Book a demo

Soil Health Monitoring & Management Patent Landscape

Soil Health Monitoring & Management Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Soil Health Monitoring & Management Patent Landscape in 2026

The soil health monitoring and management patent space is in a clear growth phase, with filings accelerating sharply since 2020 and India accounting for the dominant share of filing activity. The field remains fragmented across academic institutions, with no single applicant holding a commanding position, leaving meaningful room for differentiated technology entrants.

373
Patent families in scope
26%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+354%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

A fragmented, academically driven field with no entrenched industrial leader

Lovely Professional University leads the applicant ranking with 22 patent families, followed by Soil Information PBC at 16 and Galgotias University at 15. The top five applicants together account for 26% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating a structurally fragmented competitive landscape.

The tier gap between the leader and the rest is narrow: the top three applicants are separated by only seven patent families. This shallow gradient signals that no single organization has established a durable blocking position, and the field is still being shaped by a wide range of entrants.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Lovely Professional University22
2Soil Information PBC16
3Galgotias University15
4Plant Bioscience Limited7
5SR University6
6SAVEETHA INST OF MEDICAL & TECH SCI5
7Syngenta Crop Protection AG5
8GLA University Mathura4
9Manipal University Jaipur4
10Saveetha Engineering College4
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Chandigarh University4
12THAPAR INST OF ENG & TECH4
13The Regents of the University of Colorado4
14Reva University4
15Aditya3
16Narula Institute of Technology3
17Uttaranchal University3
18GITAM Deemed to be University3
19Vellore Institute of Technology3
20Hardeep3
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The dominance of academic institutions across the top ten implies that foundational and exploratory research — rather than commercialization-ready IP — constitutes the bulk of current activity. Industrial players such as Syngenta Crop Protection AG and Soil Information PBC are present but not yet dominant, suggesting the commercial race is still open.

Filing counts for 2025 and 2026 are understated due to standard publication lag; the apparent recent-period figures should be treated as lower bounds rather than a plateau. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Rapidly accelerating filings anchored in sensing and AI-driven agronomy

Two complementary views — annual filing volume and technology branch composition — reveal both the pace of growth and the technical priorities that define the field’s current center of gravity.

Annual filing trend

Activity was negligible through 2019, then began climbing in 2020 and accelerated markedly from 2023 onward, reaching 71 families in 2024 before the 2025 figures — still accruing — already stand at 155. The field is in a genuine growth phase; the apparent 2026 step-down reflects publication lag, not a real reversal.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 155 in 2025.120172201802019720201920211620223120237120241552025712026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

Material analysis and testing (G01N) is the dominant branch, reflecting a heavy emphasis on in-situ and laboratory soil sensing. Business and administrative data processing (G06Q) and soil working in agriculture (A01B) rank second and third, indicating that decision-support platforms and field-management systems are nearly as active as the core sensing layer. AI model computing (G06N) and digital communications (H04L, H04W) confirm that connectivity and machine learning are increasingly integral to new filings.

Technology compositionG01N · Material analysis & testing leads with 313; G06Q · Business, commerce & admin data processing 177.G01N · Material analysis…313G06Q · Business, commerc…177A01B · Soil working in a…174A01G · Horticulture & fo…141G06N · Computing based o…94A01C · Planting & sowing93H04L · Digital informati…42G05B · Control & regulat…32↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240077446A1Published 2024-03-07

Additively Fabricated Capacitive Soil Moisture Sen…

The Regents Of The University Of Colorado

A capacitive soil moisture sensor for detecting moisture levels in soil comprises a biodegradable substrate. A capacitive circuit is positioned on the biodegradable substrate. An antenna circuit is configured to communicate capacitance data. A hydrophobic, biodegradable encapsulating material encases at least the capacitive circuit. (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Additively Fabricated Capacitive Soil Moisture Sen… — patent drawingAdditively Fabricated Capacitive Soil Moisture Sen… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Optical real-time soil sensor and auto-calibration…48
2Apparatus, system and method for generating crop n…42
3Soil sensor40
4Low RF-band impedance spectroscopy based sensor fo…32
5Optical real-time soil sensor and auto-calibration…29
6Biodegradable soil sensor, system and method21
7花生生长期精准施肥与病虫害绿色防控集成方法10
8AEMC-IoT system: agriculture environment managed a…10

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of growth-stage dynamics, shallow concentration, and a largely academic filing base creates a specific set of strategic conditions for industrial and start-up entrants to evaluate.

Growth

Growth stage: filings rising, technology boundaries still forming

The field is classified as Growth, with annual filings rising continuously since 2020 and the most recent years understated by publication lag. Core sensing and data-processing approaches are being claimed at pace, but the technology taxonomy is still broadening — branches from UAV platforms (B64C, B64U) to microbiome engineering (C12N) are appearing at low volume, suggesting the perimeter of the field is not yet fixed. Early mover advantage in sub-domains remains achievable.

Growth stage
Concentration

Shallow leader gap: no blocking position established

The top five filers hold 26% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, and the gap between first and third place is only seven patent families. This shallow concentration means that a focused filing campaign of moderate scale could move an organization into the top tier within a few years. Industrial players entering now face academic incumbents whose IP tends toward enabling disclosures rather than tightly scoped product claims.

Low concentration
Collaboration

No co-applicant collaborations detected in current evidence

The collaboration dataset returned no co-filed patent families in this corpus, which is consistent with the predominantly single-institution academic filing pattern observed in the applicant ranking. The absence of visible cross-institution or industry-academia co-filings may reflect early-stage fragmentation rather than a structural barrier, and could represent an organizational differentiation opportunity for a well-resourced industrial partner seeking academic co-development.

Evidence pending
Geography

India-dominant filing base; US, China, and PCT coverage thin

India accounts for the largest share of patent records by jurisdiction, consistent with the academic filing profile. The United States, China, WIPO (PCT), and the European Patent Office each show materially lower counts. This geographic skew means that potentially valuable inventions in sensing hardware, AI inference, and agronomic decision platforms may be under-protected in the major commercial markets — a gap that industrial filers with multi-jurisdictional prosecution capability could exploit.

India-led
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are grounded in applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence from the PatSnap Eureka corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Lovely Professional University leads on volume; Soil Information PBC is the most active commercial new entrant

The top two applicants differ sharply in institutional character: the leader is a teaching university filing broadly across sensing and field management, while the primary challenger is a purpose-built public benefit corporation focused on electrochemical soil analysis.

Leader · Lovely Professional University

Lovely Professional University

Lovely Professional University holds 22 patent families, the largest count in the corpus. Its technology emphasis spans material analysis and testing (G01N 33), soil working in agriculture (A01B 79), and horticulture and forestry (A01G 25), indicating a broad agronomy-plus-sensing portfolio. Momentum is classified as a new entrant based on recent filing activity of 12 families, consistent with the field’s rapid recent acceleration.

families: 22
Challenger · Soil Information PBC

Soil Information PBC

Soil Information PBC holds 16 patent families and is the leading commercially oriented filer. Its focus is concentrated in electrochemical and materials-based soil analysis (G01N 27 and G01N 33) alongside soil working systems (A01B 79), suggesting a product-oriented sensing and field-application platform. With 14 families filed in the recent window and classified as a new entrant, it is expanding at a pace that places it on a trajectory to challenge the volume leader within the current growth cycle.

families: 16
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, technology focus, and momentum trends for all top-100 filers in this landscape.
Galgotias UniversityPlant Bioscience Limited+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Lovely Professional University12▲ new entrant
Soil Information PBC14▲ new entrant
Plant Bioscience Limited1▲ new entrant
SR University1▲ new entrant
Syngenta Crop Protection AG3▲ new entrant
SAVEETHA INST OF MEDICAL & TECH SCI3▲ new entrant
The Regents of the University of Colorado3▲ new entrant
THAPAR INST OF ENG & TECH2▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Family counts are drawn from the applicant ranking; technology emphasis from the applicant-technology breakdown; momentum from recent filing window data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches worth monitoring

Several branches sit at meaningfully lower filing density relative to the dominant sensing and data-processing core, and carry plausible technical value for soil health applications that warrants monitoring.

AI model computing (G06N) — inference layer underdeveloped relative to data collection

With 94 patent records, G06N is the fifth-ranked branch, well below the 313 records in material analysis and testing. Given the volume of sensor data being generated by the dominant G01N filings, the gap between data collection and intelligent inference is notable. An entrant with expertise in on-device machine learning, federated soil data models, or predictive nutrient management algorithms could file in a space that is active but not yet saturated, with a clear technical entry path through integration with existing IoT sensor hardware.

Search this in Eureka →

Control and regulating systems (G05B) — closed-loop field management largely unclaimed

G05B accounts for 32 patent records, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the technology composition. Closed-loop actuation — where soil sensor readings automatically trigger irrigation, fertilization, or tillage adjustments — sits at the intersection of G01N sensing and G05B control, yet this integration appears sparse. The branch has plausible commercial value in precision agriculture platforms, and the low filing density relative to the sensing layer suggests the control-side of the stack is an underexplored area worthy of focused investigation.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See filing density, share, and entry-path analysis across all identified adjacent branches in this landscape.
H04L · Digital information transmissionH04W · Wireless communication networks+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts reflect patent records across the full corpus; lower-count branches are presented as observations of relative sparsity, not confirmed commercial opportunities.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerG01N 33 · Material analysis & testingA01B 79 · Soil working in agricultureG06Q 50 · Business, commerce & admin data processingA01G 25 · Horticulture & forestryA01C 21 · Planting & sowing
Lovely Professional UniversityStrong · 17Strong · 12Moderate · 6Moderate · 8Emerging · 2
Soil Information PBCStrong · 16Strong · 9AbsentAbsentEmerging · 3
Galgotias UniversityStrong · 15Emerging · 3Emerging · 3Emerging · 2Absent
SR UniversityStrong · 6AbsentStrong · 4AbsentModerate · 2
Chandigarh UniversityStrong · 4Strong · 3Strong · 3Moderate · 2Absent
Reva UniversityStrong · 4AbsentStrong · 3Strong · 4Absent
Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical SciencesAbsentStrong · 4Strong · 4AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own position in the soil health patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.