Solid Oxide Electrolyzer BoP Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
- Filing peaked in 2023 at 34 records and has since fallen back toward the 2022 midpoint of 17, suggesting the current BoP architecture wave has already crested rather than being early-stage.
- C25B carries 117 of 122 records so electrolytic-cell claims dominate the corpus, while steam and thermal-management BoP hardware is filed as a much thinner secondary layer on top of it.
- Co-assignment is almost absent only three pairs across 122 families, meaning most BoP engineering here is being claimed by single organisations rather than through joint ventures or shared R&D filings.
Filing growth compares 2021 (11 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 122 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks patent families at the intersection of solid oxide electrolyzer (SOEC) systems and their balance-of-plant subsystems: steam management, thermal recuperation and related heat-integration hardware. The search combines SOEC-specific terminology with balance-of-plant claim language and restricts the IPC to electrolytic production, water electrolysis and steam-generation classes, so it captures BoP engineering claimed around an SOEC core rather than electrolyzer chemistry in isolation.
Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in any trend line understate real filing activity and should be read as provisional rather than a genuine falloff.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 122-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.
Filings rose to a 2023 peak, then eased
Annual filings climbed from 6 in 2017 to a peak of 34 in 2023, roughly double the 2022 midpoint of 17. The most recent years trend lower, but given the 18-month publication lag, the true 2025-2026 filing level is not yet fully visible in the data.
C25B dominates; BoP-specific classes are thin
C25B (electrolytic production of compounds) appears in 117 of 122 records, confirming these are fundamentally electrolyzer-core patents with balance-of-plant claims attached. H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) and C01B (non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds) trail well behind, and steam-plant class F01K appears in only 5 records — a sign that dedicated thermal-management hardware is still claimed sparingly relative to the cell technology it serves.
Shares are the percentage of the 122 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Balance of Plant with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about solid oxide electrolyzer balance of plant and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records in this corpus
Solid oxide electrolysis cell system and a method of operating a solid oxide electrolysis cell system
A method of operating a solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) system at partial load, where the SOEC system includes a plurality of branches electrically connected in parallel, and each branch includes at least one SOEC stack. The method includes determining a thermally neutral target voltage below which operation is endothermic and above which operation is exothermic, and executing pulse width modulation current control by cycling an ON phase and an OFF phase for each branch such that the SOEC system operates at an average operating power equal to a chosen percentage of the operating power at the thermally neutral target voltage.Filed by Versa Power Systems Ltd, published 2022-02-10. Full claim scope is rendered separately.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2019072608A1 | A method for generating synthesis gas for ammonia production | 18 |
| 2 | WO2018080571A1 | Solid oxide electrolysis with internal heater | 15 |
| 3 | US20190226101A1 | Solid oxide fuel cell with internal reformer | 13 |
| 4 | EP4086370A2 | Solid oxide electrolyzer systems containing hydrogen pump and method of operating thereof | 12 |
| 5 | KR102412626B1 | Balance of plant module for solid oxide electrolysis cell system and solid oxide electrolysis cell system | 9 |
| 6 | WO2022112642A1 | Recirculated solid oxide electrolyzer cell system and method | 9 |
| 7 | US20220349076A1 | Solid oxide electrolyzer systems containing hydrogen pump and method of operating thereof | 7 |
| 8 | US20230323793A1 | Thermal energy storage system coupled with a solid oxide electrolysis system | 6 |
| 9 | US20220042190A1 | Solid oxide electrolysis cell system and a method of operating a solid oxide electrolysis cell system | 5 |
| 10 | US20210214849A1 | Expander for SOEC applications | 5 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Read together, the trend line and technology composition point to a corpus that grew quickly, is now thinning at the edges, and still has open room in dedicated thermal hardware.
Growth has already crested
Filings roughly doubled from the 2022 midpoint of 17 to a peak of 34 in 2023, then eased. This is not a young, accelerating field — it is one that had its main filing wave in the early 2020s. New entrants should expect to build on an established base rather than stake early claims in open territory.
The cell, not the plant, is claimed most
Almost every record touches C25B, the electrolytic-production class, while dedicated steam and thermal-plant classes such as F01K and F03G each appear in only 5 records. Balance-of-plant hardware is largely being protected as an appendage to cell claims rather than through standalone thermal-system patents.
Filing is mostly solo, not joint
Only three co-assignee pairs appear across 122 families, and none recur beyond a single filing. Organisations working this space are largely filing independently rather than through joint development structures, which is unusual for a subsystem area that typically involves plant integrators and cell makers together.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to solid oxide electrolyzer balance of plant, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Yonsei University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation | HD KOREA SHIPBUILDING & OFFSHORE ENGINEERING CO LTD | 1 |
| WILSON JAMES R | BLERSCHANK DAVID M | 1 |
| WILSON JAMES R | BARNETT SCOTT A | 1 |
With only three isolated co-assignee pairs in the dataset, most balance-of-plant claims are being filed by a single organisation acting alone.
Who is active, and where the field is open
Recent-year momentum across tracked assignees is flat to negative, consistent with the post-2023 filing decline; no organisation in this set shows fresh growth in the latest year.
No assignee is currently accelerating
Every organisation surfaced in the recent-momentum view shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, including a -100% YoY drop for at least one active filer. Combined with the 18-month publication lag, this likely reflects filings still working through the pipeline rather than a genuine stop in R&D.
A moderate-sized, specialist corpus
At 122 families, this is a focused technical niche rather than a broad field. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the largest single office with 41 filings, ahead of Europe, WIPO/PCT and a cluster of Australia, Canada and India each near 9.
Filing is US- and Europe-anchored
The United States and European Patent Office together account for the bulk of receiving-office activity, with WIPO/PCT filings indicating a meaningful share of applicants seeking multi-jurisdiction coverage rather than filing domestically only.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Haldor Topsoe | 0 | — |
| Bloom Energy Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| Precision Combustion, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Versa Power Systems Ltd | 0 | — |
| Redox Power Systems | 0 | — |
| Convion Oy | 0 | — |
| Dianion Electronic Control Co. | 0 | — |
| Forseal (Wuhan) Integration Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps for teams deciding where to file or where to watch for freedom-to-operate risk.
Model the white space directly
The thin F01K and F03G representation suggests dedicated thermal-management hardware claims are still open relative to cell-level claims. A focused search restricted to those subclasses would confirm how much room actually remains.
Explore white space in EurekaTrack the post-2023 pipeline
Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the apparent 2024-2026 decline needs revisiting once later filings surface. Re-running this landscape in a year will show whether the field genuinely cooled or was simply mid-pipeline.
Set up monitoring in EurekaCheck freedom-to-operate against the most-cited families
The most-cited records concentrate claim influence in a small set of assignees. Any new BoP filing should be checked against those families before committing engineering resources.
Run an FTO check in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
Balance of plant refers to the supporting subsystems around the electrolyzer stack itself — steam supply and management, heat recuperation, thermal control loops and related hardware — rather than the electrochemical cell or electrode materials. In this dataset the search combines SOEC-specific language with balance-of-plant terms like steam management and heat recuperation, restricted to IPC classes covering electrolytic production and steam generation. That combination is why the corpus is dominated by C25B (electrolytic production) even though the search targets plant-level hardware, since most BoP claims are filed as dependent or system claims attached to a core electrolyzer patent.
Filings rose from 6 in 2017 to a peak of 34 in 2023, roughly double the 2022 midpoint of 17, then eased in the years after. Part of that apparent decline is a data artefact: patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 counts are undercounted and will rise as later applications publish. The genuine signal is that the field had a concentrated filing wave through the early 2020s rather than steady year-on-year growth, which is consistent with an initial wave of system-level architecture patents being filed and then a pause while those designs move toward commercialisation.
IPC composition shows steam-plant class F01K and motor/mechanism class F03G each appearing in only 5 of 122 records, far behind the dominant C25B electrolytic-production class at 117. That gap suggests dedicated thermal-management hardware — steam recuperation loop design, internal-reformer thermal coupling and partial-load thermal-neutral control — is claimed thinly relative to the cell technology it supports. A first claim in these areas would likely need to specify the physical heat-exchange or control architecture directly, rather than describing it as an ancillary feature of an electrolyzer cell claim.
The most-cited families in this corpus include assignees such as Versa Power Systems, along with organisations behind records like the internal-heater SOEC design and the hydrogen-pump-equipped electrolyzer system. Recent-year momentum data shows several tracked assignees, including Haldor Topsoe, Bloom Energy, Precision Combustion, Versa Power Systems, Redox Power Systems and Convion, all reporting zero filings in the latest tracked year. That flat momentum across the board, combined with the publication lag, means current filing activity by these organisations is likely understated rather than genuinely absent.
Co-assignment analysis found only three co-assignee pairs across 122 families, each appearing once, which indicates most organisations are filing independently rather than through joint ventures or shared development agreements. This is a smaller, specialist corpus of 122 total families rather than a broad, crowded field, with the United States as the leading receiving office at 41 filings ahead of Europe, WIPO/PCT, Australia, Canada and India. The pattern points to a field where a moderate number of specialist filers hold influential positions, but no single dominant cluster of joint filers controls the space.
Research Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Balance of Plant in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole solid oxide electrolyzer balance of plant corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.