Book a demo

Solid Oxide Electrolyzer BoP Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Solid Oxide Electrolyzer BoP Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/solid-oxide-electrolyzer-balance-of-plant-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Hydrogen & Fuel Cells · Patent Landscape
Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Balance of Plant Patents
  • Filing peaked in 2023 at 34 records and has since fallen back toward the 2022 midpoint of 17, suggesting the current BoP architecture wave has already crested rather than being early-stage.
  • C25B carries 117 of 122 records so electrolytic-cell claims dominate the corpus, while steam and thermal-management BoP hardware is filed as a much thinner secondary layer on top of it.
  • Co-assignment is almost absent only three pairs across 122 families, meaning most BoP engineering here is being claimed by single organisations rather than through joint ventures or shared R&D filings.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
122
Published Records
89%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-55%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (11 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 122 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families at the intersection of solid oxide electrolyzer (SOEC) systems and their balance-of-plant subsystems: steam management, thermal recuperation and related heat-integration hardware. The search combines SOEC-specific terminology with balance-of-plant claim language and restricts the IPC to electrolytic production, water electrolysis and steam-generation classes, so it captures BoP engineering claimed around an SOEC core rather than electrolyzer chemistry in isolation.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in any trend line understate real filing activity and should be read as provisional rather than a genuine falloff.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1HALDOR TOPSOE AS52
  2. 2BLOOM ENERGY CORP38
  3. 3PRECISION COMBUSTION INC8
  4. 4VERSA POWER SYST LTD6
  5. 5RONDO ENERGY INC5
  6. 6CONVION OY5
  7. 7DYNELECTRO APS4
  8. 8Forseal (Wuhan) Integration Co., Ltd.1
  9. 9SK ECOPLANT CO LTD1
  10. 10HD KOREA SHIPBUILDING & OFFSHORE ENGINEERING CO LTD1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Balance of Plant covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 122-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

Filings rose to a 2023 peak, then eased

Annual filings climbed from 6 in 2017 to a peak of 34 in 2023, roughly double the 2022 midpoint of 17. The most recent years trend lower, but given the 18-month publication lag, the true 2025-2026 filing level is not yet fully visible in the data.

Filings rose to a 2023 peak, then eased01020304062017201820192020202120223420232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

C25B dominates; BoP-specific classes are thin

C25B (electrolytic production of compounds) appears in 117 of 122 records, confirming these are fundamentally electrolyzer-core patents with balance-of-plant claims attached. H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) and C01B (non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds) trail well behind, and steam-plant class F01K appears in only 5 records — a sign that dedicated thermal-management hardware is still claimed sparingly relative to the cell technology it serves.

C25B dominates; BoP-specific classes are thinC25B · Electrolytic production of com…11795.9%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells2923.8%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…1814.8%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…97.4%C01C · Ammonia, cyanides & nitrogen c…86.6%B63H · Marine propulsion & steering54.1%F01K · Steam & thermal power plants54.1%F03G · Spring/weight & misc. motors54.1%Other3226.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 122 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Balance of Plant covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Balance of Plant with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about solid oxide electrolyzer balance of plant and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in this corpus

Representative record
US20220042190A12022-02-10

Solid oxide electrolysis cell system and a method of operating a solid oxide electrolysis cell system

VERSA POWER SYSTEMS LTD

A method of operating a solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) system at partial load, where the SOEC system includes a plurality of branches electrically connected in parallel, and each branch includes at least one SOEC stack. The method includes determining a thermally neutral target voltage below which operation is endothermic and above which operation is exothermic, and executing pulse width modulation current control by cycling an ON phase and an OFF phase for each branch such that the SOEC system operates at an average operating power equal to a chosen percentage of the operating power at the thermally neutral target voltage.Filed by Versa Power Systems Ltd, published 2022-02-10. Full claim scope is rendered separately.

US20220042190A1 — patent drawing 1US20220042190A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited patent families
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2019072608A1A method for generating synthesis gas for ammonia production18
2WO2018080571A1Solid oxide electrolysis with internal heater15
3US20190226101A1Solid oxide fuel cell with internal reformer13
4EP4086370A2Solid oxide electrolyzer systems containing hydrogen pump and method of operating thereof12
5KR102412626B1Balance of plant module for solid oxide electrolysis cell system and solid oxide electrolysis cell system9
6WO2022112642A1Recirculated solid oxide electrolyzer cell system and method9
7US20220349076A1Solid oxide electrolyzer systems containing hydrogen pump and method of operating thereof7
8US20230323793A1Thermal energy storage system coupled with a solid oxide electrolysis system6
9US20220042190A1Solid oxide electrolysis cell system and a method of operating a solid oxide electrolysis cell system5
10US20210214849A1Expander for SOEC applications5

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Balance of Plant covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Read together, the trend line and technology composition point to a corpus that grew quickly, is now thinning at the edges, and still has open room in dedicated thermal hardware.

Filing trajectory
34 in 2023
peak year filings

Growth has already crested

Filings roughly doubled from the 2022 midpoint of 17 to a peak of 34 in 2023, then eased. This is not a young, accelerating field — it is one that had its main filing wave in the early 2020s. New entrants should expect to build on an established base rather than stake early claims in open territory.

Based on 2017-2026 filing counts
Claim concentration
117 of 122
records in C25B

The cell, not the plant, is claimed most

Almost every record touches C25B, the electrolytic-production class, while dedicated steam and thermal-plant classes such as F01K and F03G each appear in only 5 records. Balance-of-plant hardware is largely being protected as an appendage to cell claims rather than through standalone thermal-system patents.

Based on IPC subclass counts
Collaboration pattern
3 pairs
co-assignee pairs found

Filing is mostly solo, not joint

Only three co-assignee pairs appear across 122 families, and none recur beyond a single filing. Organisations working this space are largely filing independently rather than through joint development structures, which is unusual for a subsystem area that typically involves plant integrators and cell makers together.

Based on co-assignee pair analysis
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to solid oxide electrolyzer balance of plant, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Collaboration is the exception here
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Yonsei University Industry-Academic Cooperation FoundationHD KOREA SHIPBUILDING & OFFSHORE ENGINEERING CO LTD1
WILSON JAMES RBLERSCHANK DAVID M1
WILSON JAMES RBARNETT SCOTT A1

With only three isolated co-assignee pairs in the dataset, most balance-of-plant claims are being filed by a single organisation acting alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Balance of Plant covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and where the field is open

Recent-year momentum across tracked assignees is flat to negative, consistent with the post-2023 filing decline; no organisation in this set shows fresh growth in the latest year.

Momentum
0 in latest year
across all tracked assignees

No assignee is currently accelerating

Every organisation surfaced in the recent-momentum view shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, including a -100% YoY drop for at least one active filer. Combined with the 18-month publication lag, this likely reflects filings still working through the pipeline rather than a genuine stop in R&D.

Based on recent-year momentum by assignee
Filing base
122 families
total in this landscape

A moderate-sized, specialist corpus

At 122 families, this is a focused technical niche rather than a broad field. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the largest single office with 41 filings, ahead of Europe, WIPO/PCT and a cluster of Australia, Canada and India each near 9.

Based on receiving-office counts
Geography
US 41 · EPO 18
leading receiving offices

Filing is US- and Europe-anchored

The United States and European Patent Office together account for the bulk of receiving-office activity, with WIPO/PCT filings indicating a meaningful share of applicants seeking multi-jurisdiction coverage rather than filing domestically only.

Based on receiving-office counts
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Branches with thin IPC representation relative to the core electrolyzer claims, suggesting room for dedicated hardware patents.
Steam recuperation loop designHydrogen pump integration with BoPInternal-reformer thermal couplingPartial-load thermal-neutral controlMarine-format SOEC heat integration
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Haldor Topsoe0
Bloom Energy Corporation0-100%
Precision Combustion, Inc.0
Versa Power Systems Ltd0
Redox Power Systems0
Convion Oy0
Dianion Electronic Control Co.0
Forseal (Wuhan) Integration Co., Ltd.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Balance of Plant covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps for teams deciding where to file or where to watch for freedom-to-operate risk.

Model the white space directly

The thin F01K and F03G representation suggests dedicated thermal-management hardware claims are still open relative to cell-level claims. A focused search restricted to those subclasses would confirm how much room actually remains.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the post-2023 pipeline

Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the apparent 2024-2026 decline needs revisiting once later filings surface. Re-running this landscape in a year will show whether the field genuinely cooled or was simply mid-pipeline.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Check freedom-to-operate against the most-cited families

The most-cited records concentrate claim influence in a small set of assignees. Any new BoP filing should be checked against those families before committing engineering resources.

Run an FTO check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Balance of Plant covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Balance of Plant covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Balance of Plant in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole solid oxide electrolyzer balance of plant corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.