Soil Vapor Extraction Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Soil Vapor Extraction and Air Sparging Patents: Leaders, Concentration and White Space
43.3% concentration at the top. The top 5 of 79 ranked assignees hold 97 of 224 records (43.3%), with the leader alone at 45 — a steep drop-off after that into a long tail. Filings sat at zero in 2017 and have not trended sharply up or down since; the closest thing to momentum is a peak of 7 records in 2023. With fewer than four complete post-lag years to compare, no growth rate can be stated reliably — the honest read is a mature field with steady, low-volume filing rather than one accelerating or contracting.
- 1SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV45
- 2SHELL CANADA LTD21
- 3THE LUBRIZOL CORP11
- 4BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST11
- 5SHELL OIL CO9
See the full soil vapor extraction and air sparging analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about soil vapor extraction and air sparging patents
How many patents exist for soil vapor extraction and air sparging?
This dataset contains 224 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that match soil vapor extraction and air sparging remediation terms combined with technical qualifiers like well spacing, vapor flow rate and vadose zone. The true global total is larger, since this is a scoped search rather than an exhaustive count of every remediation patent ever filed. Filing activity within this window has stayed low and roughly flat, peaking at 7 records in 2023, which is consistent with a mature rather than fast-growing technology area.
Who are the leading patent holders in soil vapor extraction technology?
The assignee ranking covers 79 companies, and it is heavily concentrated: the top 5 combined hold 97 of the 224 records in scope (43.3%), with the single leading assignee accounting for 45 of those. Beyond the top 10, which together hold 58.5% of all records, filing activity spreads thinly across a long tail of assignees with only a handful of families each. This pattern is typical of a field with a long operating history rather than one still attracting new entrants at scale.
What is the difference between soil vapor extraction and air sparging in the patent claims?
In patent terms, soil vapor extraction (SVE) claims typically centre on withdrawing contaminated vapor from the vadose zone, often specifying well spacing, vapor flow rate or off-gas carbon treatment as key parameters. Air sparging claims instead focus on injecting air below the water table to volatilise contaminants, which then migrate upward for capture, frequently by an SVE system. Many records in this dataset, including the representative filing analysed here, combine both techniques with additional heat or oxygen injection into a single integrated system rather than claiming either technique alone.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Soil Vapor Extraction and Air Sparging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.