Book a demo

Solid-State Battery Patent Landscape 2026 | Patsnap Eureka

Solid-State Battery Patent Landscape 2026 | Patsnap Eureka
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/solid-state-batteries-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-30 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Energy
Solid-State Battery Patent Landscape 2026
  • Filings have already turned down. the peak was 2023 at 2,170 records, and the largest filers are now pulling back sharply — Toyota's latest-year count is down 89% year-on-year.
  • H01M carries the bulk of the claim space. 19,832 records sit in batteries and cells, but conductor/insulator (H01B), inorganic compound (C01B/C01G) and ceramic (C04B) subclasses show meaningful overlap that most searches miss.
  • Co-filing is rare and concentrated. only 10 co-assignee pairs appear at scale, and one pairing — Hyundai and Kia — accounts for 373 shared filings, far ahead of any other alliance.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
152.6K
Published Records
22%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+5%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1,912 records) with 2024 (2,017) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 152,616 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the filing record shows

Solid-state battery patenting spans a wide claim surface: cell architecture and electrode formulation under H01M, ionic-conductor chemistry under H01B, and the inorganic and ceramic precursor compounds that make sulfide and garnet electrolytes work. The search set of 152,616 published records across 2015–2026 is dominated by H01M filings (19,832), but a non-trivial share of the activity — conductors, inorganic compounds, ceramics, capacitors and polymer compositions — sits outside the obvious battery subclass, which is where searches restricted to H01M alone lose coverage.

Filing activity rose steadily through the late 2010s, peaked in 2023 at 2,170 records, and has since flattened; the most recent year is necessarily undercounted because publication trails filing by around 18 months. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the dominant filing venue, well ahead of the EPO and the PCT route, with Canada, Australia and the UK a distant tail.

Filing trend and IPC composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD11,563
  2. 2TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK8,907
  3. 3SAMSUNG SDI CO LTD5,307
  4. 4PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD4,854
  5. 5LG CHEM LTD3,031
  6. 6SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD2,319
  7. 7PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP2,166
  8. 8MURATA MFG CO LTD2,064
  9. 9CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY (HONG KONG) LIMITED1,800
  10. 10NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD1,770
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Batteries covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-30. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Annual filing counts and the IPC subclass breakdown for the search set, drawn directly from the underlying corpus.

Filings by year (2017–2026)

Growth from 836 filings in 2017 to a peak of 2,170 in 2023, followed by a decline; 2026 figures are partial and will rise as publications catch up.

Filings by year (2017–2026)06251,2501,8752,5008362017201820192020202120222,1702023202420251172026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) accounts for the largest single share at 19,832 records, followed by H01B (cables, conductors & insulators) at 2,787; inorganic compound classes C01B and C01G together add 2,630 records tied to electrolyte and cathode chemistry.

IPC subclass distributionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells19,83213.0%H01B · Cables, conductors & insulators2,7871.8%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…1,4801.0%C01G · Compounds of other metals1,1500.8%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories6160.4%H01G · Capacitors6160.4%C08L · Polymer compositions3880.3%C08G · Condensation polymers3500.2%Other4,6613.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 152,616 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Batteries covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-30. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Solid-State Batteries with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about solid-state batteries and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a recent representative filing

Representative recent filing
US20250357530A12025-11-20

Oxide solid electrolyte coated Ni-based cathode for sulfide all-solid-state battery

GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC

A sulfide all-solid-state battery and a method for forming an oxide electrolyte coated cathode is provided. The battery includes a nickel-based cathode, an electrolyte coating adhered to the nickel-based cathode, an anode, and a sulfide solid electrolyte. The nickel-based cathode includes LiNi1-x-y-zCoxMnyAlzO2, coated with an inorganic oxide solid electrolyte including Li1+nAlnTi2−n(PO4)3 (LATP).Filed by GM Global Technology Operations LLC, published 2025-11-20 — illustrates the current push to pair sulfide electrolytes with oxide-coated cathodes to manage the sulfide/cathode interface.

US20250357530A1 — patent drawing 1US20250357530A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2018025582A1Solid electrolyte material, and cell524
2US5529860AElectroactive high storage capacity polyacetylene-co-polysulfur materials and electrolytic cells containing s…394
3US5601947AElectroactive high storage capacity polycarbon-sulfide materials and electrolytic cells containing same392
4US20070172739A1Composite solid electrolyte for protection of active metal anodes389
5US5324599AReversible electrode material372
6US6645675B1Solid polymer electrolytes348
7WO2011118801A1Sulfide solid electrolyte material, battery, and method for producing sulfide solid electrolyte material340
8US6982132B1Rechargeable thin film battery and method for making the same338
9US5411592AApparatus for deposition of thin-film, solid state batteries320
10US20160351973A1Nano-engineered coatings for anode active materials, cathode active materials, and solid-state electrolytes a…289

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus; treat the ranking as a map of influence on prior art, not a list of current market leaders.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Batteries covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-30. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Four read-throughs from the trend, IPC composition and citation data that matter for where to file next.

Trend
2,170 in 2023
peak filing year

The filing wave has crested

Filings grew from 836 in 2017 to a peak of 2,170 in 2023, then flattened at the 2022 midpoint of 2,046 and beyond. Combined with the sharp pullback from top filers, this reads as a maturing claim space rather than an accelerating one — new entrants are filing into ground the majors already occupy.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Composition
19,832 records
H01M share

Chemistry claims sit outside the obvious subclass

H01M carries the largest single block of filings, but H01B, C01B, C01G and C04B together add thousands of records tied to conductor materials, inorganic electrolyte compounds and ceramic processing. A search limited to H01M alone will miss a meaningful share of the electrolyte chemistry art.

IPC composition
Momentum
-89% YoY
Toyota, latest year

Incumbents are retreating in step

Every major filer tracked shows a double-digit percentage decline in the latest year — Toyota down 89%, Samsung SDI down 93%, LG Energy Solution down 98%. This is consistent with the broad slowdown rather than any single company exiting the field; the incumbents built out their core claim sets earlier in the cycle.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Alliances
373 shared filings
Hyundai + Kia

Co-filing is the exception, not the rule

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear at scale in this corpus. The Hyundai–Kia pairing is far ahead of any other on shared filings, with Toyota–Panasonic and LG Energy Solution–University of California trailing well behind. Most assignees are filing solo, which limits freedom-to-operate insight from co-ownership alone.

Co-assignee pairs
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to solid-state batteries, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing patterns worth tracking
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Hyundai Motor CompanyKia Corporation373
Toyota Motor CorporationPanasonic Corporation106
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.The Regents of the University of California99
Toyota Motor CorporationTokyo Institute of Technology66
Hyundai Motor CompanyHanyang University Industry-University Cooperation Foundation50
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.46
Toyota Motor CorporationHAMA SHIGENORI28
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Corning Incorporated28

The concentration of co-assignee pairs at the automaker-cell-maker and academic-industry level suggests joint filings cluster around vehicle integration and university-originated electrolyte chemistry, not around manufacturing-scale process patents.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Batteries covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-30. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space, and where it is still open

Assignee ranking is dominated by a handful of automakers and cell makers with decade-long filing programmes; momentum data shows all of them slowing in the latest year, which changes where a new entrant should look.

Incumbent
23 in latest year
still the largest recent filer

Toyota

Toyota remains the most active recent filer in absolute terms despite an 89% year-on-year drop, indicating a filing programme built earlier that is now winding down rather than one still ramping.

Recent-year momentum
Incumbent
-93% YoY
Samsung SDI

Samsung SDI

Samsung SDI's latest-year count of 10 filings, down 93% year-on-year, tracks the same slowdown seen across the field's largest holders rather than a company-specific retreat.

Recent-year momentum
Alliance
373 co-filings
Hyundai + Kia

Hyundai–Kia

The strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset by a wide margin, reflecting shared platform development between the two automakers rather than an arm's-length supplier relationship.

Co-assignee pairs
Cross-sector
99 co-filings
LG Energy Solution + UC Regents

LG Energy Solution & University of California

An academic-industry pairing with 99 shared filings, smaller than the automaker alliances but distinct in kind — it points to electrolyte or cathode chemistry originating in university research and co-owned through to commercialisation.

Co-assignee pairs
🔍
Sub-areas with thin filing density
Based on IPC composition outside the core H01M block, these areas carry lighter claim density relative to the core cell-architecture art.
Polymer-ceramic composite electrolyte interfacesCapacitor-hybrid solid-state cell designGarnet electrolyte sintering process controlCondensation-polymer binder systems for sulfide cellsOxide-coating adhesion at Ni-rich cathode interfaces
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Toyota Motor Corporation23-89%
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd.10-71%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.10-93%
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.8-53%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.3-81%
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.2-98%
Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.2-88%
FUJIFILM Corporation1-86%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Batteries covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-30. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this

The trend and assignee data point to a field with occupied core claims and thinner coverage at the material-interface level.

Map freedom-to-operate against the top filers

With filing concentrated among a small set of automakers and cell makers, a freedom-to-operate check should start with the highest-volume assignees' most-cited families before assessing newer entrants.

Run an FTO search in Eureka

Track the slowdown by assignee, not just by year

Aggregate year-on-year decline masks which companies are truly exiting versus consolidating filings into fewer, broader claims; assignee-level momentum tracking resolves this.

Set up assignee alerts in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed interface chemistry

Coating adhesion, binder systems and sintering process control show thinner filing density than core cell architecture — worth a focused prior-art pull before drafting.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Batteries covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-30. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on solid-state battery patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Batteries covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-30. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Solid-State Batteries in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole solid-state batteries corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.