction.
Filing activity built through the late 2010s, peaked in 2021, and has since eased back — a pattern consistent with a field where core barrier chemistry and construction methods are well established and filers are now working narrower variations rather than staking out new ground.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
The figures below use patent families as the unit of count, which neutralises aggressive continuation filing and multi-jurisdiction duplication that can inflate raw document totals.
Annual filings ran from 22 in 2017 up to a peak of 83 in 2021, then declined to 61 by 2024 — a -27% move over that span. Because 2025 and 2026 filings are still being published, treat the apparent drop-off in those years as incomplete data rather than evidence of a cooling field.
C02F (water and wastewater treatment) appears on 83.3% of the 972 records and B09C (soil and contaminated land reclamation) on 33.8%, confirming these two classes as the technical core. Secondary classes — B01J catalysis at 15.9%, B01D separation at 8.6%, and smaller shares in foundations, cement and detoxification chemistry — mark where PRB claims overlap with adjacent process engineering rather than standing alone.
Shares are the percentage of the 972 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about soil & groundwater remediation: permeable reactive barrier patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA permeable reactive barrier having two or more layers of a geotextile fabric inoculated with a bioremediation microbe is provided. The permeable reactive barrier further includes two or more layers of coarse-grained geological material separating the two or more layers of geotextile fabric such that any pair of adjacent layers of geotextile fabric is separated by a layer of coarse-grained geological material. The permeable reactive barrier includes a perforated metal casing surrounding and containing the layers of coarse-grained geological materials and geotextile fabric.Filed by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, published 2022-11-03. Combines a layered geotextile-and-microbe architecture with a perforated metal casing — a structural claim distinct from the reactive-media chemistry that dominates older, more-cited filings.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20060060464A1 | Plasma formed in a fluid | 200 |
| 2 | US6719902B1 | Fe(o)-based bioremediation of aquifers contaminated with mixed wastes | 134 |
| 3 | US6398960B1 | Method for remediation of aquifers | 81 |
| 4 | US7963720B2 | Polymer coated nanoparticle activation of oxidants for remediation and methods of use thereof | 75 |
| 5 | US20080179253A1 | Porous Particulate Material For Fluid Treatment, Cementitious Composition and Method of Manufacture Thereof | 66 |
| 6 | US20050155936A1 | Halogen-enhanced oxidizing composition | 60 |
| 7 | CN103252344A | 一种电动强化的土壤原位淋洗修复装置和方法 | 58 |
| 8 | US6423531B1 | Advanced organic-inorganic solid-chemical composition and methods for anaerobic bioremediation | 54 |
| 9 | US6834720B1 | Method and apparatus for injecting particulate media into the ground | 47 |
| 10 | WO1998049106A1 | Fe(o)-based bioremediation of aquifers contaminated with mixed wastes | 47 |
Citation counts reflect influence inside this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; use them to understand which foundational claims later filers had to design around, not as a measure of current commercial importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns recur across the concentration, geography and citation data.
The leading assignee holds 23 records, more than any competitor, but the top 5 combined still account for only 10.1% of the 972 records in scope and the top 10 for 16.7%. No single organisation controls the field; most of the 100 ranked assignees hold only a handful of filings each.
China's receiving office recorded 572 filings against 101 in the United States, 78 in South Korea and 47 via WIPO's PCT route. Anyone assessing enforcement exposure or licensing partners should weight Chinese prior art and Chinese assignees heavily rather than defaulting to a US-centric search.
Filings dropped from a 2021 peak of 83 to 61 in 2024. That decline sits alongside high existing claim density in C02F and B09C, which is more consistent with an established field where filers are refining narrower variations than with a technology losing commercial interest.
The most-cited records in this dataset date back well before the 2015 window and cover fundamentals — zero-valent iron bioremediation, aquifer remediation methods, nanoparticle-activated oxidants. New filings in reactive-media chemistry inherit this dense citation base; structural and deployment variations, like layered geotextile assemblies, face a thinner prior art trail.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to soil & groundwater remediation: permeable reactive barrier patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The figures on this page describe the field as a whole. Narrowing to a specific claim, jurisdiction or competitor requires working the underlying records directly.
Run a targeted search against the reactive-media or structural claim you plan to file, rather than relying on the aggregate view here.
Search this space in EurekaThe ranked leaders here file at very different rates; pull an individual assignee's history to see whether their activity is accelerating or winding down.
Explore assignee filings in EurekaPublication lag means the most recent years understate real activity; revisit the trend once later filings publish.
Set up monitoring in EurekaA permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is an in-situ remediation structure placed across the path of a contaminant plume, allowing groundwater to pass through while reactive media inside the barrier degrade or immobilise contaminants. In this dataset, PRB filings are classified primarily under C02F (water and wastewater treatment, 83.3% of the 972 records) and B09C (soil and contaminated land reclamation, 33.8%). Claims typically cover either the reactive material itself — zero-valent iron, nanoparticle-activated oxidants, bioremediation microbes — or the physical barrier construction, such as layered geotextile and casing designs.
The ranking is drawn from 100 assignees returned by the dataset, not a top-50 or top-100 industry list. The single leading assignee holds 23 of the 972 records, but the top 5 combined hold only 10.1% of the field and the top 10 hold 16.7%, meaning most activity comes from a long tail of organisations filing only a handful of records each. This spread includes environmental remediation contractors, research institutes and industrial firms, several of them Chinese state-affiliated environmental science institutes.
Filings rose from 22 in 2017 to a peak of 83 in 2021, then fell to 61 by 2024, a -27% change over that three-year span. The 2025 and 2026 figures are lower still, but publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so those final years are incomplete rather than proof of a slowdown. Judged on complete years only, the field has passed its 2021 peak but remains well above 2017 levels.
China's receiving office accounts for 572 of the filings tracked, far ahead of the United States at 101, South Korea at 78, the WIPO PCT route at 47, the European Patent Office at 36 and Australia at 30. This concentration means prior art searches and freedom-to-operate assessments that only cover US and European filings will miss the majority of documented activity in this field.
The most-cited records in this corpus cover foundational reactive-media chemistry rather than recent structural variations: zero-valent iron bioremediation of contaminated aquifers, general aquifer remediation methods, and nanoparticle-activated oxidant systems, several cited well over 100 times within this dataset. A new filing proposing reactive-media chemistry should expect dense prior art in these areas; a filing focused on barrier construction, layering or deployment method is likely to face a thinner citation trail.
Go past this page: query the whole soil & groundwater remediation: permeable reactive barrier patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.