Book a demo

Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/solid-oxide-electrolyzer-green-hydrogen-production-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Hydrogen & Fuel Cells
Solid oxide electrolyzer patents for green hydrogen production
  • Filing has cooled since its 2022 peak. Nineteen families published that year against thirteen in 2017 — growth is flat to declining once the most recent, still-lagging years are set aside.
  • Claim density sits almost entirely in one IPC lane. All 89 records carry a C25B electrolytic-production classification, and 57 also touch H01M fuel-cell claims — the crossover zone is where the real contest is happening.
  • The most-cited families are a decade old and heat-management focused. The top-cited record, on reversible high-temperature electrolysis with a hydride tank, has 85 citations — a sign of foundational influence, not of where filing is happening now.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
89
Published Records
87%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+80%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (9) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 89 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent set covers

This landscape tracks 89 patent families filed against solid oxide electrolyzer (SOEC) technology for green hydrogen production, captured through claims and abstracts referencing high-temperature steam electrolysis, renewable-powered SOEC operation and efficient hydrogen generation, cross-classified against the core electrolytic-production IPC codes (C25B1/04, C25B15, C25B9/23). The set spans filings from 2015 through mid-2026, with 2022 standing as the peak filing year so far at 19 families.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in any trend line understate actual filing activity — treat the most recent two years as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity by year
  1. 1COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES36
  2. 2BLOOM ENERGY CORP28
  3. 3SUNFIRE GMBH7
  4. 4SINGH GURJOT3
  5. 5MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD3
  6. 6SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF APPLIED PHYSICS CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES2
  7. 7KK TOSHIBA2
  8. 8AISIN CORP2
  9. 9STORAGENERGY TECHNOLOGIES INC1
  10. 10ELECTRIC ENERGY EXPRESS CORP1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 89 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings opened at 13 in 2017, climbed to a high of 19 in 2022, and have not exceeded that level since. Read the tail end of the chart as incomplete rather than as a genuine slowdown — later years will fill in as pending applications publish.

Filing trend, 2017–202605101520132017201820192020202119202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition

Every record in this set classifies under C25B (electrolytic production of compounds), the expected home for SOEC claims. A large secondary cluster — 57 of 89 — also carries an H01M fuel-cell classification, reflecting the reversible SOEC/SOFC designs that dominate the most-cited records. Smaller counts in C10G, C07C, C01B, F22D, B01J and B60L mark where SOEC output feeds downstream processes: refining, synthetic chemistry, boiler feed-water systems and vehicle propulsion — each with only a handful of families, and each a candidate white-space branch.

IPC compositionC25B · Electrolytic production of com…89100.0%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells5764.0%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining44.5%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds33.4%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…22.2%F22D · Boiler feed-water control22.2%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …11.1%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion11.1%Other89.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 89 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about solid oxide electrolyzer green hydrogen production and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this set

Representative record
US20180287179A12018-10-04

Heat management method in a high-temperature steam electrolysis (SOEC), solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and/or reversible high-temperature fuel cell (RSOC) arrangement

SUNFIRE GMBH

A heat management method in a high-temperature steam electrolysis [SOEC], to solid oxide fuel cells [SOFCs] and/or to a reversible high-temperature fuel cell having the SOEC and SOFC modes of operation [rSOC]. The steam required is supplied from at least one external source and at least one offgas stream is cooled at least once downstream of the cell. The internal generation of steam required is effected by internal recuperative heating of externally supplied water. The energy from the at least one cooling operation is recovered and reused within the system.Filed by Sunfire GmbH — one of the two highest-cited families in this set, at 83 citations.

US20180287179A1 — patent drawing 1US20180287179A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Top-cited SOEC families
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20190245224A1System for high-temperature reversible electrolysis of water comprising a hydride tank coupled with the elect…85
2US20180287179A1Heat management method in a high-temperature steam electrolysis (SOEC), solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and/or r…83
3US20170362724A1Elementary unit for reactor performing water electrolysis or co-electrolysis (SOEC) or fuel cell (SOFC) opera…53
4US20160355932A1Method for operating an SOEC-type stack reactor for producing methane in the absence of available electricity53
5JP2019112717AMethod of startup mode or standby mode operation of power-to-gas unit including multiple high temperature ele…38
6JP2020128576AControl device and control method of hydrogen production plant31
7WO2016161999A1Heat management method in a high-temperature steam electrolysis [SOEC], solid oxide fuel cell [SOFC] and/or r…31
8US20200358112A1System for regulating the temperature and pressure of a high-temperature electrolyser (SOEC) reversibly opera…30
9US20190194816A1Process for starting mode or stand-by mode operation of a power-to-gas unit comprising a plurality of high-te…25
10US20220372636A1Electrolyzer system with steam generation and method of operating same16

Citation counts are drawn from the same searched corpus and skew toward older filings, which have had more time to accumulate citations. Treat them as a measure of foundational influence rather than of current filing activity.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about the field

Three signals worth pulling out before reading the assignee ranking.

Filing momentum
19 in 2022
peak year to date

Growth has flattened since the 2022 high

Filings rose from 13 in 2017 to a peak of 19 in 2022, then held roughly flat. With the midpoint year already matching the peak, this reads as a maturing filing cycle rather than an accelerating one — publication lag means the last one to two years will revise upward, but not enough to change that pattern.

Based on 89 published families, 2017–2026.
Classification overlap
57 of 89
records also in H01M

SOEC and SOFC claim space overlap heavily

Nearly two-thirds of records classify under both C25B (electrolytic production) and H01M (fuel cells), consistent with the reversible SOEC/SOFC architecture that dominates the most-cited filings. A filer targeting pure electrolysis without the reversible-cell angle is working in less crowded claim territory.

IPC composition across the 89-family set.
Filing geography
US 40 · EPO 16
leading receiving offices

Filing concentrates in the US and Europe

The United States receives close to half of all filings in this set, with the EPO a distant second and Japan, Canada, India and WIPO/PCT trailing further behind. That distribution points to where enforcement and freedom-to-operate risk is concentrated, and where a new entrant should run clearance first.

Receiving-office counts, all 89 families.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to solid oxide electrolyzer green hydrogen production, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps are

Recent-year momentum across the named assignees in this set is flat: several show zero filings in the latest year, including year-over-year declines of 100% for at least two of them. That is consistent with a field where early movers staked out the reversible SOEC/SOFC core and activity has since slowed while publication catches up.

Filing pattern
0 in latest year
across multiple named assignees

Recent-year activity has gone quiet

Several of the most active historical assignees, including large industrial and research-institute filers, show no filings in the latest tracked year and year-over-year drops of 100% where a prior-year baseline exists. Read this alongside the publication lag: some of that quiet is filings still working through the pipeline rather than a genuine stop.

Recent-year momentum by assignee.
Geographic split
40 US filings
vs. 16 at the EPO

US filing leads by a wide margin

With 40 of 89 records routed through the USPTO against 16 at the EPO, 8 in Japan, 6 each in Canada and India, and 5 via WIPO/PCT, the US is the primary battleground for freedom-to-operate work in this technology.

Receiving-office distribution, all 89 families.
Citation concentration
85 citations
top-cited family

Influence concentrates in a handful of older filings

The most-cited record in the set — on reversible high-temperature electrolysis with hydride-tank coupling — carries 85 citations, well ahead of the rest of the top-cited group. Foundational filings from the mid-to-late 2010s still anchor the citation graph even as filing volume itself has flattened.

Most-cited records, this corpus.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Small IPC counts outside the C25B/H01M core suggest these downstream integration paths are still open for narrowly drawn claims.
SOEC-to-refinery hydrocarbon integration (C10G)synthetic hydrocarbon co-electrolysis pathways (C07C)boiler feed-water heat recovery for SOEC stacks (F22D)non-metallic inorganic byproduct capture (C01B)catalytic conditioning of SOEC offgas (B01J)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)0
Bloom Energy Corporation0-100%
Sunfire GmbH0
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.0
SINGH GURJOT0-100%
Aisin Corporation0
Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences0
Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with a settled core and several thinner branches. Two directions follow from that.

Map freedom-to-operate against the reversible SOEC/SOFC core

With 57 of 89 families straddling C25B and H01M, any new reversible-cell design should be checked against the most-cited filings before drafting claims, not after.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Test claim language against the under-claimed branches

The downstream integration areas — refinery coupling, boiler feed-water recovery, catalytic offgas conditioning — carry only a handful of families each. Drafting narrowly there avoids the densest prior art.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole solid oxide electrolyzer green hydrogen production corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.