Solid-State Battery Patent Landscape 2026 | Patsnap Eureka
- Filings have already turned down. the peak was 2023 at 2,170 records, and the largest filers are now pulling back sharply — Toyota's latest-year count is down 89% year-on-year.
- H01M carries the bulk of the claim space. 19,832 records sit in batteries and cells, but conductor/insulator (H01B), inorganic compound (C01B/C01G) and ceramic (C04B) subclasses show meaningful overlap that most searches miss.
- Co-filing is rare and concentrated. only 10 co-assignee pairs appear at scale, and one pairing — Hyundai and Kia — accounts for 373 shared filings, far ahead of any other alliance.
Filing growth compares 2021 (1,912 records) with 2024 (2,017) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 152,616 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the filing record shows
Solid-state battery patenting spans a wide claim surface: cell architecture and electrode formulation under H01M, ionic-conductor chemistry under H01B, and the inorganic and ceramic precursor compounds that make sulfide and garnet electrolytes work. The search set of 152,616 published records across 2015–2026 is dominated by H01M filings (19,832), but a non-trivial share of the activity — conductors, inorganic compounds, ceramics, capacitors and polymer compositions — sits outside the obvious battery subclass, which is where searches restricted to H01M alone lose coverage.
Filing activity rose steadily through the late 2010s, peaked in 2023 at 2,170 records, and has since flattened; the most recent year is necessarily undercounted because publication trails filing by around 18 months. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the dominant filing venue, well ahead of the EPO and the PCT route, with Canada, Australia and the UK a distant tail.
Filing trend and technology composition
Annual filing counts and the IPC subclass breakdown for the search set, drawn directly from the underlying corpus.
Filings by year (2017–2026)
Growth from 836 filings in 2017 to a peak of 2,170 in 2023, followed by a decline; 2026 figures are partial and will rise as publications catch up.
IPC subclass distribution
H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) accounts for the largest single share at 19,832 records, followed by H01B (cables, conductors & insulators) at 2,787; inorganic compound classes C01B and C01G together add 2,630 records tied to electrolyte and cathode chemistry.
Shares are the percentage of the 152,616 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Solid-State Batteries with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about solid-state batteries and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records and a recent representative filing
Oxide solid electrolyte coated Ni-based cathode for sulfide all-solid-state battery
A sulfide all-solid-state battery and a method for forming an oxide electrolyte coated cathode is provided. The battery includes a nickel-based cathode, an electrolyte coating adhered to the nickel-based cathode, an anode, and a sulfide solid electrolyte. The nickel-based cathode includes LiNi1-x-y-zCoxMnyAlzO2, coated with an inorganic oxide solid electrolyte including Li1+nAlnTi2−n(PO4)3 (LATP).Filed by GM Global Technology Operations LLC, published 2025-11-20 — illustrates the current push to pair sulfide electrolytes with oxide-coated cathodes to manage the sulfide/cathode interface.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2018025582A1 | Solid electrolyte material, and cell | 524 |
| 2 | US5529860A | Electroactive high storage capacity polyacetylene-co-polysulfur materials and electrolytic cells containing s… | 394 |
| 3 | US5601947A | Electroactive high storage capacity polycarbon-sulfide materials and electrolytic cells containing same | 392 |
| 4 | US20070172739A1 | Composite solid electrolyte for protection of active metal anodes | 389 |
| 5 | US5324599A | Reversible electrode material | 372 |
| 6 | US6645675B1 | Solid polymer electrolytes | 348 |
| 7 | WO2011118801A1 | Sulfide solid electrolyte material, battery, and method for producing sulfide solid electrolyte material | 340 |
| 8 | US6982132B1 | Rechargeable thin film battery and method for making the same | 338 |
| 9 | US5411592A | Apparatus for deposition of thin-film, solid state batteries | 320 |
| 10 | US20160351973A1 | Nano-engineered coatings for anode active materials, cathode active materials, and solid-state electrolytes a… | 289 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus; treat the ranking as a map of influence on prior art, not a list of current market leaders.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Four read-throughs from the trend, IPC composition and citation data that matter for where to file next.
The filing wave has crested
Filings grew from 836 in 2017 to a peak of 2,170 in 2023, then flattened at the 2022 midpoint of 2,046 and beyond. Combined with the sharp pullback from top filers, this reads as a maturing claim space rather than an accelerating one — new entrants are filing into ground the majors already occupy.
Chemistry claims sit outside the obvious subclass
H01M carries the largest single block of filings, but H01B, C01B, C01G and C04B together add thousands of records tied to conductor materials, inorganic electrolyte compounds and ceramic processing. A search limited to H01M alone will miss a meaningful share of the electrolyte chemistry art.
Incumbents are retreating in step
Every major filer tracked shows a double-digit percentage decline in the latest year — Toyota down 89%, Samsung SDI down 93%, LG Energy Solution down 98%. This is consistent with the broad slowdown rather than any single company exiting the field; the incumbents built out their core claim sets earlier in the cycle.
Co-filing is the exception, not the rule
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear at scale in this corpus. The Hyundai–Kia pairing is far ahead of any other on shared filings, with Toyota–Panasonic and LG Energy Solution–University of California trailing well behind. Most assignees are filing solo, which limits freedom-to-operate insight from co-ownership alone.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to solid-state batteries, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Hyundai Motor Company | Kia Corporation | 373 |
| Toyota Motor Corporation | Panasonic Corporation | 106 |
| LG Energy Solution, Ltd. | The Regents of the University of California | 99 |
| Toyota Motor Corporation | Tokyo Institute of Technology | 66 |
| Hyundai Motor Company | Hanyang University Industry-University Cooperation Foundation | 50 |
| Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 46 |
| Toyota Motor Corporation | HAMA SHIGENORI | 28 |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Corning Incorporated | 28 |
The concentration of co-assignee pairs at the automaker-cell-maker and academic-industry level suggests joint filings cluster around vehicle integration and university-originated electrolyte chemistry, not around manufacturing-scale process patents.
Who holds the claim space, and where it is still open
Assignee ranking is dominated by a handful of automakers and cell makers with decade-long filing programmes; momentum data shows all of them slowing in the latest year, which changes where a new entrant should look.
Toyota
Toyota remains the most active recent filer in absolute terms despite an 89% year-on-year drop, indicating a filing programme built earlier that is now winding down rather than one still ramping.
Samsung SDI
Samsung SDI's latest-year count of 10 filings, down 93% year-on-year, tracks the same slowdown seen across the field's largest holders rather than a company-specific retreat.
Hyundai–Kia
The strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset by a wide margin, reflecting shared platform development between the two automakers rather than an arm's-length supplier relationship.
LG Energy Solution & University of California
An academic-industry pairing with 99 shared filings, smaller than the automaker alliances but distinct in kind — it points to electrolyte or cathode chemistry originating in university research and co-owned through to commercialisation.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Toyota Motor Corporation | 23 | -89% |
| Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. | 10 | -71% |
| Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. | 10 | -93% |
| Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | 8 | -53% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 3 | -81% |
| LG Energy Solution, Ltd. | 2 | -98% |
| Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. | 2 | -88% |
| FUJIFILM Corporation | 1 | -86% |
Where to take this
The trend and assignee data point to a field with occupied core claims and thinner coverage at the material-interface level.
Map freedom-to-operate against the top filers
With filing concentrated among a small set of automakers and cell makers, a freedom-to-operate check should start with the highest-volume assignees' most-cited families before assessing newer entrants.
Run an FTO search in EurekaTrack the slowdown by assignee, not just by year
Aggregate year-on-year decline masks which companies are truly exiting versus consolidating filings into fewer, broader claims; assignee-level momentum tracking resolves this.
Set up assignee alerts in EurekaProbe the under-claimed interface chemistry
Coating adhesion, binder systems and sintering process control show thinner filing density than core cell architecture — worth a focused prior-art pull before drafting.
Explore white space in EurekaCommon questions on solid-state battery patents
Toyota is the most active recent filer in absolute terms, with 23 filings in the latest tracked year, though that count is down 89% year-on-year. Other large historical filers include Panasonic, Samsung SDI, Murata and LG Energy Solution, all of which show double-digit percentage declines in the latest year. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year understates true filing activity for every one of these companies.
No — filings peaked in 2023 at 2,170 records and have flattened since, with the 2022 midpoint at 2,046 confirming the plateau rather than continued acceleration. Recent-year momentum data reinforces this: every major assignee tracked shows a sharp year-on-year decline. This pattern is consistent with a field where the core claim space is already occupied, prompting filers to consolidate rather than expand their portfolios.
H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) carries the largest share of records in this corpus at 19,832, but a search limited to H01M alone misses meaningful prior art. H01B (cables, conductors & insulators) adds 2,787 records tied to ionic conductor materials, while C01B and C01G together contribute 2,630 records covering inorganic electrolyte and cathode compounds; C04B (ceramics) and C08L/C08G (polymer compositions) add further coverage for garnet processing and composite electrolytes respectively.
The thinner-density areas sit outside the core H01M cell-architecture block: polymer-ceramic composite electrolyte interfaces, garnet electrolyte sintering process control, and oxide-coating adhesion at nickel-rich cathode interfaces all show lighter filing density relative to core electrode and cell claims. This does not mean these areas are technically easier — it means the claim space is less crowded, which is different from being unclaimed outright. A freeing-to-operate and prior-art search focused specifically on these interface and process claims is more likely to surface open ground than a general cell-architecture search.
Both file heavily, and they increasingly co-file together — the Hyundai-Kia pairing alone accounts for 373 shared filings, the strongest co-assignee relationship in the dataset. Toyota's own filings, plus its co-filing with Panasonic (106 shared records), show the automaker-cell-maker alliance pattern extending across at least two major groups. Pure battery makers such as Samsung SDI and LG Energy Solution also file independently, but co-assignee pairs remain rare overall — only 10 pairs appear at scale across the entire corpus.
Research Solid-State Batteries in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole solid-state batteries corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.