Book a demo

Solid Desiccant Dehydration Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Solid Desiccant Dehydration Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/solid-desiccant-and-molecular-sieve-dehydration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Gas Dehydration & NGL
Solid Desiccant and Molecular Sieve Dehydration Patents
  • Five filers hold 84.8% of the field. 117 of 138 records in scope sit with the top five assignees, leaving little room for a new entrant to build a broad position without licensing around them.
  • Filing activity is rebuilding, not new. After a 2017 peak of 20 filings, activity thinned, then grew 400% from 2021 to 2024 (1 to 5 filings) as thermal-swing and CO2-capture-adjacent claims re-entered the pipeline.
  • Separation and fuels classes dominate together. B01D and C10L co-occur across most of the corpus (83.3% and 54.3% of 138 records respectively), pointing to dehydration claims drafted jointly with downstream fuel-gas conditioning.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
138
Published Records
85%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+400%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 138 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent activity at the intersection of solid desiccant dehydration, molecular sieve dehydration, and adsorption dehydration, narrowed to filings that also address operational specifics such as bed regeneration cycles, adsorbent attrition, thermal swing adsorption, water loading capacity, regeneration gas coolers, or switching valve sequences. That combination excludes generic desiccant chemistry claims and keeps the corpus focused on process and equipment engineering for natural gas and NGL dehydration trains.

138 published records fall within scope across the 2015-2026 coverage window, with the ranking built on patent families rather than raw document counts so that continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction copies of the same invention do not inflate any single assignee's position.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY(US)65
  2. 2UOP LLC23
  3. 3ENHANCED ENERGY GRP13
  4. 4EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO8
  5. 5NUOVO PIGNONE SPA8
  6. 6CHEVRON USA INC7
  7. 7ENGELHARD CORP5
  8. 8OELFKE RUSSELL H3
  9. 9JOHNSON ROBERT A3
  10. 10RAMKUMAR SHWETHA3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Desiccant and Molecular Sieve Dehydration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 138-record corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

A 2017 peak, a quiet middle, then renewed growth

Filings peaked at 20 in 2017, the busiest year in the window, then fell before rebuilding: 2021 to 2024 shows +400% growth (1 to 5 filings). 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent years should not be read as a slowdown.

A 2017 peak, a quiet middle, then renewed growth051015202020172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Separation processes dominate, fuels classes follow closely

B01D (separation processes) appears in 83.3% of the 138 records in scope, and C10L (fuels) in 54.3%, confirming that most dehydration claims are drafted alongside fuel-gas conditioning rather than as standalone adsorption chemistry. B01J (catalysis-adjacent processes) and F25J (gas liquefaction) sit well behind at 15.9% and 13.8%, marking smaller but active claim territories.

Separation processes dominate, fuels classes follow closelyB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…11583.3%C10L · Fuels & firelighters7554.3%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …2215.9%F25J · Gas liquefaction & separation1913.8%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…53.6%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds42.9%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining21.4%F16T · Steam traps21.4%Other75.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 138 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Desiccant and Molecular Sieve Dehydration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Solid Desiccant and Molecular Sieve Dehydration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about solid desiccant and molecular sieve dehydration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative recent filing

Representative Recent Filing
US20240058742A12024-02-22

System and method of regulating a temperature of a CO2 capture vessel during thermal swing adsorption using an inter-exchanger (US20240058742A1)

ENHANCED ENERGY GROUP LLC

A capture vessel is configured to capture carbon dioxide according to a thermal swing adsorption (TSA) process comprising a cyclical CO2 capture stage, a regeneration stage, and a cooling stage. Capture media inside the vessel adsorb CO2 from an exhaust gas during capture, producing an N2 stream that exits the vessel. An inter-exchanger thermally coupled to the capture media manages vessel temperature across the cycle stages.Filed by Enhanced Energy Group LLC, published 2024-02-22 — illustrates how thermal-swing dehydration claims are now being drafted around CO2-capture vessel thermal management rather than gas dehydration alone.

US20240058742A1 — patent drawing 1US20240058742A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing details
Highest-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5089034AProcess for purifying natural gas119
2US20170056814A1Apparatus and System For Combined Temperature and Pressure Swing Adsorption Processes Related Thereto40
3US20170056813A1Apparatus and System for Swing Adsorption Processes Related Thereto38
4US6340433B1Water purification using titanium silicate membranes38
5US10124286B2Apparatus and system for swing adsorption processes related thereto29
6US10080991B2Apparatus and system for swing adsorption processes related thereto29
7US20180056235A1Swing Adsorption Processes Using Zeolite Structures28
8US20180056229A1Apparatus and System for Swing Adsorption Processes Related Thereto27
9US10080992B2Apparatus and system for swing adsorption processes related thereto24
10US20170056810A1Apparatus and System for Swing Adsorption Processes Related Thereto19

Citation counts favour older records in any searched corpus and should be read as a signal of influence within this dataset, not as a measure of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Desiccant and Molecular Sieve Dehydration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the concentration and citation data signal

Reading the ranking and citation tables together points to a field where a handful of incumbents built broad early positions, and later filings compete for narrower operational claims around their patents.

Concentration
84.8%
of 138 records held by top 5 assignees

The field is tightly held at the top

117 of the 138 records in scope belong to just five assignees, with the leader alone accounting for 65 records. A new filer entering broad thermal-swing or bed-regeneration claim territory is likely to run into prior art from one of these five.

Top 5 combined, all records
Growth
+400%
filings, 2021 to 2024

Activity is rebuilding after a lull

Filings dropped after the 2017 peak of 20, then grew from 1 in 2021 to 5 in 2024. That growth tracks renewed interest in thermal swing adsorption tied to CO2 capture applications rather than a return to conventional gas dehydration filing volumes.

2021-2024, complete years only
Influence
119 citations
on the top-cited record

One foundational patent anchors the citation graph

US5089034A on natural gas purification is cited 119 times within this corpus, well ahead of the next tier of records in the high 30s to low 40s. High citation counts here mark foundational process patents, not necessarily current filing activity.

Most-cited record in corpus
Geography
40 filings
at the US receiving office

Filing is concentrated in a few jurisdictions

The United States leads with 40 filings, followed by Australia (18), WIPO/PCT (16), Canada (15) and Europe (13), with a smaller but notable presence in Malaysia (7). That spread suggests LNG and NGL-producing regions are the primary filing targets alongside the US.

Receiving office counts
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to solid desiccant and molecular sieve dehydration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Desiccant and Molecular Sieve Dehydration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where the gaps sit

The ranked leaders sit close together at the top, with three inventor-named entries also appearing repeatedly as co-assignees, suggesting a small technical team behind several of the leading filings.

Leader
65 records
held by the top assignee

One filer holds nearly half the corpus

The leading assignee's 65 records represent close to half of all 138 records in scope, built primarily on swing-adsorption apparatus and process claims that recur across the most-cited records in this dataset.

Leader, all records
Long tail
3 records
at 10th place in the ranking

Filing drops sharply after the top five

By tenth place, assignee counts have fallen to single digits, and the top 10 combined account for 100% of the 138 records in scope, meaning no meaningful filing activity exists outside these ranked entities.

10th place, ranked assignees
Co-filing
9 shared filings
on the strongest co-assignee pair

A small inventor network drives several filings

Three named individuals appear as co-assignees on 9 shared filings each, indicating a tight technical collaboration behind a meaningful slice of the corpus rather than filings spread across independent inventors.

Strongest co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
These sub-areas show comparatively thin claim density relative to the core separation and fuels classes, based on the IPC composition of this corpus.
Regeneration gas cooler designSwitching valve sequencing logicAdsorbent attrition mitigationWater loading capacity sensingSteam trap integration (F16T)Hydrocarbon oil co-processing (C10G)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company0
UOP LLC0-100%
Enhanced Energy Group LLC0-100%
OELFKE RUSSELL H0
JOHNSON ROBERT A0
NAGAVARAPU ANANDA K0
RAMKUMAR SHWETHA0
DECKMAN HARRY W0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Desiccant and Molecular Sieve Dehydration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a concentrated core and several thinner branches; the next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate or identifying open claim space.

Map claims against the top five assignees

Before drafting in thermal swing adsorption or bed regeneration cycles, check independent claims from the leading five assignees, who together hold 84.8% of the 138 records in scope.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Track the CO2-capture crossover

The representative 2024 filing shows dehydration claims migrating toward CO2 capture vessel thermal management; monitoring this crossover early may reveal where the next filing wave concentrates.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Explore the under-claimed branches

Switching valve sequencing, regeneration gas cooling and adsorbent attrition mitigation show thinner claim density than the core separation classes and may offer more open drafting room.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Desiccant and Molecular Sieve Dehydration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Desiccant and Molecular Sieve Dehydration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Solid Desiccant and Molecular Sieve Dehydration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole solid desiccant and molecular sieve dehydration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.