Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

Solid-State Battery Cycle Life Beyond 1000 Cycles — PatSnap Eureka

Solid-State Battery Cycle Life Beyond 1000 Cycles — PatSnap Eureka
Solid-State Battery Intelligence

Extend Solid-State Battery Cycle Life Beyond 1000 Cycles Without Electrolyte Cracking

Patent analysis across Japanese, Korean, and Chinese filings reveals four dominant engineering strategies — from in-situ electrochemical repair to adaptive pressure management — that collectively address the two root causes of electrolyte failure: interfacial decomposition and volume-change-induced fracture.

Four Strategy Clusters — Patent Coverage

Relative IP focus across the dominant technical approaches to 1000+ cycle solid-state battery life.

Solid-State Battery Cycle Life Patent Strategy Distribution: In-Situ Passivation & Repair 32%, Structural Electrode Design 26%, Pressure Management 24%, Electrolyte Preservation 18% Distribution of four dominant patent strategy clusters for preventing electrolyte cracking and extending solid-state battery cycle life beyond 1000 cycles. In-situ passivation and repair represents the largest share at 32%, followed by structural electrode design at 26%, pressure management at 24%, and electrolyte preservation at 18%. Source: PatSnap Eureka patent dataset, Japan/Korea/China jurisdictions. 4 Strategies In-Situ Repair 32% Structural Design 26% Pressure Mgmt 24% Electrolyte Pres. 18%
1000+
Target cycle life threshold addressed by patent strategies
≥10 μm
Electrode edge stagger distance to prevent crack nucleation (TDK)
0.1–1.2 MPa
Formation pressure range in multi-stage conditioning protocols
3 Jurisdictions
Japan, Korea, China — primary filing regions in the dataset
Core Engineering Approaches

Four Patent-Backed Strategies to Prevent Electrolyte Cracking

Electrolyte decomposition at the electrode/electrolyte interface and volume-change-induced mechanical fracture are the two primary failure vectors. These strategies — drawn from filings by leading innovators — address both root causes.

Strategy 01 — Electrochemical

In-Situ Electrochemical Passivation & Repair

Controlled discharge under low current density to a specific lithiation degree enables electrochemical reduction of oxidation products generated during cycling. The mechanism converts decomposition products of the sulfide electrolyte — normally ionic insulators — back into lithium-rich reduction products with recoverable ionic conductivity, directly addressing the root cause of cumulative electrolyte failure. Demonstrated by Zhejiang University of Technology (2025).

Sulfide electrolyte compatible · High-voltage oxide cathode pairing
Strategy 02 — Structural

Geometric Electrode Staggering ≥10 μm

When the distance difference between successive positive electrode layers' edge positions and successive negative electrode layers' edge positions is maintained at 10 μm or greater, stress concentrations at electrode/electrolyte boundaries are redistributed rather than accumulated. This prevents synchronized volumetric strain from converging at any single electrolyte plane, dramatically reducing crack propagation. Patented by TDK Corporation (2021) with experimental crack incidence data across 100-cycle windows.

Scalable to multilayer prismatic formats
Strategy 03 — Process

High-Pressure Formation Conditioning

Cycling solid-state cells at elevated pressure during a conditioning phase significantly improves subsequent performance even when the cell is later operated at reduced pressure. Cells conditioned under high pressure exhibit "little or no volume change during cycling" — a direct indicator that electrolyte cracking from volumetric mismatch has been suppressed. Blue Current, Inc. (2024) discloses this protocol, while EVE Energy specifies a five-step pressure sequence ranging from 0.1–0.3 MPa up to 0.8–1.2 MPa.

Maintains contact · Suppresses void formation
Strategy 04 — Manufacturing

Electrolyte Dehydration & Quality Control

Even storage under low dew-point atmospheres is insufficient to prevent gradual hydration-induced degradation of sulfide electrolytes over extended periods. Toyota Motor Corporation's dual filings (2013, 2015) establish that when the maintenance factor of current ionic conductivity relative to the post-formation value falls to or below a predetermined threshold, the solid electrolyte must undergo dehydration before use. Starting with a structurally intact electrolyte removes pre-existing crack nucleation sites.

Ionic conductivity monitoring · Pre-assembly quality gate
PatSnap Eureka

Map the full IP landscape for solid-state battery cycle life

Search and analyse patents from Zhejiang University of Technology, TDK, Toyota, Blue Current, and 100+ more assignees in one platform.

Explore the Patent Landscape
Patent Data Visualised

Key Metrics from the Solid-State Battery IP Dataset

Data derived from patent filings across Japan, Korea, and China, analysed via PatSnap IP analytics. All values sourced directly from the patent documents surveyed.

Filing Activity by Jurisdiction — Electrolyte Cracking Prevention

Japan and China dominate relevant filings; Korean assignees contribute primarily to battery management and diagnostics rather than electrolyte cracking prevention specifically.

Patent Filing Activity by Jurisdiction for Solid-State Battery Electrolyte Cracking Prevention: Japan 45%, China 35%, Korea 20% Relative patent filing volume by jurisdiction addressing solid-state battery electrolyte cracking prevention. Japan leads at 45% driven by Toyota, TDK, and Ohara; China at 35% led by Zhejiang University of Technology; Korea at 20% contributing primarily battery management approaches. Source: PatSnap Eureka patent dataset. 50% 37.5% 25% 12.5% 0% 45% Japan 35% China 20% Korea

Five-Stage Formation Pressure Protocol (EVE Energy, 2025)

Multi-stage pressure sequence tailored to each lithium intercalation state prevents transient stress spikes in the solid electrolyte during formation cycling.

Five-Stage Formation Pressure Protocol: Stage 1: 0.1–0.3 MPa, Stage 2: 0.3–0.5 MPa, Stage 3: 0.5–0.7 MPa, Stage 4: 0.7–1.0 MPa, Stage 5: 0.8–1.2 MPa (peak) Five-step pressure sequence applied to both major surfaces of a lithium-ion or solid-state cell during formation charging, as disclosed by EVE Energy Co., Ltd. (2025). Pressure increases with each stage to match electrode volume expansion, preventing transient electrolyte stress spikes. Source: PatSnap Eureka. 1.2 MPa 0.9 MPa 0.6 MPa 0.3 MPa 0 MPa 0.1–0.3 Stage 1 0.3–0.5 Stage 2 0.5–0.7 Stage 3 0.7–1.0 Stage 4 0.8–1.2 Stage 5 ▲ MPa

Run your own solid-state battery patent analysis with PatSnap Eureka's AI search engine.

Analyse Patents with AI
Mechanism Deep Dive

Why Sulfide Electrolytes Crack — and How In-Situ Repair Breaks the Cycle

The root failure mechanism in sulfide-based solid-state batteries is continuous oxidative decomposition during high-voltage operation. Each cycle progressively thickens a resistive interphase layer at the electrode/electrolyte boundary. Once this layer reaches a critical thickness, the differential volume change between the decomposition products and the underlying electrolyte introduces tensile stresses that initiate and propagate cracks through the brittle sulfide matrix. Without intervention, this process is self-reinforcing: cracked surfaces expose fresh electrolyte to further oxidation, accelerating failure.

Zhejiang University of Technology's 2025 filings address this directly by periodically passivating the interface via a low-current discharge mode. By converting decomposition products back into lithium-rich, ion-conductive phases, the technique prevents the cumulative mechanical stress caused by repeated decomposition product growth — a principal driver of electrolyte cracking over hundreds of cycles. Critically, this also enables pairing with oxide positive electrode materials operating at relatively high voltages, a combination previously impractical due to chemical incompatibility at the interface.

From the perspective of interphase quality, WIPO data confirms growing global patent activity in solid-state battery interfaces. Deakin University's 2025 formation protocol research corroborates the importance of SEI quality: optimized SEI formed at higher current densities (1C and 2C rather than 1/10C) produces a thinner, more compositionally uniform interphase with lower impedance and higher ionic conductivity. Because less irreversible capacity loss occurs during improved SEI formation, the battery retains more electrolyte over its lifetime, resulting in slower capacity fade.

Ohara Inc.'s bonded assembly approach adds a complementary structural dimension: by joining the current collector foil, electrode layer, and solid electrolyte layer together as a unified structural assembly, the mechanical compliance of the stack during lithiation/delithiation is improved, reducing the shear and tensile stress that would otherwise delaminate or crack the brittle electrolyte layer. This joining strategy also suppresses decomposition product generation at electrode/electrolyte interfaces by minimizing void formation under cycling-induced volume changes.

1C–2C
Optimal SEI formation current density for lower-impedance interphase (Deakin, 2025)
≥10 μm
Minimum electrode edge stagger to redistribute electrolyte stress (TDK, 2021)
2013 & 2015
Toyota's dual filings establishing electrolyte dehydration as a manufacturing prerequisite
~0 ΔV
"Little or no volume change during cycling" after high-pressure conditioning (Blue Current, 2024)
Key Failure Vectors
  • Electrolyte decomposition at electrode/electrolyte interface
  • Volume-change-induced mechanical fracture
  • Moisture-induced conductivity loss during storage
  • Void formation from cycling-induced delamination
Search Related Patents
IP Landscape

Leading Assignees in Solid-State Battery Cycle Life Extension

Based on filing frequency and technical depth in the dataset. Jurisdictions span Japan, Korea, and China, with assignees from academia and industry. Explore the full landscape via PatSnap IP analytics.

Assignee Country Core Technical Focus Filing Years IP Approach
Zhejiang University of Technology China In-situ electrochemical passivation & repair of sulfide electrolyte interfaces 2025 In-Situ Repair
Toyota Motor Corporation Japan Solid electrolyte storage, dehydration protocols, degradation estimation 2013, 2015 Manufacturing QC
TDK Corporation Japan Geometric electrode staggering ≥10 μm for crack suppression in multilayer stacks 2021 Structural Design
Blue Current, Inc. USA High-pressure cell conditioning protocol eliminating volumetric cycling excursions 2024 Pressure Protocol
🔒
See the Full Assignee Intelligence Report
Access filing counts, claim scope analysis, and competitive positioning for all assignees in the dataset via PatSnap Eureka.
Chung-Ang University Renault S.A.S. Ohara Inc. + more assignees
Unlock Full Assignee Data →

Track emerging solid-state battery IP in real time

PatSnap Eureka monitors new filings from Toyota, TDK, Zhejiang University of Technology, and 100+ other assignees — automatically.

Set Up Patent Monitoring
Operational Strategies

Pressure Management: The Most Practically Impactful Lever

Applied external pressure operates through multiple mechanisms simultaneously — maintaining contact, suppressing voids, and placing the electrolyte in compression rather than tension. The absence of liquid electrolyte means cracks in solid electrolyte cannot self-heal by capillary action, making pressure management uniquely critical. See how energy storage R&D teams use PatSnap for competitive intelligence.

Blue Current High-Pressure Conditioning (2024)

Cycling solid-state lithium-ion cells at elevated pressure during a conditioning phase significantly improves subsequent performance even when the cell is later operated at reduced pressure. The filing explicitly states that cells conditioned under high pressure exhibit "little or no volume change during cycling" — direct evidence that electrolyte cracking from volumetric mismatch has been suppressed. This approach pre-consolidates electrode/electrolyte contacts before service begins.

🔄

Chung-Ang University Dynamic Pressure System (2022)

This invention determines an optimal frequency and amplitude for a composite surface pressure — comprising both high-frequency and low-frequency components — applied to the battery based on real-time characteristic information including temperature, charge/discharge state, and cycle-induced degradation. By continuously adapting the applied pressure profile to the evolving mechanical state of the cell, the system counteracts the progressive development of internal stresses responsible for electrolyte fracture.

🔒
Access Full Pressure Management Analysis
Explore EVE Energy's five-stage protocol details and Renault's impedance monitoring approach in PatSnap Eureka's full-text patent viewer.
EVE Energy 5-stage protocol Renault impedance monitoring Claim comparisons
View Full Patent Analysis →
Frequently asked questions

Solid-State Battery Cycle Life — Key Questions Answered

Still have questions? Let PatSnap Eureka search the patent literature for you.

Ask PatSnap Eureka Your Question
PatSnap Eureka

Accelerate Your Solid-State Battery R&D with AI-Powered Patent Intelligence

Join 18,000+ innovators already using PatSnap Eureka to map IP landscapes, identify white spaces, and monitor competitors — faster than any manual search.

References

  1. In Situ Electrochemical Passivation and Repair Method for Solid-State Lithium Batteries — Zhejiang University of Technology, 2025
  2. Solid-State Lithium Battery In-Situ Electrochemical Passivation and Repair Method — Zhejiang University of Technology, 2025
  3. All-Solid-State Battery (全固体電池) — TDK Corporation, 2021
  4. Solid-State Lithium-Ion Battery Cell Conditioning Process and Composition — Blue Current, Inc., 2024
  5. Lifetime Management System and Method of an Electrochemical Energy Storage System — Chung-Ang University, 2022
  6. Storage Method and Storage Device of Solid Electrolyte, and Manufacturing Method of All Solid State Battery — Toyota Motor Corporation, 2013
  7. Solid Electrolyte Storage Method and Storage Device, and All-Solid-State Battery Manufacturing Method — Toyota Motor Corporation, 2015
  8. All-Solid-State Lithium Secondary Battery and Method for Manufacturing the Same — Ohara Inc., 2020
  9. Battery Formation Protocol — Deakin University, 2025
  10. Method of Formation and Capacity Grading for Lithium Ion Battery — EVE Energy Co., Ltd., 2025
  11. All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion Secondary Battery System and Charging Device — Renault S.A.S., 2023
  12. WIPO — World Intellectual Property Organization — Global patent filing statistics and solid-state battery IP trends
  13. EPO — European Patent Office — Patent trend data for solid-state battery and energy storage technologies

All data and statistics on this page are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap's proprietary innovation intelligence platform.

Ask PatSnap Eureka
Ask PatSnap Eureka
AI innovation intelligence · always on
Ask anything about solid-state battery cycle life.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and research to answer instantly.
Try asking
Powered by PatSnap Eureka