https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/solar-forecasting-and-resource-assessment-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Solar Forecasting & Resource Assessment
Solar forecasting and resource assessment patents: who holds the ground and where it's still open
  • 35.5% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees together hold 60 of 169 records in scope, a leader-plus-long-tail structure rather than a fragmented field.
  • Meteorology outweighs pure AI claims. G01W meteorology classes touch 43.8% of records versus 30.2% for G06N AI-model classes, meaning irradiance and weather-data claims still anchor the field more than model architecture claims.
  • Filings are climbing again after a mid-decade dip. From 2021 to 2024 filings rose from 5 to 9, an 80% increase over three years, even as the single leading assignee shows no filings in the latest year.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
169
Published Records
36%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+80%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (9) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 169 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 169 published records at the intersection of solar forecasting, solar resource assessment and related technical parameters such as irradiance modelling, cell efficiency and process controls. Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-08-31 cut-off, spanning a period where solar output prediction moved from statistical weather models toward machine-learning-assisted grid integration. The scope captures both meteorological forecasting methods and the downstream power-system applications that consume those forecasts.

Records here span standalone irradiance-prediction methods, cloud-detection techniques tied to distributed solar assets, and forecasting pipelines feeding grid dispatch or commerce systems. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will understate real filing activity.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1EAGLEVIEW TECHNOLOGIES INC21
  2. 2NEO VIRTUS ENG11
  3. 3LOCUS ENERGY10
  4. 4COMMONWEALTH SCI & IND RES ORG10
  5. 5ITRON INC8
  6. 6DRIFT MARKETPLACE INC7
  7. 7RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA7
  8. 8INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION6
  9. 9GREEN POWER LABS INC6
  10. 10QATAR FOUND FOR EDUCATION SCI & COMMUNITY DEV6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solar Forecasting & Resource Assessment Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Data & Trends

Filing trend and technology composition

The filing curve and the IPC composition together show where solar forecasting patent activity concentrates and how the technology mix has shifted.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings peaked in 2019 at 22 records, dipped through the early 2020s, then recovered: 2021 to 2024 rose from 5 to 9 records, an 80% increase over that three-year span. 2026 figures (8 so far) are partial and will rise as later filings publish.

Filing trend, 2017–20260613192592017201822201920202021202220232024202582026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

G01W meteorology methods appear in 43.8% of the 169 records, ahead of G06N AI-model computing (30.2%) and H02J power-grid systems (29.6%). G06F data processing and G06Q business/administrative processing each sit at 26.0%, while H02S photovoltaic generation (22.5%), F24S solar heat collectors (13.6%) and G06T image processing (12.4%) round out the mix — note these shares sum to well over 100% because most records carry multiple IPC classes.

Technology composition by IPC subclassG01W · Meteorology7443.8%G06N · Computing based on AI models5130.2%H02J · Power supply & grid systems5029.6%G06F · Electric digital data processi…4426.0%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…4426.0%H02S · Photovoltaic / solar power gen…3822.5%F24S · Solar heat collectors2313.6%G06T · Image data processing & genera…2112.4%Other11668.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 169 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solar Forecasting & Resource Assessment Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Solar Forecasting & Resource Assessment Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about solar forecasting & resource assessment patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
US20200150309A12020-05-14

Techniques for geolocation and cloud detection with voltage data from solar homes

ITRON NETWORKED SOLUTIONS, INC.

A wireless mesh network of nodes records voltage fluctuations at distributed solar sites and correlates them across sites to detect advancing cloud cover. By computing the time offset between correlated fluctuations, the system infers cloud movement speed and direction without dedicated irradiance sensors, using existing grid-connected voltage telemetry instead.Filed by Itron Networked Solutions; published 2020-05-14.

US20200150309A1 — patent drawing 1US20200150309A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20100198420A1Dynamic management of power production in a power system subject to weather-related factors284
2US20050039787A1Method and system for predicting solar energy production111
3US20130166266A1Weather and satellite model for estimating solar irradiance110
4US20130054662A1Methods of using generalized order differentiation and integration of input variables to forecast trends99
5US20160306906A1Solar irradiance modeling augmented with atmospheric water vapor data70
6US20170031056A1Solar Energy Forecasting69
7US20190158011A1Solar power forecasting68
8US7580817B2Method and system for predicting solar energy production68
9US20120191351A1Estimating solar irradiance components from plane of array irradiance and global horizontal irradiance55
10US20140196761A1Solar tracker and related methods, devices, and systems53

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of prior-art density, not of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solar Forecasting & Resource Assessment Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once concentration, technology mix and citation data are read together.

Concentration
35.5%
of 169 records held by top 5 assignees

The top of the field is settled, the middle is not

The five leading assignees hold 60 of 169 records (35.5%), and the top ten extend that to 92 records (54.4%). That leaves nearly half the field spread across a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants — room to build a position without displacing an incumbent directly.

Ranking covers 100 assignees, the full set the data endpoint returns.
Technology mix
43.8%
of records touch G01W meteorology

Meteorological method claims still anchor the field

G01W meteorology classes appear in more records than any AI-model class, including G06N at 30.2%. Forecasting patents that pair a meteorological method with a specific downstream application — grid dispatch, cell-efficiency correction — sit across more claim territory than model-only filings.

Shares exceed 100% combined because records carry multiple IPC classes.
Citation depth
284 citations
on the single most-cited record

Early power-management forecasting claims are heavily built upon

The most-cited record in scope, on dynamic power-production management tied to weather factors, has drawn 284 citations — far ahead of the next tier. That density suggests foundational forecasting-to-dispatch claims are well mapped, and later filers have mostly built narrower, application-specific claims around them rather than re-claiming the core method.

Citation counts favour older records within the searched corpus.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to solar forecasting & resource assessment patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing is rare in this field
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
NEO VIRTUS ENGBING JAMES M2
The Regents of the University of CaliforniaCOIMBRA CARLOS F M2

Only two co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, indicating most records here are filed by a single assignee rather than through joint development arrangements.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solar Forecasting & Resource Assessment Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players & Momentum

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

Filing activity concentrates among a handful of established players, but recent-year momentum data shows even the leader has gone quiet in the latest year, and named branches remain thinly claimed.

Leader
21 records
single-assignee count

One assignee sets the pace, then stalls

The leading assignee holds 21 of 169 records, well ahead of fifth place at 8. Yet recent-year momentum data shows this same leader at 0 filings in the latest year, a -100% year-over-year change — a reminder that a strong historical position can still leave room for a new entrant to move.

Momentum figures reflect the most recent year, which is still filling in due to publication lag.
Receiving offices
71 US filings
leading office by volume

Filing geography skews US and India

The United States receives the largest share of filings (71), followed by India (32) and WIPO/PCT filings (22). Europe, Australia and Canada each receive single-digit-to-teens counts, suggesting protection strategies outside the US-India-PCT corridor remain comparatively thin.

Counts are by receiving office, not by assignee headquarters.
Co-filing
2 pairs
co-assignee pairings identified

Joint filings are the exception, not the rule

Only two co-assignee pairs recur in the dataset, each appearing twice. Most solar forecasting patent activity here is filed by a single organisation working alone, rather than through university-industry or multi-party collaboration structures common in some adjacent energy fields.

Pattern holds across the full 169-record set.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
These sub-areas show comparatively thin filing density relative to the core meteorology and AI classes, based on the IPC composition in scope.
Cloud-motion inference from non-optical sensor dataCell-efficiency correction under partial shadingSolar heat collector geometry tied to irradiance forecastsVoltage-telemetry-based cloud detectionForecast-to-dispatch handoff protocols for grid operators
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
EAGLEVIEW TECHNOLOGIES INC0-100%
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)0
Qatar Foundation for Education, Science and Community Development0
Itron, Inc.0
DRIFT MARKETPLACE INC0
NEO VIRTUS ENG0
LOCUS ENERGY0
Green Power Labs Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solar Forecasting & Resource Assessment Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio positioning, or identifying acquisition targets.

Map claim scope on the highest-cited records

Start with the records carrying the deepest citation counts, particularly the dynamic power-production management filing at 284 citations, to understand what core claim territory is already occupied before drafting new applications.

Explore citation trees in Eureka

Test draft claims against the under-claimed branches

The gate chips above point to sub-areas with thinner filing density than the core meteorology and AI classes. Running a draft claim against these branches in Eureka can surface whether the gap is real or simply unindexed.

Run a claim check in Eureka

Track the leading assignees' next filings

Several top assignees show zero filings in the latest year, which given publication lag may reflect pending applications not yet published rather than reduced activity. Monitoring newly published families against this baseline will clarify which.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solar Forecasting & Resource Assessment Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about solar forecasting patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solar Forecasting & Resource Assessment Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Solar Forecasting & Resource Assessment Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole solar forecasting & resource assessment patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.